On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 01:21:36PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:08:05PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Or even better: Use a form of getopts that works on woody as well, to > > ease backporting! > > I don't think that's much of a problem nowadays. :) (Note that even > etch had perl 5.8.) > > The only remaining purpose of this bug report is to request a non-Perl > version of logtail. Given how any non-trivial Debian box has perl > installed, is it worth keeping this open? (Are there people out there > running logtail on PDAs?)
IMO it's ok to ditch this :) -- Todd Troxell http://rapidpacket.com/~xtat -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
