Bug#1112972: FTBFS with CMake 4 (addendum)

On Mon, 01 Sep 2025 13:51:43 +0200 roehl...@debian.org wrote: > > Also, the build log URL has an unfortunate mistake. The correct URL > should include the workspace, i.e., > > https://debusine.debian.net/debian/developers/artifact/ > > CMake 4 will also be available in experimental again, so it

Bug#1096323: aptitude: ftbfs with GCC-15

On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 22:28:14 +0200 Gioele Barabucci wrote: > a MR with the one-line fix for this issue can be found at > > https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/aptitude/-/merge_requests/25 > Can i ask if there is a plan to apply this patch? or is aptitude being dropped? in case user feedback is he

Bug#1112870:

Hi, is there a the plan for fixing this bug? do you need help investigating it? if the time has come to drop encfs it would be best to give users a lot of warning. While this could be in the forky release-notes, it would be much nicer for users if the message was "will be dropped in future" rathe

Bug#1116939: debsums: Cron job error "tee: /proc/self/fd/3: No such device or address" under systemd

On Tue, 30 Sep 2025, 22:27 Timo Sigurdsson, wrote: > > > If you were to adopt my fix, the shebang would also need to be changed to > bash. And that makes the fix actually a bit less simple. > > just a drive-by comment - would it help to do the fd3 stuff in a subshell?

Bug#1116003: Add launch launch option to re-enable manifest V2 in Chromium

On Mon, 22 Sep 2025, 23:23 zipdox, wrote: > uBlock Origin Lite is lacking quite a lot of features compared to uBlock > Origin. > > https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)#filtering-capabilities-which-cant-be-ported-to-mv3 > > Public opinion overwhelmingly s

Bug#1112445: cron-apt upgrades when the only action specified is download

On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 at 13:33, John Hasler wrote: >* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or > ineffective)? > > Removed the upgrade action. Im not the maintainer, but i think you will need to provide a bit more info - what exactly did you edit or remove? what is in ac

Bug#1098079: w3m: ftbfs with GCC-15

On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:34:11 +0100 Rene Kita wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:59:48PM +, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > > gcc-15/g++-15, b > JFTR, I have patches to fix this. If someone is interested just mail me > or find t

Bug#1114739: diffoscope-minimal: make it actually minimal?

On Thu, 18 Sep 2025, 07:20 Holger Levsen, wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 02:54:32PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > At least from my perspective, I would prefer a split: > > diffoscope -> recommend all the things > > diffoscope-minimal -> suggest all the things > > sounds more sound to

Bug#1110883: release-notes: mDNS resolution in systemd-resolved disabled by default, breaking existing setups

On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, 15:21 Colin Crawford, wrote: > Hello maintainer, > > Seeing as it has been nearly a month since the last update, is there any > feedback on the text I submitted? Alternatively, is there anything further > I can do to help move this forward? > you could try submitting the tex

Bug#1115097: chkrootkit: remove use of isc-dhcp from autopkgtest

package: chkrootkit version: 0.58b-5+b2 severity: important isc-dhcp is deprecated and probably will be removed from forky. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106121 1. removal will break the autopkgtest (no impact on the actual package) - dnsmasq doesnt do what we need - dhcl

Bug#1096431: chkrootkit: ftbfs with GCC-15

On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 17:17:23 +0100 Richard Lewis wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 at 17:07, Matthias Klose wrote: > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > > gcc-15/g++-15, but succeeds to build with gcc-14/g++-14. This is now fixed in git (the

Bug#1114796: upower: spams logs with value "-nan" of type 'gdouble' is invalid or out of range for property 'percentage' of type 'gdouble

package: upowerd version: 1.90.9-1 every few minutes upower tells me that the battery is reporting a bad value. yet the value shown in the gbome "top menu bar thing" (no idea what this is called) says 0%-- this didnt happen on bookworm and the battery was just as broken. this makes using the syste

Bug#1102005: webext-ublock-origin-chromium: No longer supported by latest chromium :(

> I was able to re-enable following the instructions in a comment here: >https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/3563 > > ie enable: > > chrome://flags/#temporary-unexpire-flags-m133 latest version needs you to (also?) enable chrome://flags/#temporary-unexpire-flags-m139 chrome:/

Bug#1114739: diffoscope-minimal: make it actually minimal?

package: diffoscope-minimal version: 297 severity: wishlist diffoscope-minimal seems rather badly named as it recommends a huge number of packages, very few of which seem to meet the definition of recommends for a "minimal" package -- i think most people would just a slight improvement on debdiff

Bug#1114740: systemd: please document the conflict between /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/legacy.conf and usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/debian.conf

package: systemd version: 257.8-1~deb13u1 severity: wishlist Thanks for maintaining systemd. Every day systemd in trixie tells me that /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/legacy.conf and /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/debian.conf have a duplicate line relating to /run/lock can you improve the documentation to explain why

Bug#1114736: rkhunter: add ALLOWHIDDENFILE=/etc/.updated to default config

package: rkhunter severity: important version: 1.4.6-13 systemd creates /etc/.updated since trixie, and rkhunter understandably flags this as suspicious. I think it would make sense to suppress this warning by adding ALLOWHIDDENFILE=/etc/.updated to rkhunter.conf as this is going to affect (ne

Bug#1114732: apt-listchanges: please provide an option to send one email per package

package: apt-listchanges version: 4.8 severity: wishlist Hi, it would be great if apt-listchanges could send me one email per package rather than joining everything into one -- sometimes very long --- email. it would make it much easier to skip the uninteresting parts if it was multiple messages

Bug#1114735: lxc: recommend lxc-templates directly

package: lxc version: 1:6.0.4-4 severity: minor Hi, Would it make sense for lxc to recommend lxc-templates? currently, lxc recommends distro-builder and distro-builder recommends lxc-templates, so most people wont notice a difference. But distro-builder is quite large and when i removed it i los

Bug#1114727: greylistd: legacy path in greylist.socket

Package: greylistd Version: 0.9.0.4 severity: normal Starting greylistd generates a warning from systemd: /usr/lib/systemd/system/greylistd.socket:6: ListenStream= references a path below legacy directory The line in debian/greylistd is: ListenStream=/var/run/greylistd/socket --- the path should

Bug#1111973: release-notes: Release notes suggest to delete /var/log/lastlog*, which seems required by opensshd

On Sun, 24 Aug 2025, 16:49 Ralf Bergs, wrote: > section 5.1.9 of the release notes says /var/log/lastlog* can be > deleted, as "there is no tool to read" these files. > > > sshd-session[333690]: lastlog_openseek: Couldn't stat > /var/log/lastlog: No such file or directory > > Or did I somehow mis

Bug#691258: Missing / in RE for "reducing the advertised EDNS UDP packet size"

On Fri, 31 May 2024 23:58:21 +0100 Richard Lewis wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:55:06 +0200 =?utf-8?B?TG/Dr2M=?= Minier > wrote: > > Package: logcheck > > Version: 1.3.15 > > Severity: minor > > Tags: patch > > > > Hi, > > > > Got t

Bug#1110883: release-notes: mDNS resolution in systemd-resolved disabled by default, breaking existing setups

On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 at 15:27, Colin Crawford wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Thanks for the quick reply. I'm not a developer, so I'm afraid I don't know > what an MR is or how to submit a patch. However, I've taken the text of the > relevant NEWS item from the systemd-resolved package as a starting poi

Bug#1110718: release-notes: Missing important informations in 5.1.28 "Things to do before rebooting"

On Sun, 10 Aug 2025, 13:39 Epickiwi, wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: important > > Hello ! > > After upgrading to Trixie, I encountered issue described in 5.1.10 > "Encrypted filesystems need systemd-cryptsetup package" mainly because I > didn't red the full Section 5 before rebooting

Bug#1110184: release-notes: document /etc/sysctl.conf being dropped

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 12:43 Basilikum, wrote: . On > bookworm there was a symlink /etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf to > /etc/sysctl.conf. This symlink got dropped during the upgrade causing > the file to be ignored . As kernel parameters in sysctl.conf are very > core to the system and them not ge

Bug#1110221: release-notes: Desktop restarts during upgrade

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025, 16:31 Guillermo Torres Zamora, < torreszamoraguille...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 13:51:36 +0100 Justin B Rye > wrote: > > Guillermo Torres Zamora wrote: > > > This can be triggered if you specifically tell needrestart to restart > > processes that are usually l

Bug#1110192: logcheck autopkgtest failure if /proc/kmsg is not available

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 at 19:57, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 01.08.25 um 19:01 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > if [ "/proc/kmesg" is readable (?) ] ; then echo "rules matching > > the error" > /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/foo fi # rest of test as > > befo

Bug#1110192: logcheck autopkgtest failure if /proc/kmsg is not available

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 16:05 Michael Biebl, wrote: 44s Jul 30 20:28:18 autopkgtest-lxd-lryznw rsyslogd[1999]: imklog: cannot > open kernel log (/proc/kmsg): Permission denied. > 44s Jul 30 20:28:18 autopkgtest-lxd-lryznw rsyslogd[1999]: activation of > module imklog failed [v8.2506.0 try https:/

Bug#1109692: libreoffice-common: suspicious files found by chkrootkit

Chris Hofstaedtler writes: > Control: reassign -1 chkrootkit > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 08:42:10AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> ti 22.7.2025 klo 8.57 Rene Engelhard (r...@debian.org) kirjoitti: >> > Am 22.07.25 um 07:37 schrieb Martin-Éric Racine >> > > WARNING: The following suspicious f

Bug#1070314: cryptsetup: backward incompatible change for plain mode when relying on defaults

On Sat, 12 Jul 2025 at 15:21, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Jul 2025 at 14:52:13 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > I think what i understand from this (which may be very wrong) is: > > > > The default settings for LUKS filesystems (see crypttab(5)) have > > chan

Bug#75250: ssh: syslogin_perform_logout: logout() returned an error

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.ssh as well. Paul Slootman writes: > It seems that on a fresh trixie install, nothing creates /run/utmp > anymore. Is that a bug or is utmp deprecated? who and who -b still seem > to work, so

Bug#1070314: cryptsetup: backward incompatible change for plain mode when relying on defaults

On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 23:39:24 +0200 Guilhem Moulin wrote: > On Sun, 5 May 2024 at 17:29:03 +0100, Justin B Rye wrote: > > L wrote (https://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2024/05/msg3.html): > >> Guilhem Moulin writes: > >>> cryptsetup 2:2.7.0~rc0-1 has a backward incompatible change for plain >

Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped

On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:28:33 +0100 Richard Lewis wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jun 2025, 07:43 Andrew Ruthven, wrote: > > On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven > > > > request-tracker4 has

Bug#611302: ssmtp: installation fails if hostname returned value is not known

On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:11:30 -0600 "Brian Gilomen" wrote: > From: Ricardo Mones > Unpacking ssmtp (from .../ssmtp_2.64-4_armel.deb) ... > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) > I found it's because value returned by hostname is not known. Adding it to > /etc/hosts fixed the

Bug#1108377: chkrootkit: daily system event: mail: /tmp/mail.RsXXXX8kWKZT: Read-only file system

On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 23:02, Andrew Bower wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > On Sun, Jul 06, 2025 at 12:32:09PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 06, 2025 at 12:47:36PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 at 12:01, Holger Levsen wrote: > >

Bug#1108377: chkrootkit: daily system event: mail: /tmp/mail.RsXXXX8kWKZT: Read-only file system

On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 at 12:01, Holger Levsen wrote: > > --- what provides mail(1) --is it mailx or mailutils etc? (probably doesnt > > matter, but.) > > bsd-mailx i'm not sure, but i think this may be the problem --- looking at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/bsd-mailx/-/blob/master/send.c and http

Bug#1108377: chkrootkit: daily system event: mail: /tmp/mail.RsXXXX8kWKZT: Read-only file system

On Sat, 5 Jul 2025, 23:54 Holger Levsen, wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 07:26:37PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > I have 2 thoughts, one is that we set ProtectSystem=strict so /tmp is > > read-only when the unit runs: However, we set > > Environment=TMPDIR=/run/chkr

Bug#1105685: splint: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: Headers/flag_codes.h:22:11: fatal error: flag_codes.gen: No such file or directory

e.am mapping.o: Headers/flag_codes.gen (untested, other than it fixes the build) commit 37233125ca7f0c93c4e82bdff055e80dd7857b07 (HEAD -> master) Author: Richard Lewis Date: Mon May 19 10:54:34 2025 +0100 Build flag_codes.gen before mapping.o --- ...021-Build-flag_codes.gen-before-ma

Bug#1108614: chromium: visual artefacts since 138.0.7204.49-1~deb12u1

On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 at 17:21, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the report. In general it's helpful to know if you're running > wayland or X, and your desktop environment. i am using gnome with the default (i think that is wayland? following instructions on the internet I did loginctl

Bug#1108614: chromium: visual artefacts since 138.0.7204.49-1~deb12u1

X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org package: chromium Version: 138.0.7204.49-1~deb12u1 severity: important The latest chromium security update now renders many pages with annoying visual artefacts - lwn.net, salsa.debian.org, gmail.com -- mainly when using (moving or clicking) the mouse i trie

Bug#1108377: chkrootkit: daily system event: mail: /tmp/mail.RsXXXX8kWKZT: Read-only file system

On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 at 19:26, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 10:17, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > since I've upgraded systems to trixie, logcheck mails me daily system > > events like these: > > > > Jun 27 00:01:21 hostname chkrootkit

Bug#1108377: chkrootkit: daily system event: mail: /tmp/mail.RsXXXX8kWKZT: Read-only file system

On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 10:17, Holger Levsen wrote: > since I've upgraded systems to trixie, logcheck mails me daily system events > like these: > > Jun 27 00:01:21 hostname chkrootkit-daily[2588815]: sending alert to root: > [chkrootkit] alert for hostname.example.org > Jun 27 00:01:21 hostname

Bug#1108214: old git branches in the repository

package: release-notes severity: minor The release-notes repository has accumulated some old branches that could be deleted: These are merged into the main history, but the branch was not deleted: supported-archs-no-i386 -- an ancestor of current master ( trixie ) issues-ping-reword -- ancestor

Bug#1050881: borgbackup: Mention required documentation for upgrading repositories for fixes for CVE-2023-36811

On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:22:07 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > borgbackup/1.2.5-1 contained a fix for CVE-2023-36811. But > additionally to the package upgrades, users need to follow the upgrade > procedure as documented. > > After an update of the package one is not really aware of it, so I >

Bug#1105130: release-notes: uprading a minimal system with gnupg to trixie pulls in an MTA

> If a minimal system with gnupg is upgraded to trixie it is likely to pull in > an > unwanted MTA because of changed dependencies. Such users may find it helpful > for a hint in the release notes to remove gpg-wks-server on upgrade, such as > with: > > apt full-upgrade gpg-wks-server- I was

Bug#1099613: marked as done (release-notes: have users install linux-sysctl-defaults)

> > the package linux-sysctl-defaults got introduced in trixie and is > > Priority: important. Most users should install it, to avoid being > > surprised by behaviour changes when not having it. > https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/232 > was merged. > Closing. Is thi

Bug#1104427: release-notes: Removal of policykit-1-gnome

On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 23:10, Peter Blackman wrote: > > On 21/06/2025 17:49, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 15:02, Peter Blackman > > wrote: > >> On 15/06/2025 20:13, Richard Lewis wrote: > >>> or does it mean XFCE is broken in trixie

Bug#1104427: release-notes: Removal of policykit-1-gnome

On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 15:02, Peter Blackman wrote: > On 15/06/2025 20:13, Richard Lewis wrote: > > or does it mean XFCE is broken in trixie? > Looks that way to me. it doesnt seem that anyone has reported this as a bug against xfce? (without that the chances of it being fixed see

Bug#1074223: trixie: please document samba package changes

On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:21:29 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: > Tags: patch hi Michael - you tagged this bug against release-notes as having patch but i dont see on (did i miss it?), assuming not: the NEWS things look well written and complete to me - im not a samba user, but i feel i would underst

Bug#1092176: release-notes: systemd v257 has new rules for network interface names

On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 13:38:49 + Justin B Rye wrote: > we probably ought to stop thinking of it as an item to go > under "Possible issues during upgrade" and start advertising it under > "Preparing for the upgrade" as a chronic bug that sysadmins always > need to beware of any time they upgrade

Bug#1091766: release-notes: trixie deprecating LXD in favor of Incus

On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:07:14 + Mathias Gibbens wrote: > TL;DR -- It is expected that trixie will be the last release of > Debian to include LXD, and users are encouraged to migrate to Incus > after upgrading. > See here for some suggested wording for the release-notes - https://salsa.deb

Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped

On Mon, 16 Jun 2025, 07:43 Andrew Ruthven, wrote: > On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 19:48 +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven > > > request-tracker4 and extensions targetting RT4 won't be in trixie. They > > > are > >

Bug#1107933: release-notes: document deborphan removal and replacement options

On Tue, 17 Jun 2025, 18:21 Andres Salomon, wrote: > Package: release-notes > X-Debbugs-Cc: dilin...@queued.net > > As mentioned in > , > we removed references to deborphan in the release notes; however, we > should mention that

Bug#1107587: chkrootkit: Missing 'strings' executable

On Mon, 16 Jun 2025, 20:49 Stephan Helma, wrote: > From the packages mentioned, the following are marked essential > (checked with `aptitude search '?priority(required)'`): > awk, coreutils, findutils, grep, login, sed > > The remaining packages packages are: > > binutils, ipro

Bug#1104427: release-notes: Removal of policykit-1-gnome

> Please mention in the release-notes the removal of policykit-1-gnome > AIUI This will leave XFCE desktop environment with no authentication agent. > On 30/04/2025 06:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> thunar Recommends: policykit-1-gnome | polkit-1-auth-agent > > The latter is a virtual package, wh

Bug#1104444: release-notes: request-tracker4 has been dropped

On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 23:28:01 +1200 Andrew Ruthven wrote: > request-tracker4 and extensions targetting RT4 won't be in trixie. They are > replaced by request-tracker5. Can we please include words like the below in > the > "Noteworthy obsolete packages" section: > > request-tracker4 has been r

Bug#1107587: chkrootkit: Missing 'strings' executable

On Sun, 15 Jun 2025, 14:27 Stephan Helma, wrote: > There might be even more. The `chkrootkit` skript mentions these > commands (on the right side the respective debian package is mentioned): > > Section below: > ## workaround for some Bourne shell implementations > unalias login > /dev/null 2>&1

Bug#1107573: release-notes: Document dropped cronjobs for trixie

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 01:56:27 +0200 (CEST) Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Several packages have dropped cronjobs in favour of systemd timers if someone provides a list of which packages did this, i can help write the text. I assume this should exclude packages that added a timer and made the cron-jo

Bug#1107587: chkrootkit: Missing 'strings' executable

On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 at 11:33, Stephan Helma wrote: > I did a default installation of 'chkrootkit' without installing the > recommended packages. > >* What was the outcome of this action? > I received an email with: > Today's run produced the following output: > --- [ BEGIN: cat /var/

Bug#1107331: logcheck-database: Many incorrect regular expressions

On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 at 05:51, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, Richard Lewis wrote: > It seems grep regards differently the command line pattern and the > -f patternfile. this looks like a bug in grep. perhaps you could report it to grep -- i suppose they never teste

Bug#1107331: logcheck-database: Many incorrect regular expressions

On Thu, 5 Jun 2025, 18:49 Gabor Kiss, wrote: > > > for f in * > do > echo $f > while read line > do > grep -E "$line" /dev/null 2>&1 > [[ "$?" = 2 ]] && echo $line > done < $f > done > IMHO it would be useful to exa

Bug#1106121: removal would affect other packages

On Tue, 27 May 2025 19:58:04 +0200 Thomas Lange wrote: > Hi, > > this bug also affects more packages that are not in the reverse dependency. > - chkrootkit_0.58b-4/debian/tests/control this is only used for autopkgtesting, any other dhcp server could be used (i wont bore you with the details) --

Bug#1106816: allow commands to be broken over multiple lines with a \

On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 09:09, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 12:06:00AM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > could you make the bts support a \ as a continuation character so > > commands can be split over lines? > Could you send an email from gmail to this bu

Bug#1106574: release-notes FTBFS with gbp buildpackage

> > Is there a file "debian/compat"? > > > > This file is obsolete. Please use debhelper-compat (=13) in debian/control. Found some other issues -- - most of debian/rules can replaced with a simple call to dh - missing build-dep on git (Makefile uses it to set the last-modified date) - the build o

Bug#1105792: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Mathias Gibbens ) (Bug#1105792: fixed in logcheck 1.4.5)

On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, 07:05 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello, > I just installed it and will report if anything happens. > > Just to let you know, when installing the following was printed: > > logcheck.service is a disabled or a static unit not running, not starting > it. > i think that's expecte

Bug#1106667: logcheck: apparently uses systemd rather than cron, but it is undocumented

On Tue, 27 May 2025, 16:01 Francesco Potortì, wrote: > Package: logcheck > Version: 1.4.4 > Severity: normal > > After the latest upgrade, I receive reports every hour rather than every > day as usual. I changed the /etc/cron.d/logcheck crontab to revert to the > previous behaviour, but nothing

Bug#1106816: allow commands to be broken over multiple lines with a \

Package: debbugs Version: 2.6.2 Severity: wishlist Hi, could you make the bts support a \ as a continuation character so commands can be split over lines? some software wrap long lines at spaces, which makes it impossible to use commands like "subject" or "forwarded" with long arguments eg from

Bug#1030041: release-notes: offer deb22 format for apt sources

On Sat, 24 May 2025, 15:49 Justin B Rye, wrote: > "sudo apt modernize-sources" > > > The Release Notes still need at least a mention of this issue and the > modernize-sources solution; example deb822 sources are annoyingly > longwinded, but I suppose we can get away with just pointing at >

Bug#1106574: release-notes FTBFS with gbp buildpackage

package: release-notes severity: minor trying to build with "gbp buildpackage", i get a failure due to a missing build-dependency on git and debian/compat specifies debhelper level 5, but debian/control is asking for 13 The Makefile uses git on line 8 to set the DATE: I think the Makefile should

Bug#1106405: release-notes: 4.2.1. title states 'to' instead of 'from'

On Sat, 24 May 2025 at 15:01, Justin B Rye wrote: > > Richard Lewis wrote: > > Sistemas Jaguar, wrote: > >> The title of section 4.2.1 is inconsistent with section 4.2. > >> > >>4.2 Upgrades from Debian 12 (bookworm) > >>4.2.1. Upgr

Bug#1106405: release-notes: 4.2.1. title states 'to' instead of 'from'

On Sat, 24 May 2025, 14:15 Sistemas Jaguar, wrote: > Package: release-notes > Severity: minor > > The title of section 4.2.1 is inconsistent with section 4.2. > >4.2 Upgrades from Debian 12 (bookworm) >4.2.1. Upgrade to Debian 12 (bookworm) > > The use of 'to' here is inconsistent an

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 20:19, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Richard, > Am Wed, May 21, 2025 at 05:48:43PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > cant hurt - you can also do this locally: > > > > systemctl edit logcheck > > # in the editor add: > > [Servic

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Tue, 20 May 2025, 17:29 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:41:15AM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 20:04, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > > > > > control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible > > >

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 20:04, Mathias Gibbens wrote: > > control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible > > Having reviewed the messages so far in this bug report, it's clear > that something different is happening when logcheck runs under the > systemd timer/service, but not cron. However, we don't

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 16:36, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 10:18:59PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 21:35, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > I would suggest to install a machine with local exim (per debcon

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 12:29, Marc Haber wrote: > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 06:58:56PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > >There is a known 'incompatibility' between systemd and exim that both > >upstreams have explicitly declined to address - but it's > >not c

Bug#1106030: logcheck: mails from the systemd timer are delayed by up to 30 mins

package: logcheck version: 1.4.4 (following investigation of #1105792 , which i could not reproduce - but maybe this is relevant) This assumes exim, but i believe applies to postfix as well. The systemd timer works "fine", but the mail is actually being delayed. If you do # tail -n0 -f /var/log

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025 at 21:35, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 07:01:34PM + schrieb Helge Kreutzmann: > > Hello Richard, > > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 07:12:15PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > > i think what i need to know i

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 18:02 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 05:41:49PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 17:22 Helge Kreutzmann, > wrote: > > > Yes, now the subject is Reboot: > > > > > > I dont

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 17:22 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 02:40:04PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 14:28 Richard Lewis, < > > richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 May 2025,

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 14:28 Richard Lewis, < richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 14:14 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > >> Hello Richard, >> Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 01:18:57PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: >> > On Sun, 18 May 2025,

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 14:14 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Sun, May 18, 2025 at 01:18:57PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sun, 18 May 2025, 12:37 Helge Kreutzmann, > wrote: > > > > > > > > root@twentytwo:~# cat /etc/cron.d/logchec

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sun, 18 May 2025, 12:37 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > > root@twentytwo:~# cat /etc/cron.d/logcheck > # /etc/cron.d/logcheck: crontab entries for the logcheck package > # These do nothing under systemd because the systemd timer will take > precedence > > PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/

Bug#1105920: chkrootkit: please use dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) mv_conffile, instead of issuing a warning

On Sat, 17 May 2025, 11:09 Martin-Éric Racine, wrote: > Package: chkrootkit > Version: 0.57-2+b5 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: martin-eric.rac...@iki.fi > > Setting up chkrootkit (0.57-2+b5) ... > WARNING: /etc/chkrootkit.conf is deprecated. Please put your settings in > /etc/chkrootkit/chkr

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sat, 17 May 2025 at 17:14, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Am Sat, May 17, 2025 at 05:44:03PM +0200 schrieb Marc Haber: > > On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 01:44:57PM +, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > In /etc/exim4 three files mention procmail: > > > > > > exim4-config: /etc/exim4/conf.d/transport/30_exim

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sat, 17 May 2025, 11:18 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Sat, May 17, 2025 at 11:12:05AM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Sat, 17 May 2025, 09:30 Helge Kreutzmann, > wrote: > > > Am Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:35:14PM + schrieb Helge Kreutzmann: >

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Sat, 17 May 2025, 09:30 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:35:14PM + schrieb Helge Kreutzmann: > > Am Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:58:44PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/logcheck/-/blob/debian/s

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Fri, 16 May 2025, 18:40 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > Am Fri, May 16, 2025 at 06:02:55PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Fri, 16 May 2025, 17:29 Helge Kreutzmann, > wrote: > > > > > Hello Richard, > > > first of all, to test other

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Fri, 16 May 2025, 17:29 Helge Kreutzmann, wrote: > Hello Richard, > first of all, to test other configuration, I downgraded logcheck to > the previous version - now everything is back to normal. So this is not > an exim issue or so, but is clearly caused by the updated package. > (Logcheck > i

Bug#1097920: splint: ftbfs with GCC-15

On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:54:42 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:splint > Version: 1:3.1.2+dfsg-5 > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-15/g++-15, but succeeds to build with gcc-14/g++-14. The > severity of this report will be raised before the forky

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 19:58, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Hello Richard, > Am Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:55:48PM +0100 schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:36, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > > > Since todays update of logcheck I get every message tw

Bug#1105792: logcheck: Exim print panic since upgrade and messages appear twice

On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:36, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Since todays update of logcheck I get every message twice, does message mean every email, email from logcheck, or line in the logceck report? is this perhaps because logcheck is reporting messages that are in the journal and rsyslog? (it s

Bug#1105709: tiger: FTBFS with make --shuffle=reverse: install: cannot create regular file 'debian/tiger//usr/share/man/man8': No such file or directory

control: tags -1 patch On Tue, 13 May 2025, 20:23 Lucas Nussbaum, wrote: > > This package fails to build with make --shuffle=reverse. confirmed: in Makefile.in the install target depends on installdirs installbinaries installconfig installmanpages but each install should depend on installdirs as

Bug#1097997: tiger: ftbfs with GCC-15

control: tags -1 + patch thanks On Mon, 17 Feb 2025, 18:00 Matthias Klose, wrote: > > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-15 The attached patch should fix this The failure is because in c/md5.c the PROTO_LIST macro removes the arguments unless PROTOTYPES is

Bug#1105103: ifpromisc: output is incomplete

package: chkrootkit version: 0.58b-4 severity: normal tags: upstream ifpromisc (the 'sniffer' test) does not report all 'packet sniffers' that it detected A standard desktop with network manager and wifi has 4 processes with sockets listening on network interfaces, 2 from NetworkManager and 2 fro

Bug#1104798: git-buildpackage: s/sets both/both sets/ in git-pbuilder(1)

On Tue, 6 May 2025, 18:09 Andrew Sayers, < 2025-bugs.debian@pileofstuff.org> wrote: > > > `man git-pbuilder` contains the following sentence: > > For a cowbuilder builder, this sets both the base path and is passed as the > --architecture option. > > That would be more readable as "... this bo

Bug#1099871: chkrootkit: some issues with ifpromisc

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 20:38, Peter Marschall wrote: > On Donnerstag, 13. März 2025 20:36:21 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Richard > Lewis wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025, 07:51 Peter Marschall, wrote: > > it would be good if the output of `ifpromisc` > > > would be so

Bug#1102259: cppcheck: fails to find libraries

On Fri, 18 Apr 2025, 10:30 Joachim Reichel, wrote: > > i think the message could be improved! > > > > > > It should be more like "Ignoring #include at line xxx" that would be a > lot > > more understandable > > Possibly. You could suggest that on the cppcheck mailinglist (maybe check > their >

Bug#1102259: cppcheck: fails to find libraries

On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, 20:37 Joachim Reichel, wrote: > Hi Richard, > > yes, that's expected as explained in the message from the second > invocation. hi - thanks for replying. > There is no default include path in cppcheck. You can add it explicitly, > but > typically you don't want to check th

Bug#1102259: cppcheck: fails to find libraries

Package: cppcheck Version: 2.10-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, Is it expected that cppcheck fails to find any standard include files? $ cat foo.c #include void main(void){} $ cppcheck --enable=all foo.c nofile:0:0: information: Cppcheck ca

Bug#1100699: screen: hardcopy and screen-exchange are insecure by default

On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:59:50 -0400 =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= wrote: > On 2025-03-17 15:48:56, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > + possible data loss via a symlink attack > > The screen-exchange feature (">" in copy mode) is also insecure: > Is it worth keeping screen in Debian at all? i switche

  1   2   3   4   5   >