Package: gdm
Version: 2.14.5-1
Followup-For: Bug #390607
The reason why I have submitted bug for GDM is that other WM start
session OK (i.e. wdm)
I can also start session with startx without problem.
Best regards
Andrei
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
thanks
Subject: libnss-ldap: This bugs come back
Followup-For: Bug #375215
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 251-5.2
After an upgrade to 251-5.2, during the boot sequence i have an
increasing timeout during udev initialization (16, 32, 64 seconds).
Downgrading to udev 251-5.1 solve the problem.
Here
found 390773 0.10.5-4
close 390773 0.10.5-5
stop
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> Version: 0.10.5-5
> Severity: serious
>
> After upgrading this system from unstable circa 6-9 months ago,
> quodlibet failed as described in #390309.
Are you 100% sure you tried with 0.10.5-5?
Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:27:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Never mind, corrected upload done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 390773 0.10.5-4
Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict
Bug marked as found in version 0.10.5-4.
> close 390773 0.10.5-5
Bug#390773: apparently missing python-gst conflict
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 375215
Bug#375215: libnss-ldap hangs udev at startup
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
P
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:27:38 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#390800: cupsys depends on libdbus-1-2,
which is no longer in the archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
reassign 390733 libxml2
found 390733 2.6.26.dfsg-3
thanks
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:31:07PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.57.11
> Severity: serious
> # dpkg --configure -a
> Setting up synaptic (0.57.11) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/synaptic.postinst: line 6: 428
Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2006 07:44:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close the bug as well.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:08:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352392: fixed in rssreader.app 0.6.2.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Boson-base package is remplaced by the boson package.
I think i need to ask ftp master to remove this package.
Regards,
Gonéri
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Cupsys 1.2.4-1 has an unversioned depends on libdbus-1-3, while 1.2.4-2 depends
on libdbus-1-2 >= 0.62. This is a
serious regression, given that libdbus-1-2 has been removed from the archive.
The latest ver
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 390733 libxml2
Bug#390733: Upgrade from sarge fails (Segmentation fault scrollkeeper-update -q)
Bug reassigned from package `synaptic' to `libxml2'.
> found 390733 2.6.26.dfsg-3
Bug#390733: Upgrade from sarge fails (Segmentation fault scrollke
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:08:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385239: fixed in rssreader.app 0.6.2.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 390419 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#390419: libbonoboui2-dev: Linked against libdbus-1.so.2
Tags were: unreproducible moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
tags 390419 - moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
$ objdump -p /usr/bin/bonobo-browser |grep dbus
NEEDED libdbus-1.so.2
$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/bonobo-browser
libbonoboui2-dev: /usr/bin/bonobo-browser
$ dpkg -l libbonoboui2-dev | grep ^ii
ii libbonoboui2-dev 2.14.0-4 The Bonobo UI library - de
Package: nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386
Version: 1.0.7182+1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid patch
Hi Randall,
The nvidia-glx-legacy package is uninstallable in unstable, and not being
updated in testing, because there are no nvidia-graphics-legacy-modules-i386
packages built for the current vers
El día 02/10/2006 a 17:19 Rene Engelhard escribió...
> Hi,
>
> Rudy Godoy wrote:
> > After upgrading openoffice.org I'm no longer able to use it since it crashes
> > everytime I try to start it.
> > The user case is that it crashed once I upgrade it, and I had two openned
> > files,
> > now, aft
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 361846 important
Bug#361846: non-free license for core.schema
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> retitle 361846 invalid assertion of copyright on contents of core.schema
Bug#361846: non-free license for core.schema
Changed Bug title.
severity 361846 important
retitle 361846 invalid assertion of copyright on contents of core.schema
thanks
> Plus, this is an interface specification if I've ever seen one, and
> interface specifications are not copyrightable under US law.
I agree, but was hesitant to assert this without some corr
Package: apache2-mpm-prefork
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hello,
with the latest apache2-mpm-prefork upgrade, /usr/sbin/apache2 has
become unexecutable. the permissions now are "-rw-r--r--".
/etc/init.d/apache2 therefore exites silently.
...
jonas
-
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387185: fixed in picprog 1.8.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:07:12 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390583: cupsys build against nonexistent libdbus-1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dariusz Pietrzak wrote:
>> quite a large number of debian servers, all running 2.6 fine. However,
> If you're uninterested and uneffected by the bug #389720( which by the way,
> has already been fixed) why are you trolling and wasting my and Ola's
> t
On 2-Oct-06, at 1:39 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
Backporting security fixes from newer releases is not really "extra"
in my mind. It'd be fixing stuff that isn't fixed elsewhere without
discussing it with us.
The argument for fixing upstream is that by taking a fix for a bug
that's unpatched upstr
FYI, the involved files are:
SGI Free Software License B:
glcore.h
glxmd.h
glxproto.h
glxtokens.h
GLX Public License:
glxint.h
Those five header files are the only ones in x11proto-gl which
have the problem licenses.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Henning, Nathanael,
>
> I'm working on an NMU of mesa this weekend, and was going to take care of
> bug #368562 ("debian/copyright does not contain all licenses") even though I
> obviously can't take care of bug #368560 conc
Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 19:45:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390787: Unusable: "ath_pci: disagrees about version of
symbol "
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
FYI, the files affected by the problem licenses in this package are:
GLX Public License:
hw/dmx/glxProxy/glxext.c
It may be easier to rewrite the file affected by the GLX Public License
than to get it relicensed.
SGI Free Software License B:
lots of files, all under hw/dmx/glxProxy/ or GL/glx/
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 11:46, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Package: madwifi-source
> Version: 1:0.9.2+r1710.20060914-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The drivers seem to build OK for kernel 2.6.16-2-686, but when I try to
> actually use them, I get a raft of "disagr
Reproducible here too:
# LC_ALL=C aptitude install reportbug
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading extended state information
Initializing package states... Done
Building tag database... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
cupsys openoffice.org-calc
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
apache2.2-common won't install, at least within a pbuilder chroot.
The postinst aborts with the following error:
touch: cannot touch `/var/log/apache2/error.log': No such file or directory
touch: ca
Package: madwifi-source
Version: 1:0.9.2+r1710.20060914-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The drivers seem to build OK for kernel 2.6.16-2-686, but when I try to
actually use them, I get a raft of "disagrees about version of symbol"
reports, and some of the modules in the p
system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mpd
Version: 0.12.0-2
Severity: serious
You appear to be missing a build-depends on quilt.
| Automatic build of mpd_0.12.0-2 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 2006100
severity 389277 normal
thanks
On Sep 24, Stephen Liebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 11.2
But hurd is not a releasable architecture, so bugs are not RC.
> hurd K11 install with updates does not create /etc/inetd.conf.
> update-inetd script cannot add ent
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 293257 pending
Bug#293257: ITP: hobix -- flexible generator of static blogs
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 353750 pending
Bug#353750: singularity: crash in cheat mode "gi
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.0.4~rc2-2
Followup-For: Bug #390133
Hello,
That bug is very annoying. I use OpenOffice for very important tasks, and now I
can't open any document... =/
I eargly await for that bug to be solved.
Thanks.
Nicolas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
If the network connection does matter in any way: I have to use a
http-proxy here, the network has no direct routing to the internet.
Regards,
Uwe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:03:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380539: fixed in binutils 2.17-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681
You requested the case, where the bug occurred (sorry for the German):
apt-get install apache2.2-common
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig
Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT:
apache2-c
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:36:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390770: kernel-package: ruleset/minimal.mk fails to
initialize variables
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Package: mpd
Version: 0.12.0-2
Severity: serious
You appear to be missing a build-depends on quilt.
| Automatic build of mpd_0.12.0-2 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 85
| Build started at 20061002-1652
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389277 normal
Bug#389277: nonexistent /etc/inetd.conf breaks update-inetd script
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
I'm working on it; thanks for the report!
-mt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 16:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389977: fixed in gnus 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Steinar H Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doesn't the copyright in question apply to the RFC only? AFAICS,
> core.schema basically reads:
> 1. Part of OpenLDAP, with the following license:
> 2. OpenLDAP license (see license.html)
> 3. Based on an RFC, with the following license:
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> package libpam-smbpass libsmbclient libsmbclient-dev python-samba samba
> samba-common samba-dbg samba-doc samba-doc-pdf smbclient smbfs swat winbind
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: s
Hi
On Oct 03, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Could you reproduce a full screen log for the apt session? Which
> package you tried to install, etc.
# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
freeguide (0.8.6-1 => 0.10.4
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.060
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
running unstable
untar linux-source-2.6.18
cd linux
make oldconfig
type command...
tcsh> make-kpkg --append-to-version -tryit kernel-image |& less
gives these results...
exec make -f /usr/share/kernel
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.3-1
Severity: grave
[..]
Unpacking apache2.2-common (from .../apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/apache2.2-common_2.2.3-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man8/suexec.8.gz', which is
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681
Ditto here:
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method
`pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Unterprozess if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok
installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt ||
retitle 380370 as: arm segmentation fault in low memory situations with large
C++
severity 380370 important
thanks
Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../include/c++/4.0.4/bits/basic_string.h:278:
> warning: cast from 'char*' to 'std::basic_
--On Tuesday, October 03, 2006 12:14 AM +0200 Peter Eisentraut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
Or are you claiming that anything implementing the schema from a
copyrighted RFC falls under that license?
I am talking strictly about the core.schema file as shipped. Th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 390106 openoffice.org
Bug#390106: openoffice.org-writer: Hang every time on amd64
Bug reassigned from package `openoffice.org-writer' to `openoffice.org'.
> merge 390136 390562 390702 390113 390106
Bug#390106: openoffice.org-writer: Hang every
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 380370 as: arm segmentation fault in low memory situations with large
> C++
Bug#380370: FTBFS: arts on arm due to segmentation fault (program as)
Changed Bug title.
> severity 380370 important
Bug#380370: as: arm segmentation fault in low memo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 389681
Bug#389681: apt-listbugs: Reports undefined variable and fails
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, st
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.1.1-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The X server fails to start since upgrade from 1.1.1-8 to 1.1.1-9. I have
attached the relevant logs, but in a nutshell it tries to load the "pcidata"
and "bitmap" modules, and fails.
-- Syste
Hi,
>
> Version 0.57 still has the problem.
>
Can you give an example case (package, version, bug #)?
apt-listbugs now parses the version number of the bug report and
resolved versions so that it will display all bugs that is applicable.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.
Hi,
> Package: apt-listbugs
> Version: 0.0.57
> Followup-For: Bug #389681
>
> This bug still exists in version 0.0.57:
>
> Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method
> `pkg' for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
> E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Stat
Package: python-gst0.10
Version: 0.10.5-5
Severity: serious
After upgrading this system from unstable circa 6-9 months ago,
quodlibet failed as described in #390309.
Turns out that I had python-gst installed, and removing it fixed the
problem.
I don't know if this is really a bug in python-gst o
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:48:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390189: fixed in apt 0.6.46.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Or are you claiming that anything implementing the schema from a
> copyrighted RFC falls under that license?
I am talking strictly about the core.schema file as shipped. The
Internet Society license in the file says: "this document itself may
not be modified in any
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:48:45 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388708: fixed in apt 0.6.46.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:49:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388718: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On 2 okt 2006, at 23.05, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
thanks
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
Expect it to be fixed at the next upload with version
1:7.2.2.dsfg-1.
I will modi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 390667 0.4.5-1
Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds
Bug marked as not found in version 0.4.5-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.57
Followup-For: Bug #389681
This bug still exists in version 0.0.57:
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: undefined local variable or method `pkg'
for Factory::BugsFactory:Module
E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed';
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:49:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390664: fixed in e2fsprogs 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.10.02-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:49:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390596: fixed in debsecan 0.4.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:54:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390627: fixed in vzctl 3.0.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 390562 grave
Bug#390562: firefox: CPU eating while waiting for passwd
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> reassign 390562 openoffice.org
Bug#390562: firefox: CPU eating while waiting for passwd
Bug reassigned from package `firefox' to `ope
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:49:56 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390534: fixed in ffproxy 1.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:13:36PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> No, seriously. Why are you reopening this bug? openldap2.3 does not
>> ship the RFC in question, and hasn't been doing so the last month:
> But this bug isn't about any RFCs.
Doesn't the copyright in question apply to the RFC onl
Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:01:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #390357,
regarding FTBFS: 64-bit specific error in tests?
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) bigloo mailing-list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(NB: If
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 389994 0.80
Bug#389994: initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.
Bug marked as found in version 0.80.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Hi gij maintainers,
Since that error the bigloo "jvm tests" show only occurs during, well,
the "jvm tests", I am wondering if it could not be a gij 64bit issue.
For the background, the bigloo scheme compiler, among other target
runtime environements, can generate JVM bytecode, and it is the
tests
found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
thanks
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 07:27:54PM +0200, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > Expect it to be fixed at the next upload with version 1:7.2.2.dsfg-1.
I will modify the source tarball name or version. If you can
On Monday 02 October 2006 23:06, "Steinar H. Gunderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't a bug be filed against ftp.debian.org asking for its removal,
> then?
Yes, but let's get the replacement finished first.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> notfound 389994 0.81
Bug#389994: initramfs-tools: NFS timeout on first mount causes looping.
Bug marked as not found in version 0.81.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 390667 1:7.2.2-2
Bug#390667: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-Ds
Bug marked as found in version 1:7.2.2-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 390731 grave
Bug#390731: nautilus-sendto: Not compatible with Gaim 2.0
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Hi,
jsut some more info for this.
dpkg-reconfigure doesn't work when the package is in this broken state
so one can't even switch from a (non existing) local db to a remote db
to fix the failure.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> No, seriously. Why are you reopening this bug? openldap2.3 does not
> ship the RFC in question, and hasn't been doing so the last month:
But this bug isn't about any RFCs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
mån 2006-10-02 klockan 20:51 +0200 skrev Loïc Minier:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006, Vincent Lönngren wrote:
> > Alright, here it is.
>
> Hmm, sorry, this doesn't help a lot to pinpoint the relevant file.
> Could you please grep -rl libdbus-1.so.2 /usr/lib?
>
> Please "dpkg -S" the files returned by
Hi
Arch line changed and new version uploaded.
Regards,
// Ola
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:26:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:04:48PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > > It builds only one binary, so the Architecture line is incorrect.
> > No it builds on ia64 and amd
Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:07:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390600: Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:07:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390600: Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Hi
Thanks for the help. I have now unapplied that patch and will upload
a new version in a short while.
To Truxton Fulton: Could you revise this patch to determine why
it do not work on amd64. I liked it. I assume that it can have something
to do with the fd_set calls that you mentioned in the ma
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Scheduled, but a package that generates an empty binary in response to a gcc
> failure instead of aborting the build has a (lower-severity) sourceful bug.
> Please take care of this in the source package.
FYI:
- the build system is fixed in SVN wr
gcc-4.1 uses the backport of PR 26208 from the trunk.
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.1-14
Severity: serious
The latest version of the glibc failed to build on ia64 with the
following error:
gcc-4.1 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o
/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6.ds1/build-tree
Your message dated Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:47:19 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390631: fixed in slice 1.3.8-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006, Vincent Lönngren wrote:
> Alright, here it is.
Hmm, sorry, this doesn't help a lot to pinpoint the relevant file.
Could you please grep -rl libdbus-1.so.2 /usr/lib?
Please "dpkg -S" the files returned by the above command.
Thanks,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:41:33AM +0200, Leandro Noferini wrote:
> Package: aspell-it
> Version: 0.60.20060723-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This is the message:
>
> Error: The file "/usr/lib/aspell/it.rws" is not in the proper format.
> Wrong endian order.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389404 grave
Bug#389404: [savage] savage DRI driver does not work with X.org 7.1.1
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> close 389404 1:2.1.2-1
Bug#389404: [savage] savage DRI driver does not work with X.org 7.1.1
'close' is deprecated; see
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 390596 grave
Bug#390596: debsecan: Recommend upgrading 'python-apt' from Suggests to Depends
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
>
End of message, stopping processing h
* Mike Connor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> >>To my knowledge, Debian isn't including "extra" security fixes over
> >>and above what we're shipping. If they are, that would possibly be
> >>considered an act of bad faith between downstream and upstream,
> >>unless the security bug was Debian spec
Package: synaptic
Version: 0.57.11
Severity: serious
# dpkg --configure -a
Setting up synaptic (0.57.11) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/synaptic.postinst: line 6: 4289 Segmentation fault
scrollkeeper-update -q
dpkg: error processing synaptic (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script retur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> #Apparently it's missing dependencies, a split is probably the way to go.
> severity 390419 serious
Bug#390419: libbonoboui2-dev: Linked against libdbus-1.so.2
Severity set to `seriou
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:33:15AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Well having transition packages would definitely be part of the plan,
> > > so that shouldn't be an issue.
> >
> > FWIW, I don't see any substantial difference between a package named
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 390600 serious
Bug#390600: Setting up gfortran (4.1.1-9) ...
Bug#390639: gfortran configure: failed to upgrade due to Permission denied error
Severity set to `serious' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
