On 2012-05-31 22:58, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> +(define_expand "atomic_compare_and_swap<mode>"
> +  [(match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand")
> +   (match_operand:BWD 1 "register_operand")
> +   (match_operand:BWD 2 "memory_operand")
> +   (match_operand:BWD 3 "general_operand")
> +   (match_operand:BWD 4 "register_operand")
> +   (match_operand 5)
> +   (match_operand 6)
> +   (match_operand 7)]
> +  ""
> +{
> +  if (<MODE>mode != QImode && TARGET_TRAP_UNALIGNED_ATOMIC)
> +    cris_emit_trap_for_misalignment (operands[2]);
> +
> +  expand_mem_thread_fence (INTVAL (operands[6]));
> +  emit_insn (gen_cris_atomic_compare_and_swap<mode>_1 (operands[0],
> +                                                    operands[1],
> +                                                    operands[2],
> +                                                    operands[3],
> +                                                    operands[4]));
> +  expand_mem_thread_fence (INTVAL (operands[6]));

Unlike the old sync optabs, you don't necessarily need both fences.
Operands 6 and 7 tell you what fences you need.

Please have a look at the arm, alpha, or rs6000 versions, where we
have <cpu>_{pre,post}_atomic_barrier (model) functions.


r~

Reply via email to