On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:21:49PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:13:01AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > Package: libxul-dev > > > > Version: 1.8.0.1-2 > > > > Severity: serious > > > > > The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser. > > > > Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with > > > > it, > > > > there should also be an explicit conflict in libxul-dev. > > > > Shouldn't a Replaces: be sufficient here? > > > If libxul-dev was compatible with mozilla-browser, it would. > > Presumably, "libxpcom.so" is just a symlink, so shouldn't be a major cause > of compatibility problems...? > > I dunno. Jordi has mentioned on IRC that there are other file conflicts, > and that the libs probably are not ABI compatible?
That's what I meant, they are not ABI compatible. mozilla-browser provides gecko 1.7, xulrunner gecko 1.8. They are incompatible. mozilla-browser is dead anyway, maybe it should just be removed. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
