On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:42 PM Violeta Georgieva
wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.53 release is now available for voting.
>
> NOTE: This is the last release!
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.53/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> http
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 7:52 PM Michel Feinstein
wrote:
> Hi developers, I just want to post here a feature request.
>
> There are several tutorials online on how to get Tomcat (any version)
> running on a server. They will be mostly about using "wget" to download the
> binaries and adding
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:52 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.34 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.33 release are:
>
> - Fix multiple issues associated with using the asynchronous Servlet
> API in combination with HTTP/2
>
> - Ad
ix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
> Implement an option within the Host Manager web pplication to persist the
> current configuration.
> Based on a patch by Coty Sutherland.
>
> Modified:
>
> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/host/HTMLHostManag
Your -1 hasn't been seconded and doesn't seem to have sufficient
> technical
> justification. The change is only a harmless workaround in the default
> configuration and not even a code change. As a result, it is not a valid
> veto.
>
> Rémy
>
--
Coty Sutherlan
Hi all,
I have a question regarding the way that the ResourceBundleELResolver (and
the BeanELResolver) function as part of investigations into the changes
made for https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46915 and then
reverted in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001 (very
Understood. Thanks for the walk through; I think I understand what's going
on. I am going to read through the spec a bit more and verify though since
I don't know much of anything about EL :(
Thanks again!
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/05/201
Did this issue hold up the release announcement for 8.0.35? There was
a user in #tomcat asking why it wasn't announced and was concerned
that the release had issues.
-Coty
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.o
> No. I just forgot to send out the announcement. I'll get that done shortly.
Cool, thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> It may have been branched in March, but wouldn't it have been branched from
> the 8.0 base? This change from 9.0 is not in the 8.5 code and the NPE still
> occurs.
No, 8.5 was branched from trunk and therefore included the revision
that you pointed out. Please see the dev list thread titled "T
2016-09-01 12:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> The proposed 8.0.37 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.37
+1
Unit tests pass on linux with tcnative 1.2.8 and my test suite looks good.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/09/2016
2016-08-31 19:21 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> The proposed 9.0.0.M10 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M10
+1
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote:
> The proposed 9.0.0.M10 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [ X ] Alpha - g
On 31/08/2016 21:48, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed 8.5.5 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.5.5
> [ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.5.5
> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.5
+1
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote:
>
Hi Micheal,
I hadn't heard of snaps (or used Ubuntu much) but the concept seems
interesting to me. Would you be able to send me links to what you have so
far so I can check it out? I have a few questions, but I'll reserve those
until I get a chance to review what you have.
Thanks!
On Sep 14, 201
Hi all,
I'm getting quite a few questions on freenode in #tomcat about the
versioning scheme for tomcat 9. I looked at the
http://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html page and it has some good
information there, but it doesn't mention what the milestone releases
are or how they fit into the alpha/b
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Violeta Georgieva
wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.72 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.72/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/re
s to convey the intent a bit better.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 15 September 2016 16:32:36 BST, Coty Sutherland
> wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I'm getting quite a few questions on freenode in #tomcat about the
>>versioning scheme for to
Ahh. That makes a lot more sense; thanks. I'll amend my patch and
attach it again in a bit.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/09/2016 13:59, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> I'm not sure where to file a bug for this, but I produced a first pass
>> at a
I did this to further demarcate Milestone releases from Alpha
releases. If this sounds good to everyone, I'll push it up.
Thanks!
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Jarosław Górny
wrote:
> 2016-09-16 15:52 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 16/09/2016 13:59, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>
My vote is non-binding, but...
2016-09-26 19:17 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> Version 1.2.10 includes the following change:
>
> - Update minimum recommended OpenSSL version to 1.0.2j
> - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2j
>
> The proposed release artefacts can be found at [1],
> and the buil
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Version 1.2.12 includes the following changes compared to 1.2.10:
>
> - Update minimum recommended OpenSSL version to 1.0.2k
> - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2k
> - Better documentation for building on Windows
> (including with FIPS
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/03/17 14:54, csuth...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: csutherl
>> Date: Wed Mar 1 14:54:38 2017
>> New Revision: 1784959
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1784959&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Follow up to r1784807.
>> Removing PushToken cla
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.12 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.11 release are:
>
> - Updates to the early access version of the Serlet 4.0 API to align it
> with the most recent discussions in
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.42 release is now available for voting.
>
> The main changes since 8.0.41 are:
>
> - Limited relaxation of the HTTP request line validation
>
> - Support for Java 9 during annotation scanning
>
> - Update Tomcat Na
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/03/17 19:57, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.12 release is now available for voting.
>>>
>>> The major change
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/03/17 14:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.76 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.76/
>> The Maven staging repo is:
>> ht
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.13 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.12 release are:
>
> - Various HTTP/2 improvements
>
> - Fixes for sendfile related issues that could cause subsequent requests
>
Hi all,
I see a good bit of discussion regarding testing trunk with java 9,
are we planning to test 8.5 with java 9 also? I've executed the unit
tests for both and see that there are quite a few more failures on 8.5
than there are for trunk, so it seems that we've been fixing trunk but
not 8.5.
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/03/17 16:56, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I see a good bit of discussion regarding testing trunk with java 9,
>> are we planning to test 8.5 with java 9 also? I've executed the unit
>>
Hi,
In order to improve my build process I'm looking at utilizing maven to
build tomcat rather than ant (maven works with an existing toolset,
whereas ant doesn't). Does anyone know of any groups that have tried
to do or are doing this, or any projects that I could look into? If
not, would anyone
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/03/17 18:09, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In order to improve my build process I'm looking at utilizing maven to
>> build tomcat rather than ant (maven works with an existing toolset,
>> whe
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Violeta Georgieva
wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.77 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.77/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/re
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.15 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.13 release are:
>
> - Various improvements to the handling of static custom error pages
>
> - Update to Eclipse JDT Compiler 4.6.3
>
On May 26, 2017 07:46, "Mark Thomas" wrote:
On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be
> removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up,
> and I was thinking that there doesn't seem to be a re
Just a quick question for clarity regarding APR tests...we're testing
against the openssl-1.0.2-stable branch, correct? That passes fine,
but testing against trunk fails a couple of tests:
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.openssl.ciphers.TestCipher.testAllOpenSSLCiphersMapped
junit.framework.AssertionF
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed 8.5.8 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [x] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.8
Unit tests look good and a few basic tests look good.
-
To unsubscri
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.39 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.39/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.73 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.73/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
> The proposed 8.5.9 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [x] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.9 (there's a typo here in the
> original email)
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additio
> That reference is correct. Tomcat 9 implements specs from Java EE 8.
Ah, I'll fix it. Sorry.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/12/2016 18:18, csuth...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: csutherl
>> Date: Wed Dec 21 18:18:32 2016
>> New Revision: 1775523
>>
>> URL: http://sv
Hi all,
I've been looking at the specifications listings on the
whichversions.html page and noticed JASPIC was missing, but is
implemented in 8.5+. I've added it on the site, but then I noticed
that it's also missing from the specifications page here:
https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/Specifications.
> Yes. We need you MoinMoin ID for the Tomcat wiki.
Ah. OK, I created an account for the wiki (I didn't see the sign up
link before). It's "Coty Sutherland", if you need that.
> BZ account name? I'll add you as an admin
Awesome, th
mas wrote:
> On 21/12/2016 20:15, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>>> Yes. We need you MoinMoin ID for the Tomcat wiki.
>>
>> Ah. OK, I created an account for the wiki (I didn't see the sign up
>> link before). It's "Coty Sutherland", if you need that.
>
> Is th
> 1). *.html are generated files. Do not edit them manually!
Got it, sorry. Fixed! Thanks for catching that.
> 2). Please add yourself to the following page:
Done.
Cheers,
-Coty
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomc
> I believe the committer names are sorted by family name...
> So probably you should not place yourself at last.
Yep, fixed.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@t
Hi all,
Do we intentionally ship the shell scripts along with the
tomcat-native and commons-daemon-native tarballs in bin for the
Windows distribution?
+++
$ ll apache-tomcat-7.0.73-windows-x64.zip/apache-tomcat-7.0.73/bin/ |
egrep '(tar.gz|sh)$'
-rw-r--r--. 1 coty coty 21646 Nov 7 23:29 catal
Congrats and welcome!
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 20/01/2017 à 18:12, Mark Thomas a écrit :
>> On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that
>> Emmanuel Bourg (ebourg) has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
>>
>> Please join me in welcomin
2017-01-19 1:07 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.41 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.41/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o
2017-01-18 23:45 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.75 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.75/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
Thanks for the suggestions; I implemented them in http://svn.apache.org/r1782240
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/02/17 18:13, csuth...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: csutherl
>> Date: Tue Feb 7 18:13:40 2017
>> New Revision: 1782037
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/vi
> LGTM. Thanks for seeing this through.
Awesome, no problem :)
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/02/17 19:42, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestions; I implemented them in
>> http://svn.apache.org/r1782240
>
>
> LGT
Can anyone get the validate task to show this error? I think I know
what the problem is, but my local `ant validate` shows no problems...
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more informat
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:19 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> Version 1.2.18 includes the following changes compared to 1.2.17:
>
> - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2p and APR 1.6.5
> - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.1.1 and APR 1.6.5
> - TLSv1.3 support when built with OpenSSL 1.1.1
>
> V
I had a trivial comment that I put on the GitHub commit :) Otherwise that
looks OK to me.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:55 AM Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting to review embedded. Maybe I won't make many changes in the end
> and won't need a separate API.
>
> However, I have another post
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 12:11 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.13 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 9.0.13 release are:
>
> - support for TLSv1.3 when used with a JRE or OPenSSl version that
> supports it
>
> - added support for encr
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:34 AM Violeta Georgieva
wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.92 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.92/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:00 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> Version 1.2.19 includes the following changes compared to 1.2.18:
>
> - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2q and APR 1.6.5
> - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.1.1a and APR 1.6.5
> - Fixed memory leak associated with OCSP
> - Fix an
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:37 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.14 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 9.0.13 release are:
>
> - Significant expansion of localisation support with the addition of
> Brazilian Portuguese, Korean and Chines
Hi,
I made a bunch of changes to the JK site yesterday so that it uses the
updated Tomcat site's stylesheets to unify the UI between the two project
sites. Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to deploy it. The
HOWTO-RELEASE.txt doc says to copy the build/docs output
to people.apache.org:/x1/www/
Thanks!
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:22 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/12/2018 17:16, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I made a bunch of changes to the JK site yesterday so that it uses the
> > updated Tomcat site's stylesheets to unify the UI between the t
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 18:21 Mark Thomas +1
>
> Very nice.
Thanks! I'm glad I was about to sort out the link problem. Apparently it
was broken before I touched it :) There is a bunch of other little stuff to
fix and some doc updates so I'll be pushing more things as I have time.
> Mark
>
>
> On
On Nov 17, 2017 06:24, "Rainer Jung" wrote:
Am 15.11.2017 um 12:03 schrieb Mark Thomas:
> Version 1.2.16 includes the following changes compared to 1.2.14:
>
> - Update minimum recommended OpenSSL version to 1.0.2m
> - Update minimum recommended APR version to 1.6.3
> - Windows binaries built wi
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.24 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.23 release are:
>
> - Java 9 is fully supported
>
> - Fixed a number of HTTP/2 issues
>
> - Fixed numerous JASPIC issues with patch
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.2 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 9.0.1 release are:
>
> - Java 9 is fully supported
>
> - Fixed numerous JASPIC issues with patches from Lazar
>
> - Update the packaged
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 05/12/2017 à 21:03, Mark Thomas a écrit :
>
>> and then migrate /trunk, /tags and /branches to git, leaving the rest in
>> place. Most will stay there. Some components may move to git in the future.
>
> The goal is to put all Tomcat versio
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Violeta Georgieva
wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.48 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.48/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/re
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.83 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.83/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/rep
This is a question for the users list, not the developers list. From
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-dev:
"This development list is only for discussion of changes to the Apache
Tomcat source code and related issues. Other questions will be
ignored."
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:05 AM, San
On Jan 8, 2018 09:33, "Mark Thomas" wrote:
This is the third of the per issue e-mails to discuss the issues
associated with migrating from svn to git.
The standard name for the main branch where development takes place in
svn is 'trunk'. In git the standard name is 'master'.
We can use either o
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.3 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 9.0.2 release are:
>
> - Modify the Default and WebDAV Servlets so that a 405 status code is
> returned for PUT and DELETE requests wh
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This issue might have resolved itself. We currently only have open PRs
> on the apache/tomcat github repo. Assuming that repo would be made
> read/write (I'm checking with infra) then there isn't a problem.
>
> If anyone opnes a PR on o
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 3:14 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.4 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 9.0.2 release are:
>
> - Modify the Default and WebDAV Servlets so that a 405 status code is
> returned for PUT and DELETE requests wh
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.27 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.24 release are:
>
> - Add support for GZIP compression with HTTP/2
>
> - Expand the TLS functionality exposed via the Manager appli
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Violeta Georgieva
wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.84 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.84/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/re
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.49 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.49/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/rep
I think this is the right thread to add this :)
Given that we will be able to accept PRs on Github after this
migration, do we want to add a Travis (or other CI) configuration to
our repository so that it will do a test build (and maybe test one
connector) when someone proposes a pull? Doing that
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Coty,
>
> On 1/24/18 1:34 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> I think this is the right thread to add this :)
>>
>> Given that we will be abl
Congratulations and Welcome Woonsan!
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 9:08 PM Keiichi Fujino wrote:
> Congratulations!
> Welcome Woonsan!
>
> 2018年12月19日(水) 18:56 Mark Thomas :
>
> > On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that
> > Woonsan Ko (woonsan) has been voted in as a new Tomca
Hi all,
Is there some reason why we use apr-${TCNATIVE_MAJOR_VERSION} as the
include directory instead of tomcat-native? I just pushed
http://svn.apache.org/r1849428 so that make now copies the header files
into _includedir, and noticed that the directory is named 'apr' rather than
'tomcat-native'
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 4:57 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/12/2018 19:51, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is there some reason why we use apr-${TCNATIVE_MAJOR_VERSION} as the
> > include directory instead of tomcat-native? I just pushed
> > http://svn
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:06 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/01/2019 19:53, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 4:57 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 20/12/2018 19:51, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Is t
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:13 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> This is a VOTE to migrate the primary source code repository for Apache
> Tomcat 9.0.x, 8.5.x and 7.0.x from svn to git.
>
> The migration will be performed as per:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TOMCAT/Git+migration
>
> with th
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 6:10 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 28/02/2019 à 11:47, Rainer Jung a écrit :
> > Thanks a bunch. Looks like what I was searching for, will try it.
> >
> > Rainer
>
> You could play with a single repository too:
>
+1, that's what I do.
>
> # Initial setup
> cd ~/repo
The email notifications work for when we push commits to the repository,
but it looks like we're missing emails when PRs are opened.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:03 AM Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:09 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> > On 27/02/2019 09:44, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > >
Hi,
I updated the BUILDING and CONTRIBUTING documents so that GitHub users no
longer see instructions for SVN after our migration, however I had a few
questions. Does anyone know of a git equivalent to svn:eol-style that we
should be using? It is mentioned in the "git-svn quirks" section of
https:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:39 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> It is early days but my impression is that the move to git has triggered
> an increase in conversations that end up split between a GitHub PR and
> Bugzilla.
>
> Personally, I'm not finding it unmanageable at this point but it does
> feel a lit
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:14 AM Coty Sutherland
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:39 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> It is early days but my impression is that the move to git has triggered
>> an increase in conversations that end up split between a GitHub PR and
>> Bugzill
Hi,
I'm looking into commons-daemon in Tomcat and it appears that the Windows
executables (prunsrv and prunmgr) don't require the commons-daemon.jar to
run Tomcat like the *nix binary (jsvc) does. Can someone confirm that (I
tested it and it seems to work fine without the jar)? If it's unused I ca
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:58 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.40 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.39 release are:
>
> - Fix for CVE-2019-0232 a RCE vulnerability on Windows
>
> - Add support for Java 11 to the JSP compiler. Java
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 9:44 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.18 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 9.0.17 release are:
>
> - Fix for CVE-2019-0232 a RCE vulnerability on Windows
>
> - Add support for Java 11 to the JSP compiler. Java
Are these svn commits intentional? I thought the svn repo was read-only now.
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:47 AM wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Fri Apr 12 14:47:16 2019
> New Revision: 33591
>
> Log:
> Upload 9.0.19 for voting
>
> Added:
> dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/v9.0.19/
> dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:29 AM Coty Sutherland
wrote:
> Are these svn commits intentional? I thought the svn repo was read-only
> now.
>
Disregard that :)
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:47 AM wrote:
>
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Fri Apr 12 14:47:16 2019
&g
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.19 release is now available for voting.
> 9.0.19 corrects a regression and a number of packaging errors in 9.0.18.
>
> The major changes compared to the 9.0.17 release are:
>
> - Fix for CVE-2019-0232 a RCE vulne
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 5:21 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> 4 Feb 2023 04:17:29 Bailey Brownie :
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Recently, when setting up Tomcat for development with the Eclipse IDE,
> > I noticed that the configuration files that come with Tomcat had
> > multiple hard-coded (and outdated) refer
Hi there,
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 6:01 PM Graham Leggett
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A while back I added unix domain socket support to tomcat-native, and
> patched tomcat to use it until java16 is available.
>
> Unfortunately unix domain socket support was removed from tomcat-native
> 2.0+, and now tom
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 8:37 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The latest Java 21 EA build has moved virtual threads (from project
> Loom) out of preview. How do we want to handle this in Tomcat 11? Recall
> that Jakarta EE 11 has set Java 21 as the minimum version.
>
> I think we have the follo
This commit is problematic :( It's broken some projects that depend on
Tomcat because now the tomcat-coyote.jar doesn't contain the
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.jsse or org.apache.tomcat.util.modeler.modules
packages which results in ClassNotFoundExceptions. I haven't seen any
issues with other jars
Hi Mark,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 4:48 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/07/2020 18:20, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> > This commit is problematic :( It's broken some projects that depend on
> > Tomcat because now the tomcat-coyote.jar doesn't contain the
> > org
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 7:52 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/07/2020 12:43, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 4:48 AM Mark Thomas > <mailto:ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > On 20/07/2020 18:20, Coty Sutherlan
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 9:15 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/07/2020 14:06, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>
>
>
> > Oh yeah, you're right. They were included in the ASF binaries, but
> > Fedora (and Debian I guess) built their own bits and that's where the
> > c
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
