On 06/08/13 10:02 AM, hasufell wrote: > It seems none of them (except the overview GLEP 57) are implemented yet, > although they are roughly 6-8 years old. > > What is holding it back? Is it just that we don't have a PM > implementation yet or is it some political nonsense and PMS blocking > progress again? > > I am not criticizing the portage team in any way here. I just want to > push for some attention. > > > -- > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0057.html > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0058.html > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0059.html > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0060.html > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0061.html > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64258 > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/2709 >
AFAIK, the status is "unimplemented, and nobody's working on it". I believe that the reason is simply that nobody has done the work yet, not due to bikeshedding. I agree that these should be implemented at a rate faster than the current one (i.e. not at all). (FYI, you spelled "improvements" wrong. ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
