On 26 August 2010 11:12, Pid <p...@pidster.com> wrote: > On 26/08/2010 07:26, Henri Gomez wrote: >> >> >> Le 26 août 2010 à 00:44, Konstantin Kolinko <knst.koli...@gmail.com> a écrit >> : >> >>> 2010/8/25 Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>: >>>> On 08/25/2010 10:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What about linking to the Specs? Like >>>>> >>>>> http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr315/index.html >>>>> >>>> >>>> Still, is it so important that this should be listed on >>>> the front page. We already have those links >>>> (should be updated for Tomcat7 BTW) in our documentation, >>>> so having that on the front page makes no sense to me. >>>> >>>> I'd rather have them completely removed. >>>> >>> >>> I am +1 to remove spec links from ROOT/index.html >> >> +1 > > That is +3 for removal (and a possible -0) by my count, so far. Anyone > else? > >>> "1","2","3" checkboxes - are they important? Design is pretty and >>> catching, but are those the tasks to do for every new Tomcat >>> installation? > > I don't think the current content is good; I do think that this location > should be used to display Important Things Every User Should Know (or > Do). It needn't be 123. > >>> BTW, "3 Tell us you have installed..." is not functional at all >>> without a server side script, >>> and is a feature that I personally do not like (e.g. Sun's "Register >>> me" page that pops up after installing a JDK on Windows). Maybe >>> somebody finds such feedback useful? > > It would be easy to process logs to get that feedback - e.g. if the > version is passed in the URL the user just sees a static 'Welcome' page > - but maybe just the download stats are enough. > >>> "1. Now join annou...@tomcat.apache.org" >>> Is done once and not needed later. It is also already written in red >>> text in the right part of the page. >>> >>> "2. Configure the Manager App roles" >>> It is actually a link to error 403 page? BTW, using tomcat-users.xml >>> is not the only way to configure authentication. There are other Realm >>> implementations as well. > > I was running out of ideas. :s > >>> There is >>> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/html-manager-howto.html >>> (though it does not say how to setup the manager webapp, only how to use >>> it). >>> >>> >>> BTW, this page may be a recommended reading: >>> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/security-howto.html > > Yep, that's a really good candidate for the top of the page. > >>> "App Manager" button. I think it is just "Manager". BTW, it is >>> called "Manager App" elsewhere on this page. > > I'll double check links and text for consistency before submitting the > final-ish version. > >>> "Tomcat 7.0 SVN Repository" link -- I think that usually people give >>> links to the viewvc page, or it would be better to link to >>> http://tomcat.apache.org/svn.html to provide some explanation. > >>> - documentation links should go to tomcat.apache.org, or to local /docs/ ? > > That's an interesting point - the existing version links to the local > version. The network version may/will be more current, so it's probably > better to link to apache.org. Objections?
Or link to both local and online so the user has the choice? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
