Is there a reason why it's not included? I can make a patch and try it...
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am orphaning the yamdi package as I switch to retirement status.
The package description is:
yamdi is a fast console application for adding various metadata to flv files.
The program buffers its input file, rather than loading into memory in its
entirety.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am orphaning the wmxres package as I switch to retirement status.
The package description is:
wmxres is a tiny dockable application that comes in handy when you want a
specific X mode. Modes can be scrolled through until the desired one is
active.
it a/debian/compat b/debian/compat
> index 7ed6ff8..ec63514 100644
> --- a/debian/compat
> +++ b/debian/compat
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -5
> +9
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index c05bf0d..6d65928 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -2,
the following program, with
> input.flv a valid FLV file containing audio tags:
Thanks for your recent patches, Nicolas. I have integrated them and
also asked upstream author to include these.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 04:31:06AM +, Todd Troxell wrote:
> Hello Jérémy -- did you ever get a sponsor for this? If not I'd be glad to
> help here-- quite interested in seeing this in Debian.
Nevermind, glad to see this in NEW :)
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
si
Hello Jérémy -- did you ever get a sponsor for this? If not I'd be glad to
help here-- quite interested in seeing this in Debian.
Cheers,
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: webgui
Version: 7.7.22-1
Severity: important
I also found that webgui depends on libjavascript-minifier-xs-perl
and this should be listed in the package deps.
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i3
Package: webgui
Version: 7.7.22-1
Severity: important
When I run wg-testEnvironment it tells me that I need to install
libcss-minifier-xs-perl. This is on clean sid install with current packages.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unsta
ning logtail on PDAs?)
IMO it's ok to ditch this :)
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Stefan,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:59:24PM +0100, Stefan Ebner wrote:
> Package: wmxres
> Version: 1.2-9
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: origin-ubuntu hardy ubuntu-patch
>
> It needs libxext-dev to build correctly.
Thanks, appl
thing like -q=100 should make it work like apt.
Cheers,
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mysql-proxy
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Jan Kneschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/MySQL_Proxy
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : a mysql proxy for high avai
hanks for looking at this. I have uploaded a
patched version.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Lucas,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:32:06AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 20/09/07 at 13:44 -0500, Todd Troxell wrote:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:09:21AM +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 08:00:12 sch
lling the bugs. The best thing would be
> to ask lucas how he builds the packages.
>
> But I guess two calls of "debuild" should do the job. The clean, build,
> install, clean, build, install. ;-)
> (the important thing is here the second clean.. we want to ensure with this
> procedure that the clean target of the debs is okay
Do you know how I can reproduce this bug? I tried so far:
-fakeroot dpkg-buildpackage (2x)
-debuild (2x)
-fakeroot debian/rules binary, clean, binary ,clean
Thanks,
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
make: *** [install] Error 2
>
> **
> Build finished at 20070905-2157
> END OF BUILD NO 2
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
I am having trouble reproducing this bug.
When I run "fake
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: thinkfinger
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Timo Hoenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,Pavel Machek <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://thinkfinger.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : S
One correction: This software is BSD license, not GPL.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Todd Troxell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: flvtool2
Version : 1.0.6
Upstream Author : Norman Timmler
* URL : http://www.inlet-media.de/flvtool2
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description
ardware
> System/Monitoring
> etc.
>
> I would suggest System/Hardware, but I am not entirely sure wmxres does.
Wmxres is just a tiny applet for switching screen resolution. I've moved it
to Applications/System/Hardware for now. Thanks :)
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
heck/changes note should stick around for backporting reasons, as
maks mentioned.
Any other opinions?
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: racoon
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
It would be nice to have pam support.
Cheers,
-Todd
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.21-40.EL
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
diff -ru ipsec-tools-0.6.5-orig/debian/rules ipse
but I've
> noticed that, in each logcheck report, the lines "Lines skipped," "Patterns
> to ignore," and
> "Ignored lines" are always "0". Maybe I'm misunderstanding the meaning of
> those, but it doesn't make sense to me.
Are
ration error. Please re-open this bug if you find
otherwise.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
> processed='destination(df_debug)=28'
>
>
>
> unfortunately the line length is not the only criteria. lines containing
> only numbers and letters which are longer than 503 characters seem to be
> ignored if they match a regex.
I have tested this with a couple of versions of logcheck and I'm unable to
reproduce. It is worth nothing that the string caught above contains
substrings that would trigger a violation, and therefore needs a line in
violations.ignore.d as well. I suspect this is a configuration issue.
Please let me know your findings.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hat kind of filename pattern would logcheck like run-parts to
> validate against?
We got a report on a user unable to use periods in a rule file. Is this
something run-parts could support?
Cheers,
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
f users depending on the old functionality,
so I'm going to support run-parts anyway. It will also need to be documented
that rule file names can only contain letters, numbers, underscores, and
hyphens.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rules for
> > courier are incorrect?
>
> it's a wishlist bug, no? that's what they are for.
>
> courier already has its own rule files. thus it only makes sense.
Ahh ok. Makes sense to pool our rules. At first I thought you were
suggesting that we force a random sub
files.. Sure that's not masked too?
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
intiion is:
"A patch or some other easy procedure for fixing the bug is included in the
bug logs. If there's a patch, but it doesn't resolve the bug adequately or
causes some other problems, this tag should not be used."
Cheers,
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
gs like this in post-processing. I've added
a note to the IdeaPool[0] about this.
[0] http://wiki.logcheck.org/index.cgi/IdeaPool
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ch team.
> Please add it to your next package revision, it should be inserted in
> your package build-tree as debian/po/nl.po, TIA.
>
> Feel free to mail me if this file needs updating at some future date.
Thanks, Frans. I've added this file to CVS, and it will be included
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 08:15:16PM +0200, Markus Peuhkuri wrote:
> Todd Troxell wrote:
> > I see your point. The config is not really essential.
> >
> > What do you think about this:
> >
> > if [ -f $CONFFILE -a -r $CONFFILE]; then
>
> The problem is sti
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 02:47:57PM +0100, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 07:16:24AM -0500, Todd Troxell wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:21:53PM +0200, Markus Peuhkuri wrote:
> > > Package: logcheck
> > > Version: 1.2.42
> > &g
:0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/smtpd\[[0-9]+\]: warning:
> ([0-9a-f.:]{3,39})+: address not listed for hostname [^[:space:]]+$
Thanks, Karl! I've made this change in CVS.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LE
> + . $CONFFILE
> +else
> +error "Config file $CONFFILE not exists or readable"
> fi
The patch is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Markus. Your change will be in the
next release.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
2.144
> User names tried:
> 0002593w (1), 127 (1), 16 (1), 1a4 (1), 1dd (1), 22b (1), 2a (1),
> 4ct (1), 511 (1), 561 (1), 587 (1), 72 (2), 75 (1), 9ia (1),
> Aaron (2), Aba (2), Abel (2), Account (1), Barrera (1), Castro (1),
> (cut...)
>
> Inverse mapping failures: 44
>
Package: gthumb
Severity: minor
If "import" is clicked during the "initialization" phase, only some of
the pictures will be imported.
If there are a lot of pictures, this phase takes a while, so users will
click "import" if it's active.
I'd suggest either disabling it during initialzation or mak
glad it works. Logcheck should probably warn on unreadable
rulefiles... I retitled this bug.
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
629 2005-05-30 07:21 spamd
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exes in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d files which also do
> not filter as they are supposed to. However, the postfix/policy-spf and
> amavis are the most problematic.
I was unable to reproduce this. I dropped your noise file into my
/etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ and ran it through your samp
and be in the clear.
I think what we really need is something to handle multiple rotated files,
and in that case, it might be better to extend logtail instead.
Cheers,
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, home=/var/lib/logcheck, shell=/bin/false
> > Sep 22 22:37:30 laptop chage[19561]: changed password expiry for logcheck
>
> thanks for your feedback.
I believe this is fixed in .42 which has entered unstable. Confirm?
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 06:34:19PM -0400, Todd Troxell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:10:57PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 Oct 2005 02:13, Todd Troxell wrote:
> > > How does this make it clear that adduser is not the culprit?
> > >
> &
changing the lock line(595) to somehting like:
lockfile-create --retry 1 $LOCKFILE >> /tmp/logcheck_error 2>&1
Cheers,
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OTECTED]:alnum:
> \]-\]\+/" >> $i.new; done
>
> $ egrep -vf ../logcheck/rulefiles/linux/TEST_ignore.d.server/postfix.new
> postfix.log | egrep
> -vf ../logcheck/rulefiles/linux/violations.ignore.d/logcheck-postfix
> $
>
> They work just as well as the old rules, they just match the additional
> '@'..
>
> However, if you'd rather wait for macro support, that's fine.
Macros are on the way:
http://wiki.logcheck.org/index.cgi/LogcheckTemplateSystem
:)
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:10:57PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Thursday 06 Oct 2005 02:13, Todd Troxell wrote:
> > How does this make it clear that adduser is not the culprit?
> >
>
> If adduser was to be the culprit, it should have broken the installation of
&
should hunt for the bug.
How does this make it clear that adduser is not the culprit?
Obviously there is some difference between the installation if it now works.
Can you still reproduce the breakage?
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
permitted sender$
> +^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/policy-spf\[[0-9]+\]: : SPF pass:
> smtp_comment=.*: [.[:alnum:]]+ MX [.[:alnum:]]+ A [0-9a-f.:]+,
> header_comment=[.[:alnum:]+: domain of [%[:punct:][:alnum:[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]:alnum:]]+ designates [0-9a-f.:]{3,39}
:space:]]+, IN, SOA\) from \[[\.0-9]+\]\.[0-9]+$
> +^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: rcvd
> NOTIFY\([^[:space:]]+, IN, SOA\) from \[[0-9a-f.:]+\]\.[0-9]+$
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ named\[[0-9]+\]: late CNAME in answer
> section for [^[:space:]]+$
&g
There was a failed attempt at this:
The reversion is here
http://cvs.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/logcheck/src/logcheck.diff?r1=1.109&r2=1.110&cvsroot=logcheck
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &quo
Perhaps we do not need to have logcheck user in base if we install our own
rules with dh_installlogcheck.
Related:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/2005-September/002096.html
--
Todd Troxell
http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:18:27PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 Sep 2005 09:04, Todd Troxell wrote:
> > I have tested the following scenarios and have been unable to reproduce
> > this.
> >
> > -fresh install on unstable
> > -dist-upgrade from
I have tested the following scenarios and have been unable to reproduce this.
-fresh install on unstable
-dist-upgrade from stable version
-dist-upgrade from woody version
It will be helpful to know if your adduser is functioning correctly.
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:21:23AM +0530, Ritesh Raj S
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:21:23AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Error 3:
> This error was during installation
>
> Setting up logcheck (1.2.41) ...
> useradd: unknown group logcheck
> adduser: `/usr/sbin/useradd -d /var/lib/logcheck -g logcheck -s
> /bin/false -u 118 logcheck' returned error c
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:12:59AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Package: logcheck
> Version: 1.2.41
> Followup-For: Bug #312393
>
>
> This is an important bug, infact it should be a grave bug.
> logcheck doesn't get installed properly. The postrm scripts are designed
> to add the logcheck us
tag 312393 moreinfo
thanks
My guess on this is that the postinst script got interrupted. Is anyone able
to reproduce this?
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rap
Package: mozilla-firebird
Version 1.0.4-2
Severity: wishlist
It would be cool to be able to drag tabs between browser windows.
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 12:55:32PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> tags 307585 wontfix
> stop
>
> On Wed, 04 May 2005, Anand Kumria wrote:
>
> > Package: logcheck
> > Version: 1.2.39
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > With more and more Internet background radiation, entries like the
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:49:46PM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
> Todd Troxell wrote:
> >
> >The deal with this is that we can't use gid logcheck in
> >dh_installlogcheck because the logcheck user doesn't exist until
> >logcheck gets installed.
> >
>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 09:31:14AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> todd what do you think about that dir?
> sounds ok for me,
> but i don't get why you paranoid guy show your logcheck run
> to world, why not use 750 above??
It sounds good to me. I think 755 is fine.
nb: I've just tested this
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 05:46:42PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Package: logcheck
> Version: 1.2.36
> Followup-For: Bug #302689
>
>
> Logcheck will produce spurious errors at the moment, because egrep
> returns 2 on error but 1 if no lines are returned. A patch is attached
> to fix this.
>
>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:54:34AM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
> Package: logcheck
> Version: 1.2.35
> Severity: normal
>
> I reported a bug on a couple clamav packages (302253, 302254) which
> noted that in Sarge, logcheck files are supposed to be root:logcheck
> 640, not root:root 644. The clama
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 11:32:06AM -0800, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> This patch updates ignore.d.workstation/udev to properly ignore
> creation/removal of devices in subdirectories (e.g. /dev/usb/lp0).
Applied. Thanks, Matt!
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
S
Hi Jari,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:17:39AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
> If it were possible, please add rules to ignore SSH debug level messages
> like these:
>
> Mar 22 18:59:29 cante sshd[5673]: debug2: channel 4: rcvd adjust 66020
> Mar 22 18:59:34 cante sshd[5673]: debug2: channel 4: windo
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:14:25AM +0100, Slaanesh wrote:
> Package: logcheck
> Version: 1.2.35
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Command /usr/sbin/logcheck dies with following error message:
> grep: invalid regular expression
Yeah, we definitely need more info on th
tag 296214 pending
thanks
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 03:03:40AM +0100, Martin Lohmeier wrote:
> can you change
> lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200102/msg01235.html
> to http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200102/msg01235.html
> in the copyright file?
> That would
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:15:24AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> What I suggest is that for each egrep over the filter files, you check
> whether the return value is 2, and if yes send a message to stderr:
>
> "logcheck found an invalid regular expression in file $file"
>
> (ideally with the temp
Oops. Clean version attached.
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat`. `'
`-
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:25:05AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> The solution then is to make a directory below var/run/ and run the
> daemon as a dedicated user (or daemon). for instance
> var/run/anon-proxy/foo.pid
A patch to do this is attached.
Cheers,
--
[ Todd J. Troxell
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:23:09PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I guess you really want to use pidfiles, and not go (just) by name.
I'd like it to do that too. Unfortunately the daemon forks from it's main
process and so start-stop-daemon -m does not work. I patched proxytest.cpp
to write a p
Attached is a working patch to the current anon-proxy.init
Cheers,
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat`. `'
I ran into similar breakage, and I agree that this should happen by default.
I also agree that a NEWS file is in order.
I don't think it is release critical that it contains all changes since
woody.
I've attached a simple news file. Be sure to change the (version) part if
you're going to use i
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:20:29AM -0500, Marc Sherman wrote:
> I just installed 1.2.33, and it made my rules dirs setuid, not setgid...
Oops, good catch. I'll get this uploaded shortly.
Cheers,
-Todd
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
> APT prefers testing
> APT policy: (900, '
Ok, I found a simple way to do this. This will be post-sarge.
--
[ Todd J. Troxell ,''`.
Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek : :' :
http://debian.org || http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat`. `'
Hi Peter
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 04:03:22PM +1100, Peter Hawkins wrote:
> Logtail should not output error messages to standard output, since this
> violates the principle of least surprise.
Agreed! I'll get a patch in shortly.
> In particular, my application was broken by the semantics of logt
77 matches
Mail list logo
