On 24/02/14 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote: > This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated into > systemd! > > In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just > use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds > > - still install udevd into /sbin where a daemon belongs to. > - disable the crappy new network naming scheme by default > - install the new naming scheme config files into /lib/udev/network/ (version > >=209) > - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd crap. > > I have no plans to stop fixing the annoyances the gentoo udev ebuilds have > since udev was integrated into systemd in the ebuilds from my overlay. > > <div>-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------</div><div>Von: Mike Gilbert > <flop...@gentoo.org> </div><div>Datum:24.02.2014 16:55 (GMT+01:00) > </div><div>An: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> </div><div>Betreff: > Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade </div><div> > </div>On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. <whi...@whissi.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't have >> "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK). >> >> The current news item draft raises question like "When the 'actual >> configuration' is in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will >> happen to people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?" >> >> Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path for >> systemd *and* non-systemd users... >> > > You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't want > unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead. >
While you're whinging about integration, you're sending bad HTML email.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
