ake domain from DNS config) and whether it
matches "apt-proxy" name lookup.
root@cdtest:~# host apt-proxy
apt-proxy.localdomain is an alias for issola.localdomain.
issola.localdomain has address 192.168.100.12
This works on all machines, including the machine where auto-apt-proxy
fails.
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 09:42:40 +0700
Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 21/12/2024 10:12, Charles Curley wrote:
> > Because of the NATting for the VMs I have defined an alias for the
> > cache in bind per the auto-apt-proxy man page. This works as
> > expected, even on the non-v
On 21/12/2024 10:12, Charles Curley wrote:
Because of the NATting for the VMs I have defined an alias for the
cache in bind per the auto-apt-proxy man page. This works as expected,
even on the non-virtual trixie machine.
Disclaimer: I have never tried this tool.
Have you compared results on
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:30:00 +0800
jeremy ardley wrote:
> On 21/12/24 11:12, Charles Curley wrote:
> > I have
> > two trixie machines, one virtual, the other non-virtual (literal?).
>
> physical ?
I guess ``bare metal'' describes it precicely. HTH
--
kind regards
Frank
pgpO2k4Zzj_ye.pgp
Descr
On 21/12/24 11:12, Charles Curley wrote:
I have
two trixie machines, one virtual, the other non-virtual (literal?).
physical ?
auto-apt-proxy does not appear to be working fully on trixie. I have
two trixie machines, one virtual, the other non-virtual (literal?). On
the virtual machine auto-apt-proxy works just fine. It is NATted. The
non-virtual machine has problems: it does not find my apt proxy, an
instance of apt
On Sunday 21 February 2010 20:17:56 Gonzalo Gorosito wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just installed the apt-proxy and I can't get it working. Using the config
> file as it comes here's my log file:
[ Good stuff snipped... ]
> Any clue?
I recently switched to "approx
Hi guys,
I just installed the apt-proxy and I can't get it working. Using the config
file as it comes here's my log file:
2010-02-21 22:16:47-0300 [Channel,4,192.168.1.101] [CacheEntry] this is a
real request:/var/cache/apt-proxy/dists/squeeze/Release.gpg
2010-02-21 22:16:47-030
Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
Hi, Mike:
On Friday 05 June 2009 02:40:09 mike wrote:
Has anyone installed lenny, with a netinst cd, going to a server running
apt-proxy to get packages?
Yes, but I think to remember that you can't completly do it "as is" since even
on the
Hi, Mike:
On Friday 05 June 2009 02:40:09 mike wrote:
> Has anyone installed lenny, with a netinst cd, going to a server running
> apt-proxy to get packages?
Yes, but I think to remember that you can't completly do it "as is" since even
on the expert mode you are not al
Has anyone installed lenny, with a netinst cd, going to a server running
apt-proxy to get packages? or is it better to put in a proxy server and
do the initial install that way?
are there any tips ?
thanks
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
I have several debian boxes on my home LAN. As part of my transition
from etch to lenny, I want to install apt-proxy in the box I call
'cmn', which is currently running etch. The box called 'big' is my
first box running lenny. I have installed apt-proxy on cmn, and, added
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:03:39 -0400, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:14:54 +0200
> Gilles Mocellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Le Friday 25 July 2008 18:34:17 Peter Daum, vous avez écrit :
>> > I am trying to get apt-proxy
Celejar wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:14:54 +0200
Gilles Mocellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Friday 25 July 2008 18:34:17 Peter Daum, vous avez écrit :
I am trying to get apt-proxy to work on a test machine running lenny.
[...]
Generally, apt-proxy doesn't really look overly
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:14:54 +0200
Gilles Mocellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Friday 25 July 2008 18:34:17 Peter Daum, vous avez écrit :
> > I am trying to get apt-proxy to work on a test machine running lenny.
> [...]
>
> > Generally, apt-proxy doesn't re
Le Friday 25 July 2008 18:34:17 Peter Daum, vous avez écrit :
> I am trying to get apt-proxy to work on a test machine running lenny.
[...]
> Generally, apt-proxy doesn't really look overly trustworthy (on
> every start there is a python warning about telnet being deprecated),
>
I am trying to get apt-proxy to work on a test machine running lenny.
Because hardly anything worked as expected, I stripped the configuration
down more and more.but it seems that nothing involving more than 1 backend
works. Here the scenario:
server(lenny) has the following apt-proxy backends
Hello,
I can download a package with a tilde in its name as
libpng12-0_1.2.15~beta5-1_i386.deb via my apt-proxy port with
method http :
- the package comes with the same name in the client
- but the package comes with replacement of the ~ by its code %7e on the
apt-proxy : libpng12-0_1.2.15
Hi Ive been trying to setup apt-get to work with my proxy "it wont
work without it" and I have not had any luck till now ..below is my
apt.conf file..apt-get update executes successfully but apt-get
install resolves the hostnames and just waits for headers untill it
times out..
Acquire::http::Pro
Rodrigo Castro([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I'm experiencing trouble to put apt-proxy to work. In the
> apt-proxy-v2.confI didn't change many things, only the server Ip (like
> 192.168.1.11) and the backends. And the client's source.list would be like
&
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 02:11, Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> After apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf the output
> would stop. But when I apt-get update the client fails to connect and I
> get:
I really don't know. The message below all look like regular messa
After apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf the output would stop. But when I apt-get update the client fails to connect and I get:apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/manhole/telnet.py:8: DeprecationWarning: As of
On Monday 13 November 2006 04:00, Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> I changed the port, now when I enter
> apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf
> I get this output and it stops there:
That looks right...does it still not respond on the configured port?
j
>
> /usr/lib
I changed the port, now when I enter apt-proxy --config-file=/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.confI get this output and it stops there:/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/twisted/manhole/telnet.py:8: DeprecationWarning: As of Twisted
2.1, twisted.protocols.telnet is deprecated. See twisted.conch.telnet
Didn't see that, my mistake. Thank you all.On 11/10/06, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 10 November 2006 11:29, Rodrigo Castro wrote:> 2006/11/10 18:24 BRST [-]
twisted.internet.error.CannotListenError:> Couldn't listen on 192.168.1.11: : (98, 'Address already in use').Th
On Friday 10 November 2006 11:29, Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> 2006/11/10 18:24 BRST [-] twisted.internet.error.CannotListenError:
> Couldn't listen on 192.168.1.11: : (98, 'Address already in use').
There is your problem right there: there is already a program listening on
port , so it couldn
:
/etc/init.d/apt-proxt start (didn't work)apt-proxy -c /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf (didn't work either) -> Server errors2006/11/10 18:24 BRST [-] Log opened.2006/11/10 18:24 BRST [-] twistd
2.4.0 (/usr/bin/python 2.4.4) starting up2006/11/10 18:24 BRST [-] reactor class: 2006/11
On Friday 10 November 2006 10:58, Rodrigo Castro wrote:
> I'm experiencing trouble to put apt-proxy to work. In the
> apt-proxy-v2.confI didn't change many things, only the server Ip (like
> 192.168.1.11) and the backends. And the client's source.list would be like
> d
I'm experiencing trouble to put apt-proxy to work. In the apt-proxy-v2.conf I didn't change many things, only the server Ip (like 192.168.1.11) and the backends. And the client's source.list
would be like deb http://192.168.1.11:/debian woody main for example. Is there anyone
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:47:26AM -0300, Gilberto Martins wrote:
> WOW!!!
>
> It did worked out. But, why this weird problem with FTP backends ?
> Thanks
>
>
Could be a bug. The %7e is a URL encoding, which is often used to
encose special characters in URLs, so that the browser and server don
WOW!!!It did worked out. But, why this weird problem with FTP backends ?Thanks
Have you tried switching to an HTTP backend?Regards,-Roberto
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:12:22AM -0300, Gilberto Martins wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am using apt-proxy to provide a Debian mirror to my network.
> This afternoon, I tried to install kde, by typeing "apt-get install kde" in
> a client. It almost worked, but it stucked.
> Af
Hi.I am using apt-proxy to provide a Debian mirror to my network.This afternoon, I tried to install kde, by typeing "apt-get install kde" in a client. It almost worked, but it stucked.After searching among many log files, I found that "libgadu3_1.7~rc2-1_i386.deb" and "ekg
Greetings:
I have apt-proxy setup and running fine, mostly. I do have an issue I am
unable to solve.
I am behind a dial up connection and large files (such as kernel images)
sometimes do not download in a single session. Before I install
apt-proxy, apt-get install ... would resume partial
Hello,
I'm trying to import my /var/cache/apt/archives to apt-proxy
apt-proxy:
Installed: 1.9.33
Candidate: 1.9.33
First i installed apt-proxy, then i configured
/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf
apt-proxy-v2.conf_
DEFAULT]
;; All times a
Hello,
I'm trying to import my /var/cache/apt/archives to apt-proxy
apt-proxy:
Installed: 1.9.33
Candidate: 1.9.33
First i installed apt-proxy, then i configured
/etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf
apt-proxy-v2.conf_
DEFAULT]
;; All times a
#include
* Johan Daine [Sat, Mar 04 2006, 08:18:47AM]:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am making some tests with apt-proxy.
> apt-proxy is working perfectly. I have been purging gpm, removing the
> 2006/03/04 08:16 CET [-] [apt_pkg] No Packages files available for
> security backend
>
Hi everyone,
I am making some tests with apt-proxy.
apt-proxy is working perfectly. I have been purging gpm, removing the
gpm deb on the local caches, proxy on the proxy, on other machines and
all these work perfectly.
Let's call the apt-proxy server horus.
The 'source.list' file :
I have setup apt-proxy on our ftp-server with the following
configuration:
;;---
;; Backend servers
;; Backend servers, in order of preference
backends =
ftp://localhost/debian
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian
(sorry for dups[1])
I'm just setting up apt-proxy, but have a few questions.
1) apt-proxy caches the .deb files I request. So, if I want to
*pre* fetch packages via cron during the night I might run:
apt-get -qq update && \
apt-get -qqd dist-upgrade && \
apt
Nick Hastings wrote:
Hi,
* Art Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041021 09:18]:
I have upgraded to the newest apt-proxy and things have become really
sl. I spend a lot of time [Waiting for headers]. Is there some
configuration that I'm missing?
Sounds like you're experie
Hi,
* Art Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041021 09:18]:
> I have upgraded to the newest apt-proxy and things have become really
> sl. I spend a lot of time [Waiting for headers]. Is there some
> configuration that I'm missing?
Sounds like you're experiencing a
I have upgraded to the newest apt-proxy and things have become really
sl. I spend a lot of time [Waiting for headers]. Is there some
configuration that I'm missing?
Art Edwards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Thank you - that solved that problem. Can you tell me why?
Also - when I try to stop the proxy server, I have to issue the
"/etc/init.d/apt-proxy stop" command twice.
Daniel
Toshiro wrote:
Add this to /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf:
disable_pipelining=1
Regards,
Toshiro.
El Lun 27 S
Add this to /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy-v2.conf:
disable_pipelining=1
Regards,
Toshiro.
El Lun 27 Sep 2004 02:58, Daniel L. Miller escribió:
> I recently upgraded to apt-proxy v2 on our gateway - and now all of my
> apt clients (including the server, since the sources file references the
&
I have a setup in which one of my Debian computers maintains an apt-proxy,
and all the computers on my LAN, point their apt_sources.list to that proxy.
I am running Sarge on all the computers. It has worked very nicely, but I
notice something that I don't like, and I don't know how to fi
Bengt Thuree wrote:
Hope someone can enlighten me to the status and future of apt-proxy.
Found some information on the web.
http://www.webservertalk.com/message222715.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hej
I have been using apt-proxy on woody for a year now, and been extremly
happy with the result.
I am also looking forward to use apt-proxy-v2 which is, according the
homepage http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/ supposed to be quicker and
improved.
However, I can not find any later version of
I've got apt-proxy set up and working fine for the main debian stable
and testting archives, but it doesn't work for security updates.
I have the security backend in apt-proxy configured as follows
add_backend /security/ \
$APT_PROXY_CACH
[Rob Weir]
> apt-proxy is a shell script, and thus cannot run as a daemon.
Well, you could hack something together with netcat, but that has about
as much point as using a screwdriver as a chisel. inetd is the right
tool for the job.
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 02:05:14PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 6:54 AM
> >Subject: Re: apt-proxy without i
>- Original Message -
>From: "Rob Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 6:54 AM
>Subject: Re: apt-proxy without inetd
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to run apt-proxy without inetd?
> I'm not us
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:34:48PM +0100, Benedict Verheyen said
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to run apt-proxy without inetd?
> I'm not using inetd or xinetd and would like to keep it that way.
Why? Just install it and disable everything aside from apt-proxy.
--
Rob Weir
Hi,
is it possible to run apt-proxy without inetd?
I'm not using inetd or xinetd and would like to keep it that way.
The depends field says you only need tcpd but i don't think
running tcpd without inetd is possible/useful?
On a related note, i remember that i wanted to remove inetd wh
For those that have been following the recent thread about using
apt-proxy to "mirror" the /var/cache/apt/archives directory from one
computer to an entire network, I thought the following tip may be handy.
The .deb package says it depends on wget _or_ rsync, but the default
config
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 10:00, Thomas Gebhardt wrote:
> I have not noticed any release of the python apt-proxy v2 yet.
> Apart from the mentioned flaw I'm very satisfied with apt-proxy
> which helps to save a lot of bandwith. So I'd rather stay with
> apt-proxy if I would
Hi,
I frequently encounter problems with streaming debs from apt-proxy,
(both stable and testing/unstable) getting error messages like
MD5Sum mismatch
or
404 File does not exist on any server
A second download is ok.
The bug reports indicate that this is a common problem and
the maintainer
gt; > > asks me to specify a mirror. Some particulars of my system:
> >
> > > The url of the host running apt-proxy is cmn.lan.gnu .
> > > A sample line in a using host sources.list is
> > > deb http://cmn.lan.gnu:/main woody main contrib non-free
&
> asks me to specify a mirror. Some particulars of my system:
Say, are you talking about the installation step 'installing the base
system'? I never managed to get those served through my apt-proxy,
either.
If anyone ever has, please tell me how.
The proxy serves any apt-get request
> > The url of the host running apt-proxy is cmn.lan.gnu .
> > A sample line in a using host sources.list is
> > deb http://cmn.lan.gnu:/main woody main contrib non-free
>
> > What do I type on a newly attached machine to get it to make use
> > of the apt-ca
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 10:15:54PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> But, I can't figure out what I should tell the netinstall software when it
> asks me to specify a mirror. Some particulars of my system:
> The url of the host running apt-proxy is cmn.lan.gnu .
> A sample lin
I have a recently downloaded and burnt sarge net install CD.
I would like to test it in my environment. My internet access
is ppp on one of my debian boxes. I have apt-proxy running on
that box and I have done a dist-upgrage to sarge on one of my
computers, so the apt-proxy should have cached
wjl wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
Try getting the box that runs the proxy working first before you
try the remote boxes.
Hi Roberto,
after setting it to 5 Minutes (you saw that), and after waiting for another
day (in fact it was over night) all of a sudden it works automagically. Now
I'm back
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Try getting the box that runs the proxy working first before you
> try the remote boxes.
Hi Roberto,
after setting it to 5 Minutes (you saw that), and after waiting for another
day (in fact it was over night) all of a sudden it works automagically. Now
I'm back to 60 Min
wjl wrote:
Ok; my /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy.conf looks like:
I can't see anything specifically wrong. Here is my apt-proxy.conf:
add_backend /main/ \
$APT_PROXY_CACHE/debian/\
http://ftp.us.debian.org/d
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Please post the contents of your /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy.conf (as I
> asked in the previous message) and also post a listing of the output
> for a failed session (and a successful one if you can manage it).
>
> -Roberto
Ok; my /etc/apt-proxy/apt-proxy.
wjl wrote:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
[Tips for apt-proxy]
Hmmm Roberto,
I checked all this, tho I couldn't believe that the problem would lay there,
since the clients do get the package list and everything just fine *the
first time*. Also installing new packages, even ones the proxy doesn&#
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> [Tips for apt-proxy]
Hmmm Roberto,
I checked all this, tho I couldn't believe that the problem would lay there,
since the clients do get the package list and everything just fine *the
first time*. Also installing new packages, even ones the proxy doesn't
ha
/etc/apt-procy/apt-proxy.conf
Also, make sure you have port open on the proxy machine's firewall
(if it has one).
Make sure your /etc/hosts.allow has something like this:
apt-proxy: LOCAL, 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
Make sure your /etc/intetd.conf has something like this:
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> BACKEND_FREQ=240
>
> Check to make sure you do not have this set too high. I.e., mine is set
> at 4 hours, to after an update by any client, the server won't refresh
> the archive for 4 hours. If your is set really high, that may be the
> cause of the problem.
>
> -Rob
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> # Maximum frequency of Packages/etc. updates from back end (minutes)
> # Keep high to speed things up.
> BACKEND_FREQ=240
Aaah, this is it - thanks Roberto ;-)
wjl
--
NTV '94 RedSue 24-41Mm running on fuel; everything else runs Debian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Wolfgang Lonien wrote:
Hi group (or list & group),
I use apt-proxy on unstable here, and the clients use it just fine - *the
first time*.
The next morning, they see no new packages on the proxy machine, even not
after updating/upgrading the proxy, not after apt-proxy-import, not after
setiing
Hi group (or list & group),
I use apt-proxy on unstable here, and the clients use it just fine - *the
first time*.
The next morning, they see no new packages on the proxy machine, even not
after updating/upgrading the proxy, not after apt-proxy-import, not after
setiing the sources.list of
on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:59:20PM +1000, Jimi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am looking for an apt-proxy like program that can download packages
> when told not when a client requests them. However, it could record
> requests being made to download at a later date, and then once
>
I am looking for an apt-proxy like program that can download packages when told
not when a client requests them. However, it could record requests being made to
download at a later date, and then once downloaded, serve the packages in an
apt-proxy fashion.
I don't want to create a complete m
gt; >Hi all,
> >
> >I've read that a MAX_CACHE_SIZE is on a TODO list, but not implemented yet
> >(though perhaps that has changed; I can't get to the apt-proxy list
> >archives
> >at the moment).
> >
> >In the absence of that, how will apt-proxy rea
Hi all,
I've read that a MAX_CACHE_SIZE is on a TODO list, but not implemented yet
(though perhaps that has changed; I can't get to the apt-proxy list archives
at the moment).
In the absence of that, how will apt-proxy react if I put it on its own
filesystem and consequently it simpl
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:08:56PM +0200, Frank Langanke wrote:
> This works for apt-get, how do I enable such a login-procedure for
> apt-proxy ? I tried to set the http_proxy and ftp_proxy variables like
> ftp_proxy=ftp://firewall_user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/, but
> with no success.
ap
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:46:30PM +0200, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Thanks. I just needed to add 'apt-proxy : LOCAL, 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0'
> to my /etc/hosts.allow. I can connect to my local proxy now with no problem,
> however I now get this error:
Hmm, your config looks
onfiguration,
> taken from the apt.conf:
>
> ftp
> {
> Proxy "ftp://firewall.company.de";;
>
> ProxyLogin
> {
> "USER [EMAIL PROTECTED] firewall_user"; "PASS
> firewall_passwd";
> "PASS anonymous"
Last night I installed apt-proxy on my Woody system. It doesn't work. I have
searched the debian-user archives, the apt-proxy-user archives, and done a
general Google search, but I still can't figure this out. The only relevant
discussions I found were in German and my German is a
e";;
ProxyLogin
{
"USER [EMAIL PROTECTED] firewall_user";
"PASS firewall_passwd";
"PASS anonymous";
}
};
This works for apt-get, how do I enable such a login-procedure for
apt-proxy ? I tried to set the http_proxy and ftp_pr
/P-Pro-200 unstable/main Packages
> Connection failed
This shows that apt is unable to establish a connection to apt-proxy.
Normally you should see inetd listening on that port for you:
$ sudo netstat -nlp | grep
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
you will not have anything listening there. Maybe you need
> to restart inetd? Or change your hosts.allow/.deny, see tcpd(8). If tcpd
> accepts a connection you should see a message in /var/log/daemon.log like
> this:
>
Thanks. I just needed to add 'apt-proxy : LOCAL, 192.168.0.0/2
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:37:26AM +0100, Chris Halls wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:24:09PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> > Is /var/cache/apt-proxy self contained? If I back up that directory,
> > together with /etc/apt-proxy, can I then just reinst
Hi Richard,
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:24:09PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> Is /var/cache/apt-proxy self contained? If I back up that directory,
> together with /etc/apt-proxy, can I then just reinstall apt-proxy
> and unpack those 2 to be back where I was? Or are there some ind
Hi all,
Is /var/cache/apt-proxy self contained? If I back up that directory,
together with /etc/apt-proxy, can I then just reinstall apt-proxy
and unpack those 2 to be back where I was? Or are there some indexes
or something hidden away?
Many thanks,
Richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
How do you add proxy server settings to apt-proxy? The man pages don't
seem to indicate a setting.
If one is using apt and not apt-proxy this is possible using, IIRC,
/etc/apt/apt-conf.
-Andy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Chris Halls wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:41:40PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
>
>
>>I would be glad to help if I end up getting a little better
>>understanding. I will read more of the apt-proxy script.
>>
>Thank you for offering :) Actually there is a rewri
ould be glad to help if I end up getting a little better
> understanding. I will read more of the apt-proxy script.
Thank you for offering :) Actually there is a rewrite in Python already in
alpha status, and the docs will need reworking for that, so I wouldn't
recommend spending lots
would be glad to help if I end up getting a little better
understanding. I will read more of the apt-proxy script.
>>In this case I may be closer than I think. For security I have:
>>
>>add_backend /security/ \
>> $APT_PROXY_CACHE/s
from the apt-proxy.conf that
I suggested you look at:
# Debian security
#deb http://APTPROXY:/security stable/updates main contrib non-free
(well, you need to change 'stable' to 'testing' and set your apt-proxy
host name, but otherwise it is correct for you.)
Hope that helps,
Chris
msg5/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Chris Halls wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:12:27AM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
>
>
>>I have been trying to use apt-proxy but haven't successful because I
>>really don't know how it works. I have begun to read the 30 page
>>apt-proxy script and that
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:54:08AM -0400, Jason Bleazard wrote:
> I've recently started using apt-proxy, and today discovered that I
> apparently don't have the settings quite right for security. The other
> settings all have been okay so far, so apt-proxy does work for m
Grettings,
I've recently started using apt-proxy, and today discovered that I
apparently don't have the settings quite right for security. The other
settings all have been okay so far, so apt-proxy does work for me.
Also, apt-get update seems to work okay and find the package lis
Andrea Balzi wrote:
Hi,
I have installed a PC in a LAN where is not web-proxy without problems.
After I put the PC in to a LAn with a web-proxy (squid), I've create
the apt.conf file in to /etc/apt directory with the following line:
Acquire::http::Proxy "10.0.0.169:1428"
try:
Acquire::h
README since most README's in
/usr/share/doc don't seem to say much.
My first problem was having lines in the client sources.list that didn't
match. Having fixed that I may be here:
Q: A connection cannot be established with apt-proxy on a remote machine.
Nothing appears in th
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 01:22:12PM -0700, Paul Scott,,, wrote:
> When I run apt-get update on the other machine I get 111 connection refused.
>
> Do I need something in /etc/exports or /etc/hosts.allow?
A quote from the README:
Q: A connection cannot be established with apt-proxy on
I just installed apt-proxy. I stopped and started inetd. I have lines
in sources.list on another machine addressing this machine. The default
apt-proxy.conf looks fine for now.
When I run apt-get update on the other machine I get 111 connection refused.
Do I need something in /etc/exports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:08:39PM +0200, Andrea Balzi wrote:
> When I tried launch "apt-get install " but did not contact the
> proxy for the demands.
> Have mistaken I something?
Yes. Edit /etc/environment.
Mine looks like this (for example...)
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
