Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

> This looks strange for me, as I would think, the AP on the computer > would also need some processing time for recognition, correction and > routing to the host. Try it! If you notice an important performance penalty, *then* come back with the numbers and the details of your setup, so someone c

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

Hans writes: > This looks strange for me, as I would think, the AP on the computer > would also need some processing time for recognition, correction and > routing to the host. Every packet is routed by the kernel. There is no seperate "AP". How much delay matters? Ping should be under a millis

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 15:40:07 +0200 Hans wrote: > > Then use NGINX with RTMP-module listening on its standard port and > streaming with RTMP from Computer A to Computer B to the standard > port. > > Everything without any AP or router between. > > The stream can then be made visible with VLC

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

Hans writes: > yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will be then > again a new hop, which causes delay (and I suppose, a software router is > sklower than a hardware device). I haven't tried this, but take a look at: https://wiki.debian.org/WiFi/AdHoc https://help.u

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On 2025-03-30, John Hasler wrote: > Hans writes: >> This looks strange for me, as I would think, the AP on the computer >> would also need some processing time for recognition, correction and >> routing to the host. > > Every packet is routed by the kernel. There is no seperate "AP". > > How much

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

Am Sonntag, 30. März 2025, 21:41:30 CEST schrieb debian-u...@howorth.org.uk: > Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > > [snip] > > > If you make the storage server the access point > > What storage server? > I thought this was about live video display from a drone? Oh sorry, maybe I did the wrong expr

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 9:29 AM Hans wrote: > Am Samstag, 29. März 2025, 19:21:39 CEST schrieb Stefan Monnier: > > >> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are > > > > > > yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will > > > be then again a new hop, w

Re: OT: Re: Web server access

On 4/3/25 21:43, Van Snyder wrote: On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 15:16 +0200, john doe wrote: On 4/3/25 01:19, Van Snyder wrote: On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 15:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: I added port 443 only because my router converted the port 80 request to a port 443 request. I eventually worked

Re: OT: Re: Web server access

On Thu, 2025-04-03 at 15:16 +0200, john doe wrote: > On 4/3/25 01:19, Van Snyder wrote: > > On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 15:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > > > I added port 443 only because my router converted the port 80 > > request > > to a port 443 request. I eventually worked out the reason f

OT: Re: Web server access

On 4/3/25 01:19, Van Snyder wrote: On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 15:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: I added port 443 only because my router converted the port 80 request to a port 443 request. I eventually worked out the reason for that was because my server had started running a firewall that blocke

[SOLVED] Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

Hi folks, thank you very much for all your respose! It was so hepfull amnd I have again again a lot. You showed me different ways using software AP, ad-hoc and gave me many informations. I will test all these things now, what will take me some time. All my questions are fully answered and so

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

Timothy M Butterworth wrote: [snip] > If you make the storage server the access point What storage server? I thought this was about live video display from a drone?

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On Sun 30 Mar 2025 at 15:40:07 (+0200), Hans wrote: > > What new hop? You said you had the setup: > > > > hostA≡E--cat5/6--cable--∃≡hostB > > no, I have no cable setup, I just said, I know, how to setup when using a > cable. Maybe I did not use the correct English idiom... Yes

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 15:40:07 +0200 Hans wrote: > Hi David, > > > What new hop? You said you had the setup: > > > > hostA≡E--cat5/6--cable--∃≡hostB > > > > no, I have no cable setup, I just said, I know, how to setup when > using a cable. Maybe I did not use the correct Eng

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

Hi David, > What new hop? You said you had the setup: > > hostA≡E--cat5/6--cable--∃≡hostB > no, I have no cable setup, I just said, I know, how to setup when using a cable. Maybe I did not use the correct English idiom... > where E and ∃ are ethernet sockets. (You don't norm

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

Am Samstag, 29. März 2025, 19:21:39 CEST schrieb Stefan Monnier: > >> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are > > > > yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will > > be then again a new hop, which causes delay (and I suppose, > > a software router

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 16:37:39 +0100 Hans wrote: > > You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are > > designed to then connect that AP to the rest of the network, so > > that the AP is useful to wifi-only devices, but you can just > > ignore that. > > > > Example at: > > > >

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

>> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are > yes, I already am aware of this, but this I wanted to avoid. It will > be then again a new hop, which causes delay (and I suppose, > a software router is sklower than a hardware device). No, if one of the PCs is the AP, then c

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On Sat 29 Mar 2025 at 16:37:39 (+0100), Hans wrote: > > You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are > > designed to then connect that AP to the rest of the network, so > > that the AP is useful to wifi-only devices, but you can just > > ignore that. > > > > Example at: > > >

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

> You need to make one PC an access point. I think most guides are > designed to then connect that AP to the rest of the network, so > that the AP is useful to wifi-only devices, but you can just > ignore that. > > Example at: > > http://souktha.github.io/misc/create-ap-linuxpc/ > > Cheers, >

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On 29/3/25 23:41, Hans wrote: It is not important, if a router is givng the devices an IP-address. So I do not need any dhcp. The IP-addresses can of course be set manually by me. The more problem I see, will be the encryption and passkey-exchange, if needed. However, I do not need encryption,

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

To clarify the access point will typically assign a subset of a class-C > range for DHCP. It will usually be O.K. to assign static addresses in > the same class C but out of the DHCP range > > An alternative depending on the router is to configure the router to > have fixed DHCP addresses based o

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On 29/3/25 23:01, jeremy ardley wrote: On 29/3/25 22:53, Hans wrote: But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed IP`s and give computer A the IP-address from computer B as gateway, and the other way round. Of course I my thinking was wrong (otherwise it would have be

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On 29/3/25 22:53, Hans wrote: But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed IP`s and give computer A the IP-address from computer B as gateway, and the other way round. Of course I my thinking was wrong (otherwise it would have been worked). The WiFi router usually assi

Re: OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

On Sat 29 Mar 2025 at 15:53:01 (+0100), Hans wrote: > > just a question: Is it possible, to connect two computers with linux via wlan > without any router? > > I know, it is working with ethernet cable and crossover-cable. > > But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed

OT: Connect two computers with linux with wlan, but without any router

Dear list, just a question: Is it possible, to connect two computers with linux via wlan without any router? I know, it is working with ethernet cable and crossover-cable. But is this possible with wifi, too? My idea was working with fixed IP`s and give computer A the IP-address from computer

SOLVED (Was: Re: OT what is META_ATTENDEES_DBSPAM1?)

Hellow Hanno, On Mon, 2025-03-17 at 13:28 +0100, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > Looking at e.g. <877c4p5503@thinkpad-e495.home.arpa> which has > > almost no > > words in it, yet has META_ATTENDEES_DBSPAM1=10; can you confirm

Re: OT what is META_ATTENDEES_DBSPAM1?

On Mon Mar 17, 2025 at 10:49 AM GMT, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote: because spammer use some words quite often and we use these words as detection of spammers. Looking at e.g. <877c4p5503@thinkpad-e495.home.arpa> which has almost no words in it, yet has META_ATTENDEES_DBSPAM1=10; can you con

OT what is META_ATTENDEES_DBSPAM1?

Hellow there, For two days, i had wierd experince at Debian mailing. Actually i send mail to debian-user@lists.debian.org but that did not return to my mailbox. At that time i did try 3 times. Then the third email was successful. After investigate, i did know something. Some spam rule was so high

Re: [slowly OT, was: Does anyone use a USB 'endoscope' on Debian, which ones should work OK?]

On 2025-03-16, wrote: > >> > Not yet, I'm in the UK and the boat is in France, I'll be back there >> > in a couple weeks. :-) >> That's the dream, man, to leisurely navigate those French canals in the >> spring or summer. Good sailing to you. > I used to cycle them, also a dream. And waved to t

[slowly OT, was: Does anyone use a USB 'endoscope' on Debian, which ones should work OK?]

On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 01:33:08PM -, Greg wrote: > On 2025-03-15, Chris Green wrote: [...] > > Not yet, I'm in the UK and the boat is in France, I'll be back there > > in a couple weeks. :-) > > That's the dream, man, to leisurely navigate those French canals in the > spring or summer. Goo

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:51 AM Franco Martelli wrote: > > On 17/12/24 at 22:09, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > [...] > > There may be one logic error in the code -- if you insert one item, > > then you may double free the node because you free 'p' and then you > > free 'last'. > > > > I would rewrite

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 17/12/24 at 22:09, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 2:39 PM Franco Martelli wrote: On 16/12/24 at 20:49, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Here's the problem: void dealloc() { for ( const DIGIT *p = first; p->next != NULL; p = p->next ) if ( p->prev != NULL )

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:45:43AM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > 18 Dec 2024 05:03:12 to...@tuxteam.de: > > > I'm all for concise code, but I usually revert some things in a second > > pass when they seem to hurt clarity. After all, you write your code for > > other people to read it. > > As you

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

18 Dec 2024 05:03:12 to...@tuxteam.de: > I'm all for concise code, but I usually revert some things in a second > pass when they seem to hurt clarity. After all, you write your code for > other people to read it. As you wrote the code then uness that second pass is weeks or months later then cla

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

Franco Martelli writes: > Peter A. Darnell, Philip E. Margolis - "C A Software Engineering Approach": > > https://www.google.it/books/edition/_/1nsS5q9aZOUC?hl=it&gbpv=0 > > Do you have it too? It's pretty old, with some typo, but it looks to > me good. Sorry, no, doesn't look familiar. I rememb

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 04:18:17PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 16:09:09 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > I would rewrite the cleanup code like so: > > > > void dealloc() > > { > > DIGIT *next, *p = head; > > while( p ) > > next = p->nex

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

Hello :) Le 17/12/2024 à 12:20, Anssi Saari a écrit : Franco Martelli writes: I'd prefer a mailing-list instead, once finished all the exercises, I'd like to looking for somebody that he has my same handbook and to ask him for exchange the exercises for comparison purpose. Just curious, whi

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 16:09:09 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I would rewrite the cleanup code like so: > > void dealloc() > { > DIGIT *next, *p = head; > while( p ) > next = p->next, free( p ), p = next; > } The logic looks good, but I'm not a fan of thi

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 2:39 PM Franco Martelli wrote: > > On 16/12/24 at 20:49, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Here's the problem: > > > > void dealloc() > > { > > for ( const DIGIT *p = first; p->next != NULL; p = p->next ) > > if ( p->prev != NULL ) > > free( p->prev ); >

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 16/12/24 at 20:49, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Here's the problem: void dealloc() { for ( const DIGIT *p = first; p->next != NULL; p = p->next ) if ( p->prev != NULL ) free( p->prev ); free( last ); } You seem to be checking backwards (p->prev) but walking the list

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 17/12/24 at 12:20, Anssi Saari wrote: Franco Martelli writes: I'd prefer a mailing-list instead, once finished all the exercises, I'd like to looking for somebody that he has my same handbook and to ask him for exchange the exercises for comparison purpose. Just curious, which handbook is

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

Franco Martelli writes: > I'd prefer a mailing-list instead, once finished all the exercises, > I'd like to looking for somebody that he has my same handbook and to > ask him for exchange the exercises for comparison purpose. Just curious, which handbook is it?

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

Franco Martelli wrote: ... > I'd prefer a mailing-list instead, once finished all the exercises, I'd > like to looking for somebody that he has my same handbook and to ask him > for exchange the exercises for comparison purpose. > Does anybody know a mailing-list for C language questions? comp

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 16/12/24 at 20:49, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 2:22 PM Franco Martelli wrote: I'm doing the exercises of a C language handbook. I'm using Valgrind to check for memory leak since I use the malloc calls. In the past I was used to using "valkyrie" but sadly isn't available an

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 16/12/24 at 20:42, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 16 Dec 2024 17:21 +0100, from martelli...@gmail.com (Franco Martelli): Put in something to count the number of calls to malloc() and free() respectively. Don't forget calls outside of loops. There isn't calls to malloc() or free() outside loops.

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 16/12/24 at 17:50, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 17:34:36 +0100, Franco Martelli wrote: void dealloc() { for ( const DIGIT *p = head; p->next != NULL; p = p->next ) if ( p->prev != NULL ) free( p->prev ); free( last ); }

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 2:22 PM Franco Martelli wrote: > > I'm doing the exercises of a C language handbook. I'm using Valgrind to > check for memory leak since I use the malloc calls. In the past I was > used to using "valkyrie" but sadly isn't available anymore for Bookworm > (does anybody know

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 16 Dec 2024 17:21 +0100, from martelli...@gmail.com (Franco Martelli): >> Put in something to count the number of calls to malloc() and free() >> respectively. Don't forget calls outside of loops. > > There isn't calls to malloc() or free() outside loops. What do you mean? >From a quick re-gla

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:05:26 +0100 Franco Martelli wrote: > I'm doing the exercises of a C language handbook. By all means do the exercises in your handbook as a learning experience. After that, I have found very useful Roger Sessions, Reusable Data Structures For C, Prentice Hall (1989). -- D

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 17:34:36 +0100, Franco Martelli wrote: > > > void dealloc() > > > { > > > for ( const DIGIT *p = head; p->next != NULL; p = p->next ) > > > if ( p->prev != NULL ) > > > free( p->prev ); > > > free( last ); > > > } > > > > I think you might ha

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 16/12/24 at 16:58, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 16:05:26 +0100, Franco Martelli wrote: void add_element( unsigned int i ) { DIGIT *p; /* If the first element (the head) has not been * created, create it now. */ if ( head == NULL )

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 16/12/24 at 16:43, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 16 Dec 2024 16:05 +0100, from martelli...@gmail.com (Franco Martelli): Is there a memory leak? What it sounds strange to me is that Valgrind reports: "total heap usage: 9 allocs, 8 frees, …" when for me the calls to "malloc" should be 8, not 9.

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 16:05:26 +0100, Franco Martelli wrote: > void add_element( unsigned int i ) > { > DIGIT *p; > /* If the first element (the head) has not been > * created, create it now. > */ > if ( head == NULL ) > { > head = last = (DIGIT *

Re: OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

On 16 Dec 2024 16:05 +0100, from martelli...@gmail.com (Franco Martelli): > Is there a memory leak? What it sounds strange to me is that Valgrind > reports: "total heap usage: 9 allocs, 8 frees, …" when for me the calls to > "malloc" should be 8, not 9. Put in something to count the number of call

OT: Possible memory leak in an exercise of a C handbook

Hi, I'm doing the exercises of a C language handbook. I'm using Valgrind to check for memory leak since I use the malloc calls. In the past I was used to using "valkyrie" but sadly isn't available anymore for Bookworm (does anybody know for a replacement?). I suppose that Valgrind detects a

Re: OT: Re: Trolling

On 2024-11-25 01:01, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: For $DEITY's sake, folks. Try to stick to the message, not the person. Everything else makes a mailing list unlivable. Totally agree with you Tomas. Everyone's knowledge background is different, like me who is a beginner. The community should tr

Re: OT: Re: Trolling

On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 11:37:03AM +0100, john doe wrote: > On 11/24/24 09:51, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 10:07:57PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 03:38:56PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Groeten > > Geert Stappers > > > > This person

Re: OT: Re: Trolling

Hi, On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 11:37:03AM +0100, john doe wrote: > This person is known to try to flame a conversation and is also doing > that kind of trolling on the dnsmasq mailing list. Meanwhile over on debian-devel they are applying cluebats to screen reader users for top posting. Just not a

OT: Re: Trolling

On 11/24/24 09:51, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 10:07:57PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 03:38:56PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: Groeten Geert Stappers > This person is known to try to flame a conversation and is also doing that kind of trolling

Re: ot: firefox password manager

On 23/11/24 02:16, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote: i'm using the latest release of firefox, 132.0.2 it's very annoying i use the password manager and have a password previously firefox would ask for my password when i start it now it ask for my password every time i encounter a site login screen i

ot: firefox password manager

i'm using the latest release of firefox, 132.0.2 it's very annoying i use the password manager and have a password previously firefox would ask for my password when i start it now it ask for my password every time i encounter a site login screen is there a way stop this without disabling my passwor

Re: OT: Re: I am about to give up

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 04:27:38AM -0500, gene heskett wrote: [29 lines of pointless narrative removed] > Suddenly I have zero write perms to anyplace forever. That is whats > new. Apparently with the update to 12.8. No one will ever be able to explain this for you because as usual you do not sh

Re: OT: Re: I am about to give up

On 11/11/24 03:32, john doe wrote: On 11/10/24 13:49, gene heskett wrote: I have just spent the better part of the night trying to copy a 37k firmware.bin file to an sd card. file generated on a bananapi-m5 but getting no perms responses. How is this related to Debian, what is the point of a

OT: Re: I am about to give up

On 11/10/24 13:49, gene heskett wrote: I have just spent the better part of the night trying to copy a 37k firmware.bin file to an sd card. file generated on a bananapi-m5 but getting no perms responses. How is this related to Debian, what is the point of a subject that is as obscure as possib

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic from China IPs

"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote: > I've already accumulated pretty long list. They all point to > different ISP networks in China. > The only thing I'm certain of is that they use "bttracker.debian.org" > to get peer information. > Maybe this is somehow tied to "webseed peer" of > "debian-12.5.0-

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic from China IPs

"Alexander V. Makartsev" wrote: > On 22.10.2024 08:17, Max Nikulin wrote: > > On 22/10/2024 03:21, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > >> If I manually throttle these connections they disconnect after > >> some time and soon after a new connection from another IP from the > >> same subnet or differe

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic from China IPs

On 22.10.2024 08:17, Max Nikulin wrote: On 22/10/2024 03:21, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: If I manually throttle these connections they disconnect after some time and soon after a new connection from another IP from the same subnet or different network establishes. May it happen that their i

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic from China IPs

On 22.10.2024 05:25, Nicholas Geovanis wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2024, 6:28 PM Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: On 21.10.2024 16:59, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:  they actually speaking the BitTorrent protocol? Could this be caused by simply connecting to the host (in some kind of por

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic from China IPs

On 22/10/2024 03:21, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: If I manually throttle these connections they disconnect after some time and soon after a new connection from another IP from the same subnet or different network establishes. May it happen that their internet providers have NAT and pools of I

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic from China IPs

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024, 6:28 PM Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > On 21.10.2024 16:59, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > they actually speaking the BitTorrent protocol? Could this be caused by > simply connecting to the host (in some kind of port scan), or perhaps > connecting and probing for some oth

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic from China IPs

On 21.10.2024 16:59, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: On 20/10/2024 15:44, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: Hello. I host some Debian ISO images via BitTorrent, among other things and recently I have noticed very high interest in one torrent in particular: "debian-12.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso". My torrent

Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:07 PM David wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 13:07 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > [...] > > Somewhat related, does anyone know what happened to Tank Man, > > ? > > > > I've looked for him on occasion, but I have not found mention

回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

Sir,You are doing a great job.Keep moving - 原始邮件 - 发件人：David 收件人：debian-user 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs 日期：2024年10月22日 02点09分 On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 02:06 +0800, loulet...@sina.com wrote

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

ser > 主题：Re: 回复：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent > traffic_from_China_IPs > 日期：2024年10月22日 02点01分 > > On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 01:54 +0800, loulet...@sina.com wrote: > > Hi,JeffreySince 1949,CCP had killed more than 400 million people > > directly or indire

Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 13:07 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:11 AM wrote: > > > > Hi,David > > Let me tell you the truth,Here is a case that programmer was put in > > prison due to criticize Chinese leader. > > CNN report > > https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/29/china/china-

回复：Re: 回复：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

How are you，Minister of Propaganda of Chinese Communist Party? - 原始邮件 - 发件人：David 收件人：debian-user 主题：Re: 回复：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs 日期：2024年10月22日 02点01分 On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 01:54 +0800, loulet

Re: 回复：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience > > > > > - 原始邮件 - > 发件人：Jeffrey Walton > 收件人：loulet...@sina.com > 抄送人：debian-user > 主题：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent &g

回复：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

Hi,JeffreySince 1949,CCP had killed more than 400 million people directly or indirectly.As for tank man,he was probably killed by CCP. - 原始邮件 - 发件人：Jeffrey Walton 收件人：loulet...@sina.com 抄送人：debian-user 主题：Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange

Re: Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:11 AM wrote: > > Hi,David > Let me tell you the truth,Here is a case that programmer was put in prison > due to criticize Chinese leader. > CNN report > https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/29/china/china-blogger-sentenced-program-think-intl-mic-hnk/index.html > The actual ev

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:32:43 +0200 "Thomas Schmitt" wrote: > can we please have a call to order ? Hear, hear! While the subject is fascinating (except for the name-calling), it is well off topic. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.com/bl

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic from China IPs

On 20/10/2024 15:44, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: Hello. I host some Debian ISO images via BitTorrent, among other things and recently I have noticed very high interest in one torrent in particular: "debian-12.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso". My torrent client shows multiple connections from various ne

Re: [OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

Hi, can we please have a call to order ? David wrote: > In fact, the only thing you have shown here is the effect American > control over German media has managed to turn Germany into the shithole > it currently finds itself in. Have a nice day :) Thomas

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

- > > - 原始邮件 - > 发件人：David > 收件人：debian-user > 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent > traffic_from_China_IPs > 日期：2024年10月21日 16点51分 > > On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 16:41 +0800, loulet...@sina.com wrote: > > Listen to me,DavidI born i

回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

You seem like a Minister of Propaganda work for Communist Party of China.Good Job.Keep Moving  - 原始邮件 - 发件人：David 收件人：debian-user 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs 日期：2024年10月21日 16点51分 On Mon, 2024

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

you like: I know you're nothing more than a silly little propaganda bot. > > > - 原始邮件 - > 发件人：David > 收件人：debian-user > 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent > traffic_from_China_IPs > 日期：2024年10月21日 15点57分 >

回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

fully view about the  reality of China.To be honest,the foreigner have much more human right than Chinese in China - 原始邮件 - 发件人：David 收件人：debian-user 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs 日期：2024年10月21日 15点57分 O

回复：Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

ed by Government.The foreign news agency are also restricted to do report in China - 原始邮件 - 发件人： 收件人：David 抄送人：debian-user 主题：Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs 日期：2024年10月21日 15点41分 On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:33:56P

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 09:41 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:33:56PM +1000, David wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 14:05 +0800, loulet...@sina.com wrote: > > [...] > > > CNN report. > > That says it all. > > While CNN isn't a very credible source, there are other, far

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 09:41 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:33:56PM +1000, David wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 14:05 +0800, loulet...@sina.com wrote: > > [...] > > > CNN report. > > That says it all. > > While CNN isn't a very credible source, there are other, far

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:33:56PM +1000, David wrote: > On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 14:05 +0800, loulet...@sina.com wrote: [...] > CNN report. > That says it all. While CNN isn't a very credible source, there are other, far more credible, which make a compelling point about human rights violations an

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

#x27;t bullshit! Take your agenda elsewhere. > > > - 原始邮件 - > 发件人：David > 收件人：debian-user > 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent > traffic_from_China_IPs > 日期：2024年10月21日 06点06分 > > On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 05:29 +0800

回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

report.Maybe you should seek more information about China human rights,then you will have a good sight about these thing. - 原始邮件 - 发件人：David 收件人：debian-user 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs 日期：2024年10月21日 06点06分 On

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

this is not a list to promote your propaganda efforts. Try elsewhere! Cheers! > > > > > - 原始邮件 - > 发件人：David > 收件人：debian-user > 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs > 日期：2024年10月21日 05点22分

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

this is not a list to promote your propaganda efforts, whether you're Falun Gong or Taiwanese separatist. Try elsewhere! Cheers! > > > > > - 原始邮件 - > 发件人：David > 收件人：debian-user > 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorren

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

ogrammer fined, not imprisoned, who is currently appealing his case. Cheers! > > > - 原始邮件 - > 发件人：David > 收件人：debian-user > 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs > 日期：2024年10月21日 05点22分 > > On Mon, 2024

Re: 回复：Re: 回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

in China, uses a VPN. It's an open secret. The authorities know about it, and as long as it's not overt, they don't do anything about it. Cheers! > > > > > > - 原始邮件 - > 发件人："Alexander V. Makartsev" >

回复：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

How to say.If Chinese criticize government especially President Xi,then will be put in prison.In recent years,much programmers are put into prison due to criticize President Xi. - 原始邮件 - 发件人：David 收件人：debian-user 主题：Re: 回复：Re:_回复：[OT] Strange

Re: 回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic from China IPs

On 21.10.2024 00:19, loulet...@sina.com wrote: Because of Great Fire Wall?China's network is more complex than other western countries.I am from China. ... Well this doesn't explain botnet-like behavior. What is the ultimate goal for doing this? Is this to somehow mask the traffic? Deep Packet

回复：Re: 回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs

ot; 收件人：loulet...@sina.com 抄送人：debian-user 主题：Re: 回复：[OT] Strange BitTorrent traffic_from_China_IPs 日期：2024年10月21日 03点41分 On 21.10.2024 00:19, loulet...@sina.com wrote: Because of Great Fire Wall?China's network is more complex than other western count

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >