Your message dated Wed, 17 May 2006 01:08:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line wget GFDL doc got OK from Debian
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: wget: non-free documentation [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL-1.2]
Package: wget
Version: 1.10-3+1.10.1beta1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1?
Hello,
both wget's man page and its info documentation are licensed under GFDL 1.2
or later. According to debian-legal, GFDL doesn't conform to the DFSG, so these
files must be removed from main.
As an aside, the debian/copyright file for wget only lists the license for the
wget program and not the license for the wget documentation.
// Ulf Harnhammar
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages wget depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
wget recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
the GR-2006-01 vote of Debian gave the wget documentation an OK.
--
Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--- End Message ---
