On 19/03/2012 15:07, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 03/19/2012 03:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 19/03/2012 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 19/03/2012 14:48, Mladen Turk wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we have one regression >>>> and few long lasting bugs fixed. >>>> >>>> I'd appreciate if you can check the httpd builds from trunk >>>> since I concentrated mainly on IIS. >>>> >>>> BTW, should we remove/revoke 1.2.33 or just go with 1.2.34? >>>> IMHO 1.2.33 is unusable, so that's a valid reason. >>> >>> 1.2.33 has been released so go with 1.2.34 >> >> Misunderstood the question. Lets just get 1.2.34 out there. >> > > OK. > >> Might be worth an email to announce@ now for the folks not following the >> users list. >> > > Do you have any template for that?
Sorry no. Maybe something like: The Apache Tomcat team wishes to draw your attention to stability issues that have been identified with the recent mod_jk 1.2.33 release. If you have not yet upgraded to mod_jk 1.2.33 we recommend that you wait for the mod_jk 1.2.34 release which is currently in progress. If you have upgraded and are experienced issues we recommend that you downgrade to mod_jk 1.2.32 until mod_jk 1.2.34 is available. We apologise for any inconvenience. The Apache Tomcat Team Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
