On 27/08/2010 11:53, Tim Funk wrote:
> +1 To intermediate page on wiki to allow newbies to understand what the
> JCP is
>
> -Tim
>
> On 8/27/2010 6:28 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>
>> Maybe create a Wiki page to list the relevant specification links? (I
>> don't have time now, but maybe later)
On 27.08.2010 12:53, Tim Funk wrote:
+1 To intermediate page on wiki to allow newbies to understand what the
JCP is
-Tim
On 8/27/2010 6:28 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Maybe create a Wiki page to list the relevant specification links? (I
don't have time now, but maybe later).
I started a p
+1 To intermediate page on wiki to allow newbies to understand what the
JCP is
-Tim
On 8/27/2010 6:28 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Maybe create a Wiki page to list the relevant specification links? (I
don't have time now, but maybe later).
--
On 27.08.2010 12:28, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/8/26 Pid:
On 26/08/2010 15:18, Tim Funk wrote:
In that case ... +1 for removing links to
http://java.sun.com/products/servlets and
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp (or any http://java.sun.com page)
Clearly +many for that then.
And for clari
2010/8/26 Pid :
> On 26/08/2010 15:18, Tim Funk wrote:
>> In that case ... +1 for removing links to
>> http://java.sun.com/products/servlets and
>> http://java.sun.com/products/jsp (or any http://java.sun.com page)
>
> Clearly +many for that then.
>
> And for clarity, what about to jcp.org?
>
My t
On 26/08/2010 15:18, Tim Funk wrote:
> In that case ... +1 for removing links to
> http://java.sun.com/products/servlets and
> http://java.sun.com/products/jsp (or any http://java.sun.com page)
Clearly +many for that then.
And for clarity, what about to jcp.org?
p
> -Tim
>
>
> On 8/26/2010 1
In that case ... +1 for removing links to
http://java.sun.com/products/servlets and
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp (or any http://java.sun.com page)
-Tim
On 8/26/2010 10:04 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 08/26/2010 03:14 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
-1 To removing spec links. We should be linking to th
On 08/26/2010 03:14 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
-1 To removing spec links. We should be linking to the JCP since that is what
Tomcat implements and we WANT developers to know and download the spec.
We have specs links in the documentation itself.
This is purely removing links from ASF software
to cor
-1 To removing spec links. We should be linking to the JCP since that is
what Tomcat implements and we WANT developers to know and download the spec.
It would be nice if we can just put the spec in as part of the docs, but
IIRC - that is against the licensing terms of the docs. If we could put
On Thursday 26 August 2010 12:12:02 Pid wrote:
> On 26/08/2010 07:26, Henri Gomez wrote:
> >> - documentation links should go to tomcat.apache.org, or to local /docs/
> >> ?
>
> That's an interesting point - the existing version links to the local
> version. The network version may/will be more
On 26 August 2010 11:12, Pid wrote:
> On 26/08/2010 07:26, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 26 août 2010 à 00:44, Konstantin Kolinko a écrit
>> :
>>
>>> 2010/8/25 Mladen Turk :
On 08/25/2010 10:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> What about linking to the Specs? Like
>
> http://jcp.
On 26/08/2010 07:26, Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>
> Le 26 août 2010 à 00:44, Konstantin Kolinko a écrit :
>
>> 2010/8/25 Mladen Turk :
>>> On 08/25/2010 10:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
What about linking to the Specs? Like
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr315/index.
Le 26 août 2010 à 00:44, Konstantin Kolinko a écrit :
> 2010/8/25 Mladen Turk :
>> On 08/25/2010 10:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>
>>> What about linking to the Specs? Like
>>>
>>> http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr315/index.html
>>>
>>
>> Still, is it so important that this
2010/8/25 Mladen Turk :
> On 08/25/2010 10:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>> What about linking to the Specs? Like
>>
>> http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr315/index.html
>>
>
> Still, is it so important that this should be listed on
> the front page. We already have those links
> (sh
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Pid wrote:
> On 25/08/2010 10:14, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> On 08/25/2010 10:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>
>>> What about linking to the Specs? Like
>>>
>>> http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr315/index.html
>>>
>>
>> Still, is it so important that this
On 25/08/2010 10:14, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 08/25/2010 10:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>>
>> What about linking to the Specs? Like
>>
>> http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr315/index.html
>>
>
> Still, is it so important that this should be listed on
> the front page. We already have
On 08/25/2010 10:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
What about linking to the Specs? Like
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr315/index.html
Still, is it so important that this should be listed on
the front page. We already have those links
(should be updated for Tomcat7 BTW) in our do
On 25.08.2010 10:23, Pid wrote:
On 25/08/2010 09:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/08/2010 08:45, Mladen Turk wrote:
Just been looking at the #49819 (awesome BTW)
Huge +1.
Mine too!
and noticed we are still referring to "Sun ..."
Now, dunno if some from the community can give the
answer whethe
On 25/08/2010 09:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/08/2010 08:45, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Just been looking at the #49819 (awesome BTW)
> Huge +1. Now, how easy would it be to convert the web site and the docs
> to match whilst still keeping stuff in svn, updates simple and diffs
> clean? ( I know, I do
On 25/08/2010 08:45, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Just been looking at the #49819 (awesome BTW)
Huge +1. Now, how easy would it be to convert the web site and the docs
to match whilst still keeping stuff in svn, updates simple and diffs
clean? ( I know, I don't want much do I ;) )
> and noticed we are sti
Just been looking at the #49819 (awesome BTW)
and noticed we are still referring to "Sun ..."
Now, dunno if some from the community can give the
answer whether this is still Sun or whether should
be changed to Oracle.
Next thing is why do we need that at the first
place on our welcome page? Seem
21 matches
Mail list logo
