On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:25:44 +0200 Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
> This is how I compiled the package:
> wget
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-fglrx/fglrx-driver/tarballs/fglrx-driver_10-4%7Eprerelease.orig.tar.bz2
> tar -jvxf fglrx-driver_10-4~prerelease.orig.tar.bz2
> cd fglrx-driver-10-4~prerelease/
This is how I compiled the package:
wget
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-fglrx/fglrx-driver/tarballs/fglrx-driver_10-4%7Eprerelease.orig.tar.bz2
tar -jvxf fglrx-driver_10-4~prerelease.orig.tar.bz2
cd fglrx-driver-10-4~prerelease/
svn checkout svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-fglrx/fglrx-driver/trunk/debi
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:12:48 +0200 Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
> m-a tries to build in the linux-2.6.29.1 directory cause my kernel is in
> the linux-2.6.29.1 directory.
10-4~prerelease-1 has not yet been uploaded to unstable. are you sure
you've got this version? if so, you would have had to chec
m-a tries to build in the linux-2.6.29.1 directory cause my kernel is in
the linux-2.6.29.1 directory.
here it is a sorter version of what was in my previous mail:
> m-a -t a-i fglrx
this command extract /usr/src/fglrx.tar.bz2 which is installed by
fglrx-source, than tries to build the module.
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:36:45 +0200 Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
> that's interesting:
>
> > m-a -t a-i fglrx
> .
> Updated infos about 1 packages
> Getting source for kernel version: 2.6.33.2
> Kernel headers available in /lib/modules/2.6.33.2/source
> apt-get install build-essential
> Reading package
On 2010-04-17 12:33, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 16.04.2010 21:17, schrieb Hámorszky Balázs:
the 2.6.33 patch is missing from
1:10-4~prerelease-1
the patch is here:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch
it isn't missing ;)
that's interesting:
> m-a -t a-i fgl
Am 16.04.2010 21:17, schrieb Hámorszky Balázs:
the 2.6.33 patch is missing from
1:10-4~prerelease-1
the patch is here:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch
it isn't missing ;)
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian
the 2.6.33 patch is missing from
1:10-4~prerelease-1
the patch is here:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2010-04-05 19:00, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
On 05.04.2010 18:34, Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote:
Hey there Hámorszky,
few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease
and Xorg 7.5 .
Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and ba
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> On 05.04.2010 19:06, Pascal Giard wrote:
regenerating xorg.conf helped. thx for the tip.
>>>
>>> Thanks to both of you for further investigations of the problem.
>>> Now it would be quite nice to know, which options exactly generat
On 2010-04-05 19:00, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
On 05.04.2010 18:34, Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote:
Hey there Hámorszky,
few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease
and Xorg 7.5 .
Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and ba
On 05.04.2010 19:06, Pascal Giard wrote:
regenerating xorg.conf helped. thx for the tip.
Thanks to both of you for further investigations of the problem.
Now it would be quite nice to know, which options exactly generate this
problems, so we could document it!
Could you both send us your old (
On 05.04.2010 18:34, Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote:
Hey there Hámorszky,
few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease
and Xorg 7.5 .
Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and backed up
my xorg.conf before doing an "aticonf
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> On 05.04.2010 18:34, Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
>>
>> On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey there Hámorszky,
>>> few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease
>>> and Xorg 7.5 .
>>> Following advices from a U
On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote:
Hey there Hámorszky,
few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease
and Xorg 7.5 .
Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and backed up
my xorg.conf before doing an "aticonfig --initial".
I then edited my xorg.conf to
Hey there Hámorszky,
few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease
and Xorg 7.5 .
Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and backed up
my xorg.conf before doing an "aticonfig --initial".
I then edited my xorg.conf to clean it (removed double entries and
made s
On 2010-03-21 23:31, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
On 21.03.2010 23:13, Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
this patch should fix the problem:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch
Oh thanks for it, but you were just 2 minutes too late :/
I am already uploading 10-3~prerelease..
On 21.03.2010 23:13, Hámorszky Balázs wrote:
this patch should fix the problem:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch
Oh thanks for it, but you were just 2 minutes too late :/
I am already uploading 10-3~prerelease..
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind rega
this patch should fix the problem:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reopen 571272 !
found 571272 1:10-2-2
thank you
Hi,
the module still fails to build because in 2.6.33 autoconf.h and
utsrelease.h have been moved from include/linux/ to include/generated/
Cheers,
Luca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:10-2-1
Hi,
fglrx doesn't build with linux 2.6.33, as some internal cmpxchg macro is used
which got changed.
The attached patch uses the real cmpxchg macro, which needs some casting
before, depending on the size of the data.
# Fix broken usage of internal macro;
21 matches
Mail list logo