Le 26 août 2010 à 00:44, Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 2010/8/25 Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>: >> On 08/25/2010 10:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> >>> What about linking to the Specs? Like >>> >>> http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr315/index.html >>> >> >> Still, is it so important that this should be listed on >> the front page. We already have those links >> (should be updated for Tomcat7 BTW) in our documentation, >> so having that on the front page makes no sense to me. >> >> I'd rather have them completely removed. >> > > I am +1 to remove spec links from ROOT/index.html +1 > > My thoughts are that > 1) The specifications are PDF files. They can be downloaded once and > be kept offline, and nobody will need those links anymore. Exact. > > 2) If someone has wrote a webapp, it is too late to read the specs. ;) In real (user) Life, rare are developpers reading the full specs. They take a look at it to solve obscurs points. > They will come with questions, but we already have those links, e.g. > here: http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ > > 3) Tomcat actually supports not only the latest spec. version, but > previous versions as well. It is not a reference implementation > either. May be the major reason. Good point. > > 4) If we want to document which spec versions we are using, let's do > it in the documentation webapp or in release notes, not here. > Main Tomcat page detail Servlet/JSP Apis covered/implemented by each Tomcat version. > > ============================ > > Regarding some other information on the page, my thoughts: > > "1","2","3" checkboxes - are they important? Design is pretty and > catching, but are those the tasks to do for every new Tomcat > installation? > > BTW, "3 Tell us you have installed..." is not functional at all > without a server side script, > and is a feature that I personally do not like (e.g. Sun's "Register > me" page that pops up after installing a JDK on Windows). Maybe > somebody finds such feedback useful? > > "1. Now join annou...@tomcat.apache.org" > Is done once and not needed later. It is also already written in red > text in the right part of the page. > > "2. Configure the Manager App roles" > It is actually a link to error 403 page? BTW, using tomcat-users.xml > is not the only way to configure authentication. There are other Realm > implementations as well. > > There is > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/html-manager-howto.html > (though it does not say how to setup the manager webapp, only how to use it). > > > BTW, this page may be a recommended reading: > http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/security-howto.html > > > "App Manager" button. I think it is just "Manager". BTW, it is > called "Manager App" elsewhere on this page. > > > Examples webapps links. BTW, those are a single webapp now (were > different webapps in 5.5 and earlier). Is it right to call them > "Tomcat * examples" ? Most of them were designed as app-server > neutral. > > "Tomcat 7.0 SVN Repository" link -- I think that usually people give > links to the viewvc page, or it would be better to link to > http://tomcat.apache.org/svn.html to provide some explanation. > > > Just technically: > - ASF logo image now links to manager/html. It should link to www.apache.org. > These probably were made for this preview, but shall be corrected > before committing: > - examples app links should be relative links, without explicit > "localhost:8080". > - documentation links should go to tomcat.apache.org, or to local /docs/ ? > > Best regards, > Konstantin Kolinko > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
