Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: (no subject)

2010-04-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:25:44 +0200 Hámorszky Balázs wrote: > This is how I compiled the package: > wget > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-fglrx/fglrx-driver/tarballs/fglrx-driver_10-4%7Eprerelease.orig.tar.bz2 > tar -jvxf fglrx-driver_10-4~prerelease.orig.tar.bz2 > cd fglrx-driver-10-4~prerelease/

Bug#571272: (no subject)

2010-04-18 Thread Hámorszky Balázs
This is how I compiled the package: wget http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-fglrx/fglrx-driver/tarballs/fglrx-driver_10-4%7Eprerelease.orig.tar.bz2 tar -jvxf fglrx-driver_10-4~prerelease.orig.tar.bz2 cd fglrx-driver-10-4~prerelease/ svn checkout svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-fglrx/fglrx-driver/trunk/debi

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: Bug#571272: Bug#571272: 2.6.33 support patch, missing

2010-04-17 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:12:48 +0200 Hámorszky Balázs wrote: > m-a tries to build in the linux-2.6.29.1 directory cause my kernel is in > the linux-2.6.29.1 directory. 10-4~prerelease-1 has not yet been uploaded to unstable. are you sure you've got this version? if so, you would have had to chec

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: Bug#571272: 2.6.33 support patch, missing

2010-04-17 Thread Hámorszky Balázs
m-a tries to build in the linux-2.6.29.1 directory cause my kernel is in the linux-2.6.29.1 directory. here it is a sorter version of what was in my previous mail: > m-a -t a-i fglrx this command extract /usr/src/fglrx.tar.bz2 which is installed by fglrx-source, than tries to build the module.

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: Bug#571272: 2.6.33 support patch missing

2010-04-17 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 22:36:45 +0200 Hámorszky Balázs wrote: > that's interesting: > > > m-a -t a-i fglrx > . > Updated infos about 1 packages > Getting source for kernel version: 2.6.33.2 > Kernel headers available in /lib/modules/2.6.33.2/source > apt-get install build-essential > Reading package

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: 2.6.33 support patch missing

2010-04-17 Thread Hámorszky Balázs
On 2010-04-17 12:33, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Am 16.04.2010 21:17, schrieb Hámorszky Balázs: the 2.6.33 patch is missing from 1:10-4~prerelease-1 the patch is here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch it isn't missing ;) that's interesting: > m-a -t a-i fgl

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: 2.6.33 support patch missing

2010-04-17 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 16.04.2010 21:17, schrieb Hámorszky Balázs: the 2.6.33 patch is missing from 1:10-4~prerelease-1 the patch is here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch it isn't missing ;) -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian

Bug#571272: 2.6.33 support patch missing

2010-04-16 Thread Hámorszky Balázs
the 2.6.33 patch is missing from 1:10-4~prerelease-1 the patch is here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: Solving segfault with 10-3~prerelease

2010-04-06 Thread Hámorszky Balázs
On 2010-04-05 19:00, Patrick Matthäi wrote: On 05.04.2010 18:34, Hámorszky Balázs wrote: On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote: Hey there Hámorszky, few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease and Xorg 7.5 . Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and ba

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: Solving segfault with 10-3~prerelease

2010-04-05 Thread Pascal Giard
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > On 05.04.2010 19:06, Pascal Giard wrote: regenerating xorg.conf helped. thx for the tip. >>> >>> Thanks to both of you for further investigations of the problem. >>> Now it would be quite nice to know, which options exactly generat

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: Solving segfault with 10-3~prerelease

2010-04-05 Thread Hámorszky Balázs
On 2010-04-05 19:00, Patrick Matthäi wrote: On 05.04.2010 18:34, Hámorszky Balázs wrote: On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote: Hey there Hámorszky, few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease and Xorg 7.5 . Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and ba

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: Solving segfault with 10-3~prerelease

2010-04-05 Thread Patrick Matthäi
On 05.04.2010 19:06, Pascal Giard wrote: regenerating xorg.conf helped. thx for the tip. Thanks to both of you for further investigations of the problem. Now it would be quite nice to know, which options exactly generate this problems, so we could document it! Could you both send us your old (

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: Solving segfault with 10-3~prerelease

2010-04-05 Thread Patrick Matthäi
On 05.04.2010 18:34, Hámorszky Balázs wrote: On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote: Hey there Hámorszky, few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease and Xorg 7.5 . Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and backed up my xorg.conf before doing an "aticonf

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: Solving segfault with 10-3~prerelease

2010-04-05 Thread Pascal Giard
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > On 05.04.2010 18:34, Hámorszky Balázs wrote: >> >> On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote: >>> >>> Hey there Hámorszky, >>> few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease >>> and Xorg 7.5 . >>> Following advices from a U

Bug#571272: Solving segfault with 10-3~prerelease

2010-04-05 Thread Hámorszky Balázs
On 2010-04-05 18:09, Pascal Giard wrote: Hey there Hámorszky, few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease and Xorg 7.5 . Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and backed up my xorg.conf before doing an "aticonfig --initial". I then edited my xorg.conf to

Bug#571272: Solving segfault with 10-3~prerelease

2010-04-05 Thread Pascal Giard
Hey there Hámorszky, few minutes ago I was also getting a segfault with 10-3~prerelease and Xorg 7.5 . Following advices from a Ubuntu bug entry, I went ahead and backed up my xorg.conf before doing an "aticonfig --initial". I then edited my xorg.conf to clean it (removed double entries and made s

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: patch

2010-03-21 Thread Hámorszky Balázs
On 2010-03-21 23:31, Patrick Matthäi wrote: On 21.03.2010 23:13, Hámorszky Balázs wrote: this patch should fix the problem: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch Oh thanks for it, but you were just 2 minutes too late :/ I am already uploading 10-3~prerelease..

Bug#571272: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#571272: patch

2010-03-21 Thread Patrick Matthäi
On 21.03.2010 23:13, Hámorszky Balázs wrote: this patch should fix the problem: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch Oh thanks for it, but you were just 2 minutes too late :/ I am already uploading 10-3~prerelease.. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind rega

Bug#571272: patch

2010-03-21 Thread Hámorszky Balázs
this patch should fix the problem: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst/catalyst/fglrx-2.6.33.patch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#571272:

2010-03-03 Thread Luca Niccoli
reopen 571272 ! found 571272 1:10-2-2 thank you Hi, the module still fails to build because in 2.6.33 autoconf.h and utsrelease.h have been moved from include/linux/ to include/generated/ Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

Bug#571272: fglrx doesn't build with linux 2.6.33

2010-02-24 Thread Stefan Bühler
Package: fglrx-driver Version: 1:10-2-1 Hi, fglrx doesn't build with linux 2.6.33, as some internal cmpxchg macro is used which got changed. The attached patch uses the real cmpxchg macro, which needs some casting before, depending on the size of the data. # Fix broken usage of internal macro;