On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 10:13:36PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> No, seriously. Why are you reopening this bug? openldap2.3 does not >> ship the RFC in question, and hasn't been doing so the last month: > But this bug isn't about any RFCs.
Doesn't the copyright in question apply to the RFC only? AFAICS, core.schema basically reads: 1. Part of OpenLDAP, with the following license: 2. OpenLDAP license (see license.html) 3. Based on an RFC, with the following license: 4. RFC license 5. Specific RFC attributions 6. The schema itself Or are you claiming that anything implementing the schema from a copyrighted RFC falls under that license? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
