On 14/02/2012 20:47, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 14/02/2012 08:29, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Ok, took a bit to get the Apr polling to work and add some minimal tests.
>>>
>>> Please take anoth
On 14/02/2012 21:03, Costin Manolache wrote:
> BTW - one thing that may simplify the existing code is replacing
> SocketWrapper with a simple SocketWrapper, and having JIO and APR
> define their own SocketWrapper - like NIO does.
Worth adding to the 8.0.x TODO list.
> It would also save a lot of
r
> compression, which is another requirement ).
Thanks. The fog is starting to lift now.
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>
> I hope the new interface does - it's just a small extension to Handler (
> the main method is
> present in
On 15/02/2012 03:53, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Uploaded another take.
>
> This time I'm just adding
> https://github.com/costinm/tomcat/blob/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/LightHandler.java
>
> which is just a Handler - like AjpConnectionHandler,
> Http11ConnectionHandler.
>
> I believe t
On 15/02/2012 16:11, Costin Manolache wrote:
> After I submit, I'll give a try to changing SocketWrapper (non-generic,
> add read/write), in the git. If you don't like it - easy to drop the branch,
> but I think it'll simplify the old connectors enough to compensate for the
> extra complexity I'm a
On 15/02/2012 19:58, Costin Manolache wrote:
> In spdy I'm using a SpdyFrame class ( spdy allow data frames to be
> fragmented any
> way you want by intermediary - so even if I receive a huge frame, I can
> split it
> in buffer-sized frames - I believe you can do the same for websocket, as
> long
On 15/02/2012 21:23, Mark Claassen wrote:
> We would like to use the flexibility of the standard logging mechanism for
> the AccessLogValue. I could find no way to do this. Looking at the
> AccessLogValve code in Tomcat 7, it seems it would really would not be hard
> to add.
I added org.apache.j
On 16/02/2012 01:44, Costin Manolache wrote:
> That doesn't mean the application must receive the entire message as one
> byte[]
> or as a Stream.
> You can have a very large fragment but still read it in smaller buffers and
> notify
> the user of message start and for each fragment ( I guess like
Jean-Frederic,
Post [1] the Tomcat 6 Maven metadata is still incomplete. I thought the
point of going through all that upheaval was to resolve [2]. How come
things are still broken and what is the plan to fix [2]?
If anyone knows how to poke Nexus to include all versions in the
metadata rather th
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.26 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.26/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-020/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/r
On 16/02/2012 04:01, Petr Praus wrote:
> Hello, attached is our patch. It applies cleanly on top of current trunk
> rev. 1244719. It has rudimentary support for fragmentation (callback
> after last frame), supports close messages and ping/pong. Sorry for not
> sending a patchset but I thought it wo
On 17/02/2012 23:18, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Fri Feb 17 23:18:36 2012
> New Revision: 1245804
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1245804&view=rev
> Log:
> Implement fragmentation support. Unfragmented messages still work
> correctly.
> Still trying to figure out how
On 17/02/2012 20:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.26 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.26/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/02/2012 17:20, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 2/15/12 4:33 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I also be +1 to considering making this the sole way
>> AccessLogValve logging may be output.
>
> The only possible rea
ilures we'd get
with the current code :)
What we can do is to provide the necessary servlet that AutoBahn needs
to talk to as part of the examples web app. That way, anyone can run the
test suite with minimal effort.
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 14:50, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On
On 20/02/2012 10:04, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/02/2012 02:55, Petr Praus wrote:
>> but I wanted to ask - have you considered using Autobahn for
>> testing? It's rather extensive opensource websocket testing suite.
>
> I haven't. I just took a quick look. Looks lik
I have used. You'll also get credit
in the changelog along with the other folks that have contributed code
to the WebSocket impl.
Based on progress today, things should move along pretty quickly.
Next step is to get ping/pong working.
Mark
>
> Petr
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012
On 20/02/2012 22:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Based on progress today, things should move along pretty quickly.
> Next step is to get ping/pong working.
Yep. Progress has been pretty quick. Ping/pong tests (section 2) now all
pass as do sections 3 (reserved bits) and 4 (opcodes).
There are
Binding votes:
+1: mturk, markt, hgomez, yoavs, olamy, rjung
Non-binding votes:
+1: kfujino
The vote therefore passes.
I'll move the bits shortly and announce once the mirrors have sync'd.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
On 21/02/2012 14:49, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Note that Buildbot fails as well.
>
> The error is in TestWebSocket,
> [[[
> Testcase: testSimple took 3.875 sec
> FAILED
> null
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
> at
> org.apache.catalina.websocket.TestWebSocket.readMessage(TestW
On 21/02/2012 16:31, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Regarding StreamInbound#doClose(), doPing(), doPong()
Thanks for the review.
>
> 1. in doClose():
> status = status + is.read();
> There is no check whether is.read() is not -1 above.
Added.
> 2.All 3 methods have such loops:
> while
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.26
This release is primarily a bug fix release and includes numerous
bug fixes compared to version 7.0.25. The notable bug fixes include:
* Improved @HandlesTypes processing which no longer loads
all classes on web
on may be required.
> Any concerns with it ?
Depends on why it is required.
Mark
>
> Costin
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 16/02/2012 01:44, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> That doesn't mean the application must receive the e
On 22/02/2012 18:41, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Konstantin Kolinko > wrote:
>
>> 2012/2/22 Costin Manolache :
>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22/02/2012 16:51, Costin Manolache wrot
On 22/02/2012 19:02, Ofer Israeli wrote:
> All,
This is the dev list, not the users list. This question does not belong
on this list. Further, I see you already posted to the users list.
Please do not cross post.
Mark
>
> I have a deployment on Windows 2003 Server using Apache 2.2.16,
> Tomcat
On 23/02/2012 01:32, Petr Praus wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 16:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Haven't looked too hard at those yet. Assuming Java can tell the UTF-8
>> is invalid then handling that should be easy.
>>
> Yes, except that the java CharsetDecoder di
All,
The bulk of the WebSocket implementation is complete. There are,
however, still quite a few TODOs.
1. Autobahn failure of test 7.5.1 (close handling)
2. Autobahn UTF-8 failures. Invalid UTF-8 is not being detected by the
Reader. Needs further investigating.
3. Autobhan performance failures
On 23/02/2012 19:07, sebb wrote:
> On 23 February 2012 19:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/2/23 :
>>> - case "$o" in
>>> + case "$o=1" in
>>
>> What the above line is about?
>
> I wondered the same myself;
> it so happens that the "=" key is next to the "Backspace" key, so I
> suspect th
On 23/02/2012 19:33, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 08:00 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2012/2/23:
>> Maybe:
>> while [ -n "$1" ]
>> (though both variants should work work)
>>
>
> Some solaris shells misbehave on -n.
>
>>> do
>>> - case "$o" in
>>> + case "$o=1" in
>>
>> What the abo
On 23/02/2012 23:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/2/24 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Feb 23 22:28:32 2012
>> New Revision: 1292995
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1292995&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Review comments on r1292776 from kkolinko
>>
>> Modified:
>>tomcat/trunk/java/org/apa
On 23/02/2012 12:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> The bulk of the WebSocket implementation is complete. There are,
> however, still quite a few TODOs.
>
> 1. Autobahn failure of test 7.5.1 (close handling)
Fixed.
> 2. Autobahn UTF-8 failures. Invalid UTF-8 is not being det
On 24/02/2012 02:23, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52757
>
> Chuck Caldarale changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
> Status|
On 24/02/2012 06:15, Jonathan Drake wrote:
> On 2012/02/23 17:24, "Mark Thomas" wrote:
>
>> On 23/02/2012 12:42, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> The bulk of the WebSocket implementation is complete. There are,
>>> however, still qu
On 25/02/2012 13:32, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> 5. Threading. Fix the TODOs associated around multiple threads
>>> trying
>> to
>>> send messages at the same time.
>
> Still to do.
>
>>> 6. Profiling. Take a loo
On 26/02/2012 00:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/02/2012 13:32, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>>>> 5. Threading. Fix the TODOs associated around multiple threads
>>>> trying
>>> to
>>>> send messages at the same time.
WebSocket is working with good performance and passing all Autobahn
tests on BIO, NIO and APR.
Currently, all three connectors using blocking IO throughout so there is
a one to one mapping between threads and connections. Therefore,
scalability is not what it could be for NIO and APR.
The remaini
On 28/02/2012 16:58, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 4:08 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> WebSocket is working with good performance and passing all Autobahn
>> tests on BIO, NIO and APR.
>>
>> Currently, all three connectors using blocking IO throughout so there
On 28/02/2012 18:53, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 11:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> You may also be able to help with some problems I am having getting
>> non-blocking behaviour between messages with NIO. I'm not 100% clear
>> what is happening yet, but I
On 28/02/2012 21:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 28/02/2012 18:53, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> On 2/28/2012 11:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>>> You may also be able to help with some problems I am having getting
>>> non-blocking behaviour between messages with NIO.
On 01/03/2012 11:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 28/02/2012 21:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 28/02/2012 18:53, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>> On 2/28/2012 11:39 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>>> You may also be able to help with some problems I am having getting
On 01/03/2012 03:56, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/1 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Feb 29 21:24:59 2012
>> New Revision: 1295286
>> Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/websocket/WsFrame.java
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/websoc
On 01/03/2012 15:03, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>
>> I have a draft patch [1] that seems to fix this. A similar change would
>> be required for the Comet part of Poller.processKey()
>>
>> Thoughts and/or comments? Not knowing the NIO code very well, there
>> might be a better way to achieve th
axSize = 2097152;
private int charBufferMaxSize = 2097152;
I normally multiple those by 16. The buffers need to be 16M plus a bit
for the headers so I allow a large margin ;)
Mark
>
> Filip
>
> On 3/1/2012 9:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 01/03/2012 15:03, Filip Hanik - Dev Li
On 01/03/2012 18:01, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Alright, now that I'm all squared away with Autobahn and test cases
> running. Is there a specific unit test you have to produce this behavior?
> That would help me for digging through it.
Assuming you are running trunk, then what you'll curren
o it can just be uncommented to run the Autobahn
tests. I'll try and do that shortly.
Mark
>
> Filip
>
> On 3/1/2012 10:13 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> Mark, what buffer size are you referring to increase for the web
>> socket tests to all pass?
>>
On 01/03/2012 18:22, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/2012 17:13, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>> Mark, what buffer size are you referring to increase for the web socket
>>> tests to all pass?
>>
On 01/03/2012 18:27, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Thu Mar 1 18:27:56 2012
> New Revision: 1295724
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1295724&view=rev
> Log:
> Allow the examples to configure the buffer on the fly
Guess you beat me to it. The config needs to be comment
On 01/03/2012 23:47, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Thanks for that John, I'll fix that too.
That probably explains the Comet failures we have been seeing in the
unit tests. Excellent.
Mark
>
> Filip
>
> On 3/1/2012 4:42 PM, Johno Crawford wrote:
>> On 2/03/2012 12:05 AM, fha...@apache.org w
On 01/03/2012 22:55, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> You can't register on a selector using another thread.
Bingo. That explains it. Is that documented anywhere? I don't recall
reading it but I may well have missed it. Looking at the code, it looks
like HTTP would have been unaffected which is go
On 02/03/2012 00:13, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2802
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave for t
On 02/03/2012 13:17, Johno Crawford wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Quick question regarding web socket socket states, using the BIO
> connector I have observed the socket state never transitions to
> UPGRADED.. Is this the expected behaviour?
Short answer: yes.
Longer answer: In this case state is the st
On 03/03/2012 13:06, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52815
I got fed up of the spam. The user has been blocked (again) and the
issue deleted.
I'm sufficiently fed up that I'm going hunting in the access logs for
some IP addresses. If I find a suitab
On 06/03/2012 21:27, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2816
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave for t
On 07/03/2012 11:01, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/7 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Mar 7 09:42:27 2012
>> New Revision: 1297914
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297914&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix line-endings
>>
>> Modified:
>>
>> tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/container/catalina/src/sha
On 08/03/2012 09:12, Johno Crawford wrote:
> What's next / left on the TODO list Mark? Anything I can help out with?
Porting the generic HTTP upgrade followed by the WebSocket code to
7.0.x. I don't think there is much for you to do there.
WebSocket needs some documentation. My plan was to keep i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/03/2012 14:33, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 3/8/12 4:25 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt Date: Thu Mar 8 21:25:31 2012 New Revision:
>> 1298590
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1298590&view=rev Log: Fix
>> v
On 14/03/2012 10:15, Johno Crawford wrote:
> On 8/03/2012 9:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 08/03/2012 09:12, Johno Crawford wrote:
>>> What's next / left on the TODO list Mark? Anything I can help out with?
>> Porting the generic HTTP upgrade followed by the WebSoc
2. Performance of Comet is similar to the non Comet
> implementation 3. It took me 4 hours to do this migration, so it's
> definitely very easy to work with Comet once you have the bulk work
> done (the WebSocket protocol impl by Mark Thomas)
>
> The test suite report is at
&g
On 15/03/2012 14:32, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/15 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Mar 15 14:21:32 2012
>> New Revision: 1300997
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1300997&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Document WebSocket support
>>
>> Added:
>>tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/web-socket-howto.
On 16/03/2012 19:17, Johno Crawford wrote:
> On 16/03/2012 12:57 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Mar 15 23:57:00 2012
>> New Revision: 1301284
>
> Looks like chat.html missed the changeset?
It did. My bad. I forgot to svn add before the commit.
Fixed now.
Mark
---
On 19/03/2012 10:25, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Mon Mar 19 10:25:25 2012
> New Revision: 1302359
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1302359&view=rev
> Log:
> Correct some svn keyword placeholders
Hmm. These changes should not have been necessary. The $KeywordName$
shou
On 19/03/2012 10:58, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/19 Mark Thomas :
>> On 19/03/2012 10:25, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Mon Mar 19 10:25:25 2012
>>> New Revision: 1302359
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/vie
On 19/03/2012 11:05, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/19 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> 2012/3/19 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 19/03/2012 10:25, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>>> Author: markt
>>>> Date: Mon Mar 19 10:25:25 2012
>>>> New Revision: 1302359
>&g
On 19/03/2012 14:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we have one regression
> and few long lasting bugs fixed.
>
> I'd appreciate if you can check the httpd builds from trunk
> since I concentrated mainly on IIS.
>
> BTW, should we remove/revoke 1.2.33 or just go
On 19/03/2012 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/03/2012 14:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we have one regression
>> and few long lasting bugs fixed.
>>
>> I'd appreciate if you can check the httpd builds from
On 19/03/2012 15:07, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 03:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 19/03/2012 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 19/03/2012 14:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/03/2012 01:35, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 3/19/12 4:46 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt Date: Mon Mar 19 20:46:15 2012 New Revision:
>> 1302649
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1302649&view=rev Log: Make
>>
On 20/03/2012 15:41, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 1). Why isn't is starting with this.getParentClassLoader(); ?
>
> The actual shared classloader is the one used in
> WebappLoader#createClassLoader(). I'd say that calling
> Server.getParentClassLoader() will be closer to the truth here.
>
> E.g.
On 20/03/2012 21:54, Nick Williams wrote:
> Thoughts?
That is a general Commons Daemon issue rather than a Tomcat specific
issue and would be best discussed over on the Commons lists.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsu
On 21/03/2012 20:10, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2877
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave for t
On 21/03/2012 21:46, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Mar 21 21:46:18 2012
> New Revision: 1303587
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1303587&view=rev
> Log:
> First stab at keeping concurrent runs of the tribes unit tests from
> interfering.
That appears to have done t
On 22/03/2012 10:04, build...@apache.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
> building ASF Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/493
>
> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
>
> Buildslave fo
On 22/03/2012 19:47, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Thu Mar 22 19:47:58 2012
> New Revision: 1304011
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1304011&view=rev
> Log:
> Still process events when closing to ensure that Comet connections that are
> in use when the poller is stopped
On 22/03/2012 20:33, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Thu Mar 22 20:33:54 2012
> New Revision: 1304040
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1304040&view=rev
> Log:
> Observed strange NPE while running tests. This isn't much more than a guess
> at what might have caused it.
>
On 23/03/2012 01:41, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/13 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Tue Mar 13 14:39:24 2012
>> New Revision: 1300154
> 1) It seems that quoted text handling (" TOKEN"
> construct) is slightly wrong in its handling of backslash character.
Agreed. Fixed.
> 2) RFC2616: ch.3.7
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>2012/3/23 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> 2012/3/22 :
>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1304011&view=rev
>>
>> Comparing (1) and (2),
>> both are terminating the loop, but the (2)nd block has
>> "selector.close()" call and (1)st does not have the call. I suspect
On 25/03/2012 20:52, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sun Mar 25 19:52:05 2012
> New Revision: 1305109
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305109&view=rev
> Log:
> Add Tomcat 3.2 docs
This is the start of the process to move the Tomcat web site to
svnpubsub as mandated by th
On 25/03/2012 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/3/26 Mark Thomas :
>> On 25/03/2012 20:52, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Sun Mar 25 19:52:05 2012
>>> New Revision: 1305109
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
On 25/03/2012 21:30, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sun Mar 25 20:30:06 2012
> New Revision: 1305118
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305118&view=rev
> Log:
> Add the Tomcat 4.0 docs
>
>
> [This commit notification would consist of 180 parts,
> which exceeds the limit
On 25/03/2012 17:24, Costin Manolache wrote:
> For Tomcat7 I'm proposing to only add hooks: 'beforeHandshake' callback in
> Handler, and an optional NpnHandler class plus setters in protocol.
> There is no Java7 or spdy dependency at all.
Sounds good to me.
> The main question is if it's ok to ad
a staging site you can use.
Mark
>
>
> 2012/3/25 Mark Thomas :
>> On 25/03/2012 21:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2012/3/26 Mark Thomas :
>>>> On 25/03/2012 20:52, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>>>> Author: markt
>>>>> Date: Su
On 26/03/2012 13:02, ol...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: olamy
> Date: Mon Mar 26 12:01:12 2012
> New Revision: 1305321
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305321&view=rev
> Log:
> import maven-plugin 2.0-beta-1 site for svnpub: really sorry for such
> spamming :-)
You don't want to include
The 7.0.x change log is looking long again and with the only open TC7
bugs in NEEDINFO state, I am going to start the process of rolling the
7.0.27 release.
I'm not going to tag 7.0.27 until I've confirmed that all the various
tests pass and they'll probably take a day or so to run.
Mark
---
Costin broke the unit tests for Gump when the jni classes were moved to
a separate JAR. I've hopefully fixed this so we should be good to go
with the next Gump run.
The Maven publishing for the new JARs still needs to be fixed.
Mark
---
On 30/03/2012 19:41, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The Maven publishing for the new JARs still needs to be fixed.
Done.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: de
The unit tests for 7.0.x have completed twice in a row on both Linux and
Windows. That is much better than what I was seeing a few days ago and
comparable to previous releases. Next up the TCKs. That'll be tomorrows
task.
Mark
-
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.27 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.27/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-132/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/r
On 31/03/2012 18:07, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.27 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.27/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/co
On 01/04/2012 15:26, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>- AJP via httpd + mod_jk to BIO, NIO and APR/native
>>- AJP via httpd + mod_proxy_ajp to BIO, NIO and APR/native
>
> I'm curious: which mod_jk version did you use?
1.2.31
I am mainly concerned about the AJP implementation on the Java side but
I s
On 02/04/2012 19:30, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 15:26, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>- AJP via httpd + mod_jk to BIO, NIO and APR/native
>>>- AJP via httpd + mod_proxy_ajp to BIO, NIO and APR/native
>>
>> I'm curious: which mod_jk version did you use?
On 04/04/2012 17:12, Filip Hanik Mailing Lists wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: ma...@apache.org To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Thursday,
>> March 29, 2012 2:19:18 PM Subject: svn commit: r1307093 -
>> /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/D
This vote passes.
The votes were as follows:
+1:
markt (binding)
rjung (binding)
olamy (binding)
kkolinko (binding)
schultz
fhanik (binding)
I'll move the files to /dist, give the mirrors time to sync and then
announce the release. Might happen later tonight, might be tomorrow.
Mark
-
On 05/04/2012 11:46, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/4/5 :
>> Author: kfujino
>> Date: Thu Apr 5 10:08:38 2012
>> New Revision: 1309734
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1309734&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Add new attributes of enabled and disabled to UserConfig.
>
> The name "enabled" is usu
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.27
This release is includes significant new features as well as a number of
bug fixes compared to version 7.0.26. The notable changes include:
* Support for the WebSocket protocol (RFC6455). Both streaming and
messa
On 06/04/2012 22:16, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/4/6 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Fri Apr 6 18:44:19 2012
>> New Revision: 1310541
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1310541&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Don't use static imports
>
> ?
>
> 1. I would say that I'd prefer to use static imports
On 07/04/2012 09:51, p...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: pero
> Date: Sat Apr 7 08:51:44 2012
> New Revision: 1310707
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1310707&view=rev
> Log:
> Send header with uppercase names
Why? HTTP headers are case insensitive.
Mark
-
On 07/04/2012 10:14, Peter Roßbach wrote:
> cool remove a point of my TODO list
> +1
>
> I have checked that also new maven-ant-tasks-2.1.3 works.
> How we can download this jar and jsch?
I assume updating the init-maven task in the mvn-pub.xml will do that.
Mark
---
On 07/04/2012 14:02, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> So as those poms are pushed to central repo I would prefer revert those.
> We won't be able to use those poms in the maven plugin by example and
> that will fail too people using this artifact.
The poms are kept in sync with the versions that Tomcat ships
Olivier Lamy wrote:
>2012/4/7 Mark Thomas :
>> On 07/04/2012 14:02, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> So as those poms are pushed to central repo I would prefer revert
>those.
>>> We won't be able to use those poms in the maven plugin by example
>and
>>>
On 10/04/2012 19:38, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> On 4/10/12 2:18 PM, Morten Jorgensen wrote:
>> I would imagine that there are several architects out there that
>> are experiencing similar problems, hence I want to share my
>> work.
>
> I think the best place for this kind of thing is probably di
601 - 700 of 9531 matches
Mail list logo
