Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Keith Whitwell
Its a known issue for me, thats why i do prefer the GLUT demos. I made it to bring the Mesa demos to life on DRI by just editing the libGL and other references to the systems defaults rather than to the libs in the project. As far as i do remember, it all turned out to be rather "static" in link

Re: [Dri-devel] very slow performance with radeon after reboot

2002-11-20 Thread Louis Garcia
I needed to add that line to rc.local. I wonder why it doesn't load by it self? It did with XFree86-4.2.0. I have the exact same setup as you, I'm using gnome2 and noticed that my fonts were not the same when I upgraded to XFree86-4.2.99.2-0.20021110.5. Have you noticed the same? --Lou On Wed,

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Option "AGPFastWrite" "1" This just makes the machine lock up for me at X startup. > Option "EnablePageflip" But this brings glxgears up to 2420 fps. Whee. Linus ---

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2002 04:03 schrieb Alexander Stohr: > > > > > > > > > > GL_RENDERER: Mesa X11 > > > > GL_VENDOR: Brian Paul > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, that seems to be true for the mesa test programs I installed. > > > > Doing a regular glxinfo shows > > > > OpenGL renderer

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2002 03:43 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > > > > > GL_RENDERER: Mesa X11 > > > GL_VENDOR: Brian Paul > > > > > > Yeah, that seems to be true for the mesa test programs I installed. > > Doing a regular glxinfo shows > >

RE: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Alexander Stohr
Title: RE: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48 > > > > > GL_RENDERER: Mesa X11 > > > GL_VENDOR: Brian Paul > > > > Yeah, that seems to be true for the mesa test programs I installed. > > Doing a regular glxinfo shows > >   OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 20021

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-20 Thread Philip Brown
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:11:10PM -0700, Brian Paul wrote: > Philip Brown wrote: > > That definately sounds like the Right Thing To Do. > > Easier said than done. > > I'm willing to bet that there's around 100 header files in the XFree86 > tree that get pulled into the compilation of the various

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > > GL_RENDERER: Mesa X11 > > GL_VENDOR: Brian Paul > Yeah, that seems to be true for the mesa test programs I installed. Doing a regular glxinfo shows OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 20021009 AGP 4x x86/MMX/SSE TCL

Re: [Dri-devel] very slow performance with radeon after reboot

2002-11-20 Thread Garry Reisky
Does glxinfo say "Direct Rendering: Yes" ? On my Redhat 8 test system I've tried current xfree packages and nightly bleeding edge packages and this works nice. You could install updated xfree from ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris/testing/extremely-unstable-development-code/XFree86/4.2.99.2-0.2002

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Donnerstag, 21. November 2002 00:49 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > It's _really_ really slow, though, reporting a frame rate of 1.95 - 2.0 > > > fps or so when viewing the thing (whatever it is) head on. > > > > What do you get with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose?

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > > It's _really_ really slow, though, reporting a frame rate of 1.95 - 2.0 > > fps or so when viewing the thing (whatever it is) head on. > > What do you get with LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose? > glinfo? GL_VERSION: 1.4 Mesa 5.0 GL_EXTENSIONS: GL_ARB_depth_te

[Dri-devel] very slow performance with radeon after reboot

2002-11-20 Thread Louis Garcia
I installed XFree86-cvs on my rh8 box and installed latest snap of radeon drm driver. I am able to play Q3demo but when rebooting into init 5 the game to so slow I have to reinstall drm driver to fix. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Th

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-20 Thread Brian Paul
Philip Brown wrote: On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:46:35PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: ... If the goal is to make the DRI CVS as small as possible, why not go all the way and turn it into an environment for building only the DRI-related modules? That would change the nature of XFree86 merges quite a

[Dri-devel] EXT_fog_coord on R100 / R200 hardware

2002-11-20 Thread Ian Romanick
I've been looking at the fog support on Radeon hardware (by way of {r200,radeon}_reg.h). I've come to the conclusion that EXT_fog_coord is supported on that hardware by way of the alpha component of the secondary / specular color. I've done some experiments, and I *believe* that this only works w

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 21:18 schrieben Sie: Sorry, I watched Germany vs. Netherlands. "We" lost... 1:3 ;-) > Hmm.. As far as I can tell, I'm now running the mesa-4-1-branch here, and > ipers seems to work. But I have no way to tell what the version is, > XF86_CUSTOM_VERSION is still set t

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-20 Thread Philip Brown
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:46:35PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > ... > If the goal is to make the DRI CVS as small as possible, why not go all > the way and turn it into an environment for building only the DRI-related > modules? That would change the nature of XFree86 merges quite a bit, > but that

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa-4-1-branch

2002-11-20 Thread Martin Spott
Brian wrote: > Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: >> So I decided to give the mesa-4-1-branch a whirl and do some testing... I >> grabbed it from CVS: >> >> $ cvs -z3 co -r mesa-4-1-branch xc > Do a CVS update again in case you didn't get my latest check-ins. I just ran FlightGear with this branch (instea

R200 DOT3 EXT problems (was Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48)

2002-11-20 Thread Ian Romanick
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:06:16PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton: > > > > > > > > Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I should do > > > > some testing. > > > > No go so

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:52 schrieb Andrew Morton: > Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:44 schrieb Alan Cox: > > > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:30, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > > System lookup immediately when I try to start "ipers", "isosurf" or > > > > switch the screen

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:46 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Can you please try "ipers" and "isosurf" from the Mesa-Demo package, too? > > Q3A and UT are sometimes "broken" even if the above works right. > > Well, I don't have the 3D apps, which is wh

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Andrew Morton
Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:44 schrieb Alan Cox: > > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:30, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > > System lookup immediately when I try to start "ipers", "isosurf" or > > > switch the screen. Sadly even when I try the Mesa-4-1-branch with > > > 2.5.47-mm1 o

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Can you please try "ipers" and "isosurf" from the Mesa-Demo package, too? > Q3A and UT are sometimes "broken" even if the above works right. Well, I don't have the 3D apps, which is why I test with glxgears and tuxracer (the first because it's th eo

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 19:44 schrieb Alan Cox: > On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:30, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > System lookup immediately when I try to start "ipers", "isosurf" or > > switch the screen. Sadly even when I try the Mesa-4-1-branch with > > 2.5.47-mm1 or 2.4.19-ck5 (radeon.o 1.6.0). > >

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 18:45 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Linus, Alan are you running SMP during your tests? > > Yup. I'm running with a dual P4 HT (ie 4 virtual CPU's to software), Yes, yes... Grumpf. I want a 8x Hammer...;-))) > and I > check w

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On 20 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > Are you using scsi - any measuable amount of scsi I/O also hangs 2.5.48 > 8( Only for you, Alan, only for you. I've got SCSI at home, so it must be some specific controller driver being broken rather than general breakage. Linus ---

[Dri-devel] Trunk on Red Hat 8.0?

2002-11-20 Thread Daryll Strauss
I'm having really strange problems running the X server from the trunk on one of my Red Hat 8.0 system. It dies with a SIG 11. From running an strace the last thing I see it do is read the PCI data. I suspect by now there must be people running RH 8.0, so it is probably something local to my enviro

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 17:30, Dieter Nützel wrote: > System lookup immediately when I try to start "ipers", "isosurf" or switch the > screen. Sadly even when I try the Mesa-4-1-branch with 2.5.47-mm1 or > 2.4.19-ck5 (radeon.o 1.6.0). Are you using scsi - any measuable amount of scsi I/O also hang

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Linus, Alan are you running SMP during your tests? Yup. I'm running with a dual P4 HT (ie 4 virtual CPU's to software), and I check with glxgears and the commercial tuxracer with a Radeon 8500. I've also verified it on a UP machine with a Radeon 7500

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 08:06 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton: > > > > Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I should > > > > do some testing. > > > > No go so far. > > > > Mo

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa-4-1-branch testing...

2002-11-20 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On 20 Nov 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > On Mit, 2002-11-20 at 00:38, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > > > heretic2 has some problems, but they also show up in the trunk :-) > > Basically, any sort of flashing (like if my character throws a fireball), > > causes a huge drop in the framerate

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch / NO go on 2.5.48

2002-11-20 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 07:06, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 20. November 2002 00:55 schrieb Ian Molton: > > > > > > > > Linus updated 2.5.48 with Brian's latest DRM r200 stuff so I should do > > > > some testing. > > > > No go so far. > > > >

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa 4.1 branch

2002-11-20 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2002-11-19 at 16:30, Brian Paul wrote: > David Dawes wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 03:43:02PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > > > >>>Is this hammered in stone? > >>>When will we see the next XFree86 release (4.4.0), then. > >>>Shouldn't OpenGL 1.4 better go in sooner then later? > >> >

Re: [Dri-devel] mesa-4-1-branch testing...

2002-11-20 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2002-11-20 at 00:38, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: > > heretic2 has some problems, but they also show up in the trunk :-) > Basically, any sort of flashing (like if my character throws a fireball), > causes a huge drop in the framerate. It uses the Quake 2 engine, right? As has been discus