On Mar 9, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:

> Renaming the method is fine.
> 
> We don't change the API for the sake of it but if there is a need to then it 
> is fine.
> 
> Mark

Look at you top-posting. :-P

You replied just as I was. I deprecated getFilename and wrapped it around 
getSubmittedFileName and submitted patch via bug #54658.

Let me know if I should just remove it and re-submit patch.

Nick

> 
> Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
> 
>> I'm implementing the Part#getSubmittedFileName method introduced in
>> SERVLET_SPEC-57 [1].
>> 
>> o.a.c.core.ApplicationPart already has a getFilename method that
>> accomplishes this that is not part of the interface but IS public. This
>> method is used only in o.a.c.connector.Request (once), but that's easy
>> to change. The concern is that renaming this method might break
>> applications that depend on the old method name (despite the fact that
>> using Tomcat proprietary code makes their application non-portable). Is
>> it a problem to rename this method in a new major version, or should
>> Part have both methods, with one calling the other?
>> 
>> [1] http://java.net/jira/browse/SERVLET_SPEC-57
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to