Re: Okular PDF viewer

On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:07:17 -0700 Van Snyder wrote: Hello Van, >Where does okular keep its settings? In ~/.config/ Look for files; okularrc okularpartrc okular-generator-popplerrc -- Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}{dash}{space}" / ) "The blindingly obvious is

Re: Okular PDF viewer

On Wed, 2025-06-04 at 09:12 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 03/06/2025 05:15, Van Snyder wrote: > > I've been using okular for many years, mostly because it's part of > > the > > standard Debian install. Version 22.12.3 is the one I currently > > have. > > > > Lately when I do a search or click a

Re: Okular PDF viewer

On 03/06/2025 05:15, Van Snyder wrote: I've been using okular for many years, mostly because it's part of the standard Debian install. Version 22.12.3 is the one I currently have. Lately when I do a search or click a link to another page, it doesn't display the correct page. Is this a known bu

clip on / flip up reading glasses (was: Re: PDF viewer for elderly)

On Tuesday, June 03, 2025 03:49:49 AM Chris Green wrote: > Richard Owlett wrote: > > ROFL - Been wearing tri-focals since my 30's. > > Also have wicked astigmatism correct that eliminates trying to use "off > > the shelf" "reading glasses". I also wear trifocals, and have astigmatism. They make

Re: Okular PDF viewer

Jun 3, 2025, 08:15 by van.sny...@sbcglobal.net: > That works fine for me too. But as I wrote the problem arises when I search > for something, or click on an internal link in the document, such as a > bibliographic citation or figure number or equation number. It used to work > fine until a few

Re: Okular PDF viewer

On Tue, 2025-06-03 at 06:06 +0200, local10 wrote: > On 3/6/25 06:15, Van Snyder wrote: > > > > I've been using okular for many years, mostly because it's part > > > of the standard Debian install. Version 22.12.3 is the one I > > > currently have. > > > > > > Lately when I do a search or click a

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

Richard Owlett wrote: > On 6/2/25 2:25 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> Perhaps, for the hardcopy manual, buying a pair of reading glasses > >> might help. > > > > I think it's safe to assume that people above 50 years old know about > > reading glasses. 🙂 > > > > ROFL - Been wearing tri-focals

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

On Mon 02 Jun 2025 at 21:28:50 (+0100), debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: >> Richard Owlett wrote: >> > On 6/2/25 2:03 PM, Van Snyder wrote: >> > > On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 13:39 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: >> > >> I'm over 80. My only phone just died. >> > >> I just bought an ATT CL84207 desk set

Re: Okular PDF viewer

On 3/6/25 06:15, Van Snyder wrote: >> I've been using okular for many years, mostly because it's part of the >> standard Debian install. Version 22.12.3 is the one I currently have. >> >> Lately when I do a search or click a link to another page, it doesn't >> display the correct page. Is this a

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

On Mon 02 Jun 2025 at 21:28:50 (+0100), debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote: > Richard Owlett wrote: > > On 6/2/25 2:03 PM, Van Snyder wrote: > > > On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 13:39 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > >> I'm over 80. My only phone just died. > > >> I just bought an ATT CL84207 desk set whic

Re: Okular PDF viewer

On 3/6/25 06:15, Van Snyder wrote: I've been using okular for many years, mostly because it's part of the standard Debian install. Version 22.12.3 is the one I currently have. Lately when I do a search or click a link to another page, it doesn't display the correct page. Is this a known bug? O

Okular PDF viewer

I've been using okular for many years, mostly because it's part of the standard Debian install. Version 22.12.3 is the one I currently have. Lately when I do a search or click a link to another page, it doesn't display the correct page. Is this a known bug? Or is it a feature? Thanks for mentioni

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

On 3/6/25 03:44, Richard Owlett wrote: If RETIREMENT isn't for learning, "What use is it?" I believe that the whole of life is an education, for people willing to learn. "The more we know, the more we know the little we know." .. Bret Busby Armadale West Australia (UTC+0800)

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 14:44 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > After my initial post, I discovered readability of the dim grey type > was > in some sense easier when blew up image further by choosing "Fit > Width" > rather than "Fit Height" in Atril. Try settings like +200% in Okular.

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

Richard Owlett wrote: > On 6/2/25 2:03 PM, Van Snyder wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 13:39 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > >> I'm over 80. My only phone just died. > >> I just bought an ATT CL84207 desk set which came with minuscule > >> 5"x7" manual. > >> Fortunately an ATT site has PDFs of ma

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

On 6/2/25 2:25 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: Perhaps, for the hardcopy manual, buying a pair of reading glasses might help. I think it's safe to assume that people above 50 years old know about reading glasses. 🙂 ROFL - Been wearing tri-focals since my 30's. Also have wicked astigmatism correct

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

On 6/2/25 2:03 PM, Van Snyder wrote: On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 13:39 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm over 80. My only phone just died. I just bought an ATT CL84207 desk set which came with minuscule 5"x7" manual. Fortunately an ATT site has PDFs of manuals. *HOWEVER* only BOLD text is in a saturat

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

On 3/6/25 03:25, Stefan Monnier wrote: Perhaps, for the hardcopy manual, buying a pair of reading glasses might help. I think it's safe to assume that people above 50 years old know about reading glasses. 🙂 Stefan Sometimes, the obvious might not occur to us. Due to a persistent

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

> Perhaps, for the hardcopy manual, buying a pair of reading glasses > might help. I think it's safe to assume that people above 50 years old know about reading glasses. 🙂 Stefan

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

On 3/6/25 02:39, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm over 80. My only phone just died. I just bought an ATT CL84207 desk set which came with minuscule 5"x7" manual. Fortunately an ATT site has PDFs of manuals. *HOWEVER* only BOLD text is in a saturated image. All other text is in a marginally readable p

Re: PDF viewer for elderly

On Mon, 2025-06-02 at 13:39 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm over 80. My only phone just died. > I just bought an ATT CL84207 desk set which came with minuscule 5"x7" > manual. > Fortunately an ATT site has PDFs of manuals. > > *HOWEVER* only BOLD text is in a saturated image. > All other text i

PDF viewer for elderly

I'm over 80. My only phone just died. I just bought an ATT CL84207 desk set which came with minuscule 5"x7" manual. Fortunately an ATT site has PDFs of manuals. *HOWEVER* only BOLD text is in a saturated image. All other text is in a marginally readable pale grey. Is the a PDF reader in Debian

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4/11/24 23:26, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 4 Nov 2024 09:36 -0500, from monn...@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier): Frames were current up through HTML 4[7] but are non-conformant in HTML 5[8], although interestingly enough still described[9]. Not sure if we're talking about the same "frames"

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

Hi, I do not know, if this is what you are searching for, but take a look at bluegriffon https://www.bluegriffon.org Also (if it must not the super modern tool), you can try "kompozer" or its successor "NVU" (but I believe, NVU is only for MAC and Windows). You searched for "small", but small

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

>>> Frames were current up through HTML 4[7] but are non-conformant in >>> HTML 5[8], although interestingly enough still described[9]. >> Not sure if we're talking about the same "frames", but uMatrix has >> a column dedicated to frames and I see it used fairly frequently for >> captchas and onlin

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4 Nov 2024 09:36 -0500, from monn...@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier): >> Frames were current up through HTML 4[7] but are non-conformant in >> HTML 5[8], although interestingly enough still described[9]. > > Not sure if we're talking about the same "frames", but uMatrix has > a column dedicat

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

> Frames were current up through HTML 4[7] but are non-conformant in > HTML 5[8], although interestingly enough still described[9]. Not sure if we're talking about the same "frames", but uMatrix has a column dedicated to frames and I see it used fairly frequently for captchas and online credit car

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4 Nov 2024 19:30 +0800, from b...@busby.net (Bret Busby): >> Yes, later versions of HTML have _added_ quite a lot of stuff, and >> perhaps slightly changed the default _semantics_ of some; but very >> little has been _removed_. (One biggie might be , which was >> deprecated as of HTML 4.01[1] an

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4/11/24 18:56, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 4 Nov 2024 06:00 +, from a...@strugglers.net (Andy Smith): Installing 20+ year old software just to make sure it can never parse HTML5 is total lunacy. There will be no support community for such a thing for a start, so any problem you have is goi

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4 Nov 2024 06:00 +, from a...@strugglers.net (Andy Smith): > Installing 20+ year old software just to make sure it can never parse > HTML5 is total lunacy. There will be no support community for such a > thing for a start, so any problem you have is going to be a showstopper. Also, it shoul

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Sun, 3 Nov 2024, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. You do not say whether you will be writ

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:00:03AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. > > I can see why you might THINK this is a

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

Hi, On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I can see why you might THINK this is a good requirement: you're probably thinking that by only wanting minimal f

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 12:18:39PM -0700, Antonio Russo wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > > > > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. > > On 11/3/24 07:51, Richard Owlett

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

r to Debian 9 would be running Amaya, which was last released on Debian 3.1 (sarge), I believe, as amaya 8.5. I think a WYSIWYG HTML editor might qualify as a viewer. https://www.w3.org/Amaya/ says that the latest version, 11.4.4, about 12 years old, is available, and offers support for HTML 4.01, XH

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

How do I control brightness and contrast in Debian? xrandr does not work.

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4/11/24 04:21, Bret Busby wrote: On 3/11/24 21:43, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. [Before

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 3/11/24 21:43, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. [Before I get flamed on supposed security is

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. On 11/3/24 07:51, Richard Owlett wrote: Manpage for w3m hints it may be particularly suitable. Will investigate elink

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

Richard Owlett writes: > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. > I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. > In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. > Any suggestions? Emacs and it's eww mode.

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 11/3/24 8:21 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or Jav

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. > I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. > In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. > [Before I ge

Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. [Before I get flamed on supposed security issues - system will be isolated from web

Re: webp in Image Viewer

On 8/6/24 18:40, cor...@free.fr wrote: Hi My Image Viewer on desktop seems not to support webp format. do you have any ideas? You might need the package "webp-pixbuf-loader". "webp-pixbuf-loader integrates libwebp library into GDK image processing framework, so GDK based appl

Re: webp in Image Viewer

On Wed, 2024-08-07 at 06:40 +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote: > Hi Hullo, > My Image Viewer on desktop seems not to support webp format. > do you have any ideas? It depends on what you want to do with it, but GIMP can handle webp, and export to any othwer format you may find easier to handle. Cheers!

webp in Image Viewer

Hi My Image Viewer on desktop seems not to support webp format. do you have any ideas? Thank you. -- corey hickman

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

> Try xpdf, but be aware it doesn't support forms nor other special stuff > in PDF like video. qpdfview is awfully simple. #apt install qpdfview (does well with trixie and sid) It prints well with CUPS that provides a driver for my Kyocera FS-920 b&w laser printer. That printer is 15 years old.

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 12/6/23 9:06 PM, Bert Riding wrote: On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:30:01 +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote: I use zathura which is also quite light but I'm not sure if you can print from it. I tend to print directly using lp although very infrequently in any case. In zathura :print brings up the Gtk+ prin

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:30:01 +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote: > I use zathura which is also quite light but I'm not sure if you can > print from it. I tend to print directly using lp although very > infrequently in any case. In zathura :print brings up the Gtk+ print dialog.

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 06/12/2023 12:14, tomas wrote: Debian Bullseye here. Xpdf links against libpoppler102, which has GPLv2 or V3, same as xpdf. Perhaps fact checking of the following is required. Gnome forked xpdf to have a library (poppler) for a PDF viewer (evince). For security reasons Debian maintainers

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 06:14:00 +0100 wrote: On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 05:01:37PM -0500, Paul M Foster wrote: [...] I've used Xpdf from Arch, and it's an entirely different program. My understanding was that the Arch version depended on poppler. I can only imagine that the version in Debian is

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 05:01:37PM -0500, Paul M Foster wrote: [...] > I've used Xpdf from Arch, and it's an entirely different program. My > understanding was that the Arch version depended on poppler. I can only > imagine that the version in Debian is different because there is a > licensing is

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:09:09AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 05/12/2023 18:30, Tom Browder wrote: > > When I manually print via Evince It seems to sometimes change important > > settings like page scaling and orientation. > > I had an impression that GUI print dialog may remember some settin

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

useful. > The following seems to list most of the various programs discussed in this > thread, plus a > couple of others: > apt-cache search pdf-viewer Thanks so much Mike! And also many thanks to all my Debian friends who answered. I think my side of this thread is done now. "Merry Christmas to all and t all a good night!" -Tom

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 6/12/23 01:09, Max Nikulin wrote: I believed that CUPS stack is based on PDF while earlier PostScript was used. I recently wrote a  user space CUPS driver for a thermal printer. At the point I get to process the print data it has already been rasterised into a bitmap. My impression is

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 05/12/2023 18:30, Tom Browder wrote: When I manually print via Evince It seems to sometimes change important settings like page scaling and orientation. I had an impression that GUI print dialog may remember some settings from its previous invocation. Unsure if it is relevant to evince. I

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 12/5/23 6:23 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: I use zathura which is also quite light but I'm not sure if you can print from it. I tend to print directly using lp although very infrequently in any case. I do a lot of printing from zathura but have had trouble setting up print preview.. Paul

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

I use zathura which is also quite light but I'm not sure if you can print from it. I tend to print directly using lp although very infrequently in any case. -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 30.0.50 2023-09-14) on Debian 12.2

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 17:12 Tom Browder wrote: > I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many I see I need to read the CUPS man page more closely. It looks like it has most all of the answers I need for my current situation. Thanks to all who responded. Happy Christ

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 01:14 Marco Moock wrote: > Am 04.12.2023 um 17:12:28 Uhr schrieb Tom Browder: > > > I would like to use another program which is similar but has good > > documentation. I don't need a heavy duty program like LibreOffice, > > Just something for viewing and printing. > > Try

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 02:06 Paul M Foster wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:12:28PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote: > > > I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many > > years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for > >

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:12:28PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote: > I would like to use another program which is similar but has good > documentation. I don't need a heavy duty program like LibreOffice, > Just something for viewing and printing. > Hi Tom: I recommend Okular. Has KDE dependencies, but IM

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

um Though chromium is a web browser, it can display PDFs quiet properly and can fillout formulars, print PDFs, etc. For my daily reading I want a lightweight viewer, so I use evince, but for filling out formulars I use chromium. Best regards, Klaus. -- Klaus Singvogel GnuPG-Key-ID: 1024R/5068792D 1994-06-27

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 17:12:28 -0600 Tom Browder wrote: I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for a very long time. to wit: (evince:81435): EvinceView-CRITICAL **: 16:44:57.520

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

Am 04.12.2023 um 17:12:28 Uhr schrieb Tom Browder: > I would like to use another program which is similar but has good > documentation. I don't need a heavy duty program like LibreOffice, > Just something for viewing and printing. Try xpdf, but be aware it doesn't support forms nor other special

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

Am 04.12.2023 um 19:19:37 Uhr schrieb Paul M Foster: > Don't think it has a CLI interface. However, I would imagine that > simply feeding a PDF to the printer should work for printing. I could > be wrong, though. IIRC that depends on the printer. Simply running lpr file.pdf didn't work for my pr

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 12/4/23 19:20, Paul M Foster wrote: On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:12:28PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote: I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for a very long time. to wit: (evince:81435): EvinceView

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

Also, before I started using evince, I used to use gv (based on ghostview) quite a bit. The following seems to list most of the various programs discussed in this thread, plus a couple of others: apt-cache search pdf-viewer mrc

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon 04/12/2023 at 23:12, Tom Browder wrote: > I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many > years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for > a very long time. to wit: > > (evince:81435): EvinceView-CRITICAL *

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:12:28PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote: > I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many > years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for > a very long time. to wit: > > (evince:81435): EvinceView-CRITICAL *

Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for a very long time. to wit: (evince:81435): EvinceView-CRITICAL **: 16:44:57.520: \ ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list: \ assertion

Re: QEMU/KVM doesn't open new window - Access only via vnc viewer

Am Thu, 31 Mar 2022 15:42:43 +0100 schrieb Gareth Evans : >A different invocation method, but does this help, or give a clue to something >equivalent? > >https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/09/msg00691.html The link was the path to the solution. For gtk output in a newly created window I h

Re: QEMU/KVM doesn't open new window - Access only via vnc viewer

#x27;t open a new window, but a message > appears, telling me to access the output via a vnc viewer. With the vnc > viewer I can see this output: the VM started correctly. > > How can I get back the output of the VM in a window (like in Debian9)? > > My researches in the interne

Re: QEMU/KVM doesn't open new window - Access only via vnc viewer

a std -m 3072 -enable-kvm -rtc base=localtime -boot order=c > > As a result QEMU/KVM opened a new window with the output of the VM. > > With Debian11/Bullseye QEMU/KVM doesn't open a new window, but a message > appears, telling me to access the output via a vnc viewer. With the vnc &

QEMU/KVM doesn't open new window - Access only via vnc viewer

a std -m 3072 -enable-kvm -rtc base=localtime -boot order=c As a result QEMU/KVM opened a new window with the output of the VM. With Debian11/Bullseye QEMU/KVM doesn't open a new window, but a message appears, telling me to access the output via a vnc viewer. With the vnc viewer I can see t

Re: why pdf viewer is missing in firefox for bullseye?

Thank Cater! actually firefox for debian 11 can view my local pdf file maybe those web sites with PDF files set MIME type incorrectly

Re: why pdf viewer is missing in firefox for bullseye?

On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 04:02:44PM -0500, lou wrote: > how to install pdf plugin? > > firefox for old debian distro can open pdf file > > > According to the Firefox release notes from Mozilla, firefox now includes its own pdf viewer - click on the link or open it in you

why pdf viewer is missing in firefox for bullseye?

how to install pdf plugin? firefox for old debian distro can open pdf file

Re: couldn't build pipe-viewer with debian

I put libreadline-dev on the machine since that wasn't installed and ran the instructions in the README.md file in pipe-viewer directory and the whole package built and installed. Thanks for the pointer on that -dev file. I'll have to check for those in the future. On Mon, 3 Jan

Re: couldn't build pipe-viewer with debian

I forgot to install the -dev package. I'll try this again and see if it goes through. On Mon, 3 Jan 2022, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:38:25PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > pipe-viewer youtube-viewer and straw-viewer cannot be built with debian. > >

Re: couldn't build pipe-viewer with debian

On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:38:25PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > pipe-viewer youtube-viewer and straw-viewer cannot be built with debian. > The reasons for that are each of those packages require > Term::ReadLine::Gnu and Term::ReadLine::Gnu cannot be built withreadline > 2.0. That&

couldn't build pipe-viewer with debian

pipe-viewer youtube-viewer and straw-viewer cannot be built with debian. The reasons for that are each of those packages require Term::ReadLine::Gnu and Term::ReadLine::Gnu cannot be built withreadline 2.0. That's an ancient version of readline. I tried with readline 2.01 and my x86_64 equi

No success trying to get vinagre (Gnome Remote Desktop Viewer) to work with Raspberry Pi (RealVNC server)

he RealVNC server installed and running on a Raspberry Pi 4 running the latest up-to-date Raspberry Pi OS. The VNC connection works with the RealVNC viewer but it has a long EULA (non-libre) and is not well integrated (theming, etc.) into the Gnome desktop. So far Vinagre has resisted all of my effo

Re: Viewer for html files

on, of course, to rename the file as foo.html > > It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens a file in the > current directory with auto-completion of the initial word of the filename. > > Is there such a thing? > > Consider html2text which is perfect for t

Re: Viewer for html files

On Ma, 11 feb 20, 12:26:38, Thomas George wrote: > > It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens a file in the current > directory with auto-completion of the initial word of the filename. It's not clear where that "current directory" is, a shell, file manager, e

Re: Viewer for html files

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:26:38PM -0500, Thomas George wrote: > > file:///home/user/directory/long file name.html > > It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens a file in the current > directory with auto-completion of the initial word of the filename. > > Is the

Re: Viewer for html files

on, of course, to rename the file as foo.html > > It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens a file in the > current directory with auto-completion of the initial word of the filename. > > Is there such a thing? > $ python3 -m http.server then point your browser to localhost:

Viewer for html files

subsequently want to view the file I must type something like file:///home/user/directory/long file name.html My browsers have no auto-complete and do not like file names with included spaces. The solution, of course, to rename the file as foo.html It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens

Re: Gnome application: Remote Desktop Viewer/vinagre bug

On 2019-05-11, Esteban L wrote: > Thanks for the Reply Curt, > > Sorry in advance to the rest of the group, with my lack of > "professionalism" and lack of Subject line =) I was very tired, as I am > sure many can appreciate. Perpetual stage of tiredness. > > I have tried editing the file, by rem

Re: Gnome application: Remote Desktop Viewer/vinagre bug

--Original Message- From: Curt To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: (unknown) Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 12:26:32 - (UTC) On 2019-05-11, Esteban L wrote: > Hello, > > I have this weird situation, I can't figure out. > > I can launch the Remote Deskto

Re: Paper size reported in Document Viewer.

Hi. On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:56:05PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Hi, > > Debian 9 with Document Viewer 3.22.1 here. > > Given > http://easthope.ca/AIGAbusIconScaled.svg 8.5/11 = .7727272... > the file > http://easthope.ca/AIGAbus

Paper size reported in Document Viewer.

Hi, Debian 9 with Document Viewer 3.22.1 here. Given http://easthope.ca/AIGAbusIconScaled.svg the file http://easthope.ca/AIGAbusIconScaled.pdf is obtained by rsvg-convert -f pdf AIGAbusIconScaled.svg > AIGAbusIconScaled.pdf . The svg file has attributes 'width="8.5in" hei

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:15:39PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: [...] > Thanks Tomás, Richard, Eike, and Henning for your replies! :) Glad to help :) > As for usenet, thanks for the leads on the various providers > (aeiou.net, individual.net, supernews.c

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:31 AM, wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:45:13PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: >> I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common >> acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly >>

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:45:13PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: > I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common > acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly > speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transform, but only to > inspect transformed data, but

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:49:42AM -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote: > On Sunday, November 12, 2017 10:06:11 PM -03 Dan Hitt wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote: > > >> I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On 11/13/2017 12:06 AM, Dan Hitt wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote: I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly speaking it doesn't m

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:45:13PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: > I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common > acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly > speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transfo

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Sunday, November 12, 2017 10:06:11 PM -03 Dan Hitt wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: > > On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote: > >> I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common > >> acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. An

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote: >> >> I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common >> acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly >> speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transfor

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >