Source: pv-grub-menu
Version: 1.3+nmu1
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: Charles Plessy , Thomas Goirand
, 771...@bugs.debian.org, 996...@bugs.debian.org,
732...@bugs.debian.org, 996...@bugs.debian.org, 916...@bugs.debian.org, Package
Salvaging Team
I
Source: ruby-mina
Version: 0.3.7-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
, Aggelos Avgerinos
, Package Salvaging Team
, 832...@bugs.debian.org,
1045...@bugs.debian.org
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing ruby-mina from Deb
Hi Markus & release team,
at first thanks to Nicolas for your very helpful investigation.
Am Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 03:20:06PM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Schodet:
> * Andreas Tille [250424 12:48]:
> > [...]
> > Thus I investigated a bit and found out the problem is caused by the
>
Hi Pierre,
in your last upload you restricted the autopkgtest to amd64 only.
It now seems that also the Build time test is failing. I checked
latest upstream but this makes even amd64 build fail.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Source: python-pyramid-zcml
Version: 1.0.0-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: 997...@bugs.debian.org, Free Ekanayaka ;,
Package Salvaging Team
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing python-pyramid-zcml from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accum
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1102956 in r-cran-sparr reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-sparr/-/commit/609494f22c73abe63af
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1102956 in r-cran-sparr reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-sparr/-/commit/a438ebc75d2de7d2b74
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103199 in r-bioc-oligo reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-oligo/-/commit/fa781c8b787638b0e3d
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103199 in r-bioc-oligo reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-oligo/-/commit/cbc1883ccf20e7b291a
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103202 in rapache reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/rapache/-/commit/8a6c952076735670bb69995a01a01
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103217 in r-bioc-affxparser reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-affxparser/-/commit/f9bc97101
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103217 in r-bioc-affxparser reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-affxparser/-/commit/6a6a8cfc3
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103200 in r-bioc-rtracklayer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-rtracklayer/-/commit/312daf3
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1103200 in r-bioc-rtracklayer reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-rtracklayer/-/commit/4edeaf6
Control: tags -1 help
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Thanks
Hi,
according to my ITS bug (#1101314) I'd like to care for this package.
Thus I investigated a bit and found out the problem is caused by the
Upgrade from imlib 1.12.3 to 1.12.4. All tests are passing if I try to
build libimage-imlib2-perl
Will upload soon.
Am Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 03:07:56PM +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Hi all,
>
> via Salsa I applied a fix for r-cran-fansi from Ubuntu (basically, reactivate
> our patch...), and I am happy to report that the autopkgtests pass.
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-fans
If r-cran-testthat would be removed a lot of tests of R packages become broken.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Hi,
seems the autopkgtest was affected by the new R version 4.5.0. This should be
fixed with latest upload.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Just issuing source-only upload to enable testing migration
--
https://fam-tille.de
Hi,
while my test build on i386 went fine I think its time to more
agressively remove binaries for 32bit architectures for packages where
these are not used in practice. If you agree I will make freecontact
Build-Depends: architecture-is-64-bit
and ask for removal of 32 bit architectures which
Am Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 10:52:03AM +0200 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler:
> Adding last Uploader to CC:.
Thanks, this was helpful. Fixed in new upload,
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 Daniel Müllner
Thanks
Hi Daniel,
as you can see below the Debian packaged version of fastcluster fails
its autopkgtest. It would be great if you could comment on this issue.
There might be chances that this problem is caused by
numpy (version 2
Hi Thomas,
Am Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:39:55AM +0200 schrieb Thomas Lange:
> Yes, it looks that it's that simple.
Thank you for confirming.
> I will look into dracut at MinidebConf in Hamburg. But feel free if
> you wanna work on this bug.
Since I have some spare cycles I uploaded to clear the l
Hi Thomas,
Cacin has injected the suggested patch in Git[1]. Just let me know
if you think the solution is that simple - I have seen
dracut-core.install:usr/lib/dracut/modules.d/90dmraid
which might make less sense without this recommends. If the fix is OK
for you and you simply have no time
Hi,
I tried to do some RC bug fixing to help the release and stumbled upon
#1060960. It is tagged patch and was forwarded upstream. But I can't
find anything like a patch. Is this tag valid in this case?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Source: ruby-pry-byebug
Version: 3.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Does not install
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Ruby Team
, 1054...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
$ sudo apt install ruby-pry-byebug
Solving dependencies... Error!
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: makepp -- RoM; rc-buggy
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:makepp
Thanks
Hi,
as per pre-removal bug I've now asking for removal of this
package.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks
Hi,
as per ITS I have uploaded wmdate to delayed=10.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: php-xml-svg -- RoQA; Useless in Debian
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:php-xml-svg
Thanks
Hi,
as this bug stated the package is useless in Debian. So just lets
remove it.
Kind regards and thank you for your work a
Source: ruby-cleanroom
Version: 1.0.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
, Hleb Valoshka
<375...@gmail.com>, debian-r...@lists.debian.org, 1092...@bugs.debian.org,
Package Salvaging Team
Dear maintainer,
I suggest rem
Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks
Hi,
as per ITS bug I've uploaded dvi2ps on behalf of the TeX maintainers
team. Since many valuable changes were actually done by Shengqi Chen I
honored his changes by adding him as changelog owner but the actual
sponsered upload was done by myself.
Kind regards
Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks
Hi,
as announced in the ITS bug the waiting period for the upload was
shortened to be in sync with dvi2ps. Thus I just uploaded vflib3 to
delayed=10. Please let me know if I should cancel the upload.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: affects -1 - src:liburjtag
Thanks
Hi,
I have uploaded a fix for urjtag[0] to avoid the conflict with
liburjtag, which neither the teammates in the electronics team who made
the change in Git nor I noticed before the upload. I regret the
oversight and apologize fo
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: gbemol -- RoQA: unmaintained upstream, low usage,
depends on deprecated GTK 2
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:gbemol
Thanks
Hi,
as announced I hereby turn the pre-removal bug into a RoQA bug.
Kind regards
Andr
Control: affects -1 - liburjtag
Thanks
Hi,
Am Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:44:07PM +0100 schrieb Matthias Geiger:
> > > From my perspective, renaming one of the liburjtag binary packages
> > > would
> > > be a reasonable approach. While the first-come, first-served rule
> > > usually applies, I believ
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: cereal -- RoM; rc-buggy
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:cereal
Thanks
Hi,
as per pre-removal warning I'm hereby turning this bug into
RoM.
Kind regards and thank you for your work as ftpmaster
Andreas.
--
htt
Am Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 11:19:36AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> 8. Thorsten answered[7] only to the list which I do not read regularly
Sorry for the confusion. It turns out my procmail is configured to move
emails from that list into a folder I don't check frequently. So, it was
my fa
Control: retitle -1 Conflicting binaries produced by liburjtag and urjtag
source package
Control: affects -1 src:liburjtag src:urjtag
Control: found -1 src:liburjtag/2024.03.24-1
Thanks
Hi,
I try to summarise the issue about liburjtag and the urjtag package:
1. The binary package liburjtag was
Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks
Hi Jörg,
while I originally filed an ITS bug report it turned out that nobody
from the Salvage team intended to add the own ID to the Uploaders field
which is a requirement for the salvage process. So I moved the package
to the Debian team on Salsa[1] and left all
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: mcron -- RoQA; unmaintained (upstream as well as
packaging), many alternatives in Debian
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:mcron
Thanks
Hi,
this bug was opened one month ago as pre-removal warning.
Since there was no
Source: makepp
Version: 2.0.98.5-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: Max Vozeler , 1087...@bugs.debian.org, Daniel
Pfeiffer , Package Salvaging Team
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing makepp from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated
Hi Eric,
thanks a lot for fixing the issue!
Kind regards
Andreas.
Am Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 10:51:30AM -0500 schrieb Eric Dorland:
> Version: 1.4-1
>
> Actually close :)
>
> * Andreas Tille (ti...@debian.org) wrote:
> > Source: chewmail
> > Version: 1.
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: asmix -- RoQA; rc-buggy
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:asmix
Thanks
I'm hereby retitling the bug to RoQA.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Source: gbdfed
Version: 1.6-4
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: Andrew Shadura , 1032...@bugs.debian.org,
967...@bugs.debian.org, 980...@bugs.debian.org, 1096...@bugs.debian.org,
Package Salvaging Team
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing gbdfed from De
Hi David,
Am Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 08:21:27AM +0100 schrieb David Prévot:
> Text was long because I didn’t took too much time to make it shorter ;). And
> yes, I guess I went a bit emotional, sorry about that (I didn’t reply to
> your first request because I feared to go down that path). I wrote it
Hi David,
Am Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 07:16:16AM +0100 schrieb David Prévot:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 27/02/2025 16:41, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Ping?
> >
> > Am Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 07:29:27PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> >
Ping?
Am Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 07:29:27PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi David,
>
> I appreciate your attempt to clean up the set of PHP packages. I just
> wonder in this specific case whether the new version released less than
> one year ago:
>
> Current Release
&
Hi Simon,
Am Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 11:58:12AM + schrieb Simon McVittie:
> Many of the few remaining users of cdbs (outside the Haskell team) are
> in undermaintained packages, and when a contributor converts a package
> they are not necessarily fully familiar with to a different packaging
> sty
Hi,
Am Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 01:31:53PM +0100 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> El 27/2/25 a las 12:15, Simon McVittie escribió:
> > Please add "Build-Depends: dh-sequence-gir" [...]
> I've pushed several commits for 3.8.0-1 and will tag & upload
> if they pass CI tests.
I'm super happy about Simon's and S
Hi Sudip,
it seems I was to optimistic in fixing v-sim as quickly as expected so
I'm not sure whether it will hit the archive before the NMU. To avoid
changing the history in Git it would help if you would cancel the NMU.
Unfortunately I observed in Salsa CI that the autopkgtest is failing[1]
(i
[Changed bug number which is now more affected by my mail]
Hi Sudip,
Am Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 02:28:04PM + schrieb Sudip Mukherjee:
> cancelled now. sorry for the delay. Was stuck in meetings in $dayjob.
No problem at all. I think you do not need to cancel if there is
a newer package in uns
Hi Sudip
Am Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:06:25AM + schrieb Sudip Mukherjee:
> > Sudip: At this point it would be better to delay or cancel the NMU
> > because it will create a mess in the git history.
Thanks a lot. I've force-pushed a sensible history and uploaded.
@Yaroslav / @Michael: I tried
> * New upstream version
> * Standards-Version: 4.7.0 (routine-update)
> * Rely on pre-initialized dpkg-architecture variables.
>
> -- Andreas Tille Mon, 02 Dec 2024 10:33:32 +0100
>
> Is there a reason why this was never released? (Some requirement that
> was not met at th
Am Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:55:26AM +0100 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> Sudip wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for cmtk (versioned as 3.3.1p2+dfsg-2.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
>
> Hi. I'm going to make a team upload from your NMU (as
Source: gbemol
Version: 0.3.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: Andrea Colangelo , Andrea Colangelo
, 967...@bugs.debian.org, 469...@bugs.debian.org, Package
Salvaging Team
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing gbemol from Debian for the following reas
hereby retitle the bug to RoM.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Am Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 07:13:43AM +0100 schrieb ma...@balmer.name:
> hi all,
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 25.02.2025 um 06:35 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > Am Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:38:43PM -0700 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
> > >
Hi Soren,
Am Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:38:43PM -0700 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
>
> I am the maintainer of courier-mta. couriergrey is abandoned upstream and is
> no longer
> suggested by the upstream courier project. As such, I have just uploaded
> courier 1.3.13-8,
> which removes couriergrey
Source: couriergrey
Version: 0.3.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: Marco Balmer , Package Salvaging Team
, Soren Stoutner
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing couriergrey from Debian for the following reasons:
* Bug "#849523 couriergrey needs to be
shouldn't work, but did that long ago. I doubt it
> still would against a modern one (internals changing).
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025, 10:03 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Source: empire-lafe
> > Version: 1.1-1.2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justif
Source: empire-lafe
Version: 1.1-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: 1096...@bugs.debian.org, Drake Diedrich ,
Package Salvaging Team
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing empire-lafe from Debian for the following reasons:
* It received a FTBFS bug wh
Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks
Hi
as per ITS bug I have uploaded mysecureshell to delayed=10.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Hi David,
I appreciate your attempt to clean up the set of PHP packages. I just
wonder in this specific case whether the new version released less than
one year ago:
Current Release
1.1.4 (stable) was released on 2024-03-10 by ashnazg
qualifies as '“This package is not maintained” [upstream
> (Or tell me what I'm missing if you think I'm missing anything).
I've set the proxy in d/rules to avoid attempting internet.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Am Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 03:09:20PM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> I would tend to agree, although this is probably not my call as
> I'm not an end user of cluster3. That being said, the package
> looks to have had a peak of popularity in the 2015-2020 period
> before dwindling[1], so we may not
Am Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 12:39:40PM +0100 schrieb Santiago Vila:
>
> By the time this is run, we have already executed this:
>
> eval {
> $seq_object = get_sequence('genbank',"AI129902");
> };
>
> Is that not an attempt to access the network?
Sure it is an *attempt
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1078626 in libbio-procedural-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libbio-procedural-perl/-/commit/3
Hi Joost,
Am Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 07:27:25PM +0100 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> > [0]:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/itd/ncftp/-/commit/600b2ea2d4f2c2ed9d9b34f7267de82c8513e08e
> > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/itd/ncftp/-/jobs/7094979#L1914
>
> The patch there is beautiful, it should get in im
Hi Noël,
given I understood you are generally happy with moving your packages to
Salsa I've now uploaded ncftp. To make sure you have a final say if I
misunderstood you I've choosen delayed=5. Thanks to several people and
the final polishing from наб (who remains the owner of the changelog)
we g
Hi Joost,
Am Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 03:26:43PM +0100 schrieb Joost van Baal-Ilić:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 03:02:57PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > I gave it a shot. I did:
> >
> > (sid)joostvb@agni:~/git/build-area/ncftp-3.2.7% ./configure
> >
> > .../build-area/ncftp-3.2.7% le
Hi,
thanks to the help of наб[1] most issues in ncftp where fixed in Git[2].
The only remaining issue is that the binary
/usr/bin/ncftpbookmarks
is not build which is IMHO due to a problem in detecting the ncurses
library inside the M4 code. The configure.in snippet[3] is seeking for
the vari
Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks
Hi,
as per ITS bug I've uploaded python-librtmp to delayed=10.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Hi Frédéric,
lisaac was a candidate for the bug of the day[1] today. I started by
creating a repository on Salsa[2] and injected the latest upstream
version from Github to see whether the gcc-14 bug is simply fixed.
Unfortunately this is not the case and the build is somehow running into
an endle
my time would be wasted.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Am Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 06:03:09PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Am Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 10:45:06PM +0200 schrieb Michael Banck:
> > > I'd be very happy if you could do so. In case you have time constrain
Hi David,
Am Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 06:55:50PM +0100 schrieb David Prévot:
> > […] Does it make sense to upload
> > the content of the Git repository[2] or is it better to ask for removal
> > at all? Any other suggestions?
> I raised this bug report pretty late in the release cycle, and the package
Hi David,
yesterday the package came up as a candidate for the Bug of the Day[1].
Since at first sight I have only seen bug #822899 and the popcon *votes*
of 45 (which is more than a couple of other packages we salvaged) I've
created a repository for the package[2] and pushed an (admittedly very
s
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/gleitz/howdoi/issues/489
Thanks
The issue is known upstream and seems to be connected to handling
cookies properly.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks
Hi,
as per ITS bug I have uploaded darkice to delayed=10.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Control: tags -1 help
Thanks
Hi,
thanks to Alexandre ncftp is now on Salsa which enables providing build
logs easily in Salsa CI. I think the problem of this build issue is
hidden behind some totally broken / outdated autoconf stuff. I tried my
best (which admittedly is not much) and added a pa
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1095393 in sourmash reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/sourmash/-/commit/0f48a2b945242c5d92d3212a535d7
Source: mcron
Version: 1.0.8-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: Dale Mellor , Package
Salvaging Team
Dear Dale,
I suggest removing mcron from Debian for the following reasons:
* Debian has bcron, cron, cronie and systemd-cron providing the
virtu
Control: tags -1 pending
Thanks
Hi,
as per ITS I have uploaded xshogi to delayed=10.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 13:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Am Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:41:37AM + schrieb Richard Lewis:
> > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 10:39, Richard Lewis
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > https://salsa.de
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: block -1 by 512231
Thanks
Hi,
since bug #512231 was fixed upstream pretty quickly after a Git issue
was opened I'm positive that the issue will be solved quickly in Debian.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Thanks
Hi Eric,
thanks a lot for fixing this bug upstream[1].
I would volunteer to move the package to Salsa in the debian/ team and
upload the fix as team upload in case this might help you. Please let
me know what you think.
In case it
Source: chewmail
Version: 1.3-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: grab attention of maintainer
X-Debbugs-Cc: 512...@bugs.debian.org, Eric Dorland , Enrico
Zini
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing chewmail from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated one RC-bug:
+ #512231
Hi Rhonda,
since francine came up as a candidate for the Bug of the Day[1] one team
member of the salvage team had a look into this package. I'm quoting here
the analysis:
* only upstream release 2001, itself fork of a "discontinued" program,
I haven't managed to have it not segfault yet
*
Hi,
I tried upstream version 1.2.24 but it fails as well. Sorry, I have
no better idea how to fix this but I'm keeping Debian Java List in CC.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
he current globjects source package should be built only with
> libglobjects-dev < 3.0
>
>
> Hope this is some useful progress for you.
>
> Rylie Pavlik
>
> On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 17:47 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 help
> > > Than
Control: tags -1 help
Thanks
Hi,
I've refreshed the packaging and you can find a full build log
of globjects in Salsa CI[1] (which has a different error). Any
help to build this package is welcome.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/globjects/-/jobs/6732242
--
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Control: severity -1 important
Thanks
Hi Lucas,
I can't reprocuce the problem, neither can any autobuilder for version
1.7+dfsg-2[1]. Thus setting tags moreinfo, unreproducible decrease
severity to important.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1
Am Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 01:07:05PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> Control: affects -1 + src:r-cran-lwgeom
>
> It seems at least r-cran-lwgeom needs updating to 0.2-14 for
> compatibility with the new r-cran-sf [1].
>
> version 0.2-14
>
> st_perimeter() is deprecated in favor of st_perimeter_lwgeo
Control: severity 1088784 normal
Control: reopen 1013230
Control: tags 1013230 - patch
Thanks
Am Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 07:03:01PM + schrieb Simon McVittie:
>
> I think that particular patch should not have been applied as a
> Debian-specific change, and especially not during a "salvaging"
> pr
Hi Santiago,
I admit I have no idea how I can help. If I should merge some MR and
do some upload I can do so, but I don't know what exactly to do.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Am Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 06:13:26PM +0100 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> El 27/12/24 a las 17:12, Radovan Garabik escribió:
> > I
Hi Thomas,
IMHO this bug is pretty easy to fix by adding a missing header (I've
no tried but it smells like this). The fact that you did not uploaded
the package longer than 10 years might mean we do not really need this
package in Debian.
Just let me know whether you think its worth keeping/sal
Hi Lionel,
Am Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 01:11:12PM +0100 schrieb Lionel Debroux:
> > Thanks a lot for your quick response and all your work on these tools.
> > Will you file a ROM bug or do you want me to do so?
>
> Upstream here.
Thanks a lot for the quick response.
> The UI part of GFM is pretty
Hi Andreas,
Am Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 11:27:18AM +0100 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
>
> Yes, as for tiemu, I filed an issue long ago [1], but there seem to be
> no related activities. As it's the case for tiemu, it's a pity, but
> probably better to invest the time elsewhere.
Thanks a lot for your q
Hi Michael,
since bug
#967865 ghemical: depends on deprecated libglade2
became serious now and bug
#967392 ghemical: depends on deprecated GTK 2
will fire sooner or later while upstream has orphaned the package a long
time ago I'm wondering whether we have the power inside Debian to take
over
Hi Andreas,
similarly to tiemu there is a libglade2 related bug
#967864 gfm: depends on deprecated libglade2
which became serious and sooner or later
#967387 gfm: depends on deprecated GTK 2
will affect this package. In both cases upstream is not inactive but do
you know whether they intenc
Hi Andreas,
bug
#967889 tiemu: depends on deprecated libglade2
became RC and I guess sooner or late
#967773 tiemu: depends on deprecated GTK 2
#1038572 tiemu: Depends on SDL 1.2
will become relevant sooner or later.
As far as I can see upstream is in low maintenance mode even if not
inactiv
Hi Gerd,
as far as I knoa you are not only maintaining mialmpick in Debian but
upstream of this software. Today bug
#967880 mialmpick: depends on deprecated libglade2
became serious and I guess sooner or later
#967630 mialmpick: depends on deprecated GTK 2
becomes critical as well. Do you
1 - 100 of 1326 matches
Mail list logo
