On 07/01/2015 11:31 PM, Bob Bernstein wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Joe wrote:
...it could be used if there was nothing better, and it may offer features
which the OP 'didn't know he needed'.
Speaking of the OP, has he been seen in these here parts since the thread
began? I've been wanting to ask him why he wants to view sound waveforms.
My spidey sense has been telling me that if we knew the answer to that
question, then maybe this whole um discussion might take on a refreshing new
demeanor, as in, say,
"Simply gazing at a visual representation of a sound wave is ordinarily a quite
unremarkable experience, unless the fine arts of _measurement_ are introduced, in which
case, however, what's needed, ideally, is a DC oscilloscope."
(Yes, such tools can be "emulated" by a computer, but why settle for emulation?)
Oh well.
A computer should be able to digitize a waveform and display it just like a
digital oscilloscope. Providing a sufficient sample rate, there should be no
difference in the reproduced waveform.
I don't know what's out there as an app, and I'm watching here too. And, I have
a nice 200MHz Tektronix analog scope! But if I don't have to hook it up, fine!
--doug
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5594bd2e.5050...@optonline.net
