Proposal for SVN Cleanup

Hi - It used to be the case that every podling used svn and had directories in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/. I think that other than https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/ we can safely remove almost all of the other directories. This will prevent others from inadver

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-233) Clean Up Retired Podling Repositories

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17951016#comment-17951016 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-233: --- We have accumulated a large amoun

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-283) Please delete tag v2.0.0 in incubator-horaedb

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-283. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed a year ago, but not closed. > Please delete tag v2.0.0 in incuba

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-201) Missing archiver/archives for dev@incubator - is it needed?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-201. - Resolution: Resolved As far as I can tell this is finished. commits@ is now

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-288) svn clone of incubator repo takes > 12 hours

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17950989#comment-17950989 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-288: --- Moving to git is a larger issue du

[jira] [Closed] (INCUBATOR-288) svn clone of incubator repo takes > 12 hours

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher closed INCUBATOR-288. - Resolution: Won't Fix > svn clone of incubator repo takes &g

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-288) svn clone of incubator repo takes > 12 hours

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17950987#comment-17950987 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-288: --- When you do a git-svn clone of

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] easy-cass-stress

ase it was missed (please reply to >> general@incubator.apache.org). >> >> [1] - https://lists.apache.org/thread/jl69730fl5vns7q4c57lwfsj71ookc4f >> >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 12:40 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> Please note that IP CLEARANCE is typically a LAZY CONS

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] easy-cass-stress

e > subscribed to this list, which may not be the case. You may want to CC > d...@cassandra.apache.org or the proposer directly. > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:40 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Please note that IP CLEARANCE is typically a LAZY CONSENSUS decision. >> >>

Re: [VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] easy-cass-stress

Please note that IP CLEARANCE is typically a LAZY CONSENSUS decision. How many of the contributors that do not have ICLA checked on the notion page were drive-by contributors? Or, are their contributions considered to be minor and small changes correcting typos and fixing small bugs? Best, Dave

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) as a Top level Project

+1 (binding) While this is a small PMC 4 of the 5 PMC members are ASF Members. Best, Dave > On Apr 22, 2025, at 11:52 AM, Tim Allison wrote: > > +1 carried over from dev@ > > Thank you, all! > > Tim Allison (IPMC and PPMC) > > On 2025/04/22 05:13:40 Richard Zowalla wrote: >> Hi all, >> >

Re: Missing links in the New Podling Proposal template?

I know that when OpenOffice.org was accepted in June, 2011 we had an open signup for Initial Committer. This is how I joined. I do not think that this has been since. Best, Dave > On Apr 20, 2025, at 6:22 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > I guess this refers to the different sections of the Open JP

Re: Stale files under https://incubator.apache.org/projects

Thank you for this fix. > On Apr 20, 2025, at 2:47 PM, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 at 15:58, sebb wrote: >> >> As the subject says. >> >> The bluemarlin status file [1] was updated some while ago to show that >> the podling retired. However, the generated file [2] does not show >> thi

Re: [DISCUSS] Accept SAFplus into the Apache Incubator

A major concern is that the codebase is currently GPL-2.0 licensed. Converting all of the OpenClovis included code will be needed and some clarity if all of the contributors have allowed OpenClovis to modify the license for their contributions. Best, Dave > On Apr 4, 2025, at 10:47 AM, PJ Fann

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hamilton into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Apr 2, 2025, at 10:25 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Hamilton into the Apache Incubator. > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HamiltonProposal > > And the discussion: > https://lists.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Accept Texera into the Apache Incubator

ttps://incubator.apache.org/cookbook/ >>> >>> We would definitely appreciate more mentors if anyone in the IPMC has >>> the time to spare. >>> >>> On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 23:32, Dave Fisher wrote: >>>> >>>> You only have 2 ment

Re: [VOTE] Accept Texera into the Apache Incubator

You only have 2 mentors listed in the proposal. I think that a minimum of 3 are required. > On Apr 1, 2025, at 2:27 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > I will add my +1 binding (fanningpj IPMC) > > On 2025/03/31 15:18:12 Cezar Cristian Andrei wrote: >> My vote is: >> +1, bring Texera into the Incubator

Re: Release documentation (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OzHera (incubating) 2.2.5-incubating released)

> On Mar 28, 2025, at 9:29 AM, sebb wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 16:04, tison wrote: >> >> The related docs are: >> >> * (mainly) https://infra.apache.org/release-download-pages.html >> * https://infra.apache.org/release-publishing.html >> * https://infra.apache.org/release-distributio

Re: Use of of "creator of Apache Foo"

Putting it into the maturity model may be “best practices”, but it gets treated as “policy” >> We could possibly add an extra item to the maturity model [3] along the >> lines of “TB50. The project and third parties do not refer to anyone as “the >> creator/founder of Apache Foo”. with a link t

Re: Use of of "creator of Apache Foo"

> On Mar 25, 2025, at 6:09 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 11:31 AM Paul King wrote: >> ...For me the wording is critical. If the wording is "original >> creator of the technology behind Apache Foo" or similar I have less >> concern, assuming it is true... > > I

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

a.o, but that does not happen automatically. > Infra have to request for changes to be made; there may be a charge involved. If Pony Mail retires then would it be to infrastructure repositories? Justin - should there be a “Roll Call” for Pony Mail? Best, Dave > >> Best, >> t

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

> On Mar 20, 2025, at 12:44 AM, Xuanwo wrote: > > It looks like PonyMail has been discontinued. How about we retire PonyMail > and switch to more mature solutions like Mailman and HyperKitty? lists.apache.org is a provided service from a vendor with a contract from the ASF. This Pony Mail di

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

structure, they don't > do ASF "release" IIUC but also not "retire" or archive. Sure we have infrastructure and now tooling archives. These also get archived if they are no longer relevant. Best, Dave > > Best, > tison. > > Dave Fisher 于2025年3月20日周四

Re: What to do with Pony Mail?

Let’s focus on the original question. > On Mar 20, 2025, at 12:35 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > The Pony Mail project has been incubating since 2016 and lately has failed to > submit its reports. The PPMC is struggling to attract people and only has two > or three active people on it.

Re: Clarification on the -1 policy for code changes

Hi, > On Mar 11, 2025, at 4:23 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Looking at the first propopal, I was surprised to discover > https://www.kie.org/ - having a domain name like this is not in line with ASF > trademark policy, nor is having a domain name like https://kogito.kie.org/. > There

Re: [DISCUSS] running a trial where podlings need to have their names reviewed before they join

> On Mar 6, 2025, at 9:20 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 14:53, PJ Fanning wrote: > >> Seems best to allow the discussion thread to proceed and if things seem >> ok, then start the name approval step. The vote only happens after the name >> is approved by Brand Manageme

Re: svn commit: r1924250 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

The enddate and resolution need to be added as well. Please see the numerous examples. > On Mar 9, 2025, at 6:37 AM, ror...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: roryqi > Date: Sun Mar 9 13:37:31 2025 > New Revision: 1924250 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1924250&view=rev > Log: > Change Un

Re: svn commit: r1924250 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

Nevermind, I see that this has already been corrected. > On Mar 9, 2025, at 11:36 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > The enddate and resolution need to be added as well. Please see the numerous > examples. > >> On Mar 9, 2025, at 6:37 AM, ror...@apache.org wrote: >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] running a trial where podlings need to have their names reviewed before they join

visually >> indicate the poddling’s progress through the process and highlight any >> challenges they encounter in specific phases. >> >> Best, >> Kranti >> >>> On Mar 6, 2025, at 10:08 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: >>> >>>  >>> >

Re: [MENTORS] March report timeline - reports due March 2025

> On Mar 3, 2025, at 3:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI Dave, > > This email was generated by a script. I assume that some data the script > relies on has not been updated. And that is strange because podlings.xml is updated and the website is correct. Perhaps one of the lists used was g

Re: [MENTORS] March report timeline - reports due March 2025

> On Mar 2, 2025, at 7:22 PM, jmcl...@apache.org wrote: > > Dates for next board report: > Wed March 05 - Podling reports due by end of day > Sun March 09 - Shepherd reviews due by end of day > Sun March 09 - Summary due by end of day > Tue March 11 - Mentor signoff due by end of day > Wed March

Re: Incubator SVN Clutch Analysis Part-1 CI Failure since 2024-12-01

ache%20HoraeDB%20for%20High-Cardinality%20Metrics%20at%20AntGroup.pdf > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 10:14, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> It looks like it is choking on bad data. >> >> Begin Clutch Analysis >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/tmp/incuba

Re: Incubator SVN Clutch Analysis Part-1 CI Failure since 2024-12-01

It looks like it is choking on bad data. Begin Clutch Analysis Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/incubator-site-content/clutch2.py", line 766, in dtm1 = datetime.datetime.strptime(" ".join(listing[-5:-1]),"%b %d %Y") File "/usr/lib/python3.10/_strptime.py", line 568, in _strpt

Re: Old Incubating Batchee Website & Google Analytics

> On Feb 4, 2025, at 5:02 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:39, sebb wrote: > >> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:10, Niall Pemberton >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Incubator Team! >>> >>> Batchee graduated from the Incubator in 2019 to become a sub-project of >>> Geronimo and batchee

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

Hi - > On Feb 3, 2025, at 7:04 PM, tison wrote: > > I'm considering reuse the apache/incubator repo and migrate the > scripts [1] under tools [2]. > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/ > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator/tree/master/tools If you do this then be

Re: February 2025 reporting

> On Feb 3, 2025, at 4:46 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for doing that PJ, I’ve updated the formatting and corrected the > podling list that need to report this month and sent out the notification > emails. > > You can access the step needed by running “report_runbook.py”. T

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrate incubator report workflow to github

> On Feb 3, 2025, at 5:29 AM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > I think there is probably a requirement to store the reports in ASF > svn but the idea of automating some of the generation tasks is > probably a good item to discuss. > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 14:16, Xuanwo wrote: >> >> Hey, everyone >>

Re: February 2025 reporting

xt to svn. >>>>> I'm not sure why some podlings ended up with no shepherd assignments. >>>>> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/February2025 >>>>> >>>>> These are the podlings that need to report

Re: [VOTE] Accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) wave > On Jan 31, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I'd like to call a VOTE to accept Iggy into the Apache Incubator. > > The proposal is: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Iggy+Proposal > And the discussion: > https://lists.apache.or

Re: [DISCUSS] Iggy Proposal

This is a very interesting proposal there are a number of clients for the rust based service. The following repositories are listed. https://github.com/apache/iggy https://github.com/apache/iggy-docs http

Re: podling security issues

> On Jan 24, 2025, at 1:44 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > The ASF generally mandates a min of 3 days for votes on release > candidates. This can be significantly shortened if there is a security > issue that needs a quick release. > With Podlings, they typically require 2 rounds of voting (PPMC and

Re: Seeking a Champion for Hamilton and/or Burr to apply for the Apache Incubator Program

> On Jan 3, 2025, at 2:13 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> 2. Question, does the whole repository need the same license? e.g. >> including documentation and examples? > > It would be preferable to re-license as many files as possible to the Apache > license, but ASF projects can includ

Re: [VOTE] Accept Hunter into the ASF Incubator

+1 - wave - ipmc > On Nov 21, 2024, at 4:15 AM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > Following the discussion about Hunter started ten days ago > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ojr23ssmxmfsdbnojxg3q02xdl74t75j > and its proposal > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HunterProposal >

Re: [DISCUSS] Hunter Proposal

sis that can decide whether code should be deployed to production. It >> is a young project with already good diversity, and a valued user base, and >> is well positioned for the advantages that belonging in the ASF would >> bring. >> >> Here is the proposal: >>

Re: [DISCUSS][IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

at 11:22 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > That's right Dave, but as I checked the ip clearance statement, I just > wanted to say that it looks good to me :) > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 6:14 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> The long

[DISCUSS][IP CLEARANCE] Apache DataFusion sqlparser-rs

The long-standing tradition for IP CLEARANCE is LAZY CONSENSUS. Thanks, Dave > On Sep 24, 2024, at 9:09 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:33 PM Andy Grove wrote: >> >> Apache DataFusion is receiving a donation of sqlparser-rs [1]

Re: Podling release without IPMC vote

An important question to ask is if the VOTE on the dev list included 3 of the podling’s Mentors. If it did then it already had 3 +1 IPMC (binding) Votes and the general@ vote should quickly have those carried over by those mentors. Best, Dave > On Sep 9, 2024, at 11:48 AM, Daniel B. Widdis wro

Re: Proposal: Recording votes in podlings

HI Craig, This is a good idea, and would save the secretary time when checking an account request. Having a parsable email saves a large amount of time. Where do you plan to document this prescription? Best, Dave > On Sep 6, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like to dis

Re: [VOTE] Accept Polaris into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Aug 2, 2024, at 10:26 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Following the discussion about Polaris > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/ymz26dr3bzldbntdgpctbtkb787x311d), > and after updating the proposal based on comments, I would like to > start the for

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

l is solid, the contributions (code and non >> code) are there, the community is small but eager to grow (and that's >> the purpose of the incubator). >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:39 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >&

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

Hi Justin, > In short, this seems to me (and I could be wrong) like a project mostly from > a single vendor, but the proposal has been made to make it look like more > people are involved. It may well be that these people will be involved, but > I’d prefer if the project was upfront about this

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

> On Jul 31, 2024, at 6:56 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> I understand your comment, and it's important to me. >> If it's a concern for you, I'm happy to rework the initial committer >> list with the team (also removing PPMC list to use the default layout) >> and grow the PPMC/committe

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

growing the PPMC and Committer base. Best, Dave > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 8:19 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi JB, >> >> An interesting project that looks pretty mature. >> >> I’m curious about the split between Initial PPM

Re: [DISCUSS] PolarisProposal to the incubator

Hi JB, An interesting project that looks pretty mature. I’m curious about the split between Initial PPMC and initial Committer. In the usual case a new podling will have all of the Initial Committers on the PPMC. Can you tell us why this is not the case with Polaris? Best, Dave > On Jul 30, 2

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Liminal podling

+1 (binding) > On Jul 11, 2024, at 6:41 AM, Ayush Saxena wrote: > > +1 (Binding) > > -Ayush > >> On 11 Jul 2024, at 6:50 PM, Xuanwo wrote: >> >> +1 binding. Good luck after retiring. >> >>> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, at 21:16, PJ Fanning wrote: >>> +1 binding - looks like the right decision bas

Re: [QUESTION] Can we use an AGPL components [minio] in OpenServerless?

HI - The first place to go is to check on license availability is the legal resolved page[1]. There you can learn the various classes of dependencies as well as resolved issues about licenses that have already discussed on legal-disc...@apache.org [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html

Re: Bylaws != Guidelines

Top post, but if my memory serves me properly Guidelines was used because the ASF’s ByLaws - https://www.apache.org/foundation/bylaws.html - must not be overridden by project “bylaws”. Best, Dave > On Jul 3, 2024, at 12:35 PM, Carl Steinbach wrote: > > In 2018, Justin McLean led an effort to

Re: PMC is a committee

t;>>> To be honest, I've never really paid much attention when someone >>>>>>> stated >>>>>>> they're a PMC. I knew what was meant and just auto corrected it >>>>>>> in my head. >>>>>>> I have used,

Re: PMC is a committee

someone >>>>> stated >>>>> they're a PMC. I knew what was meant and just auto corrected it >>>>> in my head. >>>>> I have used, without fully thinking about it, PMC as, "I am a >>>>> PMC" as well. >>>>

Re: PMC is a committee

Hi Tison, I’m sympathetic as well. > On Jul 2, 2024, at 5:11 PM, tison wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > I saw this kind of thread many times, and I also corrected it dozens > of times. Actually, this is part of the reason for [1] ("Maintainer" > as an alias of PMC Member?). > > [1] https://lists.apach

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenServerless into the ASF incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Jun 11, 2024, at 8:31 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> ...Following the discussion about OpenServerless [1], I'm starting a vote >> to accept OpenServerless into the ASF incubator... > > +1 >

Re: What is sufficient Incubation notification for Git repos?

I made the following comment on the PR, but will include it here as well. > Looks reasonable and points to the important detail. I would only add that if > the podling is releasing with DISCLAIMER-WIP that the linked DISCLAIMER > should be the DISCLAIMER-WIP with that added information. Best, D

Re: [QUESTION] KIE - NPM package names

Here’s my 2 cents. Incubation is a journey, and if there are parts that are yet to be compliant that should be fine. In the end all will be squared away. For the IPMC - should we have something like DISCLAIMER-WIP for binary convenience packaging? Best, Dave > On May 15, 2024, at 1:13 PM, Tia

Re: [VOTE] Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) 3.0 Release Candidate 2

Caring over my +1 (Binding) from the dev list VOTE thread. Best, Dave > On May 13, 2024, at 12:41 AM, Richard Zowalla wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I have posted release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler > (Incubating) 3.0 release and it is ready for testing. > > This is our first release afte

Re: [VOTE] Drop the incubator- prefix for podling's GitHub repo name

+0 (binding) wave > On May 7, 2024, at 5:34 PM, Francis Chuang wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I think this is a pragmatic and well-thought out approach. > > Francis > > On 8/05/2024 10:31 am, tison wrote: >> Hi, >> Following the discussion thread [1], I'd start a vote on the following >> proposa

Re: Verification of download pages and links

part0 = ".".join(path.split('.')[-2:-1]) if part0 == "asc": continue # see if this is not the first hash for this release

Re: Verification of download pages and links

> On Apr 28, 2024, at 9:58 AM, tison wrote: > > Thank you! > > I found there is no rationale for these links, and thus, it's quite a bit > challenging in memory. > > IIRC the closer.lua script is for selecting the most proper CDN for > source/binary bundles in use. They can, technically, wor

Re: Assistance Needed: Editing resilientdb.xml on Apache SVN

> On Apr 5, 2024, at 1:01 PM, Francis Chuang wrote: > > Hey Apratim, > > Those files are stored in a subversion repository, therefore, you will need > to install subversion (svn) to checkout and commit to the repository. > > I can see that you are already a committer on incubator, so your A

Re: Trademarks and incubation (was: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project)

Hi - > On Apr 3, 2024, at 4:33 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Question: where did the incubation process fail in this case? How can we > prevent something like this from happening again? Rather than consider what went wrong in this case and to avoid an how is the Incubator broken this time dis

Re: [VOTE] The retirement of Apache Milagro

+1 (binding) > On Mar 18, 2024, at 12:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Hi All, > > Based on discussion[1], I would like to call a vote to retire Apache Milagro. > > Please vote accordingly: > [] +1 approve > [] +0 no option > [] -1 disapprove with a reason > > [1]: https://lists.apache.o

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for HertzBeat

Hi - It’s not a branding conflict unless Hertz has a trademark in class 9. The champion or mentors could do a PODLINGNAMESEARCH and see what VP, Brand thinks. After all hertz is a well known unit of measure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz Best, Dave > On Mar 16, 2024, at 7:51 AM, PJ Fan

Re: [VOTE] Accept StormCrawler Into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave > On Mar 12, 2024, at 1:33 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Following the discussion about the StormCrawler proposal [1], I am > starting this official vote for the StormCrawler podling. Here is the > proposal: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/

Re: [VOTE] Podling web sites: make (incubator.) optional in podling urls

+1, binding. (I would be stronger and recommend that it not be done at all.) A string DISCLAIMER on the main page should be enough.) > On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > +1, binding. > > On 3/12/24 19:36, Craig Russell wrote: >> After this discussion >> https://lists.apache.

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StormCrawler

There are options. I helped establish ASF Pelican by converting the main ASF website from the Apache CMS. See GitHub.com/apache/www-site/. I don’t think it needs to be decided in the proposal. It can be decided at he beginning of Incubation. Best, Dave > On Mar 7, 2024, at 1:37 PM, tison wrot

Re: svn commit: r1916128 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/graduation.xml

Hi PJ, This part of the site is only maintained in GitHub. All of content/guides in svn are “historical documents”. The directory should probably be removed. Best, Dave > On Mar 5, 2024, at 7:56 AM, fannin...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: fanningpj > Date: Tue Mar 5 12:56:04 2024 > New Revi

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal for StormCrawler

I confirm my interest in being a Mentor. Best, Dave > On Mar 3, 2024, at 6:24 PM, PJ Fanning wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to propose StormCrawler [1] as a new Apache Incubator project, > and you can examine the proposal [2] for more details. > > StormCrawler is a collection of res

Re: Podling web sites: .incubator. required?

I know of former podlings that have been TLPs for five years that still have assets that read https://project.incubator.apache.org - I think requiring a DISCLAIMER on the main page of every podling website would be better in the long run. The DISCLAIMER c

Re: [NOTICE] Incubation Report for February 2024

> On Feb 24, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Feb 23, 2024, at 6:44 PM, tison wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to create an Incubation Report page for February 2024 at >> [1], including the following podlings accordin

Re: [NOTICE] Incubation Report for February 2024

> On Feb 23, 2024, at 6:44 PM, tison wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to create an Incubation Report page for February 2024 at > [1], including the following podlings according to the report group > info that they should report in this month: > > * answer > * fury > * horaedb > * streampark >

Re: ASF at Jetbrains

> On Feb 20, 2024, at 11:02 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > > wt., 20 lut 2024 o 19:19 Craig Russell napisał(a): >> So I thought there was more content which would require transferring IP >> rights. But if it's just a trivial bit of a web page, no issues. > > The only issue with the page right n

Re: ResilientDB Bootstrap missing Mailing Lists

t;> >>> Dear Dave, >>> >>> Hope you are safe and well. >>> >>> Thank you for identifying this issue; how can we correct it? >>> >>> --- >>> Best Regards, >>> Mohammad Sadoghi, PhD >>> Associate Pr

Re: (apache-website-template) branch jekyll created (now f2f8a9e)

#x27;m > a newcomer here, I'd like to listen to people's opinions before moving > forward; especially there can be some arguments. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/tvry49gdclqqdtdcgk0x9hnl18vlxnm8 > > Dave Fisher 于2024年2月21日周三 0

Re: (apache-website-template) branch jekyll created (now f2f8a9e)

From the commit email it looks like this repository belongs to the Incubator. > On Feb 14, 2024, at 2:27 AM, ti...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > tison pushed a change to branch jekyll > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-282) Modernize Clutch Analysis

Dave Fisher created INCUBATOR-282: - Summary: Modernize Clutch Analysis Key: INCUBATOR-282 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-282 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Improvement

Re: ResilientDB Bootstrap missing Mailing Lists

Hi - Perhaps the podling status file in svn was not properly updated? Best, Dave > On Feb 19, 2024, at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > > Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/resilientdb.html > > Where are the mailing lists? Where is the websi

ResilientDB Bootstrap missing Mailing Lists

Hi - Please have a look at https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/resilientdb.html Where are the mailing lists? Where is the website? Best, Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional com

Re: ASF at Jetbrains

Yes, that must happen and record the decision via LAZY CONSENSUS. > On Feb 19, 2024, at 1:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > I think we would also want a SGA from Jetbrains and go through [1] for the > donation. > > > 1: > https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 15

Re: [DISCUSS] Procedure for graduating an existing sub project to new top level project

You could also look into how Solr was spun out of Lucene. It would be up to your PMC whether to make the new PMC identical or not. Doing a podling name search on DataFusion does check a box for the board. The best place to continue this discussion is bo...@apache.org Best, Dave Sent from my i

Re: [VOTE] Accept Fury Into the ASF Incubator

+1 (binding) Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 8, 2023, at 3:06 AM, tison wrote: > > Hi Incubator > > Following the discussion [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of Fury [1], I > am starting this official vote for the Fury project. > > Here is their proposal: > https://cwiki.apache.org/conf

Re: svn commit: r1912845 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

.com/apache/incubator/blob/1c95cfce15d4a5972662cdd844b7989090972c05/bake.sh#L19 > > I've added https to the property, and changed the podlings.dtd url to > use https, and the site now builds OK. > > >> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 22:04, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> FY

Re: Retired podlings not being cleaned up

Please note that retired podlings must never be part of the Attic. The attic is for projects that were TLPs. Retired podlings can move to other places depending on the original contributions. For websites that can mean any number of actions, but it must never be confused with former TLPs that a

Re: Is llvm exception allowed for incubator projects?

The phrase Apache License with exception … is meaningless the ASF does not allow it under trademarks. Please email tradema...@apache.org for any clarification. If it’s not the Apache License then you can’t call it the Apache License + - or whatever. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 23

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of ResilientDB

Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 9, 2023, at 7:51 PM, Suyash Gupta > wrote: > > Hello All > > Let me try to add to Mohammad's response. We defined an initial committer > list of 40+ members as we wanted to give credit to everyone who has > collaborated with us on projects/papers that were buil

Re: svn commit: r1912845 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

FYI - website build has been failing since August 30 due to a switch to use https for the podlings.dtd. The part of the build with the very, very old ant/anakia build somehow requires http. The change to use https is now reverted. A subsequent comment is added to point to where this anakia proc

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] pulsar-admin-go

Hi, You need to svn co with https. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 11, 2023, at 10:11 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: > > Hi tison, > > You are in the Incubator PMC group. The svn right should be fine for > you. You need to use your Apache ID and password to log in. > I just helped you comm

Re: New Mentor Question: IP Clearance

IP Clearance is for existing PMCs as a process separate from incubation. During Incubation it is expected that IP us being built and brought in to the podling. Mentors should ensure that any SGA or IP diligence needed is filed and reported as part of the podling status file. Sent from my iPhone

Re: [DISCUSSION] The retirement of the Apache DataLab (Moving to Apache Attic)

Podlings just “retire", we’ve never moved podlings to the Attic. What retirement means can vary from podling to podling. See https://incubator.apache.org/projects/#retired One example was OpenZipken which “retired” to https://zipkin.io when the community decided that the Apache Way was not for

Re: Incubator project status website failed to build since July 7th

Here is the fix which has worked its way through the clutch and website process. Author: wave Date: Wed Aug 2 12:19:32 2023 New Revision: 1911409 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911409&view=rev Log: Update the minimum podling count fr

Re: svn commit: r1911409 - /incubator/public/trunk/clutch2.sh

The clutch stopped building because the minimum podling count used to protect from failing jobs went below 25. > On Aug 2, 2023, at 5:19 AM, w...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: wave > Date: Wed Aug 2 12:19:32 2023 > New Revision: 1911409 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1911409&view=re

Re: [MENTORS] August 2023 Incubator report timeline

Thank you! Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 29, 2023, at 7:12 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Here is the August 2023 Incubator report timeline: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/August2023 > > Wed August 02 -- Podling reports due by end of day > Sun August 06 -- Sheph

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >