Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>2012/4/7 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: >> On 07/04/2012 14:02, Olivier Lamy wrote: >>> So as those poms are pushed to central repo I would prefer revert >those. >>> We won't be able to use those poms in the maven plugin by example >and >>> that will fail too people using this artifact. >> >> The poms are kept in sync with the versions that Tomcat ships with. >The >> ECJ version used is often not present in the Maven repo. Folks that >care >> about this are free to upload it (as they have done before). > >Sure but prepare to answer on users complains :-) We have done things this way since the very first 7.0.x release and so far we have seen very few complaints. Maybe 1 or 2 in 18 months. As I have said before, folks are free to petition Eclipse to upload it or to upload it themselves. There is also the option to work around it locally. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
