On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 04:40:00PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Thursday, 17 November 2016 9:44:39 PM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote: > > firefox-dev is not in stretch, and it is not planned that it > > ever will be (see #817954). > > > > firefox-esr-dev might be the alternative, but the Mozilla maintainers > > (Cc'ed on this bug) should be able to give a more definite answer > > on that. > > What exactly am I expected to do about this bug?? If "firefox-dev" is not > meant to be in Stretch than it should have "serious" bug instead of packages > that depend on "firefox-dev".
Wait what? Packages that build depend on a package that is not in stretch are in stretch? WTF? > Should I just replace "firefox-dev" with "firefox-esr-dev"? Probably. Mike
