Processed: tagging 361692

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 361692 pending confirmed Bug#361692: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, confirmed > End of message, stopping

Processed: Fixed in upload of mdadm 2.4.1-1 to experimental

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 271033 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#271033: mdadm - is not able to properly assemble multipath device Tags were: pending Tags added: fixed-in-experimental > tag 299623 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#299623: mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed

Bug#367589: marked as done (FTBFS: use of $(PWD) fails with sudo)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 23:02:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367589: fixed in libpaper 1.1.17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#366504: marked as done (vim-runtime: Overwrites /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent in vim-common)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 22:02:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#366504: fixed in vim 1:7.0-017+2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#363030: [Pbuilder-maint] Bug#363030: aegis: FTBFS with pbuilder on i386

2006-05-16 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > maybe this is of interest of you. Feel free to close it if you don't > think it's worth working on this issue. Is this ran under fakeroot mode or is it ran under root mode? regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#321102: data-loss still possible with kmail 3.5.2

2006-05-16 Thread Adam Porter
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 11:03, Christopher Martin wrote: > Perhaps a better solution would be disable dimap support in the 3.5.3 > upload, and make sure that the fixed package makes Etch (which is > looming). Daniel, what do you feel about this? Given that upstream > appears to be unable to replicat

Bug#367537: marked as done (bacula-director-pgsql - uses LD_ASSUME_KERNEL unconditionaly)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 20:02:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367537: fixed in bacula 1.38.9-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: tagging 366927

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 366927 + patch Bug#366927: CVE-2006-2247: Information leak in webcalendar Tags were: etch security sid Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please cont

Bug#367537: bacula-director-pgsql - uses LD_ASSUME_KERNEL unconditionaly

2006-05-16 Thread John Goerzen
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:33:27PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: bacula-director-pgsql > Version: 1.38.9-7 > Severity: grave > > The init script of bacula-director-pgsql uses LD_ASSUME_KERNEL > unconditionaly which makes it fail on any arch without linuxthread > support. Bastian, This s

Processed: tagging 365134

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 365134 + pending Bug#365134: wrong paths to executables or executables in wrong places There were no tags set. Bug#363462: xdm: no login possible after restart of xdm Bug#365383:

Processed: merging 352182 365234

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > # same CVE > merge 352182 365234 Bug#352182: Crash in the ASN.1 DER decoder Bug#365234: libtasn1-2: Please patch to fix CVE-2006-0645 security issue Merged 352182 365234. > End of m

Bug#334997: marked as done (FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 18:17:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334997: fixed in kxmleditor 1.1.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#366932: marked as done (knemo - FTBFS: Build depends against unavailable package: unsermake)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 03:09:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line knemo - FTBFS: Build depends against unavailable package: unsermake has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#326097: marked as done (spim: FTBFS: static declaration of 'exception_file_name' follows non-static declaration)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 17:47:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326097: fixed in spim 7.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Re: FTBFS: missing build-depends on debhelper

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 367194 patch Bug#367194: FTBFS: missing build-depends on debhelper There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks dude Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Processed: Setting severity in line with all the other bugs like this one :-\

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 366245 important Bug#366245: xserver-xorg-core: X crashes with Sig 11 when switching from console to GUI using Alt + Fn keys Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#367194: FTBFS: missing build-depends on debhelper

2006-05-16 Thread Mohammed Adnène Trojette
tag 367194 patch thanks dude On Sun, May 14, 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: aboot-installer > Version: 0.0.20 > Severity: serious > > You're missing a build-dependency on debhelper: > > > Automatic build of aboot-installer_0.0.20 on juist by sbuild/alpha 0.44 > ... > > dpkg-buildpackag

Bug#346936: marked as done (spim: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 17:47:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346936: fixed in spim 7.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367589: FTBFS: use of $(PWD) fails with sudo

2006-05-16 Thread Eric Dorland
Package: libpaper Severity: serious Tags: patch The enviroment variable PWD is not set when building under sudo, as the alpha, mips and mipsel buildds do. Use $(CURDIR) instead, which is guaranteed to be set by make. Patch enclosed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT p

Bug#367533: marked as done (gnucash_1.9.6-1(i386/unstable): missing build-depends)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 17:23:21 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line whoops has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#365950: ntp-server: Still exists

2006-05-16 Thread Tomasz Janowski
Package: ntp-server Followup-For: Bug #365950 The problem with creation of ntp user before ntp-server script is executed still exists. Is anyone working on it? I see that the first report of this bug is quite old. I encountered this problem today, I cannot install ntp-simple because when startup

Bug#276962: harbour

2006-05-16 Thread Clint Adams
>From http://www.harbour-project.org/ Harbour News 2005-06-27 * Release of Alpha build 45 * Harbour now runs on 64 bits ! * Improved memory handling * Support for static functions used in macro compiled expressions * Better Clipper compatibility in operations with

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xview 3.2p1.4-21.1

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 364029 + fixed Bug#364029: olvwm: conflict with current x11-common There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 365778 + fixed Bug#365778: xviewg: Can't install There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#367579: Package is not building with sudo

2006-05-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Package: freetype Version: 2.1.10-3 Severity: grave Tags: patch The build is failing with sudo because $HOME is not set and thus $(PWD) is also not set. The patch just uses $(CURDIR) instead. Enjoy our workshop work! Luk Claes Daniel Baumann Kurt Roeckx -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre françai

Bug#351269: Bug#364821: NMU of libdumbnet

2006-05-16 Thread Simon Law
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 02:35:19PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > Since #364821 is blocking #351269 which is a RC bug, I have uploaded a > NMU including Niko's patch to DELAYED/5. Thank you. -- Simon Law http://www.law.yi.org/~sfllaw/ signature.asc Description: D

Bug#367462: marked as done (gnucash: Doesn't start: gnc:debugging error)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 14:47:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367462: fixed in gnucash 1.9.6-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#367574: initscripts: conflicts with 2.84-195, but declared only with 2.86.ds1-12

2006-05-16 Thread Toni Mueller
Package: initscripts Version: 2.86.ds1-14 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, this problem prevents the package from being installed, thus preventing the installation of udev and, as a consequence, newer kernels (eg. 2.6.16), too: # /usr/bin/dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/a

Processed: Re: sun-java5-bin: pre-installation script returned error exit status 10

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 367504 serious Bug#367504: sun-java5-bin: pre-installation script returned error exit status 10 Severity set to `serious' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Bug#367559: tetex-base: Package cannot be installed: fmtutil failed

2006-05-16 Thread Ralf Stubner
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 22:16 -0400, Loris Bennett wrote: > Package: tetex-base > Version: 3.0-17 > Severity: critical Thanks for reporting. Let's limit this to where the actual error occurs: > fmtutil: running `pdfetex -ini -jobname=cont-en -progname=context > -translate-file=cp227.tcx *cont

Bug#249751: marked as done (sppc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249744: fixed in sppc 1.0.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#249744: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot detect X)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249751: fixed in sppc 1.0.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#249751: marked as done (sppc: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249751: fixed in sppc 1.0.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#323099: marked as done (wget: non-free documentation [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL-1.2])

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 01:08:36 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line wget GFDL doc got OK from Debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#335145: marked as done (removal of automake1.6)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335145: fixed in sppc 1.0.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#364269: marked as done (sppc: FTBFS: build depends on removed xlibosmesa-dev)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364269: fixed in sppc 1.0.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#249744: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot detect X)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 16:32:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249744: fixed in sppc 1.0.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#367435: marked as done (lib32gcc1: Will not install: conflicts with libgcc1)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 15:47:56 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367435: fixed in ia32-libs 1.11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#364029: NMU patch attached

2006-05-16 Thread Blars Blarson
Attached is the patch for a 0-day NMU fixing these bugs that I wll upload shortly. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. diff -ruN ../src2/xview-3.2p

Bug#358958: "ping" -- Has any progress been made here?

2006-05-16 Thread Graham
Hi, I don't mean to nag anyone, but since around 5 weeks have passed since the last posting here, and the package is still not installable, I was wondering if any progress has been made on this bug. I did find the following URLs somewhat informative: http://jabba.pl/fenio?sz=komentarze&c=9120

Bug#320115: nmu qiv grave bug 320115

2006-05-16 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Justin, On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:08:41AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I'm curious why you copied me on this email, since I never touched the > bug being closed. That was just to inform you that I'm doing an NMU on top of your NMU while your NMU is not yet acknowledged by the maintainer. htt

Bug#367543: Acknowledgement (cinepaint cannot load its plugins)

2006-05-16 Thread Ilya Martynov
BTW I've noticed that I can workaround the problem if I run cinepaint as LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0 cinepaint -- Ilya Martynov, [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTO IPonWEB (UK) Ltd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: tagging 365887

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 365887 + experimental Bug#365887: glibc_2.3.999.1-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: sanity check fails There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental > End of message, stopping pr

Processed: reassign 367543 to libcinepaint0

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > reassign 367543 libcinepaint0 Bug#367543: cinepaint cannot load its plugins Bug reassigned from package `cinepaint' to `libcinepaint0'. > End of message, stopping processing here. P

Processed: tagging 367411, tagging 339244, tagging 364378, tagging 339880

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 367411 pending Bug#367411: openvrml ftbfs on m68k There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 339244 pending Bug#339244: library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ al

Bug#367543: cinepaint cannot load its plugins

2006-05-16 Thread Ilya Martynov
Package: cinepaint Version: 0.20-1-1.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It seems that cinepaint cannot load most of its plugins what makes it practically useless. When running cinepaint from console I see the following output on the console: /usr/lib/cinepaint/0.20-1/plu

Bug#367537: bacula-director-pgsql - uses LD_ASSUME_KERNEL unconditionaly

2006-05-16 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: bacula-director-pgsql Version: 1.38.9-7 Severity: grave The init script of bacula-director-pgsql uses LD_ASSUME_KERNEL unconditionaly which makes it fail on any arch without linuxthread support. Bastian -- There's another way to survive. Mutual trust -- and help. -- Ki

Bug#367325: marked as done (expect-dev: No libexpect shared library)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 11:02:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367325: fixed in expect 5.43.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#367533: gnucash_1.9.6-1(i386/unstable): missing build-depends

2006-05-16 Thread Ryan Murray
Package: gnucash Version: 1.9.6-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of gnucash_1.9.6-1 on ninsei by sbuild/i386 98 > Build started at 20060514-2323 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: libltdl3-dev

Bug#367482: marked as done (xtux - FTBFS: Missing build dependency quilt)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 10:17:37 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367482: fixed in xtux 0.2.030306-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: tags

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 262564 +pending Bug#262564: libapache2-mod-python: [INTL:pt_BR] Please add attached Brazilian Portuguese debconf template translation Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending > tags 287245 +pending Bug#287245: libapache2-mod-python2.3: French de

Processed: bluez-pin: Crashes when used with --dbus

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 363425 serious Bug#363425: Crashes when used with --dbus Severity set to `serious' from `important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#367506: network-manager: fails to detect any interface

2006-05-16 Thread Michael Biebl
severity 367506 important thanks Stephen Touset wrote: > Package: network-manager > Version: 0.6.2-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > I'm running 0.6.2-1 right now, but upgrading to 0.6.2-2 of > network-manager (and network-manager-gnome, plus the libnm libraries) >

Bug#367518: FTBFS in unstable: UTS Release version does not match the current version

2006-05-16 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Martin Michlmayr wrote: > kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha fails to build in unstable. Yes, I know. I have an update ready, but I didn't upload it yet because it's seems to be that we're removing 2.4 from etch. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processed: Re: Bug#367506: network-manager: fails to detect any interface

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 367506 important Bug#367506: network-manager: fails to detect any interface Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#367325: expect-dev: fix for "no libexpect shared library"

2006-05-16 Thread Alec Berryman
Package: expect-dev Followup-For: Bug #367325 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Trivial patch to debian/rules is attached to fix this issue. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEafwwAud/2YgchcQRAr6qAJ44wCWURYp95nD+tCOfSP+v+P7oRgCgiKD/ fx1zPAMIdmDz

Bug#367518: FTBFS in unstable: UTS Release version does not match the current version

2006-05-16 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha Version: 2.4.27-11 Severity: serious kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha fails to build in unstable. Are you in a position to get rid of 2.4 in unstable? If not, you'll have to update the package. > Automatic build of kernel-image-2.4.27-alpha_2.4.27-11 on juist by >

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ircd-hybrid 1:7.0.3-3.1

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 300638 + fixed Bug#300638: segfaults after a few messages on ppc+amd64 Tags were: fixed-upstream patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administ

Processed: tagging 367325

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 367325 + patch Bug#367325: expect-dev: No libexpect shared library There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Processed: Re: Bug#321102: data-loss still possible with kmail 3.5.2

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 321102 4:3.5.2-1 Bug#321102: kmail looses mails Bug#332473: kmail: dangerous handling of dimap-folders Bug#350851: kmail: v1.9.1: Data loss w/disconnected IMAP (reported upstream) Bug marked as found in version 4:3.5.2-1. > found 332473 4:3.5.2-1

Bug#321102: data-loss still possible with kmail 3.5.2

2006-05-16 Thread Christopher Martin
found 321102 4:3.5.2-1 found 332473 4:3.5.2-1 found 350851 4:3.5.2-1 stop On Tuesday 16 May 2006 10:05, Bastian Venthur wrote: > So here it is, someone confirmed this bug with 3.5.2 on Debian: > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104956 > > Quote: > > "Bam! I had this bug right now. Using

Bug#300638: NMU of ircd-hybrid

2006-05-16 Thread Julien Danjou
Hello, I just uploaded a NMU of ircd-hybrid fixing FTBFS and this bug. Patch attached. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou http://www.tuxfamily.org ?> Free Hosting For Free People diff -u ircd-hybrid-7.0.3/debian/patches/00list ircd-hybrid-7.0.3/debian/patches/00list --- ircd-hybrid

Processed: Fixed in NMU of amavis-stats 0.1.12-7.1

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 325835 + fixed Bug#325835: amavis-stats: graphs not being produced Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#365181: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 08:33:23 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365181: fixed in s-http-server 20060516-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: tagging 320036

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > tags 320036 + patch Bug#320036: bash exits 0 on errors reading stdin (and perhaps other scripts) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: retitle 365102 to segfault on amd64

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 > retitle 365102 segfault on amd64 Bug#365102: Segmentation fault Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#365180: marked as done ([NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 07:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#365180: fixed in s-base64 20060516-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#367506: network-manager: fails to detect any interface

2006-05-16 Thread Stephen Touset
Package: network-manager Version: 0.6.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm running 0.6.2-1 right now, but upgrading to 0.6.2-2 of network-manager (and network-manager-gnome, plus the libnm libraries) caused network-manager t

Bug#321102: data-loss still possible with kmail 3.5.2

2006-05-16 Thread Bastian Venthur
So here it is, someone confirmed this bug with 3.5.2 on Debian: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104956 Quote: "Bam! I had this bug right now. Using KDE 3.5.2 on Debian. Lost a whole folder of mails (thank god it was only a ML). Nevertheless this is totally uncool..." Whoever marked

Bug#367502: cacao_0.95-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on amd64: undeclared functions

2006-05-16 Thread Frederik Schüler
Package: cacao Version: 0.95-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src -I../../src/vm/jit/x86_64 > -I../../src -g -Wall -O2 -D__X86_64__ -D__LINUX__ -ansi -pedantic -Wall > -Wno-long-long -D_POSIX_C_S

Bug#351269: NMU of libdumbnet

2006-05-16 Thread Julien Danjou
Hello, Since #364821 is blocking #351269 which is a RC bug, I have uploaded a NMU including Niko's patch to DELAYED/5. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD

Bug#367495: gfpoken: Buttons are missing

2006-05-16 Thread Bas Wijnen
Package: gfpoken Version: 0.28-1 Severity: serious Justification: block migration to testing In this version, the button bar is completely disabled at the start. Some buttons reappear later, but in general the game is much less playable than 0.27. This will be fixed in 0.29, which should be uploa

Bug#338286: marked as done (lirc-modules-source does not build)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 14:46:32 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.8.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#320115: nmu qiv grave bug 320115

2006-05-16 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 09:40:11PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I intend to upload an NMU for qiv with this in the changelog: > >* NMU. >* debian/patches/02.improves_bgimage_setting.dpatch, debian/patches/00list: > Removed patch with regression. Closes: #320115. >

Processed: Fixed in NMU of cddb.bundle 0.2-2.1

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 352408 + fixed Bug#352408: cddb.bundle: FTBFS due to unmet build-dep libgnustep-base1.10-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Bug#352767: marked as done (lircd 0.7.2: there's no hardware I can use and no peers are specified)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 04:47:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352767: fixed in lirc 0.8.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#325835: NMU

2006-05-16 Thread Julien Danjou
Hello Jean-Michel, Since the fix is pretty trivial, I'd like to upload a NMU today fixing this RC bug, unless you have any objection. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462

Bug#367491: jetty: Jetty init fails with 'No such file or directory'

2006-05-16 Thread Elizabeth Fong
Package: jetty Version: 5.1.5rc1-6 Severity: grave Tags: patch sid etch Justification: renders package unusable Upon both system startup and attempted manual startup of jetty, Jetty fails (lines wrapped for clarity): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/jetty restart Password: Stopping Jetty serv

Bug#367049: mount breaks cfs

2006-05-16 Thread Martin Waitz
hoi :) On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 03:27:49PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > Can you tell me how to reproduce this? sorry if I was not clear enough. Here is what I did: install cfs package start nfs server (for nfs-user-server you have to add one entry to /etc/exports, cfsd will tell you the exact li

Bug#367045: rezound: FTBFS on i386/sid; build-depends on nonexistent xlibmesa-glu-dev

2006-05-16 Thread Geiger Guenter
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:19:57AM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > Package: rezound > Version: 0.12.2beta-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: no longer builds from source > > rezound build-depends on xlibmesa-glu-dev, which is no longer in sid. This > bug > is preventing fixing 358289 (FTBFS

Bug#367024: Licences conflict: Ruby under pure GPL with OpenSSL Licence

2006-05-16 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:12:31PM +0900, akira yamada wrote: > Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: > >>> Package: libopenssl-ruby1.8 > >>> Version: 1.8.2-7sarge2 > >>> Severity: serious > >>> > >>> The binary package libopenssl-ruby1.8 (pure GPL) depends on libssl0.9.7 > >>> (OpenSSL Licence). Those 2 licences

Bug#367486: cynthiune.app - FTBFS: make[2]: avifile-config: Command not found

2006-05-16 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: cynthiune.app Version: 0.9.5-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of cynthiune.app_0.9.5-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), libesd0-de

Bug#367484: duplicity - FTBFS: make: python: Command not found

2006-05-16 Thread Bastian Blank
y package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), python2.3-dev, librsync-dev (>= 0.9.6) [...] > python setup.py build > make: python: Command not found > make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127 > ** > Build f

Bug#367483: recompile libfox, .la file out of date due to libxcursor

2006-05-16 Thread Geiger Guenter
Package: libfox1.4-dev Version: 1.4.31-2 Severity: serious Hi, The X maintainers decided to drop the libXcursor.la file in the libXcursor package. When using libtool linking with libFOX-1.4.la is not possible anymore, as the file refers to the non-existing libXcursor.la file. Recompiling fox ag

Bug#367482: xtux - FTBFS: Missing build dependency quilt

2006-05-16 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: xtux Version: 0.2.030306-9 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > Automatic build of xtux_0.2.030306-9 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0), libx11-dev, libxpm-d

Bug#366665: marked as done (udev: fails sarge -> etch upgrades)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 12:09:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line duplicate has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#367427: Is it a bug?

2006-05-16 Thread Romain Beauxis
severity 367427 normal tags 367427 moreinfo, unreproducible thanks -- Hi! Are you sure you did not do anything bad? I have tested the install on a fresh server here, and it is definitly zorking.. Few hints: -- Base path for files is specified in your apache config, and is supposed to b

Processed: Is it a bug?

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 367427 normal Bug#367427: LocalSettings.php: wrong permissions and directory Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > tags 367427 moreinfo, unreproducible Bug#367427: LocalSettings.php: wrong permissions and directory There were no tags set. Ta

Bug#367464: marked as done (courier-authlib: courier-authlib requires courier-authdaemon)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 02:02:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367464: fixed in courier 0.53.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#367457: tex-common.config: arith: syntax error: "usercount++"

2006-05-16 Thread Frank Küster
severity 366789 serious merge 366789 367457 tags 366789 pending stop Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess it's referring to : $((usercount++)). Is this a bashism? My sh is > dash. Please read the BTS before reporting bugs ;-) Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectro

Bug#361913: linphone: patch for "passwords stored world-readable"

2006-05-16 Thread Simon Morlat
Hello, Thanks a lot for the patch. It is merged in CVS. Simon Le Lundi 15 Mai 2006 00:41, Alec Berryman a écrit : > Package: linphone > Version: 1.3.3-1 > Followup-For: Bug #361913 > > Linphone also stores passwords in ~/.linphonerc. That file may have > been created group- or world-accessible

Processed: courier-base should be liable for the courier-authdaemon dependency

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 367464 + confirmed pending Bug#367464: courier-authlib: courier-authlib requires courier-authdaemon There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending > reassign 367464 courier-base Bug#367464: courier-authlib: courier-authlib requires courier

Bug#366634: mindi: Filesystem to use for initrd is UNSUPPORTED

2006-05-16 Thread Andree Leidenfrost
Hi Tim, Thank you for getting back to me. I'm glad that things work for you now. I will close the bug accordingly. Best regards, Andree On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 01:37 -0400, Tim Caulder wrote: > Yes this is a custom kernel. I seem to have had some issues with part of a > previous kernel still on m

Bug#366634: marked as done (mindi: Filesystem to use for initrd is UNSUPPORTED)

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 16 May 2006 17:56:16 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing as per last message sent to submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#367024: Licences conflict: Ruby under pure GPL with OpenSSL Licence

2006-05-16 Thread akira yamada
Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote: >>> Package: libopenssl-ruby1.8 >>> Version: 1.8.2-7sarge2 >>> Severity: serious >>> >>> The binary package libopenssl-ruby1.8 (pure GPL) depends on libssl0.9.7 >>> (OpenSSL Licence). Those 2 licences conflict due to a clause in >>> OpenSSL Licence which has to be added to th

Processed: tags

2006-05-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 297289 +fixed-upstream Bug#297289: libapache2-mod-python2.3: Publisher does not support the HEAD method but returns 405 method not allowed Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed-upstream > tags 367450 +fixed-upstream Bug#367450: FTBFS: ./configure: l