>
Can you clarify: does it have fewer CVEs because
Devuan is Debian without systemd and I believe it is explained by the fact
that systemds coding standards are quite poor which is confirmed by
analysing atleast some of the bugs. Is some explained by more new code and
attention; probably.
The
On 2025-09-12 14:22:34 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> If you just want to see all "mail-related" messages with journalctl, you
> can use
>
> $ journalctl --facility mail
Indeed, thanks a lot!
> That doesn't help with journalctl's slowness if the jour
Hello
I am using debian 12:
$ lsb_release -cd
No LSB modules are available.
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Codename: bookworm
I found that after I installed postfix by apt, mail.log was not appeared
in /var/log/.
do you know how can I check the mail log then?
Thanks.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 11:37:22 -, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> >
> > I will try to install rsyslog by first. thanks Greg.
>
> Another option is Devuan (Debian without systemd) which has less CVEs
> anyway.
Suggesting that someone replace their *entire* operating system
just because Debian no lo
okworm (it gives just a few logs):
>>
>> Sep 08 01:50:46 joooj systemd[1]: Starting postfix.service - Postfix Mail
>> Transport Agent...
>> Sep 08 01:50:46 joooj systemd[1]: Finished postfix.service - Postfix Mail
>> Transport Agent.
>>
>> Using a pattern
ix\*" already give them without needing to
be root.
> If you want all of the "mail-related" messages to be in a single
> file, install rsyslog and use the traditional human-readable log files
> under /var/log.
It is already installed on my mail server, and /var/log is w
On 2025-09-12 16:10:38 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2025-09-12 09:53:31 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > hobbit:~$ journalctl -u ssh
> > Hint: You are currently not seeing messages from other users and the system.
> > Users in groups 'adm', 'systemd-journal' can see all messages.
> >
as a
> fact, though...
Timings on another machine (sid), where I do not receive mail,
though:
$ time -f %E journalctl --facility mail | wc -l
0:00.18
31247
$ time -f %E journalctl -u postfix\* | wc -l
0:00.74
31636
$ time -f %E journalctl -u postfix | wc -l
0:00.15
27119
So it seems that this is actuall
Greg Wooledge (HE12025-09-12):
> Users in groups 'adm', 'systemd-journal' can see all messages.
Not root, users in these groups.
Though how you managed to install your system and get yourself
authorized for sudo bot not at least in the adm group is anybody's
guess.
Regards,
--
Nicolas
12.09.25, 15:50 +0200, Vincent Lefevre:
> On 2025-09-12 14:22:34 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
>> If you just want to see all "mail-related" messages with journalctl, you
>> can use
>>
>> $ journalctl --facility mail
>
> Indeed, thanks a lot!
>
&
Greg writes:
> I don't have postfix installed on a system with systemd/journal
> logging, so I can't directly demonstrate everything. I'm relying on
> people to do some things correctly on their own.
I do.
toncho/~/polo 20 journalctl --facility mail
Hint: You are curre
On 2025-09-12 09:53:31 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> hobbit:~$ journalctl -u ssh
> Hint: You are currently not seeing messages from other users and the system.
> Users in groups 'adm', 'systemd-journal' can see all messages.
> Pass -q to turn off this notice.
> -- No entries --
> hobbit
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 15:36:35 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2025-09-12 08:05:58 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > The other thing you might need to know is that you can get different
> > levels of verbosity when you run the journalctl command as root vs.
> > non-root. When you "only" got the
s root.
Which could be dangerous as it seems as usual systemd does not follow best
practices and conducts these searches of potentially untrusted input as
root even if it escapes etc. it is also written in C and not something
safer like Ada.
If you want all of the "mail-related" messag
gt;
> > journalctl -u postfix
> >
> > where "postfix" is the systemd service name in question, will show you
> > the logs for that service.
>
> No, this is incorrect, at least on bookworm (it gives just a few logs):
>
> Sep 08 01:50:46 joooj systemd[1]
md service name in question, will show you
> the logs for that service.
No, this is incorrect, at least on bookworm (it gives just a few logs):
Sep 08 01:50:46 joooj systemd[1]: Starting postfix.service - Postfix Mail
Transport Agent...
Sep 08 01:50:46 joooj systemd[1]: Finished postfix.ser
I will try to install rsyslog by first. thanks Greg.
Another option is Devuan (Debian without systemd) which has less CVEs
anyway.
--
Regards, Kc
Kevin Chadwick (HE12025-09-10):
> Another option is Devuan (Debian without systemd) which has less CVEs
> anyway.
Can you clarify: does it have fewer CVEs because it has fewer security
flaws, or does it have fewer CVEs because it has all the security flaws
in Debian but nobody bothered to register
On 2025-09-10 10:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 01:25:33 +, Rob Hoo wrote:
>> I found that after I installed postfix by apt, mail.log was not appeared
>> in /var/log/.
>>
>> do you know how can I check the mail log then?
>
> Is the rsy
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 01:25:33 +, Rob Hoo wrote:
> I found that after I installed postfix by apt, mail.log was not appeared
> in /var/log/.
>
> do you know how can I check the mail log then?
Is the rsyslog package installed? It's not installed by default in newer
relea
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:49:53AM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> Have you read the mail?
>
> Anything else you do until you know what it want to say to you is a
> waste of your time.
>
> --
> Nicolas George
Clearly your mind is made up so I'll not argue with
Mike McClain (HE12025-08-10):
> Someone else suggested /etc/aliases which in my case has sent
> everything to root then root to mike for over 20+ years and there is
> no system mail being generated at that time.
Have you read the mail?
Anything else you do until you know what it want
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 21:48:53 -0500, Mike McClain wrote:
> BTW, MAILCHECK="" sets it at 0.
That is *extremely* odd. The only way that could happen is if you've
turned on the "-i" attribute for the MAILCHECK variable. This is not
the default.
hobbit:~$ bash
hobbit:~$ declare -p MAILCHECK
bash
On Sat, Aug 09, 2025 at 07:18:38PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Did this only start recently? What changed?
It's been going on for a while but happened just as I was getting ready
to read mail, therefore the post.
> I do apologize for a mis-statement in my previous email,
Mike McClain (HE12025-08-09):
> Other suggestions welcome,
The right suggestion was given to you by Dan Purgert two days ago:
Read that mail and then delete it.
Do not skip the read part, it is probably something you need to know
about your system.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
* Mike McClain [25-08/09=Sa 17:31 -0500]:
> Other suggestions welcome,
I use 'shopt -u mailwarn' which seems to work.
when opening a new TTY, it is most
> annoying
> when entering a command on the commandline, breaking the command onto two
> lines with
> 'You have mail' in the midst. It will look like this:
> mike@RPI4b3:~> ls /mc/bYou have mail in /var/mail/mike
> in/my.*
> mike@R
ine, breaking the command onto two lines
with
'You have mail' in the midst. It will look like this:
mike@RPI4b3:~> ls /mc/bYou have mail in /var/mail/mike
in/my.*
mike@RPI4b3:~> echo $MAIL
/var/mail/mike
You have mail in /var/mail/mike
mike@RPI4b3:~> echo $MAILCHECK
0
This is set
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 14:48:01 -0500, Mike McClain wrote:
> Is there any way to stop this most annoying message from appearing on
> the commandlineas I'm entering some command?
Assuming you're running bash, the variables in question are:
MAIL If this parameter is
On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 02:48:01PM -0500, Mike McClain wrote:
> Is there any way to stop this most annoying message from appearing on
> the commandlineas I'm entering some command?
> Thanks,
> Mike
You'll have to provide somewhat more context to get a meaningful
help, but I'll draw heavily on my c
On Aug 08, 2025, Mike McClain wrote:
> Is there any way to stop this most annoying message from appearing on
> the commandlineas I'm entering some command?
Seems the system has sent your user some mail. Check / clear it - as I
recall, the 'mail' command is what you're
Is there any way to stop this most annoying message from appearing on
the commandlineas I'm entering some command?
Thanks,
Mike
--
We are the only country in the world that waits till we get into a war,
before we start getting ready for it.
- Will Rogers
Hey catboxpwww,
Thanks for registering for an account on Discord! Before we get started, we
just need to confirm that this is you. Click below to verify your email address:
Verify Email:
https://click.discord.com/ls/click?upn=u001.a0NJ38DJJG1sulNx5wS1jq2Trm-2FND-2F8pNqpHdomuLLZSGXZqUjW
On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 18:29:33 +0200
Hans wrote:
> is anyone using kmail?
>
> I have added a rule, when a string is in the subject, let us say for
> example "advice", then a wav file is played.
>
> But this is also played, when I am sendin a mail with the wor
On Mon 14 Jul 2025 at 18:29:33 (+0200), Hans wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> is anyone using kmail?
>
> I have added a rule, when a string is in the subject, let us say for
> example "advice", then a wav file is played.
>
> But this is also played, when I am sendi
Dear list,
is anyone using kmail?
I have added a rule, when a string is in the subject, let us say for
example "advice", then a wav file is played.
But this is also played, when I am sendin a mail with the word "advice" in the
headline.
This suddenly appeared, but I
Ralph Aichinger (HE12025-06-29):
> Nothing related to spam or server-side bouncing, or maybe even to the
> intended purpose of bouncing, but I absolutely love bouncing mails
> in mutt instead of forwarding. I need some mail on the address
> I use on my mobile: Just bounce it. I only d
On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 10:47:43AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Ralph Aichinger wrote:
> > I absolutely love bouncing mails in mutt instead of forwarding. I need
> > some mail on the address I use on my mobile: Just bounce it.
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Ralph Aichinger wrote:
> I absolutely love bouncing mails in mutt instead of forwarding. I need
> some mail on the address I use on my mobile: Just bounce it. I only do
> this to my own mail addresses.
>
> Am I alone in this use case
purpose of bouncing, but I absolutely love bouncing mails
in mutt instead of forwarding. I need some mail on the address
I use on my mobile: Just bounce it. I only do this to my own
mail addresses.
Am I alone in this use case of bounces? Or is this considered an
abuse?
/ralph
On 6/18/25 18:54, Tom Browder wrote:
Once again I'm looking for a *simple, easy to manage* mailing list. Any of
you folks use Dada Mail?
For marketing purposes.
-Tom
MailMan or you could also use freelist.org.
--
John Doe
Once again I'm looking for a *simple, easy to manage* mailing list. Any of
you folks use Dada Mail?
-Tom
person, but I think now
few domains actually have a postmaster user or alias.
Any mailserver accepting mail for a particular domain without having
a properly configured postmaster address is not spec-compliant (and
probably deserves to be blacklisted).
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321.html
arded to the person, but I think now
> >> few domains actually have a postmaster user or alias.
> >
> > Any mailserver accepting mail for a particular domain without having
> > a properly configured postmaster address is not spec-compliant (and
> > probably deserves to
On 2025-05-22, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> These days, I would be *surprised* if most mail-accepting domains *did*
> have a postmaster address - and even more so if they actually had
> someone monitoring it, or otherwise ensuring that mail sent to it didn't
> just get dropped
ias.
>
> Any mailserver accepting mail for a particular domain without having
> a properly configured postmaster address is not spec-compliant (and
> probably deserves to be blacklisted).
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5321.html#section-4.5.1
These days, I would be *surp
On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote:
> There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and asked
> that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now few
> domains actually have a postmaster user or alias.
Any mailserver accepting mail for a particular domain without
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 12:26 PM john doe wrote:
>
> Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the
> first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)?
>
> I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just
> missing the
On Wed, 21 May 2025 15:21:15 +0200
john doe wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have
> the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)?
>
> I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2025, 15:24:36 CEST schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
> On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote:
> > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the
> > first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)?
>
> In general
On 2025-05-21 at 09:24, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have
>> the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)?
>
> In general, no.
T
On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote:
Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the
first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)?
In general, no.
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland
✎j...@debian.org
🔗
Hello all,
Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the
first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)?
I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just
missing the correct e-mail for that specific person and to directly
message
On 2025-05-08 08:37, Richard Owlett wrote:
I don't know what email program you are using, but SeaMonkey has an option to request
"Delivery Status Notification". Try your application's equivalent.
I've sent this reply to both you and the list so I'll have an example tracking
message available f
On Thu May 8, 2025 at 3:39 PM BST, Antonio Russo wrote:
I can see my message on the debian-user list (and did so almost
immediately), so it's got to be something specific to debian-devel.
It's possible that -devel is currently being moderated; it didn't used
to be, but some lists are/were, and
ng connection message for both.
HTH
On 5/8/25 8:52 AM, Antonio Russo wrote:
Hello everyone!
I'm having trouble posting to debian-devel. Mail submits fine (possibly
after a 450
greylist, but that doesn't seem to matter). I receive no email
bounces. But,
my email neither shows up on th
Hello everyone!
I'm having trouble posting to debian-devel. Mail submits fine (possibly after
a 450
greylist, but that doesn't seem to matter). I receive no email bounces. But,
my email neither shows up on the debian-devel mailing list archive, nor do I
receive
a copy of it sent
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Paul Duncan wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Richmond wrote:
>
> > Roger Price writes:
> >
> >
> >
> > Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap
> > at 72 characters or their email client can't cope.
> >
>
> Is that be
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Richmond wrote:
> Roger Price writes:
>
>
>
> Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap
> at 72 characters or their email client can't cope.
>
Is that because they are using systems which use punched cards?
Paul.
--
*Paul Duncan*
Richmond (HE12025-04-19):
> Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap
> at 72 characters or their email client can't cope.
If the mail is in text/plain without format=flowed, then “less than 80
even with a few quote marks in front” IS the etiquette, it h
Roger Price writes:
> I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I
> write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue.
I think he must be having a laugh. Tell him it *is* blue.
Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap
at 72 chara
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:06:07 +0200 (CEST)
Roger Price wrote:
Hello Roger,
>On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote:
>
>> ... when he tries to tell you how to do it
>
>Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!".
>Problem solved. Roger
This thread reminds why I le
On 4/17/25 5:37 AM, Roger Price wrote:
I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I
write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue.
Have you ever considered the possibility that you are being hazed?
--
JHHL
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 06:42:57PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> > ... he wanted me to be the first to write in blue, and then others
> > would follow.
>
> Ah, at last the reason. *He* has a personal problem and expects the rest of
> the
> world to
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Since the sender has no knowledge of what MUA (or browser) any receiver
> > is using there's no way to know how to configure whatever they're using.
>
> ... and the OP has presumably received an email from that guy so they
> can check the headers to
> Since the sender has no knowledge of what MUA (or browser) any receiver
> is using there's no way to know how to configure whatever they're using.
There's only one user of interest here (the idiot requesting a specific
color) and the OP has presumably received an email from that guy so they
can
Thank you for the link to https://useplaintext.email/ .
It may help me explain why I have SeaMonkey set to disable JavaScript,
cookies, and ignore site specified images/background when surfing.
[I date back to days of Netscape Navigator ;]
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Looking at
> > https://framalistes.org/sympa/arc/ospo.onramp/2025-03/msg1.html
> > as an example, it appears your text may become blue if you precede
> > your message with and follow
> > it with
>
> Yeah, making it a link might render it blue.
> If you do that, I
blems.
In that case just tell him that you have tried and cannot work out how to do
it. He will think that you are stupid but if/when he tries to tell you how to
do it and realises that it is not that simple, a penny might drop.
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, N
> On 4/17/25 9:52 AM, Roger Price wrote:
> > The mailing list is run by framalistes.org . They accept
> > almost anything and forcibly HTMLize it. Roger
James H. H. Lampert (HE12025-04-17):
> That's ass-backwards.
That would be ass-backwards if that were true. Fortunately, that is just
not true
On Thu 17 Apr 2025 at 10:17:54 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote:
> Alain D D Williams wrote:
> > I read/write email using mutt in a mate terminal. It is black & white. If I
> > ssh
> > in from my laptop it is yellow & black (I cannot remember why I set it up
> > like
> > that).
>
> For about a decade,
On 4/17/25 9:52 AM, Roger Price wrote:
The mailing list is run by framalistes.org . They accept
almost anything and forcibly HTMLize it. Roger
That's ass-backwards. Then again, looking at their site, so is
everything else they do, including their TOU.
I wonder if that's a symptom of excess
David Wright (HE12025-04-17):
> Same here: coloured bash prompt, with reverse video for root.
I see your reverse-video prompt and I raise with:
My *keyboard* becomes red when I type in a terminal with a root shell or
processes descended from one.
I had forgotten I had that enabled, though, since
> Looking at
> https://framalistes.org/sympa/arc/ospo.onramp/2025-03/msg1.html as
> an example, it appears your text may become blue if you precede your
> message with and follow it with
>
Yeah, making it a link might render it blue.
If you do that, I think it'd be worthwhile to make it a va
Roger Price wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> > On 17.04.2025 19:06, Roger Price wrote:
> > > Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!".
> > > Problem solved. Roger
> > >
> > I'd use software called GIMP. &shrug;
>
> Your 1.png is neat.
he same setup as he has.
> https://useplaintext.email/
A good site. Tell him to read it.
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 https://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers. Registrati
On 4/17/25 8:19 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-04-17):
Now it depends on how vengeful you are: you might end up with RTF
(out of categoty 3), or you might explain to your president that,
when the mails are all blue, people with a monochrome monitor will
be incapable to read
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> On 4/17/25 5:37 AM, Roger Price wrote:
> > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I
> > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue.
>
> Have you ever considered the possibility that you are being hazed?
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 17.04.2025 19:06, Roger Price wrote:
> > Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem
> > solved. Roger
> >
> I'd use software called GIMP. &shrug;
Your 1.png is neat. The mailing list is run by framalistes.or
l problem and expects the rest of the
world to change to make his life easier.
The real solution to this is to fix his MUA to address his visual difficulty.
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 https://www.phc
On 4/17/25 9:42 AM, Roger Price wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
Have you ever considered the possibility that you are being hazed?
I wondered, but his manner and the way he spoke about his visual difficulty
suggested that he wanted me to be the first to write in blue, an
On 17.04.2025 19:06, Roger Price wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote:
... when he tries to tell you how to do it
Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem
solved. Roger
I'd use software called GIMP. &shrug;
--
With kindest regards, Alexan
mail : I tried adding
> the
> ASCII codes that produce colored text in a X terminal, for example the
> command
> echo -e "This is a test of \e[3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored
> in
> an e-mail message body.
>
> Is there some way of producing col
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 9:45 AM Roger Price wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> > Roger Price (HE12025-04-17):
> > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when
> > > I
> > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue.
> >
> > That is
Roger Price (HE12025-04-17):
> Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem
> solved. Roger
“I did. I am sure my mail is blue. Is it not?” and join a screenshot.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
Alain D D Williams wrote:
> I read/write email using mutt in a mate terminal. It is black & white. If I
> ssh
> in from my laptop it is yellow & black (I cannot remember why I set it up like
> that).
For about a decade, I color-coded the default text in my
terminals to indicate where I was SSHd
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote:
> ... when he tries to tell you how to do it
Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem
solved. Roger
> penny might drop.
I'm sure he'll declare that it *is* that simple: just compose the mail
in HTML, and set the composer to specify a blue font color.
The fact that this won't work for all recipient mail clients won't
matter to him, since it *will* work for *his* mail client
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Roger Price wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> > Roger Price (HE12025-04-17):
> > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when
> > > I
> > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue.
> >
>
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Nicolas George wrote:
> Roger Price (HE12025-04-17):
> > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I
> > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue.
>
> That is idiotic and harmful.
I agree with you completely.
> Tell you will comp
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:19:49PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-04-17):
> > Now it depends on how vengeful you are: you might end up with RTF
> > (out of categoty 3), or you might explain to your president that,
> > when the mails are all blue, people with a monochrome m
to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-04-17):
> Now it depends on how vengeful you are: you might end up with RTF
> (out of categoty 3), or you might explain to your president that,
> when the mails are all blue, people with a monochrome monitor will
> be incapable to read them (perhaps they believe you).
Mon
ill comply only if there is a
> compelling justification. (There is not.)
You could also tell him that he should be able to configure his(?) mail
client to display incoming plain-text E-mail in blue. That sort of
display formatting is properly a client-side matter, and is not for the
sender to det
I tried adding
> the
> ASCII codes that produce colored text in a X terminal, for example the
> command
> echo -e "This is a test of \e[3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored
> in
> an e-mail message body.
>
> Is there some way of producing colored te
3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored
> in
> an e-mail message body.
>
> Is there some way of producing colored text without using HTML ?
Not possible.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
, for example the command
echo -e "This is a test of \e[3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored in
an e-mail message body.
Is there some way of producing colored text without using HTML ?
Roger
https://useplaintext.email/
m mostly writing mail on the same machine as my
MTA, to mostly writing it on my end-user machine). I don't know if
I stopped using it at that point, but in either case, I'm currently
using a different MUA (aerc) and I haven't yet investigated whether
it does f=f.
> Was it becau
On 11/21/24 19:01, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 18:32:38 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
The =20 tells me its been converted to html style encoding some where.
No, =20 is "quoted printable" encoding. It's extremely common for
email; it can be used whenever the source content is HTM
On Wed 20 Nov 2024 at 11:35:28 (-0500), eben@… wrote:
> On 11/20/24 10:49, David Wright wrote:
> > On Tue 19 Nov 2024 at 19:41:25 (-0500), eben@… wrote:
> > > On 11/19/24 10:31, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> > > > Your sig separator arrives here as "--". If it leaves you as "-- ",
> > > > which it seems
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 18:32:38 -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> The =20 tells me its been converted to html style encoding some where.
No, =20 is "quoted printable" encoding. It's extremely common for
email; it can be used whenever the source content is HTML or plain text
or a calendar invitation o
1 - 100 of 7106 matches
Mail list logo
