On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 6:05 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 26/08/2024 15:41, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > <snip/> > > >> Personally, I am leaning towards spending the $99 so we can remove the > >> watermark from the Tomcat docs. > > > > 1. $99 is nothing, even if it ends up being tied to a single person. > > I've been thinking about this some more and I'd prefer the floating > license since that is what we really want - so anyone on the PMC can use > it. There might be a few hoops to jump through to use it but I think it > is worth it to ensure we can edit these docs going forward. > > That is $129. Which is still not very much. > > > 2. Maybe they would give ASF one of more licenses at no charge? > > I suspect not. They have a free non-commercial edition. It just adds the > watermark. > > > I wouldn't want to put the burden of updating all diagrams on just one > > committer, even if you are kind of volunteering, here. > > Hence my leaning more towards the floating option. While I am happy to > do this now, should someone else need to update these diagrams a few > years down the line I'd like everything they need to do that to be in > the PMC private repo. > > There is no great rush here but I'd like to get this sorted while it is > top of mind. Therefore, I plan to purchase 1 floating license for the > Tomcat PMC with the Google funding early next week unless there are > objections.
Very good idea overall, +1 for the purchase of that flexible license. Rémy > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
