On 23/02/2012 01:32, Petr Praus wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 16:19, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >> Haven't looked too hard at those yet. Assuming Java can tell the UTF-8 >> is invalid then handling that should be easy. >> > Yes, except that the java CharsetDecoder didn't seem to think that UTF-8 > sent by Autobahn as invalid was indeed invalid. At least was my impression, > but I might very well be wrong.
Java complains about most of them. I need to dig into the ones it doesn't. Something isn't quite right there yet. >> There are some of those trunk changes (I am thinking of >> AbstractProcessor) that you'll need to pull into your fork. >> > I'll try to pull these during the weekend, maybe it'll still be useful. I get the impression that trunk is heading towards your implementation. 'd be happy to look at suggested patches to improve trunk that moved it towards your implementation. As I said before, small incremental changes are easier to manage than one big patch. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
