Hi everyone,
I am going to have to drop out as champion for SAFplus.
I don't think there is a strong enough community within SAFplus.
I don't think we are going to get enough mentors and generally, there appears
to be disinterest in this project among the Incubator PMC.
The answers about whether
Hi PJ,
Thanks a lot for your advices.
For issue 2, the list was sent.
What do you need from us that the contributors ' permission (means what do
we prove you that all contributors agree to the license change?)
Thanks,
Hung
On Thu, May 1, 2025, 3:15 AM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi Hung,
> To me, the
Hi Hung,
To me, the main issues are:
1. The lack of ASF Incubator PMC members who are interested in
mentoring this project. We typically require at least 3 mentors.
2. The license change depends on whether you have the permission from
previous contributors to change the license. I think more work i
Hi Justin, PJ,
Sorry for bothering you but I see there is not your activity for our
project for several weeks.
What should I do to make its progress?
Thanks,
Hung
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025, 10:27 AM Hung Ta wrote:
> Hi Justtin,
>
>
>> As a first step, can you supply a list of all contributors and w
Hi Justtin,
> As a first step, can you supply a list of all contributors and whether
> they were employed by OpenClovis? As PJ said, we also need to know if they
> signed CLAs or not.
>
> Here is the list (I don't know if they signed the CLAs or not).
hoangle (hoangle...@gmail.com)
karthick18
Hi,
> All contributors were employed by OpenClovis, which means the company paid
> them for their code, so the Intellectual Property Rights in this case must
> belong to the company.
While that is generally the case, just because a company paid for code, does
not always mean they own the copyri
Hi Justin,
> All contributors were employed by OpenClovis, which means the company paid
> > them for their code, so the Intellectual Property Rights in this case
> must
> > belong to the company.
>
> Looking at the contributors here [1], I see some are not part of the Open
> Clovis organisation. H
Hi Justin and PJ,
All contributors were employed by OpenClovis, which means the company paid
them for their code, so the Intellectual Property Rights in this case must
belong to the company. Therefore, the company has full copyrights for the
product, in contrast, the contributors have no any copyr
Hi Justin,
>
> > I, on behalf of the contributors, confirmed that we agree to the license
> change.
>
> We need a bit more than that. Can we see where all of the contribitors
> have agreed to this?
>
> As a first step, can you supply a list of all contributors and whether
> they were employed by
HI,
> I, on behalf of the contributors, confirmed that we agree to the license
> change.
We need a bit more than that. Can we see where all of the contribitors have
agreed to this?
As a first step, can you supply a list of all contributors and whether they
were employed by OpenClovis? As PJ
Hi PJ,
I, on behalf of the contributors, confirmed that we agree to the license
change.
Thanks.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025, 8:05 PM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi Hung,
> Could you clarify the position regarding changing the license? This
> will require that previous code contributors will need to agree to
Hi Hung,
Could you clarify the position regarding changing the license? This
will require that previous code contributors will need to agree to the
license change. If they have signed CLAs with OpenClovis or have/had
employment contracts with OpenClovis, then those people can be assumed
to have giv
Hi Paul,
The issues were tracked through http://cloviszilla.openclovis.com but when
migrating data to the new cloud server, there are some issues not resolved
yet, so it cannot be opened now. We'll fix it. And another tracking place
is github, of course.
Besides that, many customers reported iss
The other worrying thing is that there has been no blogs, issues, PRs
in the project for 8+ years.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 4:29 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> A major concern is that the codebase is currently GPL-2.0 licensed.
> Converting all of the OpenClovis included code will be needed and some
>
A major concern is that the codebase is currently GPL-2.0 licensed. Converting
all of the OpenClovis included code will be needed and some clarity if all of
the contributors have allowed OpenClovis to modify the license for their
contributions.
Best,
Dave
> On Apr 4, 2025, at 10:47 AM, PJ Fann
Hi everyone,
I'd like to formally begin the discussion about accepting SAFplus into
the Apache Incubator. The proposal is:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/SAFplusProposal
Related Thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/hn87t6gtqh5cp3nx269okghzf0ty0x3z
One of the main issues
16 matches
Mail list logo
