Hi, please send to general-subscr...@incubator.apache.org for subscribing.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023, at 13:20, Jacky Yang wrote:
> sub
--
Xuanwo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additio
sub
us that this is the right thing to do, it should be
>> "easy".
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 2023, at 07:06, Andrew Lamb wrote:
>>>
>>> I apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask this question.
>>>
>>>
hen
> prepare a resolution for the board.
>
> If there is consensus that this is the right thing to do, it should be
> "easy".
>
> Craig
>
> > On Dec 15, 2023, at 07:06, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > I apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask
is consensus that this is the right thing to do, it should be
> "easy".
>
> Craig
>
> > On Dec 15, 2023, at 07:06, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > I apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask this question.
> >
> > Can someone point to i
apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask this question.
>
> Can someone point to information about the procedure to propose
> “graduating” an *existing* sub project to a new top level project?
>
> Specifically, we are working on a proposal to graduate the “Apache Arrow
&
approval from PMC,
> proposing a new PMC/committer set.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:06 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > I apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask this question.
> >
> > Can someone point to information about the proced
logize if this is not the right list on which to ask this question.
>
> Can someone point to information about the procedure to propose
> “graduating” an *existing* sub project to a new top level project?
>
> Specifically, we are working on a proposal to graduate the “Apache Arrow
Foundation until
death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
or until a successor is appointed.
RESOLVED, that the Apache Arrow Project be and hereby
is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
Drill Arrow sub-project; and be it
gt;> search.)
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >>>> On Dec 15, 2023, at 7:09 AM, Andrew Lamb
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask this
> question.
> >>>
> >>> Can someone
t;>> I apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask this question.
>>>
>>> Can someone point to information about the procedure to propose
>>> “graduating” an *existing* sub project to a new top level project?
>>>
>>> Specifically,
nor ways, such as a name
> search.)
>
> Julian
>
> > On Dec 15, 2023, at 7:09 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > I apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask this question.
> >
> > Can someone point to information about the procedure to propose
>
ask this question.
>
> Can someone point to information about the procedure to propose
> “graduating” an *existing* sub project to a new top level project?
>
> Specifically, we are working on a proposal to graduate the “Apache Arrow
> DataFusion”[1] sub project to its own Top Le
I apologize if this is not the right list on which to ask this question.
Can someone point to information about the procedure to propose
“graduating” an *existing* sub project to a new top level project?
Specifically, we are working on a proposal to graduate the “Apache Arrow
DataFusion”[1] sub
Thanks, Alan.
Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19460 as a starting point.
On 11/15/19 2:14 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
I think you should go ahead. Everyone's voted on it, no one made any
comments on the discussion thread on general@, and Justin's been aware of
what's going on the w
I think you should go ahead. Everyone's voted on it, no one made any
comments on the discussion thread on general@, and Justin's been aware of
what's going on the whole way.
Alan.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 8:32 AM Josh Elser wrote:
> I'm a bit confused about where we go from this point.
>
> Give
I'm a bit confused about where we go from this point.
Given the doc[1] that Alan shared last time, we are good to move ahead
with the logistical changes.
Further, the next guide[2] simply says that VP Phoenix (me) should
coordinate with VP Incubator.
Should I go ahead and file the TLP Paren
com/file/d/0B7mbLUemi6LFbzFQLXB1Z1p2dm8/view?usp=sharing
-Original Message-
From: Edward Capriolo [mailto:edlinuxg...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 March 2017 09:05 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal for an Apache Hama sub-project
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Edward J. Y
Sub projects are frowned upon. It is possible for a project to graduate as
part of another project from. The incubator, but that is very unusual.
Graduating to a very quiet project like hama would be even more unusual.
A better course would be to simply create a new incubator project. Worry
about
her this approach is also fit for
> modern microservice architecture? In my opinion, this can be discussed and
> cooked in Hama community as a sub-project until it's mature enough (CC'ing
> general@i.a.o. I'll be happy to read more feedbacks from ASF incubator
> community)
this can be discussed and
cooked in Hama community as a sub-project until it's mature enough (CC'ing
general@i.a.o. I'll be happy to read more feedbacks from ASF incubator
community).
P.S., It seems you referred to incubation proposal template. There's no need
to add me as initia
le of clear sub-projects.
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Process_Description.html even
links to exactly to the umbrella project Jakarta.
I removed the confusing Jakarta reference and have updated it slightly
- see staging:
http://incubator.staging.apache.org/incub
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> Relating to IncubatorV2 and pTLP proposals - on Apache Commons I seem
> to have spurred a discussion about making sub-mailing lists (And thus
> forming sub-communities) - but keep the formalities on the general
> list
Relating to IncubatorV2 and pTLP proposals - on Apache Commons I seem
to have spurred a discussion about making sub-mailing lists (And thus
forming sub-communities) - but keep the formalities on the general
list.
(email below)
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201501.mbox
a TLP.
>> >>
>> >> Having said that, Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and
>> after
>> >> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to
>> allow
>> >> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apach
, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Tommaso Teofili
wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-04-28 10:45 GMT+02:00 Ted Dunning :
>
> Edward,
>>
>> Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
>> eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
>>
2014-04-28 10:45 GMT+02:00 Ted Dunning :
> Edward,
>
> Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
> eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
> so good. The incubator docs on this are pretty good reading.
>
>
Thanks Ted. I generally agree with your suggestion.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Edward,
>
> Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
> eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
> so good.
Edward,
Sub-projects are generally frowned on. Incubator projects can graduate
eventually to a top-level project, but starting a project as a sub is not
so good. The incubator docs on this are pretty good reading.
But if the committer community for your real-time BSP is (or can be) the
same as
d like to start to move from
github to ASF soon, although this is very *early* stage. Because, it's
highly related with Apache Hama and others. Hama sub-module or
sub-project, (or Apache incubator?). Which is best you think?
I'm also CC'ing general@i.a.o to see more feedbacks (from A
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> What we really need for podlings is a "bill of
> rights" towards what they can expect of their
> mentors, because too few of them actually are
> willing to question the participation of the
> people who signed up to mentor them and that's
> n
27;d like proponents of this thread to explain in concrete detail:
> What is the problem to be solved?
> What is the base cause of that problem?
> How does splitting the Incubator in to sub-groups of technology solves the
> cause of this problem?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
of disempowerment we too
> often dish out.
>
> From: Alan Cabrera
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?
>
> On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Joe Schaef
haefer
>Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 11:29 AM
>Subject: Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?
>
>
>On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
>> What we really need for podlings is a "bill of
>> rights" towards what they can expect
On Jun 15, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> What we really need for podlings is a "bill of
> rights" towards what they can expect of their
> mentors, because too few of them actually are
> willing to question the participation of the
> people who signed up to mentor them and that's
> not h
On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> I.e. while the IPMC or ComDev or whoever would still set policy and provide
> community best practice guidance. But then separate mailing lists/groups
> would provide actual oversight of podlings (incoming, mentoring, graduating).
> These
___
> From: Alan Cabrera
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 11:04 AM
>Subject: Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?
>
>
>
>On Jun 15, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>> I think there's merit in the i
really our problem? Who needs this greater sense of ownership and
identification?
In short, I'd like proponents of this thread to explain in concrete detail:
What is the problem to be solved?
What is the base cause of that problem?
How does splitting the Incubator in to sub-groups of technol
27;t ever learn from our
past mistakes.
>
> From: Upayavira
>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2013 10:16 AM
>Subject: Re: Incubator reorg ideas: sub-groups per technology?
>
>
>I think there's merit in the id
I think there's merit in the idea of multiple, smaller incubators, so
long as it is set up in a way that doesn't involve prospective podlings
playing the incubators against each other.
Smaller groups, with smaller membership, gives the chance of a greater
sense of ownership and identification, whi
On 6/14/2013 8:25 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
...
Do we really want jakarta@i.a.o or hadoop@i.a.o?
...
ROTFLOL! But the Jakarta project was so fun!
- Shane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For ad
I proposed this a year or so ago. It was fairly soundly rejected for a
number of reasons, the two I recall (because I felt they had
significant merit) were:
a) adds additional hierarchy
b) impossible to decide where a project best fits
These two things together give the potential for silos.
I do
Hi Shane,
On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Apologies if this horse has been beaten already, but... have we discussed the
> concept of splitting incubator operations into a handful of separate groups,
> based on technology areas?
>
> I.e. while the IPMC or ComDev or whoever w
Apologies if this horse has been beaten already, but... have we
discussed the concept of splitting incubator operations into a handful
of separate groups, based on technology areas?
I.e. while the IPMC or ComDev or whoever would still set policy and
provide community best practice guidance. B
As per recent email, this is, formally, an act of the IPMC to certify
that the IP is clear and the community good Apache citizens, followed
by an act of the accepting project, and the board expects that the
accepting project will report on the process promptly.
I'm sure various will correct me if
ergy with Apache Tuscany, and
> after
> >> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to
> allow
> >> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany.
> >>
> >> Nuvem Graduation Vote thread
> >> *http://s.ap
activity
>> low, compared to what is required for graduating it as a TLP.
>>
>> Having said that, Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
>> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
>> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-pro
Just trying to clarify, based on [1] it seems that when a project is
graduating into an existing TLP, once the IPMC vote is done, there is no
need to seek Board approval and the hand-over and infrastructure tasks can
start happening.
Is that the correct understanding ?
[1] http://incubator.apache
s a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany.
>
> Nuvem Graduation Vote thread
> *http://s.apache.org/nuvem-graduation*
> *http://s.apa
s a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany.
>
> Nuvem Graduation Vote thread
> *http://s.apache.org/nuvem-graduation*
> *http://s.apa
free time, which makes the level of activity
>> low, compared to what is required for graduating it as a TLP.
>>
>> Having said that, Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
>> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
>>
s a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany.
>
> Nuvem Graduation Vote thread
> *http://s.apache.org/nuvem-graduation*
> *http://s.apa
cubator podlings.
>
> I'm with Matt: the vote is still needed to state "this community/code
> can be moved into the ASF".
Since incubation is more about learning the apache way in practice, I also
think IPMC will be a better position to gauge it then the target PM
said that, Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany.
>
> Nuvem Graduation Vote thread
> *http://s.apache.org/nuvem-g
aving said that, Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany.
>
> Nuvem Graduation Vote thread
> *http://s.apache.org/nuvem-g
es not need to be involved. However, I will state the recipient PMC
better issue a Board report *that month*, whether it is on their
normal reporting schedule or not. Activities like that is something
that needs to be very visible. (the Board would see it in the
Incubator report, but it should also
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, permit me to ask another, related, question. It seems to me that
> the IPMC is concerned with the fact that a project is ready to leave,
> but not so much which where it is going. A proposal to form a new TLP
> is, I think, a straightf
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Raymond
On Nov 21, 2012, at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> Please cast your votes:
>
> [x] +1 Graduate Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
>
On 11/21/12 7:26 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> On 21 November 2012 10:36, Bertrand Delacretaz
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>>> wrote:
uvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
>discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
>graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany.
>
>Nuvem Graduation Vote thread
>*http://s.apache.org/nuvem-graduation*
>*http://s.apa
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> On 21 November 2012 10:36, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>> wrote:
>> > ...sub-"products", or the ability for a PMC to release multiple
>&
On 21 November 2012 10:36, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> wrote:
> > ...sub-"products", or the ability for a PMC to release multiple
> "products", like e.g.,
> > like Lucene does now (Lu
> [X ] +1 Graduate Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> ...sub-"products", or the ability for a PMC to release multiple "products",
> like e.g.,
> like Lucene does now (Lucene-Java is a product; Solr is a product; PyLucene
> is a product),
> tha
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Please cast your votes:
[x] +1 Graduate Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub
Could agree more with Chris and Ross.
I've seen, first hand, at Hadoop the behaviour of significant portions of the
PMC not being present in one of the 3 sub-projects we have (HDFS, YARN,
MapReduce) and has led to significant issues in the community and in the PMC.
Along with folks like
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> This is good point of view.
>
> I think one may also take a user cases and product distribution
> perspectives into account. For example, when both projects naturally come
> in one binary release, this may be feasible to have them joined.
>
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> ...The idea is to have Nuvem become something like Tuscany Cloud Components,
> and the active Nuvem PPMC members, which mostly are already Tuscany PMC,
> will be joining the Tuscany PMC.
>
> Does that answer your doubts ?...
Yes, thanks!
-
ow
> > graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
>
> Can you clarify what this means? Do all members of the Nuvem PPMC
> become Tuscany PMC members?
>
> -Bertrand
>
>
The idea is to have Nuvem become something like Tuscany Cloud Components,
and t
Fromt he peanut gallery of someone who has participated in a number of
sub-projects
over the years (Nutch, Tika, Solr, Hadoop, etc.): I don't think they have a big
place at the
ASF. The word "project" implies "community". Sub communities == umbrella
projects ==
pain,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> ...Where I start to get worried is when a sub-project takes on a life of
> its own and significant portions of the parent PMC are not interested
> in the sub-project...
I didn't notice this new thread, but my reply in the oth
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> ...Bertrand, this is a great opportunity to clarify the board's attitude
> toward 'subprojects'. Ever since the campaign to dismantle umbrellas,
> I've been confused about what structures the board would find
> reasonable
I don't kno
Luciano Resende
> wrote:
> >>> ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> >>> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to
> allow
> >>> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
> >
ion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
>>> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
>>
>> Can you clarify what this means? Do all members of the Nuvem PPMC
>> become Tuscany PMC members?
>
> Bertrand, this is a gr
of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
>
> Can you clarify what this means? Do all members of the Nuvem PPMC
> become Tuscany PMC members?
Bertrand, this is a great opportunity to clarify the board's attitude
toward 'subprojects'. Ever since the campaign to
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> ...Nuvem has a great synergy with Apache Tuscany, and after
> discussion between the two projects, we are seeking IPMC approval to allow
> graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany
Can you clarify
graduation of Apache Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany.
Nuvem Graduation Vote thread
*http://s.apache.org/nuvem-graduation*
*http://s.apache.org/nuvem-graduation-result*
Tuscany Graduation Vote thread
*http://s.apache.org/tuscany-accept-nuvem*
*http://s.apache.org/tuscany-accept-nuvem-result
anks,
>> Arun
>>
>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:24 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>>
>>> As we discussed in the previous thread, I'd like to call a vote to
>>> establish YARN as a sub-project (it's the best *term* we have to describe
>>> it in ou
start the necessary process to move on this.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:24 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> As we discussed in the previous thread, I'd like to call a vote to establish
>> YARN as a sub-project (it's the best *term* we ha
Hello,
I would like to request IP clearance for the Sigil sub-project
contribution to Felix from Paremus; the IP clearance form is here:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-sigil.html
Thanks a lot.
-> rich
On Jul 3, 2006, at 12:10 PM, James Strachan wrote:
On 7/3/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at
AsyncWeb
after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm
interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Syn
On 7/3/06, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb
after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm
interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Synapse, so moving it to
Apache sounds good to me.
Anyo
On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Trustin Lee wrote:
Bringing in AsyncWeb and other possible future contributions will
make this
project quite too big to fit into a subproject. We might need an
incubation
process to find a better place for MINA eventually. Any idea? I
will CC
this message to
How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb
after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm
interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Synapse, so moving it to
Apache sounds good to me.
...ant
On 7/3/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 7/4/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 3, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Irving, Dave wrote:
>> So, my proposal is, how about we start creating module(s) in
>> MINA for protocols?
>>
>
> Of course, Im biased - but It would be a shame if we re-wrote http
> support on top of Mina over again,
Noel,
Thanks. We will review and provide signed documents ASAP.
-Ismael
On 2/15/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i think that's the doc) on
> > behalf of Intalio for OpenEJB.
>
> See: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants
>
> Ismael shoul
> Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i think that's the doc) on
> behalf of Intalio for OpenEJB.
See: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants
Ismael should also submit a CCLA (see the same page) if one will be
necessary for Intalio employees to satisfy their obligations under the terms
of their
On Feb 14, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David,
The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least
one of
them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of
the CLAs
and a Software Grant?
Noel or anyone,
Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i th
On Feb 14, 2006, at 8:54 PM, David Crossley wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Is it possible to do a
quick cross-check of our committers list and the CLAs on file? Keep
in mind I have no idea if what i'm asking is hard.
See the list at http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html
The top table i
David Crossley wrote:
> David Blevins wrote:
> > Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >
> > >David,
> > >
> > >The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least
> > >one of
> > >them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of
> > >the CLAs
> > >and a Software Grant?
> >
David Blevins wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> >David,
> >
> >The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least
> >one of
> >them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of
> >the CLAs
> >and a Software Grant?
>
> Ok. I made nearly all the OpenEJB commit
On Feb 14, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David,
The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least
one of
them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of
the CLAs
and a Software Grant?
Ok. I made nearly all the OpenEJB committers sign CLAs wa
David,
The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least one of
them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of the CLAs
and a Software Grant? If so, *after* the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
has been created, we can import the code under incubator/openejb.
So, it's been about two weeks. It seems like this is all the
discussion we are going to get.
What is the next step?
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 8, 2006, at 6:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
At graduation, the community will decide its final resting place?
Interesting choice of words =)
-Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On 2/8/2006 5:50 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan,
Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are
just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at
graduation.
Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants
On 2/8/2006 5:16 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
The only person who's stepped up and volunteered is Geir. Is there
anyone else? Are two mentors enough?
I'm there also.
Yep. Thanks Ken!
Regards,
Alan
Alan,
Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are
just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at
graduation.
Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants to
participate, including other ASF projects
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> The only person who's stepped up and volunteered is Geir. Is there
> anyone else? Are two mentors enough?
I'm there also.
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opin
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
