notfound 1100661 10.1.0+dfsg-1
found 1100661 10.0.0+dfsg-2+b2
thanks
> What does that mean? The ABI will be restored in 11.0.0+dfsg-1?
>
> And how do you want the using packages to be fixed? Binary rebuild?
No answer is an answer. The version tag did not make sense, and the
result was probably th
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:31:33 +0100 Bastian Germann wrote:
> Version: 11.0.0+dfsg-1
>
What does that mean? The ABI will be restored in 11.0.0+dfsg-1?
And how do you want the using packages to be fixed? Binary rebuild?
Best regards,
Eduard.
Hi,
On Thu, 06 Mar 2025 11:52:57 +0100 eric wrote:
> After updating and generating a new initramfs, it does not find the nvme
> root fs. Booting previous kernel with previous generated initramfs (0.145)
> works. Downgrading to 0.145 and rebuilding initramfs makes system work again.
>
> Main disk
clone 1100588 -1
reassign -1 libtinyxml2-10
retitle -1 libtinyxml2-10: apparent ABI break
thanks
Hi,
see below for the description. I can confirm, with stacktrace. Maybe
time to create a custom SONAME version?
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x778fd6ce in tinyxml2::X
tags 1095263 + help
thanks
Hallo,
* Andreas Beckmann [Thu, Feb 06 2025, 03:00:26AM]:
> Package: cloop-src
> Version: 3.14.1.3+nmu1
> Severity: serious
>
> cloop-src fails to build a module for Linux 6.1 in bookworm
> (and of course also for 6.12 in trixie).
Yes. I tried to add latest API adjustme
reopen 1067486
reassign 1067486 apt
severity 1067486 normal
thanks
Am Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:46:02PM +0100 schrieb Julian Andres Klode:
> > Please upload a new version so grub-efi-amd64-signed can be installable.
> > Thanks!
>
> I'm getting a bit tired of this. This is normal, the packages are
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:46:02 +0100 Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
> Version: 1+2.12+1+b1
>
> (this should be the right version when it gets accepted)
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 06:23:06PM +0800, Tianyu Chen wrote:
> > Package: grub-efi-amd64-signed
> > Version: 1+2.12+1
> > Severity: serious
> > X
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 23:46:02 +0100 Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
> Version: 1+2.12+1+b1
>
> (this should be the right version when it gets accepted)
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 06:23:06PM +0800, Tianyu Chen wrote:
> > Package: grub-efi-amd64-signed
> > Version: 1+2.12+1
> > Severity: serious
> > X
Hallo,
* Andreas Beckmann [Fri, Feb 23 2024, 06:27:26PM]:
> Followup-For: Bug #1057447
> Control: found -1 6.30.223.271-24~exp1
> Control: tag -1 + patch
>
> This issue is caused by
> a) version parsing that expects three numeric components (6.6.1-foo) and
>fails if there are only two (6.7-rc1)
tags 1057447 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
which exact kernel version is that? Which exact compiler version is
that?
At the first glance, that looks like some DKMS bug to me (see the
strange shell warning).
I just tested the module-assistant based build with a locally built
6.6.18 on Stable, works like
Package: cryptsetup-initramfs
Version: 2:2.6.1-5
Severity: grave
Hello Maintainer,
we have a problem here. After latest upgrades, I am no longer able to
boot into a system with LUKS-encrypted rootfs. This worked just fine a few
weeks ago. I jumped in circles in the search for the cause, and only
severity 1025389 normal
thanks
Hallo,
* Fabio Pedretti [Mon, Jan 02 2023, 10:10:24AM]:
> Hi, i965 driver was removed, and replaced by iris, crocus and (gallium
> version of) i915.
>
> Did you have any reference to i965 in your configuration?
>
> cd /etc/ && grep -ri i965
>
> If so try to remove th
Am Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 11:02:08PM +0100 schrieb Eduard Bloch:
> reopen 1025389
> severity 1025389 serious
> thanks
>
> Am Sun, Jan 01, 2023 at 02:29:01PM +0100 schrieb Fabio Pedretti:
> > Version: 22.3.0-3
> >
> > 22.3.0-3 reenabled two intel drivers missing
Control: severity 996730 important
Control: tags 996730 +notreproducible +upstream
Hallo,
* 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson [Mon, Oct 18 2021, 03:42:00AM]:
> Package: icewm
> Version: 2.8.0-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Are there any other users who can confirm
> https://github.com/ice-wm/icewm/issues/62 ?
I have no
xr,
/{usr/,}bin/sed ixr,
/usr/lib/apt-cacher-ng/acngtool ixr,
# Allow serving local documentation
/etc/mime.types r,
/usr/share/doc/apt-cacher-ng/html/** r,
# used by libevent
@{PROC}/sys/kernel/random/uuid r,
# Site-specific additions and overrides. See local/README for details.
Control: severity 973883 normal
Hallo,
* Jean-Marc LACROIX [Fri, Nov 06 2020, 03:46:53PM]:
> Package: apt-cacher-ng
> Version: 3.2.1-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Dear maintainers,
>
> It seems there is one bad exit code issue (=0) when trying to start démon if
> internal check is bad. (/etc/init.d/apt-
notfound 980923 3.6-1
thanks
Hallo,
* Eduard Bloch [Sun, Jan 31 2021, 11:30:07PM]:
> > > Interesting. Please throw gcore at it and send me a copy of that dump
> >
> > Uploaded at <https://people.debian.org/~taffit/acng/core.669583>, thanks
> > for looking into
Control: tags 948346 +patch
Hallo,
* Chris Hofstaedtler [Mon, Feb 08 2021, 01:43:52AM]:
> * Eduard Bloch [210208 00:43]:
> > > Could you make an upload to DELAYED instead of further waiting?
> >
> > I am no longer waiting, today is timeout day. Will use 7-DAY DELA
Hallo,
* Adrian Bunk [Mon, Jan 25 2021, 07:15:35AM]:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 12:10:16PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >...
> > I am setting this to RC severity because it's just NOT ok and obvious to
> > fix. Going to change mentioned things and NMU this in a couple o
Hallo,
* Jamie Zawinski [Mon, Jan 11 2021, 01:13:10PM]:
> > my .icewm/startup file at the moment contains:
> >
> > xscreensaver -nosplash -log wtf-xscreensaver.txt &
> >
> > When icewm starts, I see the splash screen for a brief moment (not joking,
> > looks -nosplash has no effect there), but it
Hallo,
* Michael Biebl [Sun, Jan 10 2021, 08:24:12PM]:
> Am 10.01.21 um 20:02 schrieb Jamie Zawinski:
> > > Why would a xscreensaver instance running for user A have any influence
> > > on a xscreensaver instance running for user B? That seems absolutely
> > > weird to me and something I don't un
or
"trace" mode for such kind of issues in systemd. Mind to share your
knowledge?
* Michael Biebl [Fri, Jan 08 2021, 01:34:43PM]:
> Control: reassign -1 xscreensaver
>
> I don't see a systemd problem here, so re-assigning to xscreensaver.
>
> Am 08.01.21 u
reopen 975137
reassign 975137 binutils
thanks
Hi,
first I assumed that it's a GOLD issue but looking at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apt%2dcacher%2dng
shows the real drama. Half of architecture builds fail due to some
obscure segfault of ld linker.
Please investigate.
Best reg
Hello,
I was notified by a prominent user who is seriouly worried about the
state of this package.
Please let us know whether it will be in releasable shape in the next
weeks, or whether you need any support or a sponsored upload. Thank you.
And in case that you no longer wish to maintain it, pl
Package: libgrpc++1
Version: 1.26.0-3
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Tried to setup a basic POC using gRPC. Used the example source code for
Cpp from this source package, and dev package and protoc from regular
Debian Sid.
* What exactly did you do (or
Control: severity 952811 important
Control: tags 952811 +upstream
Hallo,
* Eduard Bloch [Fri, Mar 06 2020, 07:48:22AM]:
> Control: tags 952811 +moreinfo
>
> Hallo,
> * Jean-Marc LACROIX [Sat, Feb 29 2020, 05:25:53PM]:
> > Package: apt-cacher-ng
> > Version: 3.2-2
> &
Control: tags 952811 +moreinfo
Hallo,
* Jean-Marc LACROIX [Sat, Feb 29 2020, 05:25:53PM]:
> Package: apt-cacher-ng
> Version: 3.2-2
> Severity: grave
That's hardly grave because not clearly reproducible. But I have seen
this 502 in development a couple of times, appeared and disappeared
without t
clone 874843 -1
reassign -1 cdcat
thanks
> As you reassigned the bug to wnpp cdcat lost it's RC bug. Do you mind if I
> clone it and reassign the clone to cdcat?
>
> We are targetting at removing Qt4 from testing as a first step.
Right, I am sorry. I just applied what you suggested.
Regards, Ed
reassign 874843 wnpp
retitle 874843 RFA: cdcat - maintain disk media contents catalog
thanks
Hallo Moritz,
* Moritz Mühlenhoff [Thu, Aug 22 2019, 11:16:12PM]:
> On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 09:03:03PM +0200, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> wrote:
> > Source: cdcat
> >
> > Hi! As you might know w
Hallo,
* Debian Bug Tracking System [Thu, Jul 25 2019, 05:24:04PM]:
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>
> You can follow progress on this Bug here: 933001:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933001.
Ok, I grepped around for the last occurrence of the path
/usr/
Package: fontconfig
Version: 2.13.1-2
Severity: grave
After recent upgrades, initramfs update fails here. When I patch
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/plymouth with "set -x", this is what we
get. And this error handling = NOT helpfull.
+ '[' n = y ']'
+ cp -pP /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbsd.so
Package: apt-cacher-ng
Version: 3.2-1
Severity: serious
This bug is basically reminder to myself and not to whoever runs into
this issue.
Looks like apt-cacher-ng expiery manages to maneuver itself into a state
which cannot be recovered. It reports non-existent files from apparently
guessed sourc
Control: retitle 928390 unable to remove/upgrade where installed version is not
operational
Control: severity 928390 grave
Even worse:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
virtualbox-ext-pack
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 1062 not upgraded.
3 not fully installed or removed.
Package: virtualbox-ext-pack
Version: 6.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Just what the subject says. Tries to upgrade from 6.0.4-1, and fails.
What it's doing there? No idea, looks like it tries to do some checks
but stumbles on the results if they are not what it has expected.
The recommendation to insta
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 19:22:21 +0100
=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +unreproducible moreinfo
>
> Hi James,
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:09 PM James Henried wrote:
> > fetchmail has stopped working in version 6.4.0~beta4-2.
> Which previous version
Package: libel-api-java
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: grave
The usual story, not installable, breaks upgrade.
Please resolve this conflict:
Unpacking libel-api-java (3.0.0-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libel-api-java_3.0.0-1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite
Hallo,
* Colin Watson [Wed, Oct 31 2018, 11:38:31AM]:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:27:22PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > I am no longer able to install many packages. The man-db hook keeps
> > running and running for ages.
> >
> > I have monitored it with strace and it
Package: man-db
Version: 2.8.4-2+b1
Severity: serious
File: /usr/bin/mandb
Hello,
I am no longer able to install many packages. The man-db hook keeps
running and running for ages.
I have monitored it with strace and it seems to run over the same files
in man1 folder all over again, never ending.
tags 877613 +upstream +pending
thanks
Shitty cmake code in audio library selection, I pushed the fix through upstream
chain already.
That happens in experimental only, no urgency IMHO.
Hallo,
* Michael Biebl [Sun, Aug 27 2017, 01:04:53PM]:
> > Ok, now the problem from the original report has hit me too.
> >
> > I could not figure out what is going on. I selected an AP which has been
> > working fine for months, and suddenly NM switched me to another AP
> > (which works partly si
Hallo,
* James Cowgill [Fri, Aug 18 2017, 05:02:52PM]:
> Source: encfs
> Version: 1.9.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid buster
>
> Hi,
>
> ensfc FTBFS on mips, mipsel and various ports architectures with the error:
> > libencfs.so.1.9.2: undefined reference to `__atomic_store_8'
> > libencfs.so
Hallo,
* jcowg...@debian.org [Mon, Aug 07 2017, 03:20:41PM]:
> Package: encfs
> Version: 1.9.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid buster
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: gcc-7-op-mangling
>
> Hi,
>
> It appears that your package provides an external symbol that is
> affected by the
clone 849875 -1
reassign -1 network-manager
retitle -1 WPA usage error: Invalid passphrase character
thanks
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 11:32:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Dear Debian wpasupplicant Maintainers,
> I noticed that these 3 RC bugs (#849122, #849077, #849875) are marked
> as found in
try.diff,
+gi-require-exception.diff, subwindows-zero-size.patch)
+
+ -- Eduard Bloch Sun, 19 Mar 2017 11:12:18 +0100
+
terminator (1.90+bzr-1705-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot.
Index: debian/patches/add-keywords-entry.diff
==
Hallo,
* Francesco Namuri [Tue, Jan 31 2017, 06:06:01PM]:
> > Yes, I agree that it's easily discoverable--which is why I'm concerned
> > that simply removing the entire functionality of the package without
> > any kind of notification to the user isn't the best way to address the
> > problem. Agai
Control: severity 849034 important
Hallo,
* Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer [Wed, Dec 21 2016, 09:46:14PM]:
> Package: broadcom-sta-dkms
> Version: 6.30.223.271-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: The package becomes unusable
>
> I've found out that using the debian revision -5 of this pac
Control: retitle 841431 FTBFS on m68k/powerpcspe
Control: reopen 841431
I wanted to extend this patch to a couple of other architectures and
failed to commit the change prior to release :-(
To be fixed in an upstream release soon.
Regards,
Eduard.
Control: severity 818862 important
Hallo,
* Luca Boccassi [Tue, Aug 16 2016, 09:48:40PM]:
> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 20:02 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > Package: nvidia-kernel-source
> > Version: 367.35-1
> > Followup-For: Bug #818862
> > Control: severity 818862 grave
Control: tags 831195 +patch
While this problem can be easily patched, I have no motivation to work
on this package anymore. RFH will be opened soon.
Regards,
Eduard.
>From b1bf5f03735b5a0310698ac5143a1397dc8c0cca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eduard Bloch
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 22:26:31 +0
Hallo,
* Andreas Beckmann [Sat, Sep 12 2015, 01:13:31PM]:
> Yes, he did. But did you understand what Sven wrote?
>
> > Check:
> > https://packages.debian.org/sid/arm64/icewm-common/filelist
>
> That contains
>
> ...
> /usr/share/doc/icewm-common/html/icewm.html
> /usr/share/doc/icewm/preference
Control: reassign -1 piuparts
Hallo,
* Sven Joachim [Sat, Sep 12 2015, 10:51:16AM]:
> Control: reassign -1 icewm 1.3.8+githubmod+20150818+ad97152-1
>
> Am 12.09.2015 um 09:43 schrieb Eduard Bloch:
>
> > Control: reassign 798698 piuparts
> >
> > Hallo,
> >
Control: reassign 798698 piuparts
Hallo,
* Andreas Beckmann [Fri, Sep 11 2015, 09:07:14PM]:
> Package: icewm
> Version: 1.3.8+githubmod+20150818+ad97152-1
> Severity: serious
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts
>
> Hi,
>
> a test with piuparts revealed that your package misse
Control: tag 796601 +notreproducible
Control: severity 796601 important
> When using encfs to scramble a backup to an alternate media, the password gets
> modified somehow during umount.Any further attempts to mount the media fail,
> even if the password is correct.
Cannot reproduce. Please show
Package: apt
Version: 1.1~exp8
Severity: grave
Hello,
this morning, apt started segfaulting out of blue. My current workaround
was to install the experimental version and run "apt-cache gencaches"
then, at least, apt-cache stopped segfaulting. But apt-get still cannot
run an update, see below, be
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.17.22
Severity: grave
Hello,
today I tried to dist-upgrade my system (sid) starting from a package
state of a couple of weeks ago. First apt reported a failed dpkg right
in the middle of the upgrade process without displaying any visible
error messages. Now when I run "ap
severity 736066 important
thanks
Dear Security Team,
FYI, as discussed in this bug report, I am lowering the severity of this
bug because of not considering this a general security problem. It's
only an issue in specific scenarios which are sufficiently explained
now.
Regards,
Eduard.
* E
Hallo,
* Matthias Urlichs [Mon, Sep 29 2014, 07:29:44AM]:
> > > According to a security audit by Taylor Hornby (Defuse Security), the
> > > current
> > > implementation of Encfs is vulnerable or potentially vulnerable to
> > > multiple
> > > attacks on the encrypted data. This especially affe
tags 763685 +pending
thanks
Hallo,
* Guillem Jover [Thu, Oct 02 2014, 05:23:09AM]:
> > @@ -22,8 +24,10 @@
> > override_dh_install:
> > dh_install $(shell test -e build/acngfs || echo -Xacngfs)
> > sed -e s,^Type=simple,Type=notify, < systemd/apt-cacher-ng.service >
> > debian/apt-cacher
Hallo,
* Eduard Bloch [Thu, Sep 11 2014, 04:55:14PM]:
> > (What would be the right way to do that? Lower the severtiy of the bug?
> > Add a jessie-ignore tag?)
> >
> > To notify users about the potential security issue, a NEWS file could
> > be added, or one could
Package: libsystemd-daemon-dev
Version: 215-4
Severity: grave
The current Sid version does not have any useful contents. sd-daemon.h
is in libsystemd-dev (why?) and libsystemd-daemon.so is gone. It was
there in testing:
https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=jessie&arch=any&mode=path&searchon=c
Hallo,
* Holger Levsen [Thu, Sep 11 2014, 06:42:32PM]:
> Hi Eduard,
>
> On Donnerstag, 11. September 2014, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > In fact, that is what I considered as workaround, and even harder: add a
> > debconf message with priority critical telling exactly those deta
Hallo,
* Jan Niehusmann [Thu, Sep 11 2014, 12:12:08PM]:
> The bug report is about security issues, but these are not security
> issues of the software (as in: you can somehow hack into the computer
> wich is running the software), but of the encryption algorithms used.
>
> So it can be compared t
Package: init-select
Version: 1.20140309
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
I am sorry if this report comes too harsh but my impression is that this
package is not suitable for a release and therefore I have set the
Severity that way. Feel free to change but please with sufficient
reasons.
Thing
Hallo Geert,
nice to hear from you again.
* Geert Stappers [Thu, Oct 17 2013, 09:41:43PM]:
> Hello Eduard,
>
> Does it help if I do a NMU to fix http://bugs.debian.org/720296 ?
>
> AIUI did #720296 cause the removal of apt-cacher-ng from testing.
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/apt-cacher-
found 720296 0.1.12-2
thanks
Hallo,
* Andreas Beckmann [Tue, Aug 20 2013, 09:16:29AM]:
> 0m19.0s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot:
> /etc/apt-cacher-ng/backends_debian
This "problem" has been existing for years, the file never changes in
the upstream package and the
tags 668575 +unreproducible
severity 668575 important
thanks
Hallo,
> Severity: grave
> Tags: upstream
> Justification: renders package unusable
You cannot claim that without testing simple use cases (like with a
short password).
>* What led up to the situation?
> I transferred 2 directorie
tags 651788 +help
thanks
Hallo,
* Eduard Bloch [Sat, Feb 18 2012, 04:44:37PM]:
> Exactly. Guys, please relax, this bug just went off my radar for some
> reason but I will try to fix it ASAP. The package needed some polishing
> anyway (dropping 2.4.x legacy, using quilt format, etc.).
S
Hallo,
* Klaus Ethgen [Sat, Feb 18 2012, 11:26:48AM]:
> Am Sa den 18. Feb 2012 um 1:45 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > Ben Hutchings (12/12/2011):
> > > This module fails to build for Linux 3.1:
> > >
> > > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/cdfs/2.4'
> > > gcc -Wall -O2 -DLINUX -DCONFI
Package: libmediainfo-dev
Version: 0.7.52-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
currently, if an application relies on the flags returned from pkgconfig
for libmediainfo, the application cannot be linked! This happens because
MediaInfo_Const.h makes use of the _UNICODE definition to create the
type definiti
Source: mediainfo
Version: 0.7.52
Severity: serious
The package does cannot be built twice.
/var/tmp/libmediainfo-0.7.52 $ debuild
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package libmediainfo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.7.52-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed b
Package: llvm-gcc-4.5
Version: 0~20091229-2
Severity: grave
$ llvm-c++ source/conn.cc -o
/usr/bin/llvm-c++: line 2: exec: c++-4.5: not found
Maybe this was a link some time ago but there is no c++-4.5 with current
gcc package.
Regards,
Eduard.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
#include
* Agustin Martin [Mon, Mar 14 2011, 10:28:43AM]:
> This seems at least the problem I have with libpam-encfs, which in
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/libp/libpam-encfs.html
>
> claims to be out of date in kfreebsd*, presumably because (unistallable)
> kfreebsd* packages exists for
severity 602392 important
thanks
#include
* toobuntu [Sat, Nov 06 2010, 07:00:58PM]:
> I encountered the same issue also while trying to install
> virtualbox-ose-guest-dkms (VirtualBox Guest Additions). Please let me know
> what I can do to help. I noticed that "linux" is hardcoded all over the
>
severity 598469 important
thanks
#include
* Keith Edmunds [Wed, Sep 29 2010, 11:33:59AM]:
> 0.5.1-2 is now available in Squeeze, so I will try to build that on Lenny
> and use it.
Yeah, please. I have no clue what is causing this behaviour except of
the apt-cacher-ng server itself being DOSed b
reopen 593356
found 593356 0.5.1-1
found 593356 0.5.3-1
found 593356 0.2.2-2
thanks
Hi,
I think I found the real leak. It was obviously not found by valgrind
before because the leaked resource was the internal thread memory.
It's even worse, it was there almost from the beginning. Since the rest
#include
* Daniel Pittman [Thu, Aug 19 2010, 06:28:01PM]:
> Eduard Bloch writes:
>
> >> > We use apt-cacher-ng in the office to reduce the cost of updates, for
> >> > which
> >> > it works great. However, after moving from an Etch machine to a Lenny
&
#include
* M. Vefa Bicakci [Mon, Jul 05 2010, 09:21:25PM]:
> HTTP/1.1 206 Partial Response
>
> Content-Length: 64360088989315
>
> Content-Range: bytes
> 17496580076480779--5224466291009740840/-5314247457217970159
Yeah, that's the thing that apt-get should have displayed from the start
instead
#include
* M. Vefa Bicakci [Sun, Jul 04 2010, 03:15:21PM]:
> After upgrading apt-cacher-ng from 0.4.7-1 to 0.4.8-1, I noticed that
> apt-cacher-ng started to report a lot of 503 errors in
> /var/log/apt-cacher-ng/apt-cacher.err, and apt-get stopped working
> properly with apt-cacher-ng. After I
retitle 583009 Attempts to escape = char in Cflags
reassign 583009 pkg-config
thanks
Just what the title says...
$ pkg-config --cflags fuse
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS\=64 -I/usr/include/fuse
Previous versions didn't add a backslash there. I can find a workaround
like pushing through a Makefile variab
retitle 581203 libboost-serialization1.42.0 breaks backwards compatibility with
old XML data
reassign 581203 libboost-serialization1.42.0
thanks
This problem refers to https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3990
and http://code.google.com/p/encfs/issues/detail?id=60 . My temporary
workaround wil
severity 571536 important
thanks
#include
* Scott [Thu, Feb 25 2010, 08:12:11PM]:
> Package: apt-cacher-ng
> Version: 0.2.2-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> other comment: apt-cacher-ng is installed as the primary software on a
> vserver,
> to be used as an apt p
Package: hddtemp
Version: 0.3-beta15-45
Severity: serious
Justification: policy §12.5
The copyright file refers to http://www.guzu.net/linux/hddtemp.php - but
this page only contains links to some web directory with obsolete
versions (0.3-beta15 from 2007), or to Savannah Arch repository page
whic
#include
* Sven Joachim [Mon, Jan 04 2010, 10:11:54PM]:
> Am 04.01.2010 um 21:52 schrieb Eduard Bloch:
>
> > @Sven: please try the test packages from:
> >
> > deb http://pkg-icewm.alioth.debian.org ./
>
> Sorry, I need packages for i386 or source to build them.
#include
* Marco Macek [Mon, Jan 04 2010, 09:27:42PM]:
>>> In my (mostly default), I can reproduce
>>> this using right click -> Move...
>>> but I can get out of it by pressing Esc.
>>>
>> Correct. Somehow that simply did not occur to me.
>>
>> Sven
>>
> The problem is fixed in 1.3.6pr
notfound 548348 0.3.4-1
thanks
#include
* Jamey Sharp [Fri, Sep 25 2009, 11:17:00AM]:
> Package: apt-cacher-ng
> Version: 0.2.2-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 3.5
"serious"? Please read dp3.5 again.
"Every package must specify the dependency information about other
packages that
#include
* David Paleino [Thu, Sep 03 2009, 12:07:25PM]:
> forcemerge 538218 538009
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:48:22 +0200 Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > first, you are right. But: the problem comes from wicd itself in
clone 538010 -1
retitle -1 Broken icon data
thanks
Hello,
first, you are right. But: the problem comes from wicd itself in the
first place, therefore I open a second bug report.
AFAICS the WM icon data is crappy:
xprop | grep ICON | tr ',' '\n' | gview -
62521 62529 406342
Sorry, what is
Package: proj-data
Version: 4.6.1-3
Severity: serious
The package tries to replace a file in the old proj package. Was the
package split in a recent release? Looks like it's missing the Replaces:
field then.
dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von
/tmp/mine/debian/pool/main/p/proj/proj-data_4.6.1-3_all
#include
* Neil Mayhew [Wed, Dec 31 2008, 08:46:22AM]:
> On 30/12/08 14:25, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>> Your target kernel (2.6.26) is not from Debian Stable, cloop-src is.
>> Do the math.
>
> I find your reply rather rude. I take the time to report Debian bugs so
> tha
#include
* mariodebian [Sun, Nov 30 2008, 03:50:43PM]:
> > > Now it's really working! 2.6.23-4 uploaded. Would RMs consider to readd
> > > it now? I am almost ashamed to request that.
> >
> > Ok, unblocked. Thanks all involved indeed.
> >
>
> Changelog of cdfs-src 2.6.23-4 don't close this bug
tags 506966 + unreproducible upstream
severity 506966 important
thanks
#include
* Mark Wardle [Wed, Nov 26 2008, 02:49:44PM]:
> Subject: encfs: Cannot decrypt previously encrypted directories
> Package: encfs
> Version: 1.4.2-2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
>
> **
Hello,
actually, cdfs seems to be in big trouble. I found a fix to make it
compile on recent kernels, but the result is not ok, all contents appear
as zero-sized files returning IO errors on access.
Sorry, this needs a proper solution I cannot provide ATM. In the current
state, the package is not
#include
* Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [Mon, Oct 13 2008, 07:27:32PM]:
> package apt-cacher-ng
> tags 502072 patch
> thanks
>
> Using strtol() with appropriate check instead of atoi() should cope with
> the error better, without false alarm. (See the proposed patch.)
Indeed, thanks. But please rea
severity 500941 important
thanks
Sorry, almost every glitch at this level has to "break unrelated
software". The fact that the issue was undiscovered for 4.5 months
demonstrates its severity very well.
Regards,
Eduard.
--
Jemanden zu sagen Idiot - das ist keine Beleidigung, sondern Diagnose.
reassign 501427 lustre-source
retitle 501427 lustre build script resets version string in kernel headers
thanks
#include
* Patrick Winnertz [Tue, Oct 07 2008, 11:05:50AM]:
> Package: module-assistant
> Version: 0.10.8
> Severity: critical
>
> If you build a custom kernel with m-a maybe with this
severity 495585 normal
tags 495585 + upstream moreinfo
thanks
#include
* Patricio Rojo [Mon, Aug 18 2008, 02:53:34PM]:
> Package: vpnc
> Version: 0.5.1r334-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Not really, i.e. talk only for yourself.
> Hi, I tried to to connect to a C
tags 493455 +unreproducible
thanks
#include
* Daniel Schepler [Sat, Aug 02 2008, 11:45:32AM]:
> Package: apt-cacher-ng
> Version: 0.2.3-1
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log, on amd64:
>
> ...
> g++ -c -g -O2 "-I/tmp/buildd/apt-cacher-ng-0.2.3/include"
> source/rfc2553emu.cc -o
tags 481866 +pending
thanks
#include
* Martin Zobel-Helas [Mon, May 19 2008, 07:16:53AM]:
> Package: encfs
> Version: 1.4.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of encfs_1.4.2-1 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> > Build sta
#include
* Moritz Muehlenhoff [Fri, Mar 21 2008, 01:41:41AM]:
> > * last uploaded long ago
> > * several RC bugs
> > * there's FUSE anyway (i.e. #388386)
>
> Eduard, I agree we should remove this. It's dead upstream (last release/
> commits from 2003), hasn't been part of Etch either and wil
Hello,
I had exactly the same problem on upgrade and there was no solution.
I upgraded Java to sun-java6-bin but that didn't help either.
After a reboot and after a dozen of postinst calls (during installation
of other packages) it suddenly worked once, and I could not reproduce
the problem since
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
