Hi all,
I'm trying to get Firefox set up so it'll display Japanese pages
properly, but I don't seem to be having any luck.
I'm using Firefox 0.9.3 in Sarge.
Whenever I view a page with Japanese characters in it, they get
represented as a box with a four-character alphanumeric (hex?) code in
i
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 11:18:45AM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:26:12PM -0300, ScruLoose wrote:
> > For several weeks now, I've been having X lock up on me occasionally,
> > and I'm a bit stumped as to where to start debugging it...
>
Hi all,
For several weeks now, I've been having X lock up on me occasionally,
and I'm a bit stumped as to where to start debugging it...
I'm running Sarge on a P4 3.2 HT, and my video card is a GeForce FX
5200 using the nvidia binary driver. I've had this problem on both a
home-rolled 2.4.22
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 06:21:33PM +, steve downes wrote:
> I am using debian testing with:-
>
> Exim 3.36
> Cyrus 1.5
> Mutt 1.5.5
>
> Very happy with it but want to add an auto mail sort to pre sort
> mailing lists out from work mail into other boxes to read at my
> leisure. Also a bit of
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:43:24AM +, Brian Brazil wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 05:22:12PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 05:36:33PM -0500, Paul Galbraith wrote:
> > > I have a soundblaster audigy gamer, and am running sarge with a 2.4.24
> > > kernel. Has anyone g
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 07:37:10AM -0800, Number Six wrote:
> Even though I still have a bunch of stock, and I'm a linux lover now, so
> I cheer if it goes up and I cheer if it goes down, I was expecting
> Europe to really nail Microsoft to the wall. I dunno, I expected some
> surrogate America
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:07:03AM +1200, Ashley Noel Hinton wrote:
> I tried recently installing alsa-modules from the alsa-source (stable
> package) using make-kpkg. I compile a kernel image using make-kpkg
> kernel_image and then the alsa modules using make-kpkg modules_image.
>
> I'm making
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 06:19:45AM -0600, Ronin wrote:
> Before upgrading my kernel, my dhcp worked..as it should during the
> installation...
> However, after upgrading the kernel (currently using 2.4.24).. my pcmcia
> nic was recognized during boot (NE2000 compatible) but it did not pick
> up
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 06:25:41PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I have a motherboard which has an intel810 audio chipset on it AND an
> Soundblaster Live card. My loadspeakers are connected to the Soundblaster
> (emu10k1)
>
> When I boot up, something is loading the sound modules for both chi
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:13:23AM +0100, Jeroen Keppens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking for a solution for something (I think) must be easily
> solved. On a few of our servers when we type up/down we scroll in a list of
> previous command, home/end brings us to the beginning and the end of the
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 01:39:13PM -0200, uGAH man! wrote:
>Hi.
>I have a Creative Live Value (driver emu10k1) and am using debian
> unstable and kernel 2.4.22-k7-1.
>I've been using the OSS output plugin for XMMS on KDE and have been
> able to play music, although having low quality
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 07:28:12AM +0700, Le Hoang Anh wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have a trouble with sound volume in my woody box
>
> The volume is too low though I have 'cdvolume' to
> the maximum level (255), I `cdplay` the volume is only
> a bit louder.
>
> My sound stuff:
> 82820 Camino 2, AC'9
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 10:13:35PM +0100, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> Am Di, den 16.12.2003 schrieb ScruLoose um 21:36:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:08:12PM +0100, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
>
> > > A mailserver can harm _others_.
> > >
> > > I sai
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:42:07PM -0500, charlie derr wrote:
> Debian User wrote:
> >maybe i missed something in a previous post... isn't it the purpose
> >to soecify hosts you are allowing to relay w/ the host_accept_relay
> >setting in exim.conf? this will allow you not to be an open relay
>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:10:34AM +0100, Christian Schnobrich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The topic says it all...
> I'm using woody on all machines here. Ofc, I'm tempted to install
> backports of some software, or sometimes from tarballs.
>
> How will this affect the eventual dist-upgrade once sarge g
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:08:12PM +0100, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> Am Mo, den 15.12.2003 schrieb Wesley J Landaker um 02:55:
> > Local software is childish, dangerous and nonsense.
>
> Local software can destroy (your) local stuff.
>
> A mailserver can harm _others_.
>
> I said that yesterd
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 07:34:05PM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:26:49 -0500, alex wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > we tell which ones? My guess is that there just hasn't been any incentive
> > for manufacturers to 'bother' with even trying them on Linux. Could it
> > be that
> > they
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Ricky Taylor wrote:
> I second this. Getting tired of seeing his inter-company mail. Just my .02.
1) Please don't top-post. It screws up the readability of threads.
2) I think you mean "intra-company mail".
3) Unless my .forward logging is badly b0rken,
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:31:35AM +0100, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, ScruLoose wrote:
>
> > I sent him a brisk note and promptly killfiled him. ;-)
>
> You killfiled him ... how does it look like ... what weapons did you use
> ... was he bleeding ... he sho
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:07:19PM -0800, Raquel Rice wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:04:53 -0500
> charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jonathan Melhuish wrote:
> > > WTF is going on? Why is this guy bombarding the list with junk?
> > > It's
> > > not even proper spam!
> > >
> > > Ca
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 03:05:21PM -0500, H. S. wrote:
>
> What is this going on? How come my mail is being forwarded by this guy
> "Sreelal Chandrasenan"? Or is it something to do with his procmail rules
> or something similar?
From the looks of it, yes.
It looks like he's somehow managed to s
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:00:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Yes, killfiles and all, but still...)
Personally, I sent a quick off-list message before I killfiled him.
I suspect that if a few hundred (or thousand) other readers do the same,
he'll get motivated to fix his setup pretty quic
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:37:01PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> I just found this ... and want it ... bad.
>
> Thought some of you might find it of interest:
>
> http://www.linuxjewellery.com/catalogue/DBV/
That's pretty sweet.
"Geek chic" to a whole new level!
Cheers!
--
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:08:51PM -0800, Nunya wrote:
>
> I'd like to be able to sit a single key, and be prompted "Narrow or
> Wide ?" with a default of Wide.
>
> Wide means "reply to group" in my Inbox and "reply only to list, unless
> sender has requested a CC" for lists. Narrow means "re
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:07:17PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:23:36PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> >
> > I will admit that I have pretty much given up on any expectation that
> > you have anything useful to add to this forum
>
> I'm totally okay
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:37:04PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 02:18:55PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
>
> What the fuck are you ranting about?
Um, no. I did not write this.
LEARN. TO. QUOTE.
Are you making a deliberate attempt to mis-attribute your inane blather
to me, o
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 03:35:40AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 11:25:33PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > Peace.
>
> What the fuck are you ranting about?
Ah, there's a surefire way to bolster your credibility.
Clearly the mark of a mature mind: As soon as somebody hits a litt
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 03:54:44AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> What can I do to mutt to make it stop CC-ing the list when I hit "g" and
> only want to reply to the sender? I always forget to check the CCs
> before I hit Y.
If you just want to reply to the sender, the key you want is "r".
The "g" key i
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 04:46:28AM -0500, michelle wrote:
>
> I can't get any sound to play. I'm using sarge, with ALSA 0.96
> /proc shows 3 "sound cards"
> 0 Dummy
> 1 Virtual MIDI
> 2 Live
>
> 2 is my SBLive card. However, there's no sound, perhaps because it's muted
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:36:07AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> 1) For a machine that doesn't have a cdrom and/or is physically
> available to me, is there any other trick to make sure the database is
> secure? The machine I'm thinking about doesn't have nfs mounts
> available to it, either.
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:36:55PM -0500, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> At the risk of starting a flamefest, what is a good IDS? I ask because
> the recent compromises have got me thinking. I have a couple of
> web/mail servers I am adminning at school, and I really have no way of
> knowing if they ha
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:50:35PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> David Palmer. wrote:
> > Put all politicians on a wage of $500.00/week, and make it a capital
> > offense to take a political bribe, and you would get the ones that want
> > to do the job for the right reasons.
>
> No. You'd get the
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:07:59PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 at 00:48 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned:
> >
> > given the regular stream of ridiculous garbage coming from redmond
> > about linux, while new holes are found in their os and apps on an
> > almost weekly basis,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:57:43PM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 at 23:04 GMT, ScruLoose penned:
> >
> > They don't have to. They can use Libranet or Xandros or Knoppix if
> > they want an "easy" way (on x86 systems). If you choose Debia
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:00:18PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> Thanasis Kinias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > scripsit Bijan Soleymani:
> >
> > I was under the impression that Knoppix, as ia32-only, was just in a
> > different category than Debian, with (including stuff under development)
>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:29:02PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote:
> "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Many people, including me, would not recommend debian for a linux
> > novice, though there are debian-based distros that some might recommend.
>
> It would be nice if we could
(Please post in plain text, not HTML)
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:31:17PM +0100, Robert Cates wrote:
>Hi,
>
>my ISP allows me to use SSH to logon (port 22), but only to change my
>account password.
>
>I am running a Debian Woody server with SSH 3.7.1 (using protocol 2
>only) a
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:50:35PM -0700, Dave wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:20:21 +0100, Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> >There is also the point that *somebody* found this bug. Just not the
> >folks we were hoping would. ;-) Letting real crackers hammer your
> >system is a
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:34:23PM +, Danilo Raineri wrote:
> Magnus von Koeller wrote:
>
> > The KMix Handbook, section 1 (Introduction):
> >
> > "KMix supports several platforms and sound drivers. Version 1.9 works
> > with:
> > [...]
> > - The ALSA soundcard driver.
> > [...]"
> >
> > But
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:02:34AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:42:37AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> >
> > I didn't know of a particular security issue with Gentoo, actually.
> >
> > And since you haven't provided a reference or a link to any a
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:29:34PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> Gentoo has now had a security issue too (as I'm sure you know).
I didn't know of a particular security issue with Gentoo, actually.
And since you haven't provided a reference or a link to any actual
information, I can't say as I really know
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:14:03PM -0200, Leandro Guimar?es Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote:
> Em Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:46:12 -0300, Mariano Wahlmann escreveu:
>
> > i want to know if debian
> > has the an automatic update tool (like up2date), i read that debian use
> > apt
>
> Which is much bette
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:52:23PM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:28:52 -0800 "Hereon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Request For Comment on:
> > Enhancing the Debian mailing lists by:
> > Creating debian-user-woody and debian-user-sarge mailing lists,
> > and deactiv
pamd daemon running, right?
If you call spamassassin by the name "spamassassin" it's self-contained,
but kinda hard on resources. If you call it by "spamc" you need to have
spamd _already_ running.
Cheers!
--
,----
at has subkeys.
Some of the other servers can't be trusted not to (thus resulting in
retrieving keys that then don't work).
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- | If I had a dog as daft as you,
your HD performance pretty hard... But it's
definitely not a question of needing more processor, RAM, or sound card.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | I don't want to start any blasphemous rumours
your
.forward file, or look into an MDA such as procmail.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | Now I realize that just getting through the day <
>Please | without killing someone can be an achie
.
Not that I'm upset about it or anything, just letting you know the
local etiquette.
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:22:10PM +0100, tripolar wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 10:00 pm, ScruLoose wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 02:26:33PM +0100, tripolar wrote:
> > > can I
reboot.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | <
>Please |Bwahahaha-- I mean, oop
ted except by rebooting into single-user mode. You might also want to
set the AIDE binary immutable, too... for even better paranoia. And for
even _more_ paranoia, make sure it's statically compiled so it can't be
compromised by an attacker screwing with libs...
Cheers!
--
,---
easy-to-use interface that lets you browse and
search the package listing visually.
It has other advantages, too... better handling of suggests and
recommends... keeps a log of what it does...
It's a cool toy.
Cheers!
--
,-----
Yep.
Well, as soon as you issue an "upgrade" or "dist-upgrade" command, that
is. Or if you use aptitude...
That's why I specify "woody" in my sources.list instead of "stable".
I probably will switch to sarge as soon as it gets released as "stable&q
elp me?
I think you'll have to give us more info...
What exactly are the new values for all those things you changed?
How about posting your /etc/network/interfaces, and the output of
ifconfig and route, too...
Cheers!
--
,---
the whole system,
including newer versions of libc6... Note that sarge (testing) and sid
(unstable) do experience some brokenness sometimes.
OR
you could compile those things yourself, I suppose.
-Cheers
--
,-----.
>
s Paul has mentioned, they do. Security is a huge part of the
development cycle. Why do you think kernels go through so many "test"
versions before they get called "stable"?
I'd be interested to know on what particular factors you base your
conclusions of "inevitable&
rd
issue by removing it, although it was with a totally different card.
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- | Why can't we ever attempt to solve a problem <
>Please | in this country
his compromise!"
...which seems to me to indicate there's no need to get all paranoid
about trojaned packages and such.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | Forward he cried from the rear; and the front rank d
gt; that did work. Any idea?
Just a guess here, but is your cdrom mounted with exec permissions?
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | I do not agree with what you have to say, <
>Please |bu
t is using that mount point?
I believe fuser may be the tool for this job.
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- |You don't *have* a soul. You *are* a soul. <
>Please | Y
bit the bullet and bought a
NIC for it...
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | I do not agree with what you have to say, <
>Please |but I'll defend to the death your r
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:57:53PM +0100, Martin Sengstschmid wrote:
> Hallo!
> I found your Email-address in the Mailinglist of debian.
Note that I'm sending this message to the list as well.
If this isn't enough to get you going, please direct further questions
to the list.
> I have now
> the
You might want to keep an eye on the Adblock plugin.
They aren't there yet, but the homepage
http://adblock.mozdev.org/index.html
mentions under "And we're targeting these items for future builds:"
"Bayesian probability analysis, for minimal-interation bl
fig_docs/exim-spamassassin/
but I'm afraid I have no experience with postfix)...
Or set up two rules in procmail... one to pipe the message through
spamc, then a second to sort based on the headers.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
sin (or
spamc) with the -u option, it'll use the prefs for the specified user.
Using -u $local_part will supply the username of the local user the mail
is being delivered to.
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- |
odem will work or not, but I do know that
since Windows starts counting at 1, where Linux starts at 0, you're
probably looking for /dev/ttys4.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | Do not meddle in the affair
aildir
Maildir format (by definition) has one message per file.
There are probably scripts/utilities to do the job right at the command
line, but like I say... that's what worked for me.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -
ve or meaningful discussion.
So I'll stop adding to it.
And to the general readership: sorry for dragging down the
signal-to-noise ratio... I got a bit carried away.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | Wha
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:47:03PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:31:36AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> [a bunch of horseshit]
Hehe!
Now, that's funny.
I bring you references from your own country's press, reporting that
your government is detaining people indef
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:02:43AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 00:21, ScruLoose wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:49:28PM -0600, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> > >
> > > The reason the 2nd is there is so that King xyz or our own goverment will
> >
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:42:57PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:21:55AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> > Great theory. Shame it's such a dismal failure in practice.
> > People have been getting "disappeared" lately in The States. Somebody
> >
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:10:25AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Hello 'ScruLoose'!
Howdy, Flo!
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:13:31PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> >I wonder whether the .muttrc is flexible enough to support something
> >like looking for known "li
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 08:06:15PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 15:41, ScruLoose wrote:
> >
> > Well, when you look at the US figures on "firearm-related fatalities"
> > being up in the tens of thousands per year...
> > compared to
istance is suicide.
In the meantime, making guns easily accessible to the general public
just makes it that much easier for your citizens to blow each other away
when they get pissed off.
I don't see how all this makes you any freer than me.
Cheers!
--
,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:56:51PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:39:56PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> > Now you're just contradicting yourself. You're also handing me the
> > point I've been trying to make on a platter.
> > After claiming
ink _about_ is moot.
The current culture (including shitty schools, the media, etc) seems to
be pretty effectively designed to teach "the people" _not_ to think.
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- | Never eat more than yo
ericans are somewhere
on the order of ten _times_ as likely to blow each other away.
Does it take "multiple Columbines on a daily basis" to constitute a
problem?
Somewhere close to a hundred Americans blow each other away _per_day_
and you want this to lead me to the conclusion that things ar
there are some nifty kernel-building helper tools
in Debian. The above-linked guide assumes you want to use them.
make-kpkg in particular.
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- | You don't *have* a soul. Y
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:25:42PM -0500, David Z Maze wrote:
> ScruLoose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've been wanting to switch from ext2 to ext3 on this machine, including
> > the root filesystem.
> >
> > I'm using the stock Debian 2.4.16-i68
arge.
> And charge extra for anything else.
Sounds good.
Better PR to call it a discount on the Debian ones, though.
Likewise, you could offer a "discount" on the maintenance of the Debian
boxen.
Cheers!
--
,---
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 02:38:12PM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:04:57PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> > Regarding any one drug as being just the same as any other makes no more
> > sense than prescribing morphine for an infection or penicillin for a
> > migra
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:03:35PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:42:09AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it be easier to use mutt's builtin support for mailing lists?
> >
> > Add the line
> > subscribe [EMAIL PROTECT
with an incredible mess of dependency problems.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | If we do not believe in freedom of speech <
> Please do not | for those we despise
he nameserver addresses go in /etc/resolv.conf
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | Forward he cried from the rear; and the front rank died<
> Please do not | and the General sat, and the lines on the map &
dividual_ drugs and you
enable them to make smarter, informed decisions.
Regarding any one drug as being just the same as any other makes no more
sense than prescribing morphine for an infection or penicillin for a
migraine.
Cheers!
--
,-
is such a pain...
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | Reporter: What do you think of western civilization? <
> Please do not | Ghandi: I think it w
a lot more per year
(not necessary if you go with the $n*100/year formula I guess)
- Maybe cover additional machines in same household for a discounted
rate? Home LAN packages with file- and printer-sharing?
Cheers!
--
,---
t my DSL company waived when I
signed up. (That "promotion" has been running for at least two years.)
In terms of making a monthly support plan, I'd say the best bet is to
design the system to need as little maintenance as possible and keep the
monthly fee _really_low_. Maybe e
kernel-source package which is listed as sid and sarge but works
fine on woody too)...
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- | Why can't we ever attempt to solve a problem <
> Please do not | i
#x27;s builtin support for mailing lists?
Add the line
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
somewhere in your .muttrc, and then use L for "reply-to-list"...
I _think_ this setup will even respect the mail-followup-to header and
automatically cc people when they have that header set (not sure,
okay I handled that successfully" SMTP codes from the
MTA before it deletes the message off the POP server. If it gets a
failure code from the MTA it will _not_ delete the mail.
So really, the only way you're likely to lose your mail with fetchmail
is if your MTA is so misconfigured tha
you need is a POP and/or IMAP
server.
There are various choices out there... Courier's implementations seem to
be pretty popular, though they do require the maildir format.
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose-
;re familiar with how debian
does things, how apt handles dependencies, etc.
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- | I find it kind of funny, I find it kind of sad<
> Please do not | the
instead of FAT,
that's a different story entirely. The linux drivers for NTFS are
experimental and it's recommended to mount those drives read-only.
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- | Reporter: What do you think
ess right.
And the google search would fail because the filename is actually
kernel-source-2.4.22_2.4.22-3_all.deb
Don't ask me about that naming scheme! ;-)
Cheers!
--
,-.
> -ScruLoose- |
people have been
suggesting. I used this method to install all the tools that are called
for in the Very Verbose Guide to Compiling a Debian Kernel.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | If we do not believe
he machine and do the maintenance yourself.
Cheers!
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- | I don't want to start any blasphemous rumours <
> Please do not | but I think that God's got a s
as far as I'm concerned.
Cheers
--
,-----.
> -ScruLoose- |They that can give up essential liberty<
> Please do not | to obtain a little temporary safety <
> reply off-list. | deserve neither liberty nor safety.
esn't _have_ permissions, so those programs may barf.
It's just going to be less of a headache for you to leave /home/david on
an appropriate linux filesystem, and mount your windows partition
someplace else.
Cheers!
--
,---
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 04:51:54PM -0800, Mark Healey wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 13:09:24 -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
>
> First off. I am doing this because none of the kernels on the cds
> support my nic. Consequently, any suggestions that involve using
> apt-get show that the
o
> choice, now would we?
If having sid's version of mozilla is more important to your needs than
having a rock-solid system, AND the latest backport is not a good enough
compromise for your needs, AND you don't want to run a
non-debian
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
