On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 02:54:54AM +0200, b...@debian.16bits.net wrote:
> > /proc/cpuinfo shows it supports sse, but not sse2. And movsd is a sse2
> > instruction [1]
>
> This is an intentional upstream change which also affects
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 09:08:35AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 02:54:54AM +0200, b...@debian.16bits.net wrote:
> > > /proc/cpuinfo shows it supports sse, but not sse2. A
Package: rustc
Version: 1.28.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: critical
Build anything with the rustc compiler for i386, and the result will
contain SSE2 instructions. This means rust-based packages don't support
the full range of what the i386 Debian architecture supports.
Specifically, this is the main cause
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 02:10:14PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 09:08:35AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:40:08PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 02:54:54AM +0200, b...@debian.16bits.net wrote:
>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 05:50:39PM +1200, Tim Makarios wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your work on this so far. I downloaded
> firefox-esr_60.2.0esr-1~deb9u2.1_i386.deb, installed it via
> > $ sudo apt-get install
> > ./Downloads/firefox-esr_60.2.0esr-1~deb9u2.1_i386.deand tried to run it,
> > but
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:04:54PM +1200, Tim Makarios wrote:
> On 13/09/18 18:42, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Can you install the firefox-esr-dbgsym package from
> > https://people.debian.org/~glandium/firefox-esr-dbgsym_60.2.0esr-1~deb9u2.1_i386.deb
> >
> > an
severity 908889 normal
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 03:59:13PM +0200, Roberto Guardato wrote:
> Package: src:firefox-esr
> Version: 60.2.0esr
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source
>
> Hi all,
> trying to build firefox-esr on PowerPc64 (ppc64) arch i obtain the following
> er
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 04:55:07PM +1200, Tim Makarios wrote:
> On 13/09/18 21:23, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Huh. Can you then try ulimit -c unlimited, and upload the resulting core
> > file somewhere?
>
> I'm not sure I quite understand you here. I ran
>
> $ uli
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 05:26:43PM +1200, Tim Makarios wrote:
> On 18/09/18 17:05, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Oh, right. Forgot about the crash reporter interposing itself. You can
> > do one of the following:
> > ...
> > - or send the report to Mozilla, and find its id i
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 02:30:03PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 05:26:43PM +1200, Tim Makarios wrote:
> > On 18/09/18 17:05, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > Oh, right. Forgot about the crash reporter interposing itself. You can
> > > do one of the foll
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:17:15PM +1200, Tim Makarios wrote:
> On 18/09/18 17:55, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > So the crash is happening in JITed code, which is not expected: the JIT
> > should disable itself. There might be something wrong either in the
> > detection or maybe som
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 04:40:00PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 November 2016 9:44:39 PM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > firefox-dev is not in stretch, and it is not planned that it
> > ever will be (see #817954).
> >
> > firefox-esr-dev might be the alternative, but the Mozilla main
severity 921832 normal
thanks
I don't know how you built this, but in a pbuilder with a fresh
unstable, it doesn't FTBFS.
Mike
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 10:56:57AM +0100, Charlemagne Lasse wrote:
> Source: firefox-esr
> Version: 60.5.0esr-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Forwarded: https://bugz
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 12:27:02AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2015-08-29 00:17:06 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2015-08-28 19:34:53 +0100, jnqnfe wrote:
> > > Package: iceweasel
> > > Version: 38.2.1esr-1
> > > Severity: grave
> > >
> > > The latest iceweasel update causes it to seg
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 10:24:06PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> at bottom :-
>
> On 04/01/2017, Patrick Mutwiri wrote:
> > thats how fonts are installed.
> >
> >
> > this is not a bug.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *Kind Regards,*
> >
> >
> > Patrick Mutwiri / _dev
> >
> > +254 727 542 899
> >
> > Nairobi
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:25:57PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 01/12/2017 12:02 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >> sed: character class syntax is [[:space:]], not [:space:]
> >
> > Almost looks like sed changed its syntax although I can't really believe
> > this
> > would
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 01:35:35PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Mike!
>
> On 01/12/2017 01:30 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > It's more subtle than that. Also, firefox and icedove already do an
> > autoreconf on their own.
> >
> > icu.m4 is auto
severity 1035947 normal
thanks
This would be serious if it failed to build with the sources in the
Debian archive, which is what counts.
Note that using uscan doesn't get you all the sources.
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:32:40AM -0400, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> Source: firefox
> Severity: serious
>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 06:38:15PM +, arizona.rover wrote:
> Pidgin is dying on start-up too due to "an illegal instruction"
>
> Thread 1 "pidgin" received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> 0x7fffdb7489ab in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreeblpriv3.so
Can you install libnss3-db
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 08:48:23PM +, arizona.rover wrote:
> Thread 1 "pidgin" received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
> 0x7fffdb7489ab in fadd (f2=0x7fffaa60, f1=0x7fffaa40,
> out=0x7fffaac0)
> at verified/curve25519-inline.h:40
> 40 verified/curve25519-inline.h:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:39:12AM +0200, Philipp Marek wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 114.0-1
> Severity: grave
> X-Debbugs-Cc: phil...@marek.priv.at
>
> Websites that need randomness ([1]) are broken,
> on both Debian FF 113.0.2 and 114.0 (114.0.2 not yet available for amd64).
>
> Reprodu
Package: cargo
Version: 0.35.0-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cargo&arch=mips&ver=0.35.0-1&stamp=1559294265&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cargo&arch=mips64el&ver=0.35.0-1&stamp=1559294794&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pk
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 10:27:15PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: cargo
> Version: 0.35.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=cargo&arch=mips&ver=0.35.0-1&stamp=1559294265&raw=0
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fet
reassign -1 unzip
found -1 6.0-24
notfound -1 6.0-23
This is a false positive from the changes in unzip 6.0-24.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:04:24PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> package: firefox-esr
> version: 60.8.0esr-1
> severity: serious
>
> While trying to update firefox-esr in raspbian bullse
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 01:19:15AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019, Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> > reassign -1 unzip
> > found -1 6.0-24
> > notfound -1 6.0-23
> >
> > This is a false positive from the changes in unzip 6.0-24.
>
> Please
Package: gcc-10
Version: 10.2.0-15
Severity: serious
See the full buildd log in
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firefox-esr&arch=armhf&ver=78.4.0esr-2&stamp=1603260510&raw=0
The preprocessed source that fails is attached as intrapred_neon.i.gz.
This is reproducible on armhf with:
And _of course_ I forgot to attach the file.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:50:58PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: gcc-10
> Version: 10.2.0-15
> Severity: serious
>
> See the full buildd log in
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firefox-esr&arch=armhf
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:12:14AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/22/20 9:57 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> The code in question hasn't changed in a long time, so the same code
> >> effectively built fine with older versions of gcc. The last successful
> >>
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:44:07PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 04:08:04PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> >...
> > Can anybody have a look at this why it's failing? Bug with references is
> > #859912
> >...
>
> Your package shouldn't exist, this is the main problem here.
I
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 06:13:13AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 08:08:06AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:44:07PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 04:08:04PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> >...
> >
On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 07:59:24PM +0300, jim_p wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 67.0-3
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> After today's update to 67.0-3, firefox fails to open every https site,
> popping
> up the "NS_ERROR_NET_INADEQUATE_SECURITY" error.
>
> It was working as it s
severity 990058 normal
thanks
With #990059 addressed in 2:3.67-2, this can be downgraded to normal.
The problem also exists with other functions, which is why I'll keep
this open for a more complete and long-term solution.
Mike
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 03:09:36PM -0600, Kevin Locke wrote:
> Packa
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 03:35:48PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The simplest fix is thus to let nss migrate into bullseye.
The simplest fix is a binNMU of firefox-esr because the issue was fixed
in NSS, but since there's going to be a security update for firefox-esr
next week, I didn't ask for
reassign 993973 libc6-dev
found 993973 2.32-1
thanks
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:21:52AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: nss
> Version: 2:3.70-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
>
> A native build of nss now fails as follows:
>
> | x86_64-linux
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:52:03AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27476
>
> On 2021-09-09 00:21, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Source: nss
> > Version: 2:3.70-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lis
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 09:01:24PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Source: firefox-esr
> Version: 78.14.0esr-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: out-of-sync
> Control: block -1 by 998679
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> The Release Te
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Package: firefox-esr
> Version: 78.15.0esr-1~deb11u1
> Followup-For: Bug #1001234
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> 91.4.0esr-1 was indeed uploaded. However, mipsel was not removed from the
> list of ar
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 10:31:32AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> ke 8. jouluk. 2021 klo 9.41 Mike Hommey (m...@glandium.org) kirjoitti:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 09:07:24AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > 91.4.0esr-1 was indeed uploaded. However, mipsel was no
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 03:16:20AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> So the libvpx transition prompted me to take a look at this, I added some
> code to debian/rules to create a fake homedir, use it for the build and
> remove it in the clean target.
https://salsa.debian.org/mozilla-team/firefox/commit
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 01:59:36PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Could someone then possibly rebuild this with Julian’s patch, ASAP?
>
> Over a week with a likely remote code exploit hole in the browser of
> any Debian (non-ESR) FF user, seems not so ideal,
There's a 101.0.1 on the way
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 12:06:06AM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: firefox-esr
> Version: 102.5.0esr-1~deb11u1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: violates a Debian Etch release goal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
>
> see attached screenshot
Try removing that %eth0 from the ipv6 address
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 12:00:07AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Mike Hommey dixit:
>
> >Try removing that %eth0 from the ipv6 address.
>
> That would invalidate said address and is therefore impossible.
Why would it? Is your setup so complex that the network stack ca
forwarded 1024727 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700999
title 1024727 Firefox does not support ipv6 link-local addresses with
severity 1024727 normal
thanks
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 01:08:19AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Mike Hommey dixit:
>
> >> >Try removi
On Sat, Oct 15, 2022 at 09:27:33AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: firefox-esr
> Version: 102.3.0esr-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: bookworm sid
> X-Debbugs-Cc: Carsten Schoenert ,
> debian-rele...@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org,
> debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
> [ various potent
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:53:19PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: firefox-esr
> Version: 52.2.0esr-1
> Severity: serious
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=firefox-esr&suite=sid
>
> ...
> checking for valloc in malloc.h... yes
> checking for valloc in unistd.h... no
> checkin
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:56:45PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 04:53:19PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Source: firefox-esr
> > Version: 52.2.0esr-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=firefox-esr&am
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:16:05AM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Package: nss
> Severity: grave
>
> Hi, please revert this commit which switched the default certificate database
> format to SQL:
>
> https://github.com/nss-dev/nss/commit/33b114e38278c4ffbb6b244a0ebc9910e5245cd3
>
> Several packa
There is something wrong with the default locale. Try installing a
locale package (even firefox-l10n-en-gb) or downgrade to 57.
Mike
On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 09:51:09PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> tag 881301 pending
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> Bug #881301 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
> see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
>
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/p
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 11:35:08AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 08:50:14 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > When can this reach unstable? Somehow, I've started hitting this bug
> > yesterday
>
> Huh. Did you recently enable any new Shell extens
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 03:25:32PM +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 58.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
> I used FF58b4, it works fine.
> Then I upgraded it to FF58b14, it crashed from time to time.
>
> Today I upgraded FF to 58.0, it crashes each 1 minute (see backtrace)
> (
Package: libfreetype6-dev
Version: 2.10.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Firefox failed to build with:
ERROR: Package libbrotlidec was not found in the pkg-config search path.
ERROR: Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libbrotlidec.pc'
ERROR: to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
ERRO
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:22:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:45 +0200 Johannes Rohr wrote:
> > It would be great to have firefox (or the next firefox-esr) in
> > buster-backports, as it has important new functionality relevant for
> > privacy and data protection, suc
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 08:25:10PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 7:31 am, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 03:22:40PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:10:45 +0200 Johannes Rohr
> > > wrote:
&
Source: pixman
Version: 0.42.2-1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
The package fails to build on armhf on current sid/testing with:
../../pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm.h:821: Error: garbage following instruction --
`bne 01f'
../../pixman/pixman-arm-simd-asm.h:869: Info: macro invoked from here
.
Package: mercurial
Version: 6.8-1
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
Running mercurial (simply running `hg`) on trixie fails with:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/hg", line 57, in
from mercurial import dispatch
File "", line 1360, in _find_and_load
File "", line 13
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:55:58PM +0200, tv.debian wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 22:40:01 +0200 Christoph Anton Mitterer
> wrote:
> > FYI:
> >
> > I haven't seen that behaviour after upgrading... and I do have quite a
> > few tabs in many windows open.
> > Maybe it happens not in all configurati
reassign 1052002 clang-16
affects 1052002 firefox
affects 1052002 firefox-esr
thanks
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:19:17PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Source: firefox
> Version: 117.0.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the p
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:48:02AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: libxslt
> Version: 1.1.16-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> libxslt FTBFS on alpha/MIPS since over 3 weeks. I have no clue about the
> causes/fix (please refer to
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:58:15PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This bug is open for almost two months. As Mozilla version 1.7.13 fixes
> several security bugs, please package it. If you don't have time, can I
> NMU it?
Please do. Nobody cares enough for mozill
Package: libxft-dev
Version: 2.1.8.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
The file /usr/lib/pkgconfig/xft.pc says xft requires xproto, which is
available in no package, as stated by apt-file.
Even if it existed, there should be a dependency to the dev package
holding it.
I don't know which bug you intended to close, but it's not this one...
Mike
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 09:48:16AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #349678: libxft-dev: pkg-config file says requires xproto th
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:27:10AM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:39:27PM +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> > Package: firefox
> > Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-1
> > Followup-For: Bug #351898
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:42:10PM +0100, Gregor Zattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> O.K. I have no clue about bactraces and such. Here is, what I
> did to produce a bactrace:
>
> 1. purged mozilla-browser and mozilla-firefox
> pit:/usr/lib# aptitude purge mozilla-browser mozilla-firefox
>
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:09:24PM +, Stuart T. R. Rowan <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 20:19 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:42:10PM +0100, Gregor Zattler <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > O.K. I have no clu
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:56:42PM -0500, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:53:56PM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > It works just fine for me...
> >
> > Not for me. Neither with my old ~/.mozilla and ~/.firefox
> > nor with them moved out of the way.
> Let me
severity 365057 normal
thanks
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:20:40PM +0200, Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: python2.3-libxml2
> Version: 2.6.23.dfsg.2-3
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> While updating a box which had not been updated for a long time, the
> installation failed on
forwarded 362170 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161826
thanks
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:06:11AM -0400, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
(...)
> > 5102 while (aNumChars-- > 0) {
> > 5103// XXX: If you crash here then you may see the issue described
> > 5104// in htt
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Links in /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj point to
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include/ while the directory provided
by libgcj6-dev is /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.4/include/
That makes packages using java-gcj-comp
FWIW, rebuilding the package is enough. It would be sane to have better
dependency on libgcj6-dev
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
severity 340283 important
thanks
Until it is proven that the crash can lead to an exploit, it's not
critical.
Mike
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 12:33:33PM +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.7-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> An exploit
severity 336171 important
thanks
Until it is proven to be exploitable, this can't be critical.
Mike
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:50:09AM +0100, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.7-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> 05.41.42 CVE: Not Available
severity 340283 important
thanks
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:46:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> severity 340283 grave
> thanks
>
> * Mike Hommey:
>
> > severity 340283 important
> > thanks
> >
> > Until it is proven th
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 10:08:09PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: firefox Version: 1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-2 Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build on a few arches because it's not
> using -fPIC to make a shared library.
If you look closely at the com
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 09:49:32AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 10:08:09PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Package: firefox Version: 1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-2 Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
>
severity 342099 important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:54:51PM +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> reopen 342099
> thanks
>
> also sprach Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.12.05.1525 +0100]:
> > 1. I hardly see why it is grave
> &
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:04:43PM +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Steve Kemp:
>
> >> My ff does not crashed, but it ate really much cpu-time when I tested
> >> slightly modified version of javascript.
> >
> > Not a security issue, "just" a DOS attack.
> >
> > Mozilla.o
tag 342550 - security
severity 342550 important
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:25:04AM +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey:
>
> >> Even if the browser cannot be restarted after the attack has been
> >> carried out? The impact of this
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 10:07:14PM -0800, Itai Seggev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think this bug may be saefly closed now, as the relicensing project
> is complete:
>
> http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/2006/03/relicensing_complete.html
This will be closed whenever the source tarbal
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
> The availability to do this is enough even if there are other
> (possibly better) ways to do the same. One free driver _in_ Debian and
> the package should stay in main.
>
> But does the cipe-source build or ship the windows driver f
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:11:32AM +0100, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:36:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
> > > The availability to do this is enough even if there a
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Package: libxul-dev
> > Version: 1.8.0.1-2
> > Severity: serious
>
> > The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser.
>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:21:49PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:13:01AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 19
Package: abiword
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The abiword source includes the sources for libpng, zlib, libiconv, fribidi,
expat, pbx, popt, wv (and maybe some others I didn't see), none of which
copyright holder and license is given in the copyright file.
-- System Information:
D
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:03:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:50:20PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Package: abiword
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 12.5
>
> > The abiword source includes th
Package: firefox-locale-ja
Version: 1.5.0.1lang20060301-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
There is no chrome.manifest file bundled in firefox-locale-ja, making it
pretty useless, Firefox not being able to register its chrome.
Mike
-- System Information:
Debian Release: te
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:27:58PM +0100, Bart Vanhaute
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: libxul0d Version: 1.8.0.1-6 Severity: grave Justification:
> renders package unusable
>
> An update to this version of xulrunner makes galeon and epiphany crash
> on startup. Perhaps they both need to reb
severity 377300 normal
reassign 377300 libmozjs0d
merge 377300 376374
tag 376374 pending
thanks
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:19:03PM -0400, Akira Yamanita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: libxul0d
> Version: 1.8.0.4-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Epiphany an
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:23:01PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: xulrunner
> Version: 1.8.0.4-2
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
This is the same as #328238, mozilla sources need to be built on s390,
and crosscompili
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:09:48PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:59:34PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > This is the same as #328238, mozilla sources need to be built on s390,
> > and crosscompiling is not very well supported. I
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:00:08PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-2
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of firefox_1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 8
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 03:16:57PM +0200, Martin Vlk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: firefox
> Version: 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.4-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When I try to start Firefox the process disappears after a few seconds
> with no error messages and witho
Package: scim-anthy
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
scim-anthy depends on a version of libanthy0 that is not available.
namakemono:/media# LANG=C apt-get install scim-anthy -t experimental
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could n
tag 329413 +patch
thanks
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:16:51PM -0400, Michael Spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Right now I am assuming that once Firefox 1.5 is released to unstable,
> the Debian chrome update scripts will be included. I sent the Firefox
> maintainer an email to try and confirm t
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 10:14:30PM +1100, Vincent McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.4-2sarge5
> Followup-For: Bug #322239
>
> Hi
>
> I think I am seeing this too. It was reported in #316824 (for 'mozilla')
> but I did not cross-report to 'mozilla-firef
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 03:20:18PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> reassign xsltproc 1.1.15-1
> retitle 336280 xsltproc: doesn't recognize variables in some particular
> situations
> thanks
>
> Le vendredi 28 octobre 2005 à 08:06 -0700, Matt Kraai a écrit :
> > Package: logid
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 07:15:27PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> reassign 336280 logidee-tools
> retitle 336280 XSL files incorrectly use variables in match pattern
> thanks
>
> Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 18:06 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> >
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:16:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Le samedi 05 novembre 2005 à 20:02 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > I hate when good features are removed because the standard says so
> > > without explaining why it makes sen
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:06:49PM +0200, Torsten Zirzlaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> >* Torsten Zirzlaff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [...]
> >
> >Can you move your ~/.mozilla directory o
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 07:25:08PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >And what about people that actually intend to use libraries from
> >other locations instead of those in /lib, without breaking firefox ?
>
> Sorry, but I'm not following you. How would that come about? T
1 - 100 of 835 matches
Mail list logo
