-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Henning, Nathanael,
>
> I'm working on an NMU of mesa this weekend, and was going to take care of
> bug #368562 ("debian/copyright does not contain all licenses") even though I
> obviously can't take care of bug #368560 concerning what licenses the code
> is under. In the sources of mesa 6.5 CVS (the version in experimental), I'm
> unable to find any references to the "GLX Public License" at all. Does that
> mean we should consider this particular license issue resolved, or do either
> of you have evidence that the license statements included upstream are
> incorrect?
The "GLX Public License" appears to be gone from the Mesa sources: all
the files which contained it are simply gone.
I've summarized the status in the other two bugs (368559 and 368564)
which resulted from the Xorg package split. It's still present in those
packages, albeit in one file each. It may be easier to rewrite those
two files than to get the code relicensed.
The SGI Free Software License B is still present in all three packages,
and in substantial quantities.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFIdD0RGZ0aC4lkIIRAhBJAJsHUvhp8xC28G9TfShbZcoIWuys7wCfUjXy
igBGkk3+KL4iQqZGi0w1+Og=
=rKxq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
