Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-24 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there On 23/05/2025 10:56, Joe wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:57:28 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: On 2025-05-22 at 10:53, Jan Claeys wrote: On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and asked that a message be forwarded to the per

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-23 Thread Joe
On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:57:28 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: > On 2025-05-22 at 10:53, Jan Claeys wrote: > > > On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: > > > >> There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and > >> asked that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now > >> fe

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-22 Thread Greg
On 2025-05-22, The Wanderer wrote: > > These days, I would be *surprised* if most mail-accepting domains *did* > have a postmaster address - and even more so if they actually had > someone monitoring it, or otherwise ensuring that mail sent to it didn't > just get dropped into the bit bucket. Cou

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-22 Thread The Wanderer
On 2025-05-22 at 10:53, Jan Claeys wrote: > On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: > >> There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and >> asked that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now >> few domains actually have a postmaster user or alias. > > Any mailserver a

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-22 Thread Jan Claeys
On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: > There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and asked > that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now few > domains actually have a postmaster user or alias. Any mailserver accepting mail for a particular domain without having a

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 12:26 PM john doe wrote: > > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the > first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just > missing the

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Joe
On Wed, 21 May 2025 15:21:15 +0200 john doe wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have > the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Hans
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2025, 15:24:36 CEST schrieb Jonathan Dowland: > On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote: > > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the > > first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > In general

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread The Wanderer
On 2025-05-21 at 09:24, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote: > >> Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have >> the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > In general, no. T

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote: Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? In general, no. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland ✎j...@debian.org 🔗

Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread john doe
Hello all, Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just missing the correct e-mail for that specific person and to directly message

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-19 Thread tomas
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Paul Duncan wrote: > On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Richmond wrote: > > > Roger Price writes: > > > > > > > > Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap > > at 72 characters or their email client can't cope. > > > > Is that be

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-19 Thread Paul Duncan
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Richmond wrote: > Roger Price writes: > > > > Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap > at 72 characters or their email client can't cope. > Is that because they are using systems which use punched cards? Paul. -- *Paul Duncan*

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-19 Thread Nicolas George
Richmond (HE12025-04-19): > Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap > at 72 characters or their email client can't cope. If the mail is in text/plain without format=flowed, then “less than 80 even with a few quote marks in front” IS the etiquette, it has been for dec

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-19 Thread Richmond
Roger Price writes: > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. I think he must be having a laugh. Tell him it *is* blue. Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap at 72 chara

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-18 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:06:07 +0200 (CEST) Roger Price wrote: Hello Roger, >On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote: > >> ... when he tries to tell you how to do it > >Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". >Problem solved. Roger This thread reminds why I le

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-18 Thread James H. H. Lampert
On 4/17/25 5:37 AM, Roger Price wrote: I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. Have you ever considered the possibility that you are being hazed? -- JHHL

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 06:42:57PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > > ... he wanted me to be the first to write in blue, and then others > > would follow. > > Ah, at last the reason. *He* has a personal problem and expects the rest of > the > world to

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Since the sender has no knowledge of what MUA (or browser) any receiver > > is using there's no way to know how to configure whatever they're using. > > ... and the OP has presumably received an email from that guy so they > can check the headers to

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Since the sender has no knowledge of what MUA (or browser) any receiver > is using there's no way to know how to configure whatever they're using. There's only one user of interest here (the idiot requesting a specific color) and the OP has presumably received an email from that guy so they can

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Richard Owlett
Thank you for the link to https://useplaintext.email/ . It may help me explain why I have SeaMonkey set to disable JavaScript, cookies, and ignore site specified images/background when surfing. [I date back to days of Netscape Navigator ;]

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread debian-user
Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Looking at > > https://framalistes.org/sympa/arc/ospo.onramp/2025-03/msg1.html > > as an example, it appears your text may become blue if you precede > > your message with and follow > > it with > > Yeah, making it a link might render it blue. > If you do that, I

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > Long ago he was a senior manager in a major IT manufacturer known for its > color. > I've known him for many years. I don't fancy the job of telling him how > stupid > he is. IT also involves human problems. In that case just te

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
> On 4/17/25 9:52 AM, Roger Price wrote: > > The mailing list is run by framalistes.org . They accept > > almost anything and forcibly HTMLize it. Roger James H. H. Lampert (HE12025-04-17): > That's ass-backwards. That would be ass-backwards if that were true. Fortunately, that is just not true

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread David Wright
On Thu 17 Apr 2025 at 10:17:54 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote: > Alain D D Williams wrote: > > I read/write email using mutt in a mate terminal. It is black & white. If I > > ssh > > in from my laptop it is yellow & black (I cannot remember why I set it up > > like > > that). > > For about a decade,

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread James H. H. Lampert
On 4/17/25 9:52 AM, Roger Price wrote: The mailing list is run by framalistes.org . They accept almost anything and forcibly HTMLize it. Roger That's ass-backwards. Then again, looking at their site, so is everything else they do, including their TOU. I wonder if that's a symptom of excess

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
David Wright (HE12025-04-17): > Same here: coloured bash prompt, with reverse video for root. I see your reverse-video prompt and I raise with: My *keyboard* becomes red when I type in a terminal with a root shell or processes descended from one. I had forgotten I had that enabled, though, since

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Looking at > https://framalistes.org/sympa/arc/ospo.onramp/2025-03/msg1.html as > an example, it appears your text may become blue if you precede your > message with and follow it with > Yeah, making it a link might render it blue. If you do that, I think it'd be worthwhile to make it a va

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread debian-user
Roger Price wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > > On 17.04.2025 19:06, Roger Price wrote: > > > Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". > > > Problem solved. Roger > > > > > I'd use software called GIMP. &shrug; > > Your 1.png is neat.

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:37:36PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. I would reply to say that writing in blue makes you depressed and that your doctor has advised against

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Richard Owlett
On 4/17/25 8:19 AM, Nicolas George wrote: to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-04-17): Now it depends on how vengeful you are: you might end up with RTF (out of categoty 3), or you might explain to your president that, when the mails are all blue, people with a monochrome monitor will be incapable to read

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, James H. H. Lampert wrote: > On 4/17/25 5:37 AM, Roger Price wrote: > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. > > Have you ever considered the possibility that you are being hazed?

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > On 17.04.2025 19:06, Roger Price wrote: > > Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem > > solved. Roger > > > I'd use software called GIMP. &shrug; Your 1.png is neat. The mailing list is run by framalistes.or

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 06:42:57PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > I wondered, but his manner and the way he spoke about his visual difficulty > suggested that he wanted me to be the first to write in blue, and then others > would follow. Roger Ah, at last the reason. *He* has a personal problem a

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread James H. H. Lampert
On 4/17/25 9:42 AM, Roger Price wrote: On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, James H. H. Lampert wrote: Have you ever considered the possibility that you are being hazed? I wondered, but his manner and the way he spoke about his visual difficulty suggested that he wanted me to be the first to write in blue, an

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 17.04.2025 19:06, Roger Price wrote: On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote: ... when he tries to tell you how to do it Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem solved. Roger I'd use software called GIMP. &shrug; -- With kindest regards, Alexan

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
mail : I tried adding > the > ASCII codes that produce colored text in a X terminal, for example the > command > echo -e "This is a test of \e[3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored > in > an e-mail message body. > > Is there some way of producing col

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 9:45 AM Roger Price wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > > > Roger Price (HE12025-04-17): > > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when > > > I > > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. > > > > That is

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
Roger Price (HE12025-04-17): > Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem > solved. Roger “I did. I am sure my mail is blue. Is it not?” and join a screenshot. Regards, -- Nicolas George

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Dan Ritter
Alain D D Williams wrote: > I read/write email using mutt in a mate terminal. It is black & white. If I > ssh > in from my laptop it is yellow & black (I cannot remember why I set it up like > that). For about a decade, I color-coded the default text in my terminals to indicate where I was SSHd

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote: > ... when he tries to tell you how to do it Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem solved. Roger

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread The Wanderer
On 2025-04-17 at 09:52, Alain D D Williams wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > >> Long ago he was a senior manager in a major IT manufacturer known >> for its color. I've known him for many years. I don't fancy the >> job of telling him how stupid he is. IT a

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread tomas
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > > > Roger Price (HE12025-04-17): > > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when > > > I > > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. > > >

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > Roger Price (HE12025-04-17): > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. > > That is idiotic and harmful. I agree with you completely. > Tell you will comp

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread tomas
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:19:49PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-04-17): > > Now it depends on how vengeful you are: you might end up with RTF > > (out of categoty 3), or you might explain to your president that, > > when the mails are all blue, people with a monochrome m

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-04-17): > Now it depends on how vengeful you are: you might end up with RTF > (out of categoty 3), or you might explain to your president that, > when the mails are all blue, people with a monochrome monitor will > be incapable to read them (perhaps they believe you). Mon

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread The Wanderer
ill comply only if there is a > compelling justification. (There is not.) You could also tell him that he should be able to configure his(?) mail client to display incoming plain-text E-mail in blue. That sort of display formatting is properly a client-side matter, and is not for the sender to det

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread tomas
I tried adding > the > ASCII codes that produce colored text in a X terminal, for example the > command > echo -e "This is a test of \e[3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored > in > an e-mail message body. > > Is there some way of producing colored te

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored > in > an e-mail message body. > > Is there some way of producing colored text without using HTML ? Not possible. Regards, -- Nicolas George

Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
, for example the command echo -e "This is a test of \e[3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored in an e-mail message body. Is there some way of producing colored text without using HTML ? Roger https://useplaintext.email/

Re: Never receive an unsubscription confirmation e-mail

2024-07-27 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 05:39:30PM +0200, rudu wrote: > I wrote an e-mail to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with the > subject "unsubscribe" and sent it, expecting to receive a confirmation > e-mail ... which never comes ... > I also tried https://www.debian.org/Ma

Never receive an unsubscription confirmation e-mail

2024-07-26 Thread rudu
Hello, I'm just trying to suspend my subscription to Debian-user for a few weeks. So, I wrote an e-mail to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with the subject "unsubscribe" and sent it, expecting to receive a confirmation e-mail ... which never comes ... I also tried https:/

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-11 Thread David Wright
Threaded to the OP, rather than a private message. On Sun 11 Dec 2022 at 18:56:24 (-0600), Greg Marks wrote: > Dear David, Thanks, but please keep replies on list so others can see solutions or join in with suggestions. Rather than appending a piece of free-standing text to the rest of the email

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread David Wright
On Sat 10 Dec 2022 at 20:45:37 (-0500), pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:49:54 +1100 > David wrote: > > > On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 19:05, wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks > > > wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > I don't know the RFCs involved, but I'

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread paulf
On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:49:54 +1100 David wrote: > On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 19:05, wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks > > wrote: [snip] > > > I don't know the RFCs involved, but I'm guessing they mandate or > > suggest this treatment. > > Here's a reference describing 'mb

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread David
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 19:05, wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks wrote: > > In a recent instance, the body of the e-mail contained a line > > beginning with the word "From"; the sendmail program prefixed the > > line with the character "&g

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread David Wright
On Sat 10 Dec 2022 at 08:24:05 (+0200), Teemu Likonen wrote: > * 2022-12-09 20:39:34-0600, Greg Marks wrote: > > > > I occasionally send e-mail from the command line via Postfix, using a > > script containing the command > > > >/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread Miguel A. Vallejo
I remember some e-mail programs automatically add an extra space in front of a From in the message body if any line starts with From. Probably Thunderbird is one of them. to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 08:36:39AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > [...] > > &

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread debian-user
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 02:57:42AM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com > wrote: > > You don't want to do this. Consider an MUA which stores your mail in > > "mbox" format-- one email right after another in one file. The > > delimiter is a line which starts at the left margin with the word > > "From".

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread tomas
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 08:36:39AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: [...] > Technically, it's the 5-character sequence "From " (including the space) > that matters in mbox formats. If you begin a line with "Fromage" [...] I thusly propose to drop the '>' escaping of "From" and change every From at a

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 02:57:42AM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > You don't want to do this. Consider an MUA which stores your mail in > "mbox" format-- one email right after another in one file. The > delimiter is a line which starts at the left margin with the word > "From". Technically

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > [...] any other line which starts with "From" must > be "armored". And the way you do that is to precede it with "> ". > I don't know the RFCs involved, but I'm guessing they mandate or > suggest this treatment. It does not look like being fully specified by a

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread paulf
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks wrote: > I occasionally send e-mail from the command line via Postfix, using a > script containing the command > >/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f -t < file > > In a recent instance, the body of the e-mail contained a line >

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-09 Thread Teemu Likonen
* 2022-12-09 20:39:34-0600, Greg Marks wrote: > Is there a way to tell the Postfix sendmail command not to alter any > such lines ["From" lines] in the body of the message? I can't answer your actual question but I think Postfix and other "sendmails" do the right thing. In my opinion you shouldn'

e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-09 Thread Greg Marks
I occasionally send e-mail from the command line via Postfix, using a script containing the command /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f -t < file In a recent instance, the body of the e-mail contained a line beginning with the word "From"; the sendmail program prefixed the line with

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-12 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 10 sep 21, 20:55:43, Gary Dale wrote: > On 2021-09-10 18:11, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > > > > Pretty sure, it's the issue with Yahoo¹ ², nothing to do with Thunderbird. > > Yahoo is following the same path as GMail, forcing their users to use > > web browsers as mail clients. > > In ca

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-11 Thread Ralph Katz
On 9/10/21 3:39 PM, Gary Dale wrote: [snip] Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together? Yes, works fine with Thunderbird windows and thunderbird 78.14.0 on debian linux stable. Settings: Account name: y...@yahoo.com email address: y...@yahoo.com IMAP server imap.mail.yahoo.

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Dale
Request failed; Mailbox unavailable. Please check the message and try again." when I tried to send an e-mail from the account. The only change I made to the settings was I set a reply-to...  The message went into my sent folder after I cleared the error (for the second time) but it isn't

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Dale
On 2021-09-10 20:51, Gary Dale wrote: On 2021-09-10 18:32, jeremy ardley wrote: On 11/09/2021 6:26 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote: On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote: Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together? I have it running on thunderbird. Both imap and smtp use ssl/tls and

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Dale
On 2021-09-10 18:11, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: On 11.09.2021 02:39, Gary Dale wrote: I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to send e-mail from it using Yahoo's smtp server

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Dale
On 2021-09-10 18:26, Jeremy Ardley wrote: On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote: I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to send e-mail from it using Yahoo's smtp servers. Instead I

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Dale
On 2021-09-10 18:32, jeremy ardley wrote: On 11/09/2021 6:26 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote: On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote: Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together? I have it running on thunderbird. Both imap and smtp use ssl/tls and oauth2 smtp uses port 465 while ima

Re: OT: Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Jeremy Ardley
On 11/9/21 9:48 am, piorunz wrote: Offtopic: You sure you want to use Yahoo knowing what are they capable of, or, what they are not capable of doing, where they should? https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/yahoo-admits-staff-knew-state-sponsored-hack-2014-1590924 https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/yahoo

OT: Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread piorunz
-actor-criminals-1.3898586 On 11/09/2021 01:52, Gary Dale wrote: On 2021-09-10 18:26, Jeremy Ardley wrote: On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote: I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to send

is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Gary Dale
I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to send e-mail from it using Yahoo's smtp servers. Instead I've been sending e-mail via another smtp server so the "From" addr

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Jeremy Ardley
On 11/9/21 8:51 am, Gary Dale wrote: On 2021-09-10 18:32, jeremy ardley wrote: On 11/09/2021 6:26 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote: On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote: Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together? I have it running on thunderbird. Both imap and smtp use ssl/tls and

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread jeremy ardley
On 11/09/2021 6:26 am, Jeremy Ardley wrote: On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote: Does anyone have Thunderbird and Yahoo working together? I have it running on thunderbird. Both imap and smtp use ssl/tls and oauth2 smtp uses port 465 while imap uses port 993 I have some memory gettin

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Jeremy Ardley
On 11/9/21 5:39 am, Gary Dale wrote: I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to send e-mail from it using Yahoo's smtp servers. Instead I've been sending e-mail via another

Re: is it possible to send e-mail via Yahoo's smtp servers using Thunderbird (78.13.0)?

2021-09-10 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 11.09.2021 02:39, Gary Dale wrote: I've got a Yahoo mail account (among others) that I use for a particular purpose. However it's been a while since I've been able to send e-mail from it using Yahoo's smtp servers. Instead I've been sending e-mail via another

Bestätigung der E-Mail-Adresse

2020-02-25 Thread Immolovo
Bitte bestätigen Sie Ihre E-Mail-Adresse, um unseren Newsletter zu erhalten Besuchen Sie hier die [Webversion](https://smoton.com/y9clmgo3-rmviuq8k-8kxpj807-115r). [Recherche Service](https://smoton.com/y9clmgo3-rmviuq8k-deuf6p6v-19q6 "Immolovo Recherche Se

E-Mail-Benachrichtigung (Dringend behandeln)

2019-12-16 Thread Cultura Amán
Beachtung: Ihr E-Mail-Konto wurde kürzlich an einem unbekannten Ort angemeldet. Bitte klicken Sie hier zur Bestätigung, um die Schließung Ihres E-Mail-Kontos zu vermeiden<https://aguileracasilda.formstack.com/forms/kontomitteilung_> Um diese Überprüfung abzuschließen, klicken Sie einfach

<> Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-12-10 Thread mark
On Monday, November 26, 2018 9:37:21 AM EST Mark Neidorff wrote: > > It is time for me to give the static IP back and stop being my own e-mail > service. I'm moving from my static IP to Verizon FIOS, but I don't think > that really matters. > > If you know of an e

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-12-07 Thread David Wright
On Fri 07 Dec 2018 at 10:08:35 (+), Joe wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:05:24 -0500 Celejar wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:59:25 + Ben Oliver wrote: > > > On 18-11-26 21:12:19, Celejar wrote: > > > >On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:37:21 -0500 Mark Neidorff > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >... > >

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-12-07 Thread Joe
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 23:05:24 -0500 Celejar wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:59:25 + > Ben Oliver wrote: > > > On 18-11-26 21:12:19, Celejar wrote: > > >On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:37:21 -0500 > > >Mark Neidorff wrote: > > > > > >... > > > > > >> Now, I don't like the webmail interfaces and th

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-12-06 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:59:25 + Ben Oliver wrote: > On 18-11-26 21:12:19, Celejar wrote: > >On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:37:21 -0500 > >Mark Neidorff wrote: > > > >... > > > >> Now, I don't like the webmail interfaces and the limited storage for old > > > >Limited storage? Who - big or small player

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-29 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2018-11-26 hackte Brian in die Tasten: > On Mon 26 Nov 2018 at 09:37:21 -0500, Mark Neidorff wrote: > gmail and yahoo. :) He asked for a "friendly" EMail Service not a crappy free one Depending on his traffic, he could get an account under my domain which support IMAP/SMTP plus Squirrelmail

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 27 November 2018 09:49:22 John Hasler wrote: [...] > You've reinvented parts of Mailagent and Exim. With something I am familiar with and doesn't need a 200 page help file. Similar to skinning cats, first make sure its truly dead. ;-) -- Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxe

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-27 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:04:48 +1100 Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 26.11.18 21:12, Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:37:21 -0500 > > Mark Neidorff wrote: > > > Now, I don't like the webmail interfaces and the limited storage for old > > > > Limited storage? Who - big or small player - of

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-27 Thread John Hasler
Gene writes: > No for everything that clamav gives a clean bill of health, it tells > kmail to go get the mail when a mailfile in /var/mail is closed after > procmail writes it there. Kmail looks at the headers and if spamd said > it was spam, sorts it to the spam folder. procmail takes care of the

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 27 November 2018 08:41:32 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Monday, November 26, 2018 09:51:49 PM Gene Heskett wrote: > > I even wrote a script to couple kmail so the incoming mail only > > exists few a few milliseconds in /var/mail. > > I don't understand -- what is your script doing? Is

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-27 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, November 26, 2018 09:51:49 PM Gene Heskett wrote: > I even wrote a script to couple kmail so the incoming mail only exists > few a few milliseconds in /var/mail. I don't understand -- what is your script doing? Is it doing it only for spam? > I'm a lazy cuss, let the computer > h

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-27 Thread Ben Oliver
On 18-11-26 21:12:19, Celejar wrote: On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:37:21 -0500 Mark Neidorff wrote: ... Now, I don't like the webmail interfaces and the limited storage for old Limited storage? Who - big or small player - offers unlimited storage for old emails? My suggestion [0] (a 'small' pla

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-26 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 26 November 2018 23:04:48 Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 26.11.18 21:12, Celejar wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:37:21 -0500 > > > > Mark Neidorff wrote: > > > Now, I don't like the webmail interfaces and the limited storage > > > for old > > > > Limited storage? Who - big or small pla

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-26 Thread Erik Christiansen
On 26.11.18 21:12, Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 09:37:21 -0500 > Mark Neidorff wrote: > > Now, I don't like the webmail interfaces and the limited storage for old > > Limited storage? Who - big or small player - offers unlimited storage > for old emails? There are various values for old

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-26 Thread Celejar
I like to download and > process the email locally using either kmail or thunderbird (doesn't matter > which to me. I have experience with both.) > > If you know of an e-mail service that allows me POP3 and SMTP connections, > would you please post it in a reply. My impression

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-26 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 26 November 2018 21:22:35 Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 26.11.18 17:13, Gene Heskett wrote: > > Get on the horn and ask your isp if they run a mailserver. Mine > > does, and I use it, but when I first started, I had to call their > > network guy and have him whitelist all the mailing lis

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-26 Thread John Hasler
debian-user writes: > Here, down under, that's the norm - I've never heard of an ISP which > so despises the 'S' that there's no mail. We generally have a choice > of IMAP or POP3. (I have fetchmail set to use the latter.) They just about always offer email service but it can be pretty bad. You're

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-26 Thread Erik Christiansen
On 26.11.18 17:13, Gene Heskett wrote: > Get on the horn and ask your isp if they run a mailserver. Mine does, and > I use it, but when I first started, I had to call their network guy and > have him whitelist all the mailing lists I an on. Here, down under, that's the norm - I've never heard of

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-26 Thread Gene Heskett
had a static IP and my own domain for > > nearly 15 years. I set up a mailserver which has run without > > missing a beat in all that time. > > > > It is time for me to give the static IP back and stop being my own > > e-mail service. I'm moving from my static IP to

Re: Looking for a "friendly" e-mail service

2018-11-26 Thread Joe
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:40:33 -0600 John Hasler wrote: > Joe writes: > > Are you hanging on to your domain name(s)? Many domain hosts also > > offer limited email facilities, which is no problem if you're > > downloading regularly. > > Any decent registry will forward mail addressed to your dom

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >