I had the master muted. I was sure I unmuted it before.
Thank you very much for your help.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nd run /etc/init.d/alsa to save the
settings. Also make sure your card is supported by the snd-emu10k1
driver (i.e. that is a real SB Live!, not the so called SB Live! build
by Dell).
best regards
Andreas Janssen
--
Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 ICQ #17079270
R
Glenn Meehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> should I tell kde the device is OSS or ALSA?
ALSA, or autodetect.
> I have checked all the volume levels (that I can) in alsamixer.
Did you unmute the channels?
> There is no mention of the sound card in dmesg. Does this mean that
> the card is not b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glenn Meehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which kernel options should I use? Should I create modules or compile
> into the kernel?
Go with modules for everything that isn't used to boot. You probably
want the emu10k1 module.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 19:29, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Hello
> Kernel 2.6 comes with both ALSA and OSS drivers. It is very likely that
> discover/hotplug try to load both and because of that the card does not
> work properly. Make sure the alsa-base and alsa-oss packages are
> installed, and that
Hello
Glenn Meehan (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I'm having problems getting my sound card (SB Live!) working with the
> kernel 2.6.8.1.
>
> It was working fine with 2.4.26.
>
> Which kernel options should I use? Should I create modules or compile
> into th
Hi,
I'm having problems getting my sound card (SB Live!) working with the
kernel 2.6.8.1.
It was working fine with 2.4.26.
Which kernel options should I use? Should I create modules or compile
into the kernel?
I'm using the testing branch with kde 3.3.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Monday 05 July 2004 04:35 am, Erik Steffl wrote:
>alsa used to work on my system, I didn't change anything I think
> might be related and suddenly the modprobe -v snd-seq-oss freezes.
I don't know anything about the root cause of the problem, but FWIW someone
just reported problems with a
alsa used to work on my system, I didn't change anything I think
might be related and suddenly the modprobe -v snd-seq-oss freezes.
system:
debian unstable
kernel 2.6.5 (with alsa)
I did not change kernel or modules (I checked and there are no
new/changed files under /lib/modules/2.6.5
On Saturday 03 July 2004 05:35 am, LeVA wrote:
> I'm asking for help, to make the rear speakers working with
> this sb live card.
I have no idea how to control them independently from the front speakers, but
I have all five working.
I run ALSA rather than OSS.
I have an RCA cable p
Hi!
I have an SB Live! 5.1 PCI soundcard. It's pci id is
1102:0002
I can access three dsp devices under my /dev. These
are /dev/dsp , dsp0 and dsp1.
I can test the dsp devices with:
`cat /usr/bin/mc > /dev/dsp' -> Front Speakers
`cat /usr/bin/mc > /dev/dsp0' ->
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 02:33, Baka Tamas wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 September 2003 06.20, Alex Malinovich wrote:
--snip--
> > i.e. modprobe -r emu10k1
> >
> > After that, you'll want to make sure that you have the appropriate ALSA
> > drivers loaded:
> >
> > modprobe snd-emu10k1
--snip--
> Thanx, it w
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 06.20, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> Sorry, but I accidentally deleted your previous reply. As it wasn't on
> list, I'm also taking the opportunity to put us back on-list with the
> discussion.
>
> If OSS is working but ALSA isn't, that's a problem. OSS should not be
> wor
Sorry, but I accidentally deleted your previous reply. As it wasn't on
list, I'm also taking the opportunity to put us back on-list with the
discussion.
If OSS is working but ALSA isn't, that's a problem. OSS should not be
working at all, except through the ALSA-provided OSS compatibility
support.
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:07:11AM +0200, Baka Tamas wrote:
> I tried installing the alsa stuff that I think is needed and was somewhat
> successful :-)
>
> Now I can choose the ALSA drivers in xmms and kde too, but an error message
> comes up: error opening alsa device: No such device (same err
s howto set up the sound right?
>
> Well, for starters, are you using the OSS drivers or the ALSA drivers?
> That's going to make a big difference. In my experience, getting the OSS
> drivers working with an SB live is very painless, but the ALSA drivers
> work much better with mu
eakers work only, and the volume slider on
> the speakers (its a philips thingy) have only minimal effect.
>
> Any ideas howto set up the sound right?
Well, for starters, are you using the OSS drivers or the ALSA drivers?
That's going to make a big difference. In my experience, g
Hi!
I've been a Mandrake user for 2 years, and now I'm experimenting with Debian.
I like it very much so far, only having trouble with sound and Nvidia.
So, my problem is:
I upgraded to sid, and I do have sound, but it is not working as I expected.
In mandrake I only had to unmute it and set u
Please don't top post.
Good point. Participation on too many top post heavy lists has lead to
some bad habits :-)
You can find that module in the latest kernel versions. I use it myself.
Either download a pre-built kernel binary (look for kernel-image packages), or
better yet, build
On 03/12/02 Peter van Oene did speaketh:
> When modprobe tells me i'm missing emu10k1, do I just go to creative and
> download it?
>
>
> almo:~# modprobe emu10k1
> modprobe: Can't locate module emu10k1
Please don't top post.
You can find that module in the latest kernel versions. I
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:06:57PM -0500, Bruce Park wrote:
> Hmm, which kernel are you using? I am using 2.4.18.bf24. It was only
> loaded because I chose to install it when I first installed the
> system.
The boot floppy kernels are missing a bunch of stuff since they're not
intended for normal
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:40:11AM -0500, Peter van Oene wrote:
> When modprobe tells me i'm missing emu10k1, do I just go to creative and
> download it?
>
>
> almo:~# modprobe emu10k1
> modprobe: Can't locate module emu10k1
It's standard in the 2.4 kernels. 'apt-get install
kernel-image-2.4.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 2:40 pm, Peter van Oene wrote:
> When modprobe tells me i'm missing emu10k1, do I just go to creative and
> download it?
>
This is in the standard debian 2.4 kernels - set up one of these thats
appropriate to your CPU
- -
Peter van Oene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SB Live
Date: 03 Dec 2002 09:40:11 -0500
When modprobe tells me i'm missing emu10k1, do I just go to creative and
download it?
almo:~# modprobe emu10k1
modprobe: Can't locate module emu10k1
tx
pete
On Tue
n anyone point me to a decent FAQ or HOWTO describing how to enable
> > support for my SB Live? I'm pretty noobed, and can't seem to get it
> > going.
>
> It's quite simple, as far as soundcards go. Try the following:
>
> modprobe emu10k1
>
>
It looks like Michael is absolutely correct about this. I too had a problem
loading it and although I had emu10k1 already loaded, I wasn't added to the
'audio' group. Make sure to do that and restart.
bp
From: "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL
On 03/12/02 Peter van Oene did speaketh:
> Can anyone point me to a decent FAQ or HOWTO describing how to enable
> support for my SB Live? I'm pretty noobed, and can't seem to get it
> going.
It's quite simple, as far as soundcards go. Try the following:
modprob
Can anyone point me to a decent FAQ or HOWTO describing how to enable
support for my SB Live? I'm pretty noobed, and can't seem to get it
going.
Thanks
Pete
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
efore, using a customer kernel and frozen at the time.
> >
> >
> > What is the cause? Is there a way to fix the module so the kernel can
> > remain stock? Has anyone else ran into related issues with the SB Live
> > card and stock kernels & modules?
> >
> >
Shawn Lamson said:
>
> I thought that Linus was quoted as saying that the function of the kernel
> should not be to pass messages to modules. That it should
> interact directly with hardware. (obviously I am not quoting here). ie.
> the kernel _should_ be monolithic. Why are they going to
> "m
--- nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip
>If it can be compiled into the kernel it will
>be on my systems. Which makes me sad to see that future linux
>kernels will be module-only.
snip
I thought that Linus was quoted as saying that the function of the
kernel should not be to pass messag
Andy said:
> A side question if you don't mind.
> It is my understanding that people use modules
> to make a lighter/smaller kernel. Is that correct?
> Other reasons?
some things cannot be compiled into the kernel, or cannot be
easily compiled into the kernel. examples are nvidia drivers,
A side question if you don't mind.
It is my understanding that people use modules
to make a lighter/smaller kernel. Is that correct?
Other reasons?
I have compiled kernels 30 times or so and most of the
time I have no modules loaded. (maybe because I am clueless?)
Are modules supposed to
Wolftales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-31 14:57:19 -0800]:
>
> I am trying to troubleshoot why I do not have sound on my system
> (specific info below). I have had this hardware configuration working
> before, using a customer kernel and frozen at the time.
> [...]
> sandbox:~# insmod emu10k1
> Us
lar to the problems I had using the stock kernel
> 2.4.18 & 2.4.19 as well for debian on this system. The research I have
> done suggests rebuilding the kernel with SB Live support inside the
> kernel instead of as a module resolve the issue for some using SUSE, but
> I would like ti
you can try downloading and compiling the driver from Creative
http://www.americas.creative.com/support/files/download.asp?Centric=107&OS=12&descID=346
=
Shawn Lamson
Debian Gnu\Linux Sid
Kernel 2.4.19-custom
XFree86 Version 4.2.1
__
Do you Yah
for debian on this system. The research I have
done suggests rebuilding the kernel with SB Live support inside the
kernel instead of as a module resolve the issue for some using SUSE, but
I would like ti stay with a stock kernel if possible (translated :)
system wouldn't boot after attempting t
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, sdownes wrote:
> I'm using the emu10k1 driver & I've been trying a few bits of software
> over the last few weeks to no effect. (Most recently wavp & wavr) Reading
> the how to gives very little info & seems to think it should just work.
>
> Reading your reply I have had a lo
I'm using emu10k1 with the sound card with sound, soundcore, & ac97_codec.
Reading between the lines on your email would suggest this is not enough.
The sound-HOWTOs seem to suggest that this should work but don't offer
much help.
I have had a brief look at alsa & again it seems a bit vague on
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, sdownes wrote:
> I've got a deb 2.4 system (testing) working fine & my soundblaster live
> card is working fine as far as playing is concerned. It will take inputs
> from wav files & line inputs & play them no problem. I am also using aumix
> without problems.
>
> I cannot per
I've got a deb 2.4 system (testing) working fine & my soundblaster live
card is working fine as far as playing is concerned. It will take inputs
from wav files & line inputs & play them no problem. I am also using aumix
without problems.
I cannot persuade it to record from any source to file.
I'd like to get wavetable synthesis working on my SB Live!. PCM works
fine. FM synth works as well as can be expected. I'm using
kernel-image-2.4.18-k6 and the matching alsa-modules. I use devfs. Do
I need to do something with the snd-emu10k1-synth module in
/etc/modutils/al
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 05:50:27PM +0200, Matthias Ospelkaus wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have got a problem: I am using woody installed via netinst. After
> configuring X I now would like to make my sound card working! It's an
> soundblaster live value pci. So I created a new file /etc/modutils/sound
>
Hi all,
I have got a problem: I am using woody installed via netinst. After
configuring X I now would like to make my sound card working! It's an
soundblaster live value pci. So I created a new file /etc/modutils/sound
with two lines: alias char-major-14 emu10k1 and alias sound emu10k1. In
con
Hi all,
I have got a problem: I am using woody installed via netinst. After
configuring X I now would like to make my sound card working! It's an
soundblaster live value pci. So I created a new file /etc/modutils/sound
with two lines: alias char-major-14 emu10k1 and alias sound emu10k1. In
con
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:16:30PM -0700, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> Derek Williams said:
> >> ALSA is still officially beta, so the packages are still in a state of
> >> flux; it always seems at least a bit broken when I try them with my
> >> SBLive.
> >
> > I have gotten alsa working with my sblive.
Derek Williams said:
>> ALSA is still officially beta, so the packages are still in a state of
>> flux; it always seems at least a bit broken when I try them with my
>> SBLive.
>
> I have gotten alsa working with my sblive... don't think I did anything
> special. Running alsaconf always seemed to g
> ALSA is still officially beta, so the packages are still in a state of flux;
> it always seems at least a bit broken when I try them with my SBLive.
I have gotten alsa working with my sblive... don't think I did anything
special. Running alsaconf always seemed to get it working properly. If I
re
Howdy,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:06:44PM +, Alan James wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 07:56:16AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> > Oh, ok, so that's "soundcore". But is that a problem -- will startup
> > scripts expect soundcore to be a module?
>
> I dont think it'll be a problem. I have
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 07:56:16AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Oh, ok, so that's "soundcore". But is that a problem -- will startup
> scripts expect soundcore to be a module?
I dont think it'll be a problem. I have a module so i wouldnt really know
though. I dont think I have any audio related
At 11:04 AM 3/20/2002 +, Alan James wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:44:23PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
>>
>> I think I need soundcore, but I'm not clear what kernel config I should
>> use to build it. I'm not clear if I need ALSA or OSS in addition.
>>
>> fgrep SOUND /boot/config-2.4.1
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:44:23PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
>
> I think I need soundcore, but I'm not clear what kernel config I should
> use to build it. I'm not clear if I need ALSA or OSS in addition.
>
> fgrep SOUND /boot/config-2.4.17 | grep -v ^#
> CONFIG_SOUND=y
Thats why you dont h
High,
ok, please wrap your lines at 72 chars.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Argh! - HOWTO overload.
>
> I've got a Sound Blaster Live Value. I'm running Debian Testing. I've
> build my own kernel 2.4.17 from kernel-source package. I did build the
> emu10k1 module. I ran modconf
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Bill Moseley wrote:
> Argh! - HOWTO overload.
>
> I've got a Sound Blaster Live Value. I'm running Debian Testing. I've
> build my own kernel 2.4.17 from kernel-source package. I did build the
> emu10k1 module. I ran modconf and selected emu10k1. emu10k1 loads fine
> with
Argh! - HOWTO overload.
I've got a Sound Blaster Live Value. I'm running Debian Testing. I've build
my own kernel 2.4.17 from kernel-source package. I did build the emu10k1
module. I ran modconf and selected emu10k1. emu10k1 loads fine without
errors. I can cp some .wav files to /dev/audi
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:55:42AM -0800, David Wright wrote:
>
> > But anyways, you should make sure that the card is not muted.
>
> Thanks for the tip; I'll try it when I get home. But... what is "muted"? (I
> know what the word means, I just don't know why one would do such a thing to
> a so
I just added a Creative SB Live! 5.1 card to my machine -- my first
sound card -- and am having trouble with it. On the software side,
everything seems to run just perfectly, but it produces no sound.
Right off the top: I can use normal stero speakers even with a
surround-sound card, right? I
> But anyways, you should make sure that the card is not muted.
Thanks for the tip; I'll try it when I get home. But... what is "muted"? (I
know what the word means, I just don't know why one would do such a thing to a
soundcard.)
David Wright went something in the lines of:
> Creative EMU10K1 PCI Audio Driver, version 0.16, 15:45:02 Oct 13 2001
> PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device 00:0a.0
> emu10k1: EMU10K1 rev 8 model 0x8064 found, IO at 0x9000-0x901f, IRQ 5
> ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x8384:0x7608 (SigmaTel STAC9708)
>
I just added a Creative SB Live! 5.1 card to my machine -- my first
sound card -- and am having trouble with it. On the software side,
everything seems to run just perfectly, but it produces no sound.
Right off the top: I can use normal stero speakers even with a
surround-sound card, right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 9:01 pm, Brad Cramer wrote:
> I have asked this before and still can't get the problem fixed so here we
> go again.
> System specs:
...
> SB Live 5.1 sound card
> Running Debian Sid with alsa 0.9.0
Brad Cramer, 2001-Dec-11 15:01 -0600:
> I have asked this before and still can't get the problem fixed so here we go
> again.
> System specs:
> AMD Athlon 1.4
> 512 meg PC2100 DDR RAM
> Nividia Geforce Ti200 agp video card
> Realtek NIC card
> WinTV tv card
> SB
I don't have your card, so I'm stabbing in the dark a little,
but it looks to me like you need lines like
alias sound-slot-0 sb
in your /etc/modules.conf file. I use a vanilla soundblaster,
so I alias mine to "sb". You'll have to do something different
there.
G'luck
I have asked this before and still can't get the problem fixed so here we go
again.
System specs:
AMD Athlon 1.4
512 meg PC2100 DDR RAM
Nividia Geforce Ti200 agp video card
Realtek NIC card
WinTV tv card
SB Live 5.1 sound card
Running Debian Sid with alsa 0.9.0beta10 compiled from so
i Heinonen wrote:
> I changed form the 2.4.7 kernel to the 2.4.8 about a week ago,
> and still have a problem with SB live. Problem is that it
> _looks_ like it work, but it doesn't. For example, xmms starts
> playing mp3, but nothing comes out of the speakers. I've
> che
* Petteri Heinonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2001-08-18 10:00):
> I changed form the 2.4.7 kernel to the 2.4.8 about a week ago,
> and still have a problem with SB live. Problem is that it
> _looks_ like it work, but it doesn't. For example, xmms starts
> playing mp3, but n
I changed form the 2.4.7 kernel to the 2.4.8 about a week ago,
and still have a problem with SB live. Problem is that it
_looks_ like it work, but it doesn't. For example, xmms starts
playing mp3, but nothing comes out of the speakers. I've
checked that nothing is muted in mixer (gmixer)
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Ray Percival wrote:
I see that potato has 2.2.17pre6, but woody is just 2.2.17 (the final, I
assume).
Can I just install the woody deb for kernel-source? Anybody know if it's
compatable?
> Or if you don't want to rebuild your kernel go to opensource.creative.com.
>
> ---
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 04:24:04PM -0700, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Matthias Czapla wrote:
>
> > In Kernel 2.2.17 there is direct Support for SB Live!. Just compile it
> > in.
>
> I keep hearing this and I keep looking and I can't find it in my
Or if you don't want to rebuild your kernel go to opensource.creative.com.
-- Original Message --
From: S.Salman Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:45:53 -0500
>> "RM" == Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, Matthias Czapla wrote:
> In Kernel 2.2.17 there is direct Support for SB Live!. Just compile it
> in.
I keep hearing this and I keep looking and I can't find it in my 2.2.17
source (from potato debian package).
_Please_ point me to a file!
...RickM...
13sQQS-05t-00
> After managing to get my XFree86 4.0.1 running last night (which
> seemed an achievement) I set upon setting up an SB Live! (Xgamer)... I
> downloaded the drivers from opensource.creative.com and compiled them
> with few warnings. I then did a 'make install'
Sorry,
but isn't the SB-Live already included into the 2.2.17-kernel?
why not compiling a new one then?
greetings,
Michael
>Hello,
>
> After managing to get my XFree86 4.0.1 running last night (which
> seemed an achievement) I set upon setting up an SB Live! (Xgamer)... I
Hello,
After managing to get my XFree86 4.0.1 running last night (which
seemed an achievement) I set upon setting up an SB Live! (Xgamer)... I
downloaded the drivers from opensource.creative.com and compiled them
with few warnings. I then did a 'make install' and got the followin
Hello everyone,
Has anyone been able to get MIDI working with the SB Live (and
preferably ALSA) without resorting to timidity? I think I read
somewhere that the same tools that are used to load soundfonts into the
AWE series (sfxload?) work also with the SB Live. Has anyone tried this
and if so
You seem to have the right idea with #1 below. Compiling the modules seems
to be a little tricky for some people, so I'll tell you how I handle it.
Install the alsa-source and other alsa debs. You'll have an
'alsa-driver.tar.gz' file in /usr/src that you'll have to extract yourself
(I believe it'
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 07:11:28PM +0200, Fehér Csaba - Egyetem wrote:
> I'm very beginner in Linux. I'm using the Slink with 2.0.36 kernel.
i don't know, wether the SB Live is supported by Linux 2.0.36.
> I'd like to use ISDN, but the hisax answers: 'resource b
ny CD
Rom CDU711 + 2 HDDs + Adaptec AHA-1542 SCSII card (ISA) + Matshita CD-R
CW-7502 + ISA NE-series Ethernet Adapter + Fritz! Card PCI (for ISDN) + SB
Live Value sound card
My second problem is:
I do not install the SB Live Value.
Thanx for helping!
Csaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RAM) (PCI) + Sony
CD Rom CDU711 + 2 HDDs + Adaptec AHA-1542 SCSII card (ISA)+
Matshita
CD-R CW-7502 + ISA NE-series Ethernet Adapter + Fritz! Card PCI
(for ISDN) + SB Live Value sound
card
My second problem is:
I do not install the SB Live
Value.
Thanx for
27;t want to upgrade to woody so how do I get
> > just the debs for ALSA without upgrading?
>
> I'm using kernel 2.2.17, and I have a SB Live! Value card. I just
> grabbed the Creative Labs module source, built it, and modprobed it
> in. Done.
>
You could als
for ALSA without upgrading?
I'm using kernel 2.2.17, and I have a SB Live! Value card. I just
grabbed the Creative Labs module source, built it, and modprobed it
in. Done.
Mike
Hi
I'm forwarding this message again because it didn't seem to get to the
list; I will add a couple of questions.
I recently installed Potato and now would like to set up sound.
I have already read on the mailing list some stuff about installing
sound support but would like to check a few things
Hello all,
Everyone thanks for your help. I ended up downloading the ALSA stuff
from the unstable directory and after some playing around managed to get
everything intalled in proper order. The really cool thing is that now
my rear speakers are working as they should as opposed to my SuSE
instal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I'm trying to get my SB Live to work with Debian 2.2 and ALSA. The
> ALSA that ships with Debian 2.2 doesn't appear to have the driver I
> need for the SB Live. So I have a few questions.
I just downloaded he 5.9b source from t
On Sun, Aug 20, 2000 at 03:13:07PM +, David Bellows wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm trying to get my SB Live to work with Debian 2.2 and ALSA. The ALSA
> that ships with Debian 2.2 doesn't appear to have the driver I need for
> the SB Live. So I have a few questions.
&
Hello all,
I'm trying to get my SB Live to work with Debian 2.2 and ALSA. The ALSA
that ships with Debian 2.2 doesn't appear to have the driver I need for
the SB Live. So I have a few questions.
1. I directed apt to get stuff from the unstable branch which has an
ALSA that has
> -Original Message-
> From: Joachim Trinkwitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 12:21 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Creative SB Live! 1024
>
>
> As I wrote in my initial posting, the card is working (it only doesn&#x
Hi there,
Sound has to be compiled as a module but it works fine with SMP!
Regards JohnG
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ John Gould _/
_/ Senior Systems Support Engineer _/
_/ Power Innovations Limited
Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
> The question is why I don't have the modversion.h, which the compiler
> can't find.
>
You'll need to select "Set version information on all symbols for modules" in
the Loadable Module Support section when you compile your kernel.
Jonathan
sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You didn't compile sound support into the kernel did you? Also, this
> kernel doesn't work if you are using a kernel with SMP enabled. For the
> driver to work sound support has to be compiled as a module
> (soudcore.o) and SMP has to be disabled.
As I wrote in m
You didn't compile sound support into the kernel did you? Also, this
kernel doesn't work if you are using a kernel with SMP enabled. For the
driver to work sound support has to be compiled as a module
(soudcore.o) and SMP has to be disabled.
~Sam
On 6 Apr 2000, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
> sam <[E
sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Go to this site and download the source for the sblive kernel module
> (emu10k1) http://opensource.creative.com/
>
> Once that is compiled, cp it to /lib/modules/kernelversion#here/misc/
Thanks, but compiling fails with:
"Please run make dep in your kernel sou
On 5 Apr 2000, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to get my new Creative SB Live! 1024 soundcard to work with
> esound (for GNOME). It seems to work only with ALSA, but the newer
> version 0.5, not the older one. I have successfully compiled the alsa
> modules from the als
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] _/
_/ Tel: +44 1234 223002 Fax: +44 1234 223000_/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
On 5 Apr 2000, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to get my new Creative SB Live! 1024 soundcard to work with
> esound (for GN
Hi,
I try to get my new Creative SB Live! 1024 soundcard to work with
esound (for GNOME). It seems to work only with ALSA, but the newer
version 0.5, not the older one. I have successfully compiled the alsa
modules from the alsa-sources deb, the card works from the command
line, but then I&#
I have seen several recent posts from people who could not get their SB Live
card to work under Linux. If you have problems with this card, you might
check out the article at:
http://www.linuxnewbie.org/nhf/intel/soundcards/sblive.html
--
Andrew
-
GnuPG Public
I made a fatal mistake...
I added /usr/src/linux/include/linux :((
So I can't compile it.
Thanks for your help.
It sounds very nice ;-)
Bye,
Sven
Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 05:22:18PM +0100, SGaerner wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > There are still
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 05:22:18PM +0100, SGaerner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There are still problems with the SB Live kernel module.
> I have added the following lines...
>
> Makefile:
> -I/usr/src/linux/include to the line
> CFLAGS += -I$(INCLUDEDIR) -I.
> newline-
Hi!
There are still problems with the SB Live kernel module.
I have added the following lines...
Makefile:
-I/usr/src/linux/include to the line
CFLAGS += -I$(INCLUDEDIR) -I.
newline--> CFLAGS += -I$(INCLUDEDIR) -I. -I/usr/src/linux/include
audio.c:
after the following line I ad
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 02:29:44AM +0100, Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote:
> Raaahhh, too simple: there are many things to change :((
Sorry, forget it: the PB was comming from the include directories
as many people, I began with 2.0.36, which is always set in /usr/include;
so I just changed, in Makefi
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
