+1 Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity On 15 Jun 2013 16:04, "Alan Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 15, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > I think there's merit in the idea of multiple, smaller incubators, so > > long as it is set up in a way that doesn't involve prospective podlings > > playing the incubators against each other. > > Can you provide detail on what you mean by "prospective podlings playing > the incubators against each other"? I'm not sure what that means. > > > Smaller groups, with smaller membership, gives the chance of a greater > > sense of ownership and identification, which are important to community > > building. > > Is that really our problem? Who needs this greater sense of ownership and > identification? > > In short, I'd like proponents of this thread to explain in concrete detail: > What is the problem to be solved? > What is the base cause of that problem? > How does splitting the Incubator in to sub-groups of technology solves the > cause of this problem? > > > Regards, > Alan > >
