Hallo Geert, nice to hear from you again.
* Geert Stappers [Thu, Oct 17 2013, 09:41:43PM]: > Hello Eduard, > > Does it help if I do a NMU to fix http://bugs.debian.org/720296 ? > > AIUI did #720296 cause the removal of apt-cacher-ng from testing. > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/apt-cacher-ng/news/20131015T163915Z.html > is not really clear about the real reason for removal from testing. I know. I have actually seen the black list proposal on debian-devel but I didn't expect them to really push that through... and I realize that I failed to fix it in time. Well. However, I really wish that you hold this NMU back for a few days. I think you have thought it through and most of the changes will be used but there is at least one thing that looked suspicious (this patch of acfg.cc, the part you replaced was meant for systems without glob(), if I remember correctly, and shouldn't be effective on Debian/glibc based ones, but I am not sure though). So I really wish to proof read this without rush and having a clear mind. Unfortunately I am not in the condition to work on Debian packages in the next couple of days but I hope to find some spare time on Sunday. > Something else, but related to this offer to help. > > Is there a public SCM repository with the authoritive version > of apt-cacher-ng? The mecurial repo at Alioth was empty > last time (about a month ago) I checked. Yes, it is. It's on my TODO list, and I planned to switch to git, actually. This will happen soon, I hope. Regards, Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
