On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 10:33 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> > > Oleg Endo wrote:
> > > > Some of the tests pass, some of them don't because
> > > > of the auto-inc-dec issues mentioned in the PR.
> > >
> > > I thought that the tes
I don't know if there's already a PR but I get an ICE compiling this
with a non-patched version. If x is not an array everything goes ok.
2012/6/11 Tobias Burnus :
> On 06/11/2012 11:24 AM, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
>>
>> gfortran.dg/coarray/poly_run_3.f90
>
>
> That one fails because I for for
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:16 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 12:11 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
>
>> I found this parameter that seems to correspond to well-predicted
>> conditional jumps:
>>
>> /* When branch is predicted to be taken with probability lower than this
>>
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> OK, once more with feeling... :)
>
> This patch differs from the previous one in two respects: It disables
> the optimization when either the then or else edge is well-predicted;
> and it now uses the existing l1-cache-line-size parameter instead
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A number of the vector permute intrinsics in arm_neon.h end up
> generating quite wasteful code because we end up packing these into
> larger types. While looking at a particularly bad example and the
> infamous PR48941
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> This test modifies dg-message test directives by adding comments that
> will be added to lines in the test summary to eliminate non-unique lines
> for checks of messages for the same line of source code in a test.
>
> Tested on i686-pc-linux-
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> This test modifies dg-error, dg-warning, dg-message, and dg-bogus test
> directives by adding comments that will be added to lines in the test
> summary to eliminate non-unique lines for checks of messages for the
> same line of source code i
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> This test modifies dg-message test directives by adding comments that
> will be added to lines in the test summary to eliminate non-unique lines
> for checks of messages for the same line of source code in a test.
>
> Tested on i686-pc-linux-
This changes the error message printed for an invalid access to an atomic
component, which was:
access to volatile object cannot yield access-to-non-volatile type
into the more correct:
access to atomic object cannot yield access-to-non-atomic type
The problem was that Is_Atomic_Object returned
This patch implements properly the aspects Convention, Import, Export, Link_
Name and External_Name, which replace the corresponding Ada 2005 pragmas.
Compiling missing_convention.ads must yield:
missing_convention.ads:3:07: missing Convention aspect for Export/Import
---
function missing_conv
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:46:27 +0100
Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't like the ML bits of the patch as it stands today and before
> committing I would like to clean up the ML bits quite a bit further
> especially in areas where I've put FIXMEs [...]
I had a go at this, see attached.
On 06/05/2012 05:19 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hi,
what is the blocking point for the integration of these patches?
Ping.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Obere Lagerstr. 30, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 18 90 80 79-6
Fax : +49 89 18 90 80 79-9
E-Mail :
This change allows the use of -fdump-scos as a synonym of -gnateS to
request the generation of SCOs in Ada ALI files.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-12 Thomas Quinot
* back_end.adb (Scan_Back_End_Switches): Treat -fdump-scos as
synonym of -gnateS.
This patch handles a rare case of accidental overloading in an instance, when
the profile of a subprogram body that depends on a formal type becomes
compatible with that of a homonym whose profile in the generic mentions the
actual type.
execution of inst.adb must yield:
expected T... In P (T)
ex
Hi!
As stated in the PR, the -Wuninitialized warnings are bogus if
fields have NSDMI, as they are actually initialized then.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
What about 4.7.2?
2012-06-11 Jakub Jelinek
PR c++/53594
* class.c (check_bases_and
A "null record" type does not have a variant part, so it is not a legal
candidate for pragma Unchecked_Union. This change fixes the circuitry
that enforces this rule so that it correctly rejects such illegal code
instead of crashing the compiler.
The following compilation must be rejected with the
An implicit dereference of an access to constrained unchecked union subtype
has inferable discriminants. This change fixes the Has_Inferable_Discriminants
function to take this case into account properly.
The following program must compile quietly and display "OK" when executed:
with Ada.Text_IO;
This patch extends the information generated by the compiler in
ALI files adding references to entities exported to foreign
languages. This information can be used by cross reference
tools and text editors (for example, GPS).
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-12 Javier Mi
This package will be used with the gprinstall tool.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-12 Pascal Obry
* prj-attr.adb: Add install package and corresponding attributes.
* snames.ads-tmpl (Name_Active): New constant.
(Name_Exec_Subdir): Likewise.
The following test must run without raising an exception on
systems supporting symbolic links:
with Ada.Directories; use Ada.Directories;
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
procedure Delln is
F1 : constant String := "libname.so";
F2 : constant String := "libname.so.1";
File : File
Hello!
Similar to x86, this patch puts soft-FP exception handler out-of-line.
The patch also cleans asm constraints a bit (introduces "+"), but has
no other functional changes.
2012-06-12 Uros Bizjak
* config/ia64/sfp-machine.h (__sfp_handle_exceptions): New
function declarati
This patch implements AI05-0296, concerning freeze rules in the presence of
formal incomplete types: a formal abstract subprogram cannot have an incomplete
controlling type, and the profile of the actual subprogram is not frozen if it
includes a incomplete untagged type.
Compiling abstr.ads in Ada
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:46:27 +0100
> Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't like the ML bits of the patch as it stands today and before
>> committing I would like to clean up the ML bits quite a bit further
>> especially in areas
Applied the following changes:
- Note on avr's progmem attribute.
- Fix -mfix-at697f which is a Sparc option.
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html
Johann
Index: htdocs/gcc-4.6/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/g
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:01 PM, William J. Schmidt
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 16:10 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 11:15 +0200, R
This patch adds code to recognize a scenario where an object is initialized by
a sequence of nested function calls where one of them returns a controlled
result. This in turn triggers the mechanism which exports such transient
objects to the enclosing finalizer on the assumption that one of the cal
On 12 June 2012 11:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Julian Brown
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:46:27 +0100
>> Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I don't like the ML bits of the patch as it stands today and before
>>> committing I would like to cle
This patch is a minor cleanup in the front end. It
introduces a new subtype N_Subprogram_Call which includes
N_Function_Call and N_Procedure_Call_Statement, and then
uses this new subtype in many place in the front end
where it simplifies the code. Since there is no change
in behavior, no test is r
In large systems, gnatmake may crash when invoked with -m (minimal
recompilation) when there are many sources that have been modified
but have kept the same checksum.
This patch fixes this.
There is no simple test.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-12 Vincent Celier
On 12 June 2012 10:22, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:46:27 +0100
> Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't like the ML bits of the patch as it stands today and before
>> committing I would like to clean up the ML bits quite a bit further
>> especially in areas where I've
On 06/12/2012 11:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06/05/2012 05:19 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hi,
what is the blocking point for the integration of these patches?
Ping.
GCC uses a *-*-*eabi patterns to destinguish EABI toolchains from other
ABIs. Your endeavour contradicts the spirit beh
On 06/12/2012 01:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/12/2012 11:53 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06/05/2012 05:19 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hi,
what is the blocking point for the integration of these patches?
Ping.
GCC uses a *-*-*eabi patterns to destinguish EABI toolchains from other A
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 12:59 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Btw, with PR53533 I now have a case where multiplications of v4si are
> really expensive on x86 without SSE 4.1. But we only have vect_stmt_cost
> and no further subdivision ...
>
> Thus we'd need a tree_code argument to the cost hook.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
> On 12 June 2012 11:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Julian Brown
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:46:27 +0100
>>> Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I don't like the ML bits of th
On 06/11/2012 08:01 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 11/06/2012 13:56, rbmj ha scritto:
... simply pass the extra mode argument in unconditionally,
as it should be transparent to the function and ignored if it is
variadic (I'm no expert on calling conventions though).
Yes, please do this.
Done.
VxW
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> wrote:
>> On 12 June 2012 11:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Julian Brown
>>> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:46:27 +0100
Ramana Radhakri
>
> + if (TREE_CODE (mask) == SSA_NAME)
> + {
> + gimple def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (mask);
> + if (is_gimple_assign (def_stmt)
> + && gimple_assign_rhs_code (def_stmt) == VECTOR_CST)
> + mask = gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt);
> + }
> +
> if (TREE_CODE (mask) == VE
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
>>
>> + if (TREE_CODE (mask) == SSA_NAME)
>> + {
>> + gimple def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (mask);
>> + if (is_gimple_assign (def_stmt)
>> + && gimple_assign_rhs_code (def_stmt) == VECTOR_CST)
>> + mask = gimpl
With this change, the compiler now supports the -gnatn[d] switch, where 'd'
is a digit and can only be '1' or '2' for the time being, to let the user
specify the level of inlining across modules. If the old form `-gnatn' is used,
the compiler will pick the inlining level based on the optimization l
No functional change.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
2012-06-12 Tristan Gingold
* a-exexpr-gcc.adb (Unwind_Exception): Add 4 more private fields.
Index: a-exexpr-gcc.adb
===
--- a-exexpr-gcc.adb(re
This patch corrects the machinery which detects controlled objects inside a
block created for the purposes of avoiding interference of exception handlers
and At_End handlers.
-- Source --
-- types.ads
with Ada.Finalization; use Ada.Finalization;
package Types is
ty
On 12-06-08 22:25 , Sandeep Soni wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes the failure test case that I had submitted the last time.
The changeLog is testsuite/gChangeLog.gimplefe is as follows.
2012-06-09 Sandeep Soni
* gimple.dg/20120605-2.gimple : New.
While the changelog in gimple/Chan
On 2012-06-11 18:40, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>> Nope. I do see the obvious mistake in the atomic_load pattern though:
>> The mode iterator should have been INT1 not INT.
>
> Did you want to commit the fix for the iterator?
Yes. I'm j
Hi,
Please find the attached patch that adds offset bits for mova/Sz assembly
instruction of memory access in H8SX target.
Please review the patch and let me know if there should be any
modifications in it?
Tested with h8300-elf. No new regressions.
Regards,
Sandeep Kumar Singh,
KPIT Cummi
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As the testcase shows, we weren't diagnosing compound literals with
> incomplete type at all. Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on
> x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK with the various testcases from the other duplicates of this b
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:59:57 +0200
> > From: Michael Hope
> > Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:04:19 +0200
>
> > On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsson
> > wrote:
> > >> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> > >> Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 06:29:04 +0200
> > >
> > >> > From: Micha
You need to provide a self-contained explanation of what the problem is
that your patch is fixing and why you chose that approach to fixing it -
with reference to the ARM EABI documentes (RTABI etc.) for why your
approach is valid according to the ARM EABI.
libunwind is a library separate from
On 06/11/2012 09:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Janis Johnson
> wrote:
>> The tests in gcc.dg/torture/stackalign use two sets of torture options:
>> the usual optimization sets used as default for torture tests, and up to
>> four sets of options that are specific to stac
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> No functional change.
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
>
> 2012-06-12 Tristan Gingold
>
> * a-exexpr-gcc.adb (Unwind_Exception): Add 4 more private fields.
>
Does this mean that GCC will officially support SEH
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 18:24 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> > This patch addes the -mno-synci flag to MIPS tests that specify an
> > architecture that does not support synci, thus getting rid of the
> > warning message and making the tests pass. Tested with the mips-linux-gnu
> > and mips-sde-elf tar
On 06/12/2012 04:37 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
You need to provide a self-contained explanation of what the problem is
that your patch is fixing and why you chose that approach to fixing it -
with reference to the ARM EABI documentes (RTABI etc.) for why your
approach is valid according to the AR
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 04:30 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > How about this:
>
> OK, looks good.
>
> > There is still a file config/arm/aout.h
>
> I noticed that, but it seems to be used together with elfos.h, so it seems not
> to be a.out-specific. :)
I comme
On Jun 12, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> No functional change.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
>>
>> 2012-06-12 Tristan Gingold
>>
>>* a-exexpr-gcc.adb (Unwind_Exception): Add 4 more pri
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>>> No functional change.
>>>
>>> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk
>>>
>>> 2012-06-12 Tristan Gingold
>
On 31/05/12 19:18, Paul Brook wrote:
>> * The patches have not been explicitly tested with any FPA variants (which
>> are deprecated in 4.7 and expected to become obsolete in 4.8).
>
> I'm not keen on breaking these without actually removing them.
>
> Paul
>
Ok, so lets remove them...
R.
On 06/12/2012 07:55 AM, Sandeep Kumar Singh wrote:
Hi,
Please find the attached patch that adds offset bits for mova/Sz assembly
instruction of memory access in H8SX target.
Please review the patch and let me know if there should be any
modifications in it?
Tested with h8300-elf. No new re
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 09:05 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Janis Johnson
>> wrote:
>>> The tests in gcc.dg/torture/stackalign use two sets of torture options:
>>> the usual optimization sets used as default for torture tests
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:37 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> OK, once more with feeling... :)
>
> This patch differs from the previous one in two respects: It disables
> the optimization when either the then or else edge is well-predicted;
> and it now uses the existing l1-cache-line-size paramet
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
> The stdint.h doesn't have all the typedefs needed for standards
> compliance, so add a hack that adds all of the needed typedefs
> to be fully compliant to the standard. Fixes broken libstdc++.
If you're touching VxWorks stdint.h perhaps you could also define th
On 2012-06-11 18:40, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> > Nope. I do see the obvious mistake in the atomic_load pattern though:
>> > The mode iterator should have been INT1 not INT.
> Did you want to commit the fix for the iterator?
>
Applied the following to mainline.
It ought to go onto the 4.7 branch
The enclosed patch for Google 4.6 backports the final pubnames-canonicalization
patch from top of trunk. It differs slightly from the earlier one because
google/4.6 had an earlier implementation already present.
OK for Google 4.6?
Sterling
2012-06-11 Sterling Augustine
* gcc/c-famil
Richard Sandiford wrote:
Thanks for the update.
Tejas Belagod writes:
+/* Implementations of the iterator_group callbacks for ints. */
+
+/* Since GCC does not construct a table of valid constants,
+ we have to accept any int as valid. No cross-checking can
+ be done. */
+
+static int
+
On 12-06-12 11:58 , Sterling Augustine wrote:
+/* Wrap lang_decl_name with options appropriate for dwarf. */
+
+const char *
+lang_decl_dwarf_name (tree decl, int v, bool translate)
+{
+ const char *name;
+ /* Curiously, reinit_cxx_pp doesn't reset the flags field, so setting the
flag
+
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-06-12 11:58 , Sterling Augustine wrote:
>
>> +/* Wrap lang_decl_name with options appropriate for dwarf. */
>> +
>> +const char *
>> +lang_decl_dwarf_name (tree decl, int v, bool translate)
>> +{
>> + const char *name;
>> + /* Curiou
On 12-06-12 12:57 , Sterling Augustine wrote:
The wrapper code is the same, but the internal call is
not--"lang_decl_name" and "decl_as_string" return different strings,
and their interface is different so it wouldn't be easy to pass a
function pointer.
So, I'm not sure how you would combine th
On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:33 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> This test modifies dg-error and dg-warning test directives by adding
> comments that will be added to lines in the test summary to eliminate
> non-unique lines for checks of messages for the same line of source code
> in a test.
>
> OK for mainli
On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:40 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> This test modifies dg-message test directives by adding comments that
> will be added to lines in the test summary to eliminate non-unique lines
> for checks of messages for the same line of source code in a test.
> OK for mainline?
Ok.
Hello,
As mentioned in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00544.html
the PR 51340 test cases are obsolete. The attached patch deletes them.
OK?
Cheers,
Oleg
testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/53511
* gcc.target/sh/pr51340-1.c: Delete obsolete test case.
* gcc.tar
On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> The tests in gcc.dg/torture/stackalign use two sets of torture options:
> OK for mainline?
Ok, if H.J. is happy.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> The tests in gcc.dg/torture/stackalign use two sets of torture options:
>
>> OK for mainline?
>
> Ok, if H.J. is happy.
It is OK for me. Thanks.
--
H.J.
On Jun 12, 2012, at 6:40 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-06-11 18:40, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>>> Nope. I do see the obvious mistake in the atomic_load pattern though:
>>> The mode iterator should have been INT1 not INT.
>>
>>
On Jun 12, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> As mentioned in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00544.html
> the PR 51340 test cases are obsolete. The attached patch deletes them.
>
> OK?
Ok. Didn't Kaz already pre-approve the concept?
On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Mike Stump writes:
>> On May 4, 2012, at 8:01 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>> This patch updates libgo to the Go 1.0.1 release. This is a relatively
>>> small collection of bug fixes, with no API changes.
>>
>> So, it is an important part o
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-06-08 22:25 , Sandeep Soni wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes the failure test case that I had submitted the last time.
>>
>> The changeLog is testsuite/gChangeLog.gimplefe is as follows.
>>
>> 2012-06-09 Sandeep Soni
>>
The patch adds some preliminary tests for type declarations and
varaible declarations for the gimple front end.
Following is the ChangeLog Entry.
2012-06-12 Sandeep Soni
gimple.dg/20120611-1.gimple : New.
gimple.dg/20120611-2.gimple : New.
gimple.dg/20120611-3.gimple : N
On 12-06-12 13:52 , Sandeep Soni wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12-06-08 22:25 , Sandeep Soni wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes the failure test case that I had submitted the last time.
The changeLog is testsuite/gChangeLog.gimplefe is as follows.
2012-06-09 Sa
On 12-06-12 14:20 , Sandeep Soni wrote:
2012-06-12 Sandeep Soni
gimple.dg/20120611-1.gimple : New.
gimple.dg/20120611-2.gimple : New.
gimple.dg/20120611-3.gimple : New.
gimple.dg/20120611-4.gimple : New.
gimple.dg/type-1.gimple : New.
gimple
Tejas Belagod writes:
> New patch attached. OK?
> +There are two standard integer attributes: @code{int}, the name of the
> +code in lower case, and @code{INT}, the name of the code in upper case.
I don't think this is true. So the surrounding paragraph reduces to:
It is possible to define a
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 10:46 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 12, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> > As mentioned in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00544.html
> > the PR 51340 test cases are obsolete. The attached patch deletes them.
> >
> > OK?
>
> Ok. Didn't Kaz already pre
On 06/07/2012 04:29 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The problem here was that when we instantiate G::bar, we want to
instantiate F, and end up improperly pushing the declaration inside G,
which leads to the ICE. Adjusting the call to pushclass is enough to fix
this, which is what I propose doing for the
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Sterling Augustine
wrote:
[Regarding generating pubnames]
> OK, I've updated the patch with all these additional comments. Just
> waiting on the decision between -f and -g. I'll repost and then commit
> it when that is settled--hopefully soon.
>
> Next up, the big
I'd rather have a macro HOST_WIDE_INT_C in hwint.h (like INTMAX_C etc. in
stdint.h). HOST_WIDE_INT_1 is already defined in hwint.h to either 1L or
1LL; I'd suggest defining HOST_WIDE_INT_C to concatenate with either L or
LL (and then HOST_WIDE_INT_1 can be HOST_WIDE_INT_C (1), unconditionally).
On 06/12/2012 11:47 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
The stdint.h doesn't have all the typedefs needed for standards
compliance, so add a hack that adds all of the needed typedefs
to be fully compliant to the standard. Fixes broken libstdc++.
If you're touching VxWor
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 11:47 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, rbmj wrote:
> >
> > > The stdint.h doesn't have all the typedefs needed for standards
> > > compliance, so add a hack that adds all of the needed typedefs
> > > to be fully compliant to the s
This patch to the Go frontend and the runtime library handles the
package path like the other Go compiler. Gccgo needs to canonicalize
type names based on the reflection string, so that types defined in
shared libraries work correctly. That means that it needs to include
the package path in the r
On 2012-06-05 12:33, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> for gcc/ChangeLog
> from Alexandre Oliva
>
> PR debug/49888
> * var-tracking.c: Include alias.h.
> (overlapping_mems): New struct.
> (drop_overlapping_mem_locs): New.
> (clobber_overlapping_mems): New.
> (var_mem
On 2012-05-31 22:58, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> +(define_expand "atomic_compare_and_swap"
> + [(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand")
> + (match_operand:BWD 1 "register_operand")
> + (match_operand:BWD 2 "memory_operand")
> + (match_operand:BWD 3 "general_operand")
> + (match_operand:BWD
Hi!
The combiner combines
(set (reg:SI x) (and:SI (reg:SI y) (const_int 1234)))
(set (reg:DI z) (zero_extend:DI (reg:SI x)))
into
(set (reg:DI z) (and:DI (subreg:DI (reg:SI (y) 0) (const_int 1234
which unfortunately isn't the best form on x86_64 from RA POV, because
if y needs to be moved arou
On 2012-06-12 11:26, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Tejas Belagod writes:
>> New patch attached. OK?
>
>> +There are two standard integer attributes: @code{int}, the name of the
>> +code in lower case, and @code{INT}, the name of the code in upper case.
>
> I don't think this is true. So the surrou
On 2012-06-12 14:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> PR target/53639
> * config/i386/i386.md (*anddi_1 into *andsi_1_zext splitter): New.
Ok.
r~
Oleg Endo wrote:
> As mentioned in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00544.html
> the PR 51340 test cases are obsolete. The attached patch deletes them.
>
> OK?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
On 13 June 2012 02:32, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
>> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:59:57 +0200
>
>> > From: Michael Hope
>> > Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:04:19 +0200
>>
>> > On 8 June 2012 16:53, Hans-Peter Nilsson
>> > wrote:
>> > >> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
>> > >> Date
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-06-11 18:40, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> > Nope. I do see the obvious mistake in the atomic_load pattern though:
>>> > The mode iterator should have been INT1 not INT.
>> Did you want to commit the fix for the iterator?
>>
>
> App
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> I like your suggestion, but the PowerPC developer community does not
>> uniformly appreciate that behavior.
>
> Surely there's a difference between gratuitously using fp registers
> and that being the *only* way to implement a particula
> From: Richard Henderson
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:04:02 +0200
> On 2012-05-31 22:58, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > +(define_expand "atomic_compare_and_swap"
> > + [(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand")
> > + (match_operand:BWD 1 "register_operand")
> > + (match_operand:BWD 2 "memory_op
> From: Michael Hope
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:43:47 +0200
> On 13 June 2012 02:32, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> >> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> >> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:59:57 +0200
> >> > > user-space code". Maybe the kernel too, I can't say; there was
> >> > > IIRC no sign of it.
> > But
This patch is a follow-up to the discussion generated by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00546.html. I've added
vec_construct to the cost model for use in vect_model_load_cost, and
implemented a cost calculation that makes sense to me for PowerPC. I'm
less certain about the default,
On 06/08/2012 05:22 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
I kind of prefer -g, but I did notice that it's -fdebug-types-section,
so I could go with -f[no-]pubnames (or, as Jakub suggests,
-f[no-]debug-pubnames-section). On the other hand, there's
-g[no-]record-gcc-switches. What would you prefer?
If we change
This patch to libgo uses Entersyscall and Exitsyscall when reading
directory entries. This matters when reading a directory from something
that can stall, such as NFS or a user-mounted file system. Bootstrapped
and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to
mainline.
Ian
diff -
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> 12.2 states that a temporary bound to a reference lives as long as the
> reference itself. We have done that for reference variables, but not in
> other cases, such as aggregate initialization of a struct with reference
> members. In C++11,
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
