Hellow Hanno, On Mon, 2025-03-17 at 13:28 +0100, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > Looking at e.g. <877c4p5503....@thinkpad-e495.home.arpa> which has > > almost no > > words in it, yet has META_ATTENDEES_DBSPAM1=10; can you confirm > > that the > > rule means the sender has used said bad words in *older mail*? > > I can only say that you are correct, that here you have > META_ATTENDEES_DBSPAM1=10, but you _also_ have rules in his favour, > like the Whitelist and the Bayes-Filter. > > > In which case, do they "age out" of this particular test at any > > point? > > Believe me, this rule won't be aging out since we still see mails > with these keywords at least twice a day.. >
OK man, you are nice guy, thanks! Sincerely, Byunghee from South Korea
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
