[Bug 69568] New: past papers offer a concise and direct route to revision. Focused preparation on specific topics ensures students are ready for any question.

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69568 Bug ID: 69568 Summary: past papers offer a concise and direct route to revision. Focused preparation on specific topics ensures students are ready for any question

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

On 30/08/2024 08:01, Felix Schumacher wrote: Am 29.08.24 um 18:29 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 29/08/2024 15:34, Felix Schumacher wrote: While I don't object to buying a license, I would love to know, which diagram you looked at and what exactly did not work out. (the activation stuff in mermai

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

Am 29.08.24 um 18:29 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 29/08/2024 15:34, Felix Schumacher wrote: While I don't object to buying a license, I would love to know, which diagram you looked at and what exactly did not work out. (the activation stuff in mermaid is brittle, but I think I managed to get th

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

Mark, On 8/29/24 12:29, Mark Thomas wrote: On 29/08/2024 15:34, Felix Schumacher wrote: While I don't object to buying a license, I would love to know, which diagram you looked at and what exactly did not work out. (the activation stuff in mermaid is brittle, but I think I managed to get t

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

Mark, On 8/29/24 09:14, Mark Thomas wrote: On 29/08/2024 14:02, Christopher Schultz wrote: Felix, On 8/29/24 05:06, Felix Schumacher wrote: Am 25. August 2024 10:36:44 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas : All, You have probably seen that I am working on updating the UML diagrams we have in the arc

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

On 29/08/2024 17:29, Mark Thomas wrote: On 29/08/2024 15:34, Felix Schumacher wrote: Another alternative to use would be umlet (https://www.umlet.com/), which I used way back, but haven't looked at lately. I'll take a look. The Eclipse plug-in didn't seem to do anything and the online to

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

On 29/08/2024 15:34, Felix Schumacher wrote: While I don't object to buying a license, I would love to know, which diagram you looked at and what exactly did not work out. (the activation stuff in mermaid is brittle, but I think I managed to get them all right) I couldn't find a way to get

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

Am 29.08.24 um 13:08 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 29/08/2024 11:36, Mark Thomas wrote: On 29/08/2024 10:06, Felix Schumacher wrote: Am 25. August 2024 10:36:44 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas : Thoughts? Personally, I am leaning towards spending the $99 so we can remove the watermark from the Tomca

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

On 29/08/2024 14:02, Christopher Schultz wrote: Felix, On 8/29/24 05:06, Felix Schumacher wrote: Am 25. August 2024 10:36:44 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas : All, You have probably seen that I am working on updating the UML diagrams we have in the architecture section of the Tomcat documentation

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

Felix, On 8/29/24 05:06, Felix Schumacher wrote: Am 25. August 2024 10:36:44 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas : All, You have probably seen that I am working on updating the UML diagrams we have in the architecture section of the Tomcat documentation. The original diagrams were written in IBM Rati

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

On 29/08/2024 11:36, Mark Thomas wrote: On 29/08/2024 10:06, Felix Schumacher wrote: Am 25. August 2024 10:36:44 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas : Thoughts? Personally, I am leaning towards spending the $99 so we can remove the watermark from the Tomcat docs. Have you thought about using a too

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

On 29/08/2024 10:06, Felix Schumacher wrote: Am 25. August 2024 10:36:44 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas : Thoughts? Personally, I am leaning towards spending the $99 so we can remove the watermark from the Tomcat docs. Have you thought about using a tool like plantuml or mermaid-js? I did lo

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

Am 25. August 2024 10:36:44 MESZ schrieb Mark Thomas : >All, > >You have probably seen that I am working on updating the UML diagrams we have >in the architecture section of the Tomcat documentation. > >The original diagrams were written in IBM Rational Rose. They were donated by >a contributo

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 6:05 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 26/08/2024 15:41, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > > > >> Personally, I am leaning towards spending the $99 so we can remove the > >> watermark from the Tomcat docs. > > > > 1. $99 is nothing, even if it ends up being tied to a single person

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

On 26/08/2024 15:41, Christopher Schultz wrote: Personally, I am leaning towards spending the $99 so we can remove the watermark from the Tomcat docs. 1. $99 is nothing, even if it ends up being tied to a single person. I've been thinking about this some more and I'd prefer the floating l

Re: [QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

Mark, On 8/25/24 04:36, Mark Thomas wrote: All, You have probably seen that I am working on updating the UML diagrams we have in the architecture section of the Tomcat documentation. The original diagrams were written in IBM Rational Rose. They were donated by a contributor. I don't thnk an

[QUESTION] Purchase UML tool using Google security funding

All, You have probably seen that I am working on updating the UML diagrams we have in the architecture section of the Tomcat documentation. The original diagrams were written in IBM Rational Rose. They were donated by a contributor. I don't thnk any committer ever had access to a license for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.84 [test-failure question]

On 16/11/2022 16:48, Christopher Schultz wrote: All, I'm getting a test failure on Windows for this test: TEST-javax.servlet.http.TestHttpServletDoHeadValidWrite513.NIO.txt Looking at the log file, it seems to be complaining that it can't clean-up after itself: Testsuite: javax.servlet.htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.5.84 [test-failure question]

All, I'm getting a test failure on Windows for this test: TEST-javax.servlet.http.TestHttpServletDoHeadValidWrite513.NIO.txt Looking at the log file, it seems to be complaining that it can't clean-up after itself: Testsuite: javax.servlet.http.TestHttpServletDoHeadValidWrite513 Tests run: 2

Re: Question about the log variable in Filters

Well, actually the Filter class will only be loaded once by the common classloader, to ensure that the latest log configuration in the webapp is used, we have to remove the static modifier to ensure that the log instance is recreated with the new configuration (if the configuration changes). Th

Re: Question about the log variable in Filters

ср, 31 авг. 2022 г. в 13:25, tianshuang : > > Hi, > > In this commit > , > the static modifier was removed from the log variable in the Filters class, > but I don't understand why it needs to be removed. As far as

Question about the log variable in Filters

Hi, In this commit , the static modifier was removed from the log variable in the Filters class, but I don't understand why it needs to be removed. As far as I know, when a class is loaded by different classLoade

Re: Question ad using System.gc()

sical" tag handlers. This would work only for BSF script engines (the Apache scripting framework that predates the official Java scripting framework javax.script a.k.a. jsr223) as there terminate() is available. The question: would you see a problem in employing System.gc() independent of

Re: Question ad using System.gc()

ooling provided by the JSP specification / Tag Extension API for "classical" tag handlers. > > The question: would you see a problem in employing System.gc() independent of > the JVM and/or Tomcat? > Theoretically it may be invoked every second or two (unless of course the >

Question ad using System.gc()

of a ScriptEngine that serves as the peer for a native programming language instance would employ a System.gc() in the case that 100 or more such unreferenced ScriptEngines exist in the currently running JVM. The question: would you see a problem in employing System.gc() independent of the JVM and/or T

RE: Question

Thank you so much Mark!!! Yesterday was a PEBKAC day. Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com) From: Mark Thomas Sent: Feb 4, 2021 1:57 AM To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Question On 04/02/2021 05:04, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote

Re: Question

On 04/02/2021 05:04, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > Hi Folks! Another wild and crazy question. > > So, Tomcat 10.0.2. I see that it uses Jakarta EE 9, and the README states it > requires at least Java 8. So, will it run just fine on Java 1.8x or does the > Jakarta

Question

Hi Folks! Another wild and crazy question. So, Tomcat 10.0.2. I see that it uses Jakarta EE 9, and the README states it requires at least Java 8. So, will it run just fine on Java 1.8x or does the Jakarta EE 1.9 have to be installed? Thanks, Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire Jon McAlexander

Re: 10.0.x Release Question

On 23/01/2021 16:59, Volodymyr Siedlecki wrote: > Hello, > > Since 10.0.0 is still in beta, is there an expected timeframe of a non-beta > release? > Will it be 10.0.1 or another future release? That depends on how the community votes on the 10.0.1 release. Personally, I think 10.0.x is stable b

10.0.x Release Question

Hello, Since 10.0.0 is still in beta, is there an expected timeframe of a non-beta release? Will it be 10.0.1 or another future release? Thank you for your help, Volodymyr

RE: Migration Guide question

your cooperation. > -Original Message- > From: Mark Thomas > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 1:59 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Migration Guide question > > On 11/01/2021 05:04, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > > Quick question

Re: Migration Guide question

On 11/01/2021 05:04, jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com.INVALID wrote: > Quick question. > > In looking at the Migration Guides, there is a guide for going from 7.0x to > 8.0x and a guide for going from 8.0x to 8.5x. However, there isn't a guide > for going from Tomcat 7x to 8.5x

Migration Guide question

Quick question. In looking at the Migration Guides, there is a guide for going from 7.0x to 8.0x and a guide for going from 8.0x to 8.5x. However, there isn't a guide for going from Tomcat 7x to 8.5x. With 7.0 going EOL at the end of March, is there any hope of a migration plan for devel

Re: Question regarding PoEditor

On 18/04/2020 06:51, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello, > > some time ago Mark announce the ability to use POEditor so users can > contribute translations > > I have started to import Apache OpenMeetings strings to PoEditor to > provide our users easier way to contribute > But found our strings doe

Question regarding PoEditor

Hello, some time ago Mark announce the ability to use POEditor so users can contribute translations I have started to import Apache OpenMeetings strings to PoEditor to provide our users easier way to contribute But found our strings doesn't fit into Free plan :( Can you share how you were able t

Re: Question Regarding McastServiceImpl#setupSocket

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Gurkan, On Thursday, May 30th, 2019, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > In macOS test server, when configuring the mcastBindAddress as > 192.168.1.139 and address as 228.0.0.4 , the code does not use > mcastBindAddress , instead it uses multicast addre

Re: Question Regarding McastServiceImpl#setupSocket

Hi ChrisIn  macOS test server, when configuring the mcastBindAddress as 192.168.1.139 and address as 228.0.0.4 , the code does not use mcastBindAddress , instead it uses multicast  address for socket binding and throws exception when sending the datagram packet. Here is the exception: Exception

Re: Question Regarding McastServiceImpl#setupSocket

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Gurkan, On 5/29/19 02:28, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > Hi In an McastServiceImpl#setupSocket method, if the user > configures the mcastBindAddress, it will use the socket to bind to > this address. But, in the code below, it uses the "address" field > wh

Question Regarding McastServiceImpl#setupSocket

HiIn an McastServiceImpl#setupSocket method, if the user configures the mcastBindAddress, it will use the socket to bind to this address. But, in the code below, it uses the "address" field while creating the socket. Is this correct ? if (mcastBindAddress != null) {  try {     log.i

Re: commons-daemon packaging question

пт, 5 апр. 2019 г. в 22:48, Coty Sutherland : > > Hi, > > I'm looking into commons-daemon in Tomcat and it appears that the Windows > executables (prunsrv and prunmgr) don't require the commons-daemon.jar to > run Tomcat like the *nix binary (jsvc) does. Can someone confirm that (I > tested it and

commons-daemon packaging question

Hi, I'm looking into commons-daemon in Tomcat and it appears that the Windows executables (prunsrv and prunmgr) don't require the commons-daemon.jar to run Tomcat like the *nix binary (jsvc) does. Can someone confirm that (I tested it and it seems to work fine without the jar)? If it's unused I ca

Re: 8.5.38 release date question

On 28/01/2019 18:27, Matt Stoddart wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for all the development support. Is there an expected release date > for 8.5.38? My company is significantly impacted by > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63022 and we're eager to > release a fix. Tag is expected early

8.5.38 release date question

Hi all, Thanks for all the development support. Is there an expected release date for 8.5.38? My company is significantly impacted by https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63022 and we're eager to release a fix. Thanks, --Matt

Re: Bug 62140 implementation question

My only thought was the single-source value. If it would be a lot of extra work to do the text file, then I think the original design is fine. Mitch On 10/02/2018 09:56 AM, Marek Czernek wrote: Well, I personally would prefer if it was  a soure-able (or call-able for windows) script; otherwi

Re: Bug 62140 implementation question

Well, I personally would prefer if it was  a soure-able (or call-able for windows) script; otherwise, you'd have to parse the text file to check which part of the text you want to output, since you don't want to output all the text at once, but only for one particular verb. Any particular bene

Re: Bug 62140 implementation question

Are the available verbs the same for both .sh and .bat? If so, perhaps a text file that contains the actual help text that could be output from both .bat and .sh. Mitch On 10/01/2018 02:48 PM, Marek Czernek wrote: Hi there, I'd like to resolve Bug 62140 [0]. I just wanted to gather some opi

Bug 62140 implementation question

Hi there, I'd like to resolve Bug 62140 [0]. I just wanted to gather some opinions about the implementation details. In my mind, the following solution is quite reasonable: 1. Create new help scripts, such as help.sh and help.bat. These files contain a method for each functional verb that

Re: Question about r1780601

2017-03-21 17:45 GMT+01:00 Violeta Georgieva : > Hi, > > I was checking some back ports related to bug 60897. > This [1] was not back ported to the older versions. > Do we really want it only for Tomcat 9? > It can now be backported since nobody complained about it, although it will increase code

Question about r1780601

Hi, I was checking some back ports related to bug 60897. This [1] was not back ported to the older versions. Do we really want it only for Tomcat 9? Regards, Violeta [1] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1780601

Re: Question on submitting bugs/patches for multiple versions of Tomcat

On 18/01/2017 10:48, Michael Orr wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've submitted a patch for Tomcat 7 (bug #60597) and have patches > prepared for 8.5 and 9 as well. Do I just attach these patch files to > the same bug in Bugzilla or should I create two new bugs - one for > each major version of Tomcat? J

Question on submitting bugs/patches for multiple versions of Tomcat

Hi folks, I've submitted a patch for Tomcat 7 (bug #60597) and have patches prepared for 8.5 and 9 as well. Do I just attach these patch files to the same bug in Bugzilla or should I create two new bugs - one for each major version of Tomcat? Thanks, Michael ---

Re: Question about Windows zip distro

On 09/01/2017 18:24, Coty Sutherland wrote: > Hi all, > > Do we intentionally ship the shell scripts along with the > tomcat-native and commons-daemon-native tarballs in bin for the > Windows distribution? Yes. The only variation is the difference in line-endings. I believe the intention is to

Question about Windows zip distro

Hi all, Do we intentionally ship the shell scripts along with the tomcat-native and commons-daemon-native tarballs in bin for the Windows distribution? +++ $ ll apache-tomcat-7.0.73-windows-x64.zip/apache-tomcat-7.0.73/bin/ | egrep '(tar.gz|sh)$' -rw-r--r--. 1 coty coty 21646 Nov 7 23:29 catal

Re: a small question of org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester

On 12/12/2016 12:01, 储巍 wrote: > Hi！ > > when I read the code of Tomcat 9. I have the following question. > > CLass：org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester > Method：endDocument() > > What's the purpose of the following code block. I think it is same as >

a small question of org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester

Hi！ when I read the code of Tomcat 9. I have the following question. CLass：org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester Method：endDocument() What's the purpose of the following code block. I think it is same as "stack.clear()" in method clear(). while (getCount

Re: Question about AccessLog.setRequestAttributesEnabled

On 17/11/2016 09:06, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > There is an issue [1] about an incorrect javadoc > for org.apache.catalina.AccessLog.setRequestAttributesEnabled > > I have a question about the default value. > > With the following change [2], back in 2

Question about AccessLog.setRequestAttributesEnabled

Hi, There is an issue [1] about an incorrect javadoc for org.apache.catalina.AccessLog.setRequestAttributesEnabled I have a question about the default value. With the following change [2], back in 2011, the default for all implementations was set to "true". But with change [3] the def

Re: Question about o.a.t.util.digester.Digester.useContextClassLoader

On 13/09/2016 17:24, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > There are places in org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester that do not > consider useContextClassLoader. > I would like to ask whether this is intentional or I can change that and > use the provided classloader when useContextClassLoader is

Question about o.a.t.util.digester.Digester.useContextClassLoader

Hi, There are places in org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester that do not consider useContextClassLoader. I would like to ask whether this is intentional or I can change that and use the provided classloader when useContextClassLoader is false. Thanks a lot, Violeta

Re: question regarding current versioning scheme

On 09/09/2016 17:32, Jarosław Górny wrote: > Hi, > > I need to write a piece of code for the tool I'm working on, to > compare Tomcat version strings ;) I've been advised on #tomcat channel > to ask here, so here I am. Please forgive me, but I haven't found > relevant information on the homepage /

question regarding current versioning scheme

Hi, I need to write a piece of code for the tool I'm working on, to compare Tomcat version strings ;) I've been advised on #tomcat channel to ask here, so here I am. Please forgive me, but I haven't found relevant information on the homepage / docs. I see that for 9.x branch there are the builds

[Bug 57670] Question about javaEncoding of a generated-from-jsp java file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57670 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 57670] New: Question about javaEncoding of a generated-from-jsp java file

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57670 Bug ID: 57670 Summary: Question about javaEncoding of a generated-from-jsp java file Product: Tomcat 7 Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Linux

Re: Question about taglibs. Issue 37466

> On Feb 18, 2015, at 3:10 AM, Stephan van Loendersloot (LIST) > wrote: > > Hi Konstantin, Jeremy, > > Yes I can provide a simple example shortly... > > Apologies for breaking the first rule of questioning: provide all details > about operating system, container, libraries, etc. > > Would i

Re: Question about taglibs. Issue 37466

wrote: On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:34 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > > 2015-02-14 20:04 GMT+03:00 Stephan van Loendersloot (LIST) > : >> Hi everyone, >> >> I have a question about this issue: >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37466 >> >> I

Re: Question about taglibs. Issue 37466

On Feb 17, 2015, at 8:23 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > > On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:34 AM, Konstantin Kolinko > wrote: >> >> 2015-02-14 20:04 GMT+03:00 Stephan van Loendersloot (LIST) >> : >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I have a question about this iss

Re: Question about taglibs. Issue 37466

On Feb 17, 2015, at 4:34 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > > 2015-02-14 20:04 GMT+03:00 Stephan van Loendersloot (LIST) > : >> Hi everyone, >> >> I have a question about this issue: >> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37466 >> >> I

Re: Question about taglibs. Issue 37466

2015-02-14 20:04 GMT+03:00 Stephan van Loendersloot (LIST) : > Hi everyone, > > I have a question about this issue: > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37466 > > I tried to switch to the latest Tomcat TagLibs implementation, but due to > this fixed bug, it s

Question about taglibs. Issue 37466

Hi everyone, I have a question about this issue: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37466 I tried to switch to the latest Tomcat TagLibs implementation, but due to this fixed bug, it seems that posted form parameters aren't visible anymore in relative pages imported by

Re: Question of new SessionIdGenerator implementation.

2014-10-14 16:17 GMT+04:00 Konstantin Kolinko : > 2014-10-14 10:12 GMT+04:00 Keiichi Fujino : >> I have a question of new SessionIdGenerator implementation. >> If reloading Manager( or Context), SessionIdGenerator is re-created based >> on sessionIdGeneratorClass that

Re: Question of new SessionIdGenerator implementation.

2014-10-14 10:12 GMT+04:00 Keiichi Fujino : > I have a question of new SessionIdGenerator implementation. > If reloading Manager( or Context), SessionIdGenerator is re-created based > on sessionIdGeneratorClass that is cached to Manager. > However, attributes of jvmRoute and session

Question of new SessionIdGenerator implementation.

I have a question of new SessionIdGenerator implementation. If reloading Manager( or Context), SessionIdGenerator is re-created based on sessionIdGeneratorClass that is cached to Manager. However, attributes of jvmRoute and sessionIdLength are default value. I think these attributes are need to

Re: tomcat staging 8.0.0 RC7 question

Cool! Thank you, Ludo On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 17/12/2013 00:47, Ludovic Champenois wrote: > > Hi, > > I see there is a maven staging repo at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-047 > > > > but it seems I am missing the 2 artifa

Re: tomcat staging 8.0.0 RC7 question

On 17/12/2013 00:47, Ludovic Champenois wrote: > Hi, > I see there is a maven staging repo at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-047 > > but it seems I am missing the 2 artifacts: > The POM for org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler:ecj:jar:4.3.1 is missing, no > dependenc

tomcat staging 8.0.0 RC7 question

Hi, I see there is a maven staging repo at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-047 but it seems I am missing the 2 artifacts: The POM for org.eclipse.jdt.core.compiler:ecj:jar:4.3.1 is missing, no dependency information available The POM for org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-

Re: Couple of question about javax.el.BeanELResolver

2013/7/11 Mark Thomas wrote: > > On 11/07/2013 13:49, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have the following question about: > > > > 1. Method setValue > > There is some mismatch in the javadoc. In the method description there is > > the foll

Re: Couple of question about javax.el.BeanELResolver

2013/7/11 Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > > 2013/7/11 Violeta Georgieva : > > Hi, > > > > I have the following question about: > > > > 1. Method setValue > > There is some mismatch in the javadoc. In the method description there is > > the following sta

Re: Couple of question about javax.el.BeanELResolver

On 11/07/2013 13:49, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > I have the following question about: > > 1. Method setValue > There is some mismatch in the javadoc. In the method description there is > the following statement: > > "If the property exists bu

Re: Couple of question about javax.el.BeanELResolver

2013/7/11 Violeta Georgieva : > Hi, > > I have the following question about: > > 1. Method setValue > There is some mismatch in the javadoc. In the method description there is > the following statement: > > "If the property exists but does not have a setter, then

Couple of question about javax.el.BeanELResolver

Hi, I have the following question about: 1. Method setValue There is some mismatch in the javadoc. In the method description there is the following statement: "If the property exists but does not have a setter, then a PropertyNotFoundException is thrown." But the throws cla

[Bug 54942] a design question of websocket

|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Chuck Caldarale --- Bugzilla is not a question and answer forum. Post your query on the Tomcat users' mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for th

[Bug 54942] New: a design question of websocket

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54942 Bug ID: 54942 Summary: a design question of websocket Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.39 Hardware: PC OS: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: Question for the loader used in o.a.t.util.scan.StandardJarScanner

On 21/03/2013 08:09, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > 2013/3/20 Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 20/03/2013 13:55, Violeta Georgieva wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a question for the loader that is used in >>> o.a.t.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.scan(ServletContext, C

Re: Question for the loader used in o.a.t.util.scan.StandardJarScanner

2013/3/20 Mark Thomas wrote: > On 20/03/2013 13:55, Violeta Georgieva wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a question for the loader that is used in >> o.a.t.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.scan(ServletContext, ClassLoader, >> JarScannerCallback, Set) (7.0.x trunk). >>

Re: Question for the loader used in o.a.t.util.scan.StandardJarScanner

On 20/03/2013 13:55, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question for the loader that is used in > o.a.t.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.scan(ServletContext, ClassLoader, > JarScannerCallback, Set) (7.0.x trunk). > > Why don't we use the loader that is provided as

Question for the loader used in o.a.t.util.scan.StandardJarScanner

Hi, I have a question for the loader that is used in o.a.t.util.scan.StandardJarScanner.scan(ServletContext, ClassLoader, JarScannerCallback, Set) (7.0.x trunk). Why don't we use the loader that is provided as a method parameter, but instead of this we are using the thread context class l

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

On Mar 9, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Nick Williams wrote: > >> >> On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> >>> Renaming the method is fine. >>> >>> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to >> then it is fine. >>> >>> Mark >> >> Look at you t

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

Nick Williams wrote: > >On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Renaming the method is fine. >> >> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to >then it is fine. >> >> Mark > >Look at you top-posting. :-P :-) Sorry. Mobile client wasn't configured properly

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

2013/3/10 Nick Williams : > > On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > >> Renaming the method is fine. >> >> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it >> is fine. >> >> Mark > > Look at you top-posting. :-P > > You replied just as I was. I deprecated getF

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > Renaming the method is fine. > > We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it > is fine. > > Mark Look at you top-posting. :-P You replied just as I was. I deprecated getFilename and wrapped it around getSubmit

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Nick Williams wrote: > I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in > SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1]. > > o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename method that accomplishes > this that is not part of the interface but IS public. This method is

Re: Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

Renaming the method is fine. We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it is fine. Mark Nick Williams wrote: >I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in >SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1]. > >o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename metho

Question on SERVLET_SPEC-57 (getSubmittedFileName)

I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1]. o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename method that accomplishes this that is not part of the interface but IS public. This method is used only in o.a.c.connector.Request (once), but that's eas

Re: Question about bug 51526

On 11/02/2013 18:23, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to work on this enhancement request [1]. > What do you think? Is it Ok to provide implementation for it in Tomcat 7? For addWebapp, processing META-INF/context.xml seems reasonable to me. I don't have an issue with that feature

Question about bug 51526

Hi, I would like to work on this enhancement request [1]. What do you think? Is it Ok to provide implementation for it in Tomcat 7? Thanks Violeta [1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51526 - To unsubscribe, e

RE: Tomcat 8 question

Thanks, Mark. Also, thanks Violeta for pointing out Mark's slides where he mentions JSP 2.3. Nick On 20/01/2013 07:14, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > 2013/1/20 Williams, Nick > >> So, will Tomcat 8 be targeted for EE 7, or will it wait until >> JSP-next comes out, even if that takes a good d

Re: Tomcat 8 question

On 20/01/2013 07:14, Violeta Georgieva wrote: > Hi, > > 2013/1/20 Williams, Nick > >> So, will Tomcat 8 be targeted for EE 7, or will it wait until JSP-next >> comes out, even if that takes a good deal longer than EE 7? >> >> Also, I know that a lot depends on the timeline of EE 7, but now that t

Re: Tomcat 8 question

Hi, 2013/1/20 Williams, Nick > So, will Tomcat 8 be targeted for EE 7, or will it wait until JSP-next > comes out, even if that takes a good deal longer than EE 7? > > Also, I know that a lot depends on the timeline of EE 7, but now that that > date is approaching, do we have a GENERAL timeframe

Tomcat 8 question

Back in August 2011 (a long time ago, I know) Mark wrote a blog posting about Tomcat 8 and Java 7: http://www.tomcatexpert.com/blog/2011/08/25/apache-tomcat-8-and-java-7-will-they-work-together In it, he said "We create a new major version of Tomcat when there are new versions of three specific

Re: Question about a change in the el-api in v7.0.14

Mark, thanks for the prompt answer, and yes I do know now why the change was made. Le 07/01/2013 11:20, Mark Thomas a écrit : > On 07/01/2013 10:03, Emmanuel Poitier wrote: >> All, >> >> This is my first post for the Tomcat project, and I do hope it is the >> right pla

  1   2   3   >