On 27.08.2010 12:28, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/8/26 Pid<p...@pidster.com>:
On 26/08/2010 15:18, Tim Funk wrote:
In that case ... +1 for removing links to
http://java.sun.com/products/servlets and
http://java.sun.com/products/jsp (or any http://java.sun.com page)
Clearly +many for that then.
And for clarity, what about to jcp.org?
My thoughts are:
1. I do not mind advertising jcp.org
2. Unfortunately jcp.org pages are hard to understand for a newcomer.
It is actually not our problem, but the problem of the JSR website.
E.g., in this case for the Servlet spec two pages are important
[1] http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr315/index.html
[2] http://jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=315
[1] provides download of the spec, but the problem is that
- There is no description,
- It is hard to navigate further. I do not see there any direct link
to [2]. Maybe someone has better eyes?
[2] provides the description, but
- It is the same page for the whole lifetime of a JSR. You have to
know what to download: a "Final Release", or some "Maintenance
Release" (JSP 2.2 is actually MR of JSR 245).
So I think that while a link to [1] should be enough, it might be
better to mention both [1] and [2].
3. It came to my mind, that not only those two specs might be
important, but also some others, like the ones mentioned here:
http://markmail.org/message/olpuftjrqhcfk3vb
Maybe create a Wiki page to list the relevant specification links? (I
don't have time now, but maybe later).
That's a good idea! Yes, the JCP pages are hard to use. An intermediate
page can contain several links and a short explanatory hint for all
relevant Specs. Good thing.
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
