On Jun 15, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > I think there's merit in the idea of multiple, smaller incubators, so > long as it is set up in a way that doesn't involve prospective podlings > playing the incubators against each other.
Can you provide detail on what you mean by "prospective podlings playing the incubators against each other"? I'm not sure what that means. > Smaller groups, with smaller membership, gives the chance of a greater > sense of ownership and identification, which are important to community > building. Is that really our problem? Who needs this greater sense of ownership and identification? In short, I'd like proponents of this thread to explain in concrete detail: What is the problem to be solved? What is the base cause of that problem? How does splitting the Incubator in to sub-groups of technology solves the cause of this problem? Regards, Alan
