Re: smail drops off; what to replace it with? exim?

dman said: > | Ah, yes, I think you're right: > | > | timshel# apt-get install -d exim > ... > | I just tried the above and then exited. I didn't actually run it yet, > > See the '-s' option. It tells apt to simulate the operation, but to > not actually try to execute it. It also gives more deta

Re: smail drops off; what to replace it with? exim?

On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 06:02:23PM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote: | Vineet Kumar said: | > * Rick Macdonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020502 15:31]: | >> I've never tried to replace a package that has many packages that | >> require it. What do I tell apt to get it to remove smail and install | >> its rep

Re: smail drops off; what to replace it with? exim?

Vineet Kumar said: > * Rick Macdonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020502 15:31]: >> I've never tried to replace a package that has many packages that >> require it. What do I tell apt to get it to remove smail and install >> its replacement? > > apt-get install exim Ah, yes, I think you're right: timshe

Re: smail drops off; what to replace it with? exim?

* Rick Macdonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020502 15:31]: > > smail keeps dropping off my woody system and I have to continually restart > it. > > Rather than deal with the problem I thought I'd just replace it. A newer > woody system seems to have exim. The system with smail has been running > Debian

Re: smail error on setup- FQDN does not match

> "cxpx" == cxpx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: cxpx> I get the following error after 'apt-get install linuxconf' (which in turn cxpx> wants smail or exim- both get the same error). cxpx> Setting up smail (3.2.0.111-1) ... cxpx> Error: system's FQDN hostname (the_kernel) doesn'

Re: smail says "550 You are not permitted to send mail"

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:39:40PM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote: > Aha, smailconfig. OK, I tried reinstalling smail before and now running > smailconfig, same error. Guess I'll try exim next. exim is the standard MTA for Debian these days - in fact, smail was removed from potato due to a number o

Re: smail says "550 You are not permitted to send mail"

Bwahahaha upon removing smail apt-get installed sendmail which comes with its own e-z konfiguration skrypt and runs great. Can't see why anyone would want to use anything else. Can't see either why anyone would want to have a mail daemon on their box other than for mailing cron output, given that

Re: smail says "550 You are not permitted to send mail"

> You should try reconfiguring smail - there's probably a program called > smailconfig in /usr/sbin that will do that for you, or failing that > removoing and reinstalling should do the trick. If smail doesn't > configure itself I'd try another MTA (exim is the default choice for > recent Debian

Re: smail says "550 You are not permitted to send mail"

On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 09:39:08AM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote: > Sendmail (which is smail, anyway) doesn't work either. Invoking the sendmail binary gets you the same MTA but it bypasses many of the checks MTAs perform > It neither sends the mail nor returns it to the sender like it claims to.

Re: smail says "550 You are not permitted to send mail"

Sendmail (which is smail, anyway) doesn't work either. It neither sends the mail nor returns it to the sender like it claims to. -chris 09:33:06$ sendmail root aoeusnaohe 09:33:20$ smail: mail moved to /var/spool/smail/error/13FJGC-0006PKC 09:33:43# cat /var/spool/smail/error/13FJGC-0006PKC !ro

Re: smail says "550 You are not permitted to send mail"

On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 09:58:47AM -0700, Krzys Majewski wrote: > 550 You are not permitted to send mail localhost isn't in the list of systems that smail will allow to forward mail through it. How you tell smail about that I don't know. > What gives? The only reason I'm trying to set this up

Re: smail routing

Hi, I tried that, and indeed when I have set this sort of thing up before using TIS Gauntlet this is what you do. However, because I am on a dial-up line smail is delivering to the smarthost as soon as it sees that the mail is not local ie it never checks DNS. So the problem appears to be, ho

RE: Smail help needed from newbie

. -paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Abdul Aziz Sent: Sunday, October 17, 1999 1:25 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Smail help needed from newbie "Dwayne C . Litzenberger" wrote: &

Re: Smail help needed from newbie

"Dwayne C . Litzenberger" wrote: > > How far does the mail get before it bounces? (does it get to your ISP's mail > server?) It could be that your machine name is not a valid domain name, and > therefore DNS confirmation fails. Thanks for the reply - it does not get to the ISP's mail server but

Re: Smail help needed from newbie

How far does the mail get before it bounces? (does it get to your ISP's mail server?) It could be that your machine name is not a valid domain name, and therefore DNS confirmation fails. BTW I use exim instead of smail, and it works like a charm. On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 07:16:53PM +, Abdul A

Re: smail misconfigured?

Markus Reuscher wrote: > > Hi all! > > I want to receive mails on my server with the addresse > [EMAIL PROTECTED] When I send mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] everything is allright. > But when I send mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get this > reply: > >- Transcript of s

Re: Smail rewrite From address

Steve George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Any pointers to info along these lines would be great - atm I've had to giveup > mutt for Netscape mailer :-( Mutt can rewrite the From: header for you. In my ~/.muttrc (sort of) I have this: my_hdr From: Greg Wooledge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I don't use

Re: Smail rewrite From address

On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Steve George wrote: > Hi, > > I currently use a Debian machine as my main machine at work but am having a > problem with mail. The problem is that I need the from address to be > [EMAIL PROTECTED] .com but smail keeps making the From address > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Because w

Re: Smail rewrite From address

I once used smail (use sendmail now). If the "From" header rewrite problem is the same as it was, you can go to the www.debian.org site, follow the "Documentation" link, then follow the "FAQ-O-MATIC" link to find your answer. Yes, you can change a smail configs to rewrite the "From" header t

RE: smail relay spamming

On 24-Aug-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi > > I am having problems with spam relay. I am using smail 3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2 > which doesn't seem to support the security attribute "smtp_remote_allow". > What do i need in order to make this attribute work? is there any other > viable alternative t

Re: smail doesn't read ~/.forward file

On Sun, Aug 01, 1999 at 08:52:58AM +0200, you wrote: > Hi, > I am using smail on my debian slink box with 2.2.10 kernel. > I set up my ~/.forward file in order to sort my mail through procmail > ("|/usr/bin/procmail") but it didn't work. > Trying various .forward files, I figured out that this file

Re: smail immediate delivery

On Mon, 14 Jun 1999, Max wrote: > AFAIK, smail will not work properly with libc later than 2.0.7t. I > had the same problem as you and was forced to switch to exim. But I > don't regret the switch because exim is an actively supported MTA that > performs better and is easier to configure than ex

Re: smail immediate delivery

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > smail used to work on my 'slink'-debian system to my full > satisfaction: incoming mail was delivered into my INBOX > /var/spool/mail/$USER immediately and xbiff beeped. > > Now this changed (apparently after I installed a few packages from > 'potato' to get licq versio

Re: smail immediate delivery

Same behavior here (Full Potato from the I-net) Please let me know if you have a solution to this with best regards Reiner Stallknecht ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Smail hosed.

On Sat, 5 Jun 1999, Dan Willard wrote: > I've apparently hosed smail. Mail still comes in, but doesn't get put into > my mailbox, it just sits in /var/spool/smail/input. I must have killed it > while getting a Wascom tablet to work last weekend, played with libs. Can > anyone point me in the r

Re: smail config for outfoing mail

>> "AC" == Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AC> I'm registering for an ISP which gives the server for outgoing mail AC> (relay.force9.net). AC> Can anyone tell me where this has to be configured please? Run smailconfig, use Option "Internet site" and enter the name as the smarthost

Re: smail problem

>> "SZ" == Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SZ> Some sites block the emails sent from an unqualified domain. How SZ> do I configure smail so that I can send the mail via a qualified SZ> smtp, or as it looks like my domain is qualified. First make sure you don't deliver mail directly to th

Re: smail/exim/qmail/zmailer/... which MTA?

>> "ML" == Michael Laing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ML> In the near future I may need to handle daily bulkmail to a list ML> of users in the 20,000-100,000 range. I would check the documentation on www.exim.org. debian.org runs with exim, and it does pretty well. Ciao, Martin

Re: smail problem

You'll have to find docs to make your email headers be rewritten with yoour qualified domain name -Original Message- From: Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Mail List Date: Friday, 7 May 1999 11:41 Subject: smail problem >Hi, > Some sites block the emails sent from an unqualifie

Re: smail, not open email relay

:-) Done, and with the new version the attrib you suggested is exactly what I needed :-) I put this link in /usr/lib: /usr/lib/libnsl.a -> libident.a Compilation of smail-3.2.0.102-1 needed libnsl, none of the packages in the Debian1.3.1 binary CD contained such file, but I started thinking it co

Re: smail, not open email relay

>> "NB" == Nicola Bernardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NB> Alas I fear that the version string "Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #2" NB> means _before_ that feature was added, sendmail does not work any NB> more, the above line is what I got when I tried to send out mail NB> as a user of the box. You sai

Re: smail, not open email relay

Ph, installed jed which survives much better than emacs the awful Windog telnet. Also, had to install bind and libident for smail wanted them... now it asks about libnsl, I'm afraid I don't have any package containing it on the cdrom which is in the machine there... building list of packages a

Re: smail, not open email relay

Sorry, I realize that the diff file I sent was unreadable, here's a not-context one which seems to be much more clear. Anyway, I just got smail_3.2.0.102-1 sources and am going to try compiling+installing and using the attribute you suggested for /etc/smail/config :-) Nicola Output of diff -B tran

Re: smail, not open email relay

:-) Nice to meet you, I was no more expecting to have a reply. On 24 Apr 1999, Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > >> "NB" == Nicola Bernardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > NB> the problem is far from here on a Debian box permanently connected to the > NB> Internet and I would not like to update

Re: smail, not open email relay

>> "NB" == Nicola Bernardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NB> the problem is far from here on a Debian box permanently connected to the NB> Internet and I would not like to update the mail agent from here. The new standard MTA is exim. You don't have to switch, if your current setup is working O

Re: Smail -> Exim: If smail works, why change?

On Sat, Feb 20, 1999 at 11:54:31AM -0500, Jim Foltz wrote: Hi Jim, >Is there any compelling reason to switch from smail to exim? How about this: Ease of configuration with Exim, and Procmail (with it's cryptic recipes) becomes obsolute, because Exim has already very powerful filtering capabilit

Re: smail -> exim = mail now broken

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kenneth F. Ryder III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >found out that there is no cron job for exim -bd, (DOH!) it helps to be >running your mail daemon. I am not sure why there was no cron job, since >Dselect had done one for smail, when I had that installed Errr

Re: smail -> exim = mail now broken

I fixed my local mail and retrieval of ISP mail. added / changed local domains (were not set properly by eximconfig, probably a type-o by me) that took care of local mail. found out that there is no cron job for exim -bd, (DOH!) it helps to be running your mail daemon. I am not sure why there

Re: smail configuration.

I use procmail/fetchmail/smail for all my mail handlings... if I send an email locally, I would have something like from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and virge is my machine name. when I send an email to the outside world, I always use pine, and set the From: header to an email address in my uni. And my f

Re: smail configuration.

Hi, > from the ISP's mailserver instead. (man smail, look > at /usr/doc/smail, this isn't exactly easy) an easier way could be to install exim als MTA. There you have to uncommend the last two lines in exim.conf and create a file called email-addresses in /etc/ with user [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: smail configuration.

> Hi, > some sites mail spam rejects my mail because my hostname is not > qualified. > > So how do I config smail to make sure my host name is qualified. I > had a look at the man page about /etc/smail/qualify... but don't really > understand what to do with it... > Hard to answer w

Re: smail or sendmail

Martin, I've read many good things about the exim MTA here. *Is it as powerful (configurable) as sendmail?* I've run smail and sendmail--sendmail, because it's very standard for the work I'm getting into soon. Exim will be the next one I'll run, though, just to see what it will do. O

Re: smail or sendmail

>> "c" == caa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: c> i will be setting up a mailserver for the first time, can someone c> please suggest to me as what should i use, smail or sendmail .. exim Exim is smail done right. *Very* good manual. Easy to setup and configure. Ciao, Martin

Re: smail. From field

Worik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please note that the return address in the from field is something like > [EMAIL PROTECTED], and smtp.ihug.co.nz is where I send my mail. > > But I recieve it at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I would like to get [EMAIL PROTECTED] into the from field! How do I do it

Re: smail mail

Fine, but AFAIK the smail command can only be used as root. As a normal user do: runq -v George Bonser dixit: > > smail -v -q > > or smail -q > > the -v lets you watch it try to deliver the mail. > > > On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, tracheotomy bob wrote: > > > I've read the documentation but I can'

Re: smail mail

Hi! > I've read the documentation but I can't find what I'm looking for. > mailq lists the mail waiting to be sent, but is there a command that says > "Send all waiting mail NOW!" ? runq :-) -- p.

Re: Smail not delivering mail to local domain

Pat, I had the same problem and made the same change. Sorry I didn't recognize that when you posted your query; I made the change to the hostnames line in /etc/smail/config more on a hunch than based on actually understanding what I was doing ;-), and I promptly forgot about it. I had already se

Re: smail relay control

>> "AR" == Alvaro Reguly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AR> Hi .. how do I stop smail from relaying email ? make it deliver AR> email only for/from local users .. (to prevent my host to act as a AR> mail bomber for outside users for example) I have this in my /etc/smail/config smtp_remote_allow=lo

Re: smail not resolving some remote addresses

perhaps this is because there is no host debian.debian.org? methinks so. m* -- Horseman of the Digital Apocolypse

Re: smail aliases

>> "A" == Azog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: A> moved to smail... I was wondering how smail handles files similar to this. A> ex, ~alias/.qmail-ppl is a list of addresses of my friends and it allows me A> to send mail to all of them at once, how can I do this with smail? Or would A> another MTA be

Re: Smail configurationg (wrong from)

have you tried the 'set hostname' option in your ~/.muttrc or global muttrc? i believe it gets the domain name from your /etc/resolv.conf under domain. On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 12:34:49AM +0200, shaul wrote: > > Hi Sahul, > > I tried your sugestion but it fails to send any e-mail. > > A

Re: Smail configurationg (wrong from)

I am using exmh, and for this reason I can't help you with mutt (I didn't even tried to use mutt). Sorry. I think I had the same problem that you have with exmh as well, but someone on debian-user showed me how to bypass it and that is what I am doing. If you like I can send you his letter. His

Re: Smail configurationg (wrong from)

There are instructions for configuring smail to rewrite your From field, in the Debian FAQOMATIC (Courtesy of Daniel Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ): > Hi Debian users, > I'm using smail as my MTA and I have a problem: > when sending a ma

Re: smail config broken?

At 23:49 Uhr -0700 21.10.1998, George Bonser wrote: >Exim is a much better choice. Any chances that this will replace Smail as Debian's de-facto default MTA in the near future?

Re: smail problems (dial-up)

Leon Breedt writes: > > I found a command "runq" which seems to push stuff through. Is that what > > it's for? If so, how do I get this to happen automatically when I start > > the PPP link? > > any scripts in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ get run when the ppp link is established. > so, in your case, i

Re: smail problems (dial-up)

On Tue, Oct 20 1998, Moore, Paul spake thus: > I found a command "runq" which seems to push stuff through. Is that what > it's for? If so, how do I get this to happen automatically when I start > the PPP link? any scripts in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/ get run when the ppp link is established. so, in your

Re: smail not giving me my mail

Actually George, I seem to have found another bug in xfmail. I have it set to read my local spool as well as pop. The mail from my spool is getting grabbed and placed in my pop inbox rather than spool inbox. Turning that off now. On 09-Oct-98 George Bonser wrote: > > Is it sitting in the queue

Re: smail delays delivering mail from fetchmail

Hallo Michael Beattie > > I use fetchmail to download my mail from a POP3 server, and until > > recently the local smail/in.smtp process that gets that mail from > > fetchmail would immediately deliver the messages to my mailbox. Now > > it queues the mail for delivery, but doesn't actually delive

Re: smail delays delivering mail from fetchmail

On Tue, Sep 29, 1998 at 08:55:19PM -0500, Fred Yankowski wrote: > I use fetchmail to download my mail from a POP3 server, and until > recently the local smail/in.smtp process that gets that mail from > fetchmail would immediately deliver the messages to my mailbox. Now > it queues the mail for de

Re: smail delays delivering mail, not just for fetchmail

I've noticed a similar behavior with smail with no fetchmail involved. Even mail on my own system is delayed several minutes. rick --

Re: smail delays delivering mail from fetchmail

On Tue, 29 Sep 1998, Fred Yankowski wrote: > I use fetchmail to download my mail from a POP3 server, and until > recently the local smail/in.smtp process that gets that mail from > fetchmail would immediately deliver the messages to my mailbox. Now > it queues the mail for delivery, but doesn't a

Re: smail and domains SOLVED

> For some reason, I can't convince smail to expand hostnames to contain > the complete host and domain name. For example, I want to send mail > to a user on leland.stanford.edu from my Debian box which is also in > the stanford.edu domain. I should be able to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it > shou

Re: Smail and local machines

Thanks. That did the trick. A. Paul

Re: Smail and local machines

apaulh wrote: > Hello, >I am having trouble getting smail to deliver > mail between my local machines. I have a private > network setup with a debian box running as the > news and mail server. > > What I am unable to do is get the debian box (daffy) > to send mail to another box (tweety).

Re: smail question

Marlon Urias wrote: > Recently we had the problem that the smail server did not properly > mount /var/spool/mail/ from the spool server. This caused all incoming > mail to either be lost or put into the errors directory. My question is: > How did smail know not to use the local /var/spol/mail and w

Re: smail config...

Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >> "tp" == terence pua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | tp> i am looking to... | tp> 1) access my mail via POP3 | | So you want to access the mail stored at this box via pop3? You need | cucipop or qpopper. Or the imap package, which provides pop2, p

Re: smail config...

>> "tp" == terence pua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: tp> i am looking to... tp> 1) access my mail via POP3 So you want to access the mail stored at this box via pop3? You need cucipop or qpopper. You want fetch mail from your ISP with pop3? Use fetchmail. tp> 2) send mail via SMTP ??? This is wh

Re: smail config...

> i tried it but smailconfig doesn't configure the entire config file. > i am looking to... > 1) access my mail via POP3 > 2) send mail via SMTP these can both be done from the regualr config, I think. I certainly do the 2'd; i'm not sure about pop3. My mail routes through one, but I think th

Re: smail config...

rick, i tried it but smailconfig doesn't configure the entire config file. i am looking to... 1) access my mail via POP3 2) send mail via SMTP 3) forward some other mail to another email 4) forward [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] i went into the /etc/smail/config file but don't know what

Re: smail config...

> i am trying to setup the /etc/smai/config file to my configurations but > don't know if this is the right file to change. > is this the compiled-in configuration? if not, please advise. you should be using smailconfig; it does it for you. rick

Re: Smail in hamm checking DNS lookups?

>> "JB" == Jay Barbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JB> My home system is setup on a dummy network (192.168.xxx.xxx), and I do JB> typically email myself at my work Debian box which is on the net with a JB> legit IP address. Now (after the hamm upgrade, I assume) I cannot send JB> mail, and port 2

Re: Smail in hamm checking DNS lookups?

On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Jay Barbee wrote: > > I recently upgraded several of my Bo systems to Hamm. All went fine. I > am currently struggling with some of the minor changes that the new > packages have. delete use_bind in your /etc/smail/transports file's smarthost clause and probably anywhere

Re: smail smart host

Mark Yobb wrote: > I am having no luck getting my smail configured to send mail to my ISP > smart host. Can someone please let me know what is typically involved. routers: smart_host: driver=smarthost, transport=smtp; path=mail.your.provider.com Regards, Joey -- The M

Re: setting the sender field (was Re: Smail Configuration)

> I did a similar thing to get my smail working. > I use exmh/mh for email. My problem is that the sender field is set to > [EMAIL PROTECTED](FQDN). The user is jmb (or whoever I'm logged > in as) and the hostname is achimota. The network I'm on (from my dial-up > ISP) > is ziplink.net. M

Re: Smail help please

> > Hi. I really need some help here. I have fetchmail working fine. It pops > my mail off my ISP's server just fine. I can't figure out how to make smail > send mail through my account on my ISP to the internet when I am logged in. > If I use netscapes mail it works fine. I have looked thro

setting the sender field (was Re: Smail Configuration)

I did a similar thing to get my smail working. I use exmh/mh for email. My problem is that the sender field is set to [EMAIL PROTECTED](FQDN). The user is jmb (or whoever I'm logged in as) and the hostname is achimota. The network I'm on (from my dial-up ISP) is ziplink.net. My FQDN ends u

Re: Smail Configuration

On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 04:07:45PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 01:23:14AM -0500, Eric wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 03:48:27PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > > Both your From: and Reply-To: were [EMAIL PROTECTED] here. > > > I don't know what a Return-Path is,

Re: Smail Configuration

On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 01:23:14AM -0500, Eric wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 03:48:27PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > Both your From: and Reply-To: were [EMAIL PROTECTED] here. > > I don't know what a Return-Path is, nor why an MUA would be using it. > > It's my understanding that a Retur

Re: Smail Configuration

On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 03:48:27PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Both your From: and Reply-To: were [EMAIL PROTECTED] here. > I don't know what a Return-Path is, nor why an MUA would be using it. It's my understanding that a Return-Path is the header which determines where smtp errors go. For e

Re: Smail Configuration

On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 12:52:52AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 1998 at 12:20:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi , > > I have a mail account at my ISP which is SMTP. Can somebody please > > explain to me how to set up smail so that I can send and receive mails > > from

Re: Smail Configuration

On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 02:42:51AM +0300, Shaul wrote: > > Hi , > > I have a mail account at my ISP which is SMTP. Can somebody please explain > > to me how to set up smail so that I can send and receive mails from my > > machine...Right now, I am using netscape mail, but not very comfy with >

Re: Smail Configuration

On Thu, Jul 09, 1998 at 12:20:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi , > I have a mail account at my ISP which is SMTP. Can somebody please > explain to me how to set up smail so that I can send and receive mails > from my machine...Right now, I am using netscape mail, but not very > comfy with

Re: Smail Configuration

> Hi , > I have a mail account at my ISP which is SMTP. Can somebody please explain > to me how to set up smail so that I can send and receive mails from my > machine...Right now, I am using netscape mail, but not very comfy with that. > (I did look at the HOWTO, but can not make head or tail o

Re: smail errors

On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Zachary DeAquila wrote: > Hi, I've got > Linux zachs 2.0.32 #1 Tue Nov 25 17:21:48 CST 1997 i686 unknown > running > ii smail 3.2.0.92-3 Electronic mail transport system. > and smail has started exiting apparently randomly; I'm wondering if > 1) anyone has su

Re: smail

>> "PS" == Peter Shtinkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: PS> Can you tell me how to set smtp_remote_allow properly with 2 networks PS> in smail config (Hamm - distribution). [Please configure your mailer to break lines after 70 characters] This is described in man smail-config rather longish. smt

Re: smail is not working (MY USERS ARE GOING TO KILL ME)

>> "EB" == Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: EB> I go on the net (ppp) static IP address, loads of e-mail comes in from my EB> ISP by SMTP. smail does not deliever it, you have to run, runq, that does EB> not work most of the time. it has not been delievering outgoing mails they EB> just s

Re: smail set-up

Hi, I'm using smail on a laptop, and I came from sendmail :-). I'm using hamm. > 1. change the name of any outgoing mail to another username (i.e. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) I used the visible_name option in config. Actually you can set it up throught the configuration script (s

Re: smail upgrade, machine no longer accepts mail

On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Michael B. Taylor wrote: > I recently upgraded my smail to the new version (from 'stable', not the > deep frozen stuff) and my machine stopped accepting mail. I think I found > the cause. I found this in /etc/inetd.conf > # smtpstream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcp

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 10:36:41PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote: > At 07:07 -0700 1998-06-02, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > >K6 IS supported in multiprocessor, but it is using an SMP scheme called > >OpenPIC or similar. Cyrix use the same spec. Intel use a different spec > >though and no motherboards availa

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

At 07:07 -0700 1998-06-02, Hamish Moffatt wrote: >K6 IS supported in multiprocessor, but it is using an SMP scheme called >OpenPIC or similar. Cyrix use the same spec. Intel use a different spec >though and no motherboards available support the open one. No motherboards for x86 processors that is.

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

At 15:12 -0700 1998-06-02, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote: >Or going Alpha or PPC. Cost effectiveness seems to indicate PPC to me, >though there are 1,000,001 different PPC for Linux branches it seems. There are five PPC subarchitectures of Linux: * CHRP-compliant PowerPC machines * PC

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 12:07:36AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > I think I heard at some point that you can't have two K6's on the same > > board is that true? > > This is my understanding [could be wrong]: > > K6 IS supported in multiprocessor, but it is using an SMP scheme called > OpenPIC o

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

Ciao, > be sent > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (my ISP) which is definitely not what I want. I'm using smail on a hamm system. I configured smail with 1, giving the mail host of my ISP as smart host. I also have a visible name different from the name of my machine (that is the domain name of outgoing mai

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 11:17:16AM +0200, Karsten Bolding wrote: > I think I heard at some point that you can't have two K6's on the same > board is that true? This is my understanding [could be wrong]: K6 IS supported in multiprocessor, but it is using an SMP scheme called OpenPIC or similar. Cy

Re: smail anti-spam

Hallo Hamish Moffatt > Can anyone give me an example of an smtp_remote_allow for smail? > I have tried > > smtp_remote_allow=localnet:rising.com.au > > and some variations, but whatever I do, my machine hamishpc.rising.com.au > is not allowed to relay mail through. Any ideas? > smtp_remote_allow

Re: Smail spam-prevention filter?

> > Hallo Curt Howland > > > > Sure enough, there was a later version on the web site, > > taking me from v3.2 to 3.2.0.92-3. :^> > smail*92* is the last version of smail _without_ spam protection > > > > So I installed the package, and tried the smtp_remote_allow > > in the config file, as me

Re: smail says:

Hallo Derek Tam > >A sample "mailsession" could be: > > > >220-haitech.martin.home Smail-3.2.0.101 (#2 1998-Mar-18) ready at Sun, > 17 May 1998 18:21:21 +0200 (CEST) > > [snip] > > >RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >250 '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Recipient Okay. > > Ugrading to the newest hamm smail packa

Re: Smail spam-prevention filter?

> > > More info: > > Sure enough, there was a later version on the web site, > taking me from v3.2 to 3.2.0.92-3. :^> > > So I installed the package, and tried the smtp_remote_allow > in the config file, as mentioned for smail 3.2. No such luck, > it doesn't know that configuration option. >

Re: Smail spam-prevention filter?

pgpzZwSEGs6on.pgp Description: PGP message

Re: Smail spam-prevention filter?

is supposed to do. Curt- - Begin Included Message - >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 28 12:07:59 1998 To: Curt Howland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Smail spam-prevention filter? Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date:

  1   2   3   4   >