Bug#1099871: chkrootkit: some issues with ifpromisc

2025-04-20 Thread Richard Lewis
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 at 20:38, Peter Marschall wrote: > On Donnerstag, 13. März 2025 20:36:21 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Richard > Lewis wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Mar 2025, 07:51 Peter Marschall, wrote: > > it would be good if the output of `ifpromisc` > > > would be so

Bug#1102259: cppcheck: fails to find libraries

2025-04-18 Thread Richard Lewis
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025, 10:30 Joachim Reichel, wrote: > > i think the message could be improved! > > > > > > It should be more like "Ignoring #include at line xxx" that would be a > lot > > more understandable > > Possibly. You could suggest that on the cppcheck mailinglist (maybe check > their >

Bug#1102259: cppcheck: fails to find libraries

2025-04-15 Thread Richard Lewis
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025, 20:37 Joachim Reichel, wrote: > Hi Richard, > > yes, that's expected as explained in the message from the second > invocation. hi - thanks for replying. > There is no default include path in cppcheck. You can add it explicitly, > but > typically you don't want to check th

Bug#1102259: cppcheck: fails to find libraries

2025-04-06 Thread Richard Lewis
Package: cppcheck Version: 2.10-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, Is it expected that cppcheck fails to find any standard include files? $ cat foo.c #include void main(void){} $ cppcheck --enable=all foo.c nofile:0:0: information: Cppcheck ca

Bug#1100699: screen: hardcopy and screen-exchange are insecure by default

2025-04-05 Thread Richard Lewis
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:59:50 -0400 =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= wrote: > On 2025-03-17 15:48:56, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > + possible data loss via a symlink attack > > The screen-exchange feature (">" in copy mode) is also insecure: > Is it worth keeping screen in Debian at all? i switche

Bug#1102018: utmp in trixie

2025-04-04 Thread Richard Lewis
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.general as well. Holger Levsen writes: > package: releasenotes > x-debbugs-cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org > > On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 03:27:05PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote > Message-ID: <7

Bug#1102005: webext-ublock-origin-chromium: No longer supported by latest chromium :(

2025-04-03 Thread Richard Lewis
Package: webext-ublock-origin-chromium Version: 1.46.0+dfsg-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, The latest upgrade of chromium considers the ublock plugin unsupported. I was able to re-enable following the instructions in a comment here: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues

Bug#1101186: editorconfig-core: Fails to build

2025-03-27 Thread Richard Lewis
you can fix this FTBFS by changing the version of cmake in the 3 files in test/cmake/*.cmake -cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.5) +cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.25) works for me -- 3.5 is apparently no longer supported by cmake. bookworm has cmake version 3.25

Bug#1099871: chkrootkit: some issues with ifpromisc

2025-03-13 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 9 Mar 2025, 07:51 Peter Marschall, wrote: > > when running chkrootkit using `chkrootkit-daily` in diff mode, ifpromisc > sometimes raised an alert because of its output appears in a different > order. > this is why we have the diff mode and the filtering mechanism, to avoid this kind of

Bug#1096108: docs look ancient on first view

2025-02-16 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025, 14:51 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, < jo...@debian.org> wrote: > I intend to do a major rewrite of the first part of the man > page for Trixie. I think the man-page for sbuild is no worse than other docs in debian (which doesnt say much, but i dont think you should worr

Bug#1085646:

2025-02-11 Thread Richard Lewis
I also just hit something like this -- /dev/shm had somehow been unmounted (not due to sbuild) and so the chroot could not be unpacked --- the build fails but there was no info about why, not even "could not unpack the chroot", so something is throwing away the error message

Bug#355549: checksecurity: Checking for incorrect md5sums

2025-02-05 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:07:50 +0100 =?utf-8?B?0L3QsNCx?= < nabijaczlew...@nabijaczleweli.xyz> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:55:00PM +0200, Panu Kalliokoski wrote: > > Here is a simple script (in shell) to list files that have conflicting > > md5sums from those in the package: > Or, you know >

Bug#1087512: ITS: checksecurity

2025-02-05 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 13:14, Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:41:37AM + schrieb Richard Lewis: > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 10:39, Richard Lewis > > wrote: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/checksecurity/-/merge_requests/1 > >

Bug#1092611: checksecurity: piuparts testing shows a regression (blocks testing migration)

2025-02-05 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 21:06:14 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote: > Package: checksecurity > Version: 2.0.17 > Severity: serious > Tags: security > X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net,ti...@debian.org > > Hi > > The 2.0.17 upload cannot migrate to testing, since piuparts reports a > regression for it. The (hopef

Bug#1093596: chkrootkit autopkgtest failure when not running dhclient

2025-02-05 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 20:54, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 04:07:31PM +0000, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > This is not really about debusine. It is about autopkgtest in general. > > > If you happen to set up an autopkgtest image that happens to not use &g

Bug#1093596: chkrootkit autopkgtest failure when not running dhclient

2025-02-04 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025, 20:34 Helmut Grohne, wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Thanks for picking up my report and implementing a more robust solution. > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:35:24AM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > Does the version at > > https://salsa.debian.org/rpil2/chk

Bug#1095132: tracker.debian.org: patch to forward upstream should not appear if patch has Applied-Upstream

2025-02-04 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025, 11:21 Raphael Hertzog, wrote: > On Tue, 04 Feb 2025, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I tend to agree with you but this is under control of UDD and AFAIK UDD > > is just applying what's documented in DEP-3. There have been suggestions > > to update DEP-3 regarding this but nothing h

Bug#1073927: autopkgtest: --shell and --shell-fail are broken

2025-01-29 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:34:57 +0200 Paride Legovini wrote: > On 2024-06-20 13:12, Paul Gevers wrote: > > Some time ago, I already experienced on my own laptop that --shell and > > --shell-fail didn't work anymore I see this with lxc, she shell starts, but it seems to hang wiating for input once y

Bug#1093596: chkrootkit autopkgtest failure when not running dhclient

2025-01-27 Thread Richard Lewis
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:04:53 +0100 Helmut Grohne wrote: > chkrootkit fails its autopkgtest when the containment environment is not > running dhclient. > If instead running systemd-networkd, the output looks like this: > > https://debusine.debian.net/debusine/System/artifact/1204564/raw/1774387/t

Bug#1094414: sbuild: The --purge-build=never option doesnt work with schroot

2025-01-27 Thread Richard Lewis
Package: sbuild Version: 0.88.1~bpo12+1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, This may be a local issue as im running the sbuild from git, commit 39120d92, but on stable: If i run sbuild with --chroot-mode=schroot --purge-build=never then /var/lib/sb

Bug#1094175: ITP: linux-os-updater -- Linux OS Updater. This is a package updating system designed to ease the update process for most Linux distributions efficiently.

2025-01-25 Thread Richard Lewis
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.general as well. Crypticverse writes: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Crypticverse > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, crypticvers...@gmail.com > > * Package name

Bug#1093896: isc-dhcp: autopkgtests fail with autopkgtest-virt-unshare

2025-01-23 Thread Richard Lewis
Source: isc-dhcp Version: 4.4.3-P1-5 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, The client-server autopkgtest for isc-dhcp fails when run in an 'unshare' 'container' as it can't create a netns: Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ... autopkgtest [20:39:58

Bug#1093377: mailutils: git repository on salsa seems to be corrupt

2025-01-17 Thread Richard Lewis
Package: mailutils Version: 1:3.15-4 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, there seems to be some issue with the git repository on salsa: git clone --config transfer.fsckobjects=true https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mailutils.git mailutils Cloni

Bug#1083102: trixie: last and lastlog are gone

2025-01-17 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 00:38:38 +0200 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 07:57:04PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote: > > I think the advice for most users would be that they dont need to do > > anything else > > Yes. My idea was that actually caring sites probabl

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

2024-12-30 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 21:15:34 + Richard Lewis wrote: > On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 22:40:51 + Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:43:18PM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > [...] > > > I think all it needs is > > > /etc/systemd/system/chk

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

2024-12-28 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 22:40:51 + Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:43:18PM +0000, Richard Lewis wrote: > > [...] > > I think all it needs is > > /etc/systemd/system/chkrootkit.service.d/override.conf with > > > > [Service] > > ProtectSyste

Bug#1091170: [SPAM] Bug#1091170: sbuild: unsbale to update unshare chroots, or use them if $apt_update=0

2024-12-27 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 at 07:21, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > > >If i set $apt_update=0 ... then --run-autopkgtest doesnt work, > > > >If i add --skip=cleanup/apt/lists to mmdebstrap it all works again > > > This seems to all work as expected, can you describe how you think it > > >

Bug#1035401: Fwd: release-notes | upgrading.rst: Mention tmux in preference to screen (!213)

2024-12-24 Thread Richard Lewis
Hi Romain, Is a tmux client from bookworm able to connect to a server from trixie? In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035401 it was requested that the release notes suggest doing the upgrade in tmux ( in preference/as an alternagive to screen, which has been suggested for many

Bug#1089105: [SPAM] Bug#1089105: Broken chroot after an upgrade

2024-12-24 Thread Richard Lewis
On Fri, 06 Dec 2024 08:57:03 +0100 Julien Puydt wrote: > Le jeudi 05 décembre 2024 à 19:09 +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof a écrit : > > * Julien Puydt [2024-12-05 18:52]: > Solution A. > (1) changing the first paragraph to explain that's how it has to be > done (not just "recommends") ; > (2) and

Bug#1091170: [SPAM] Bug#1091170: sbuild: unsbale to update unshare chroots, or use them if $apt_update=0

2024-12-24 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024, 13:21 Jochen Sprickerhof, wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Hi Richard, > > * Richard Lewis [2024-12-22 20:43]: > >I make a chroot with > >mmdebstrap --variant=buildd bookworm > --include=eatmydata,debhelper,fakeroot,apt-utils > ~

Bug#1035401: tmux as an alternative to screen

2024-12-23 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 3 May 2023 22:09:44 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 02-05-2023 22:52, Marc Haber wrote: > > the release notes in the "preparing a safe environment" chapter > > recommend running in screen. Since tmux has reached some matureness in > > the mean time, it might be a good idea to mention

Bug#977358: release-notes: document how to make the rescue mode usable if no root password is set (buster)

2024-12-23 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sat, 03 Jun 2023 13:10:09 +0100 > Although this was documented for bullseye, the underlying cause > remains, and I think that it could be valuable for users to continue > to have this documentation available. > I've tested that the previously-added guidance from the bullseye > release notes re

Bug#1054019: broken sample rate passthrough

2024-12-23 Thread Richard Lewis
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 10:04:18 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?RHlsYW4gQcOvc3Np?= wrote: > Le mar. 17 oct. 2023 à 19:59, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit : > > 0.3.82-1~bpo12+1 solves the bug :) > > Great! :-) > > > Rather than close this bug as fixed right away, do you think it would be > > worthwhile to keep it open

Bug#930318: Suggestion for i386/amd64 "PC"

2024-12-23 Thread Richard Lewis
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:29:34 +0900 hox...@noramail.jp wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 10:01:25PM +0900, hox...@noramail.jp wrote: > > > en/whats-new.dbk: "Supported architectures" section > > > 1. 32-bit PC (i386) and 64-bit PC (amd64) > > > 2. 64-bit ARM (arm64) > > > > "arm64" is not Debian ar

Bug#708982: release-notes: l is difficult to distinguish from I or | (at least in the html version)

2024-12-23 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 23:58:03 +0200 Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 02 dec 14, 08:25:07, Niels Thykier wrote: > > On Mon, 20 May 2013 02:18:35 +0300 Andrei POPESCU > > wrote: > > > In the paragraph describing how to find big packages with aptitude there > > > is an occurrence of 'l' which is very ha

Bug#1043043: UDD patches: marks Forwarded as invalid if not 'no', 'not-needed', 'yes' or URL

2024-12-22 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 22:32:54 +0100 Richard Lewis wrote: > On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 01:19:38 +0200 Guillem Jover wrote: > > > On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 23:35:27 -0300, David da Silva Polverari wrote: > > > > When using https://udd.debian.org/patches.cgi, I notice that whenever &

Bug#1091170: sbuild: unsbale to update unshare chroots, or use them if $apt_update=0

2024-12-22 Thread Richard Lewis
Package: sbuild Version: 0.86.3~bpo12+2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, I make a chroot with mmdebstrap --variant=buildd bookworm --include=eatmydata,debhelper,fakeroot,apt-utils ~/.cache/sbuild/bookworm-amd64.tar \ http://deb.debian.org/deb

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

2024-12-11 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 at 15:53, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 01:10:16PM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, 09:10 Julian Gilbey, wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 10:45:40PM +, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > On Mon

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

2024-12-10 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, 09:10 Julian Gilbey, wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 10:45:40PM +0000, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2024, 12:42 Julian Gilbey, wrote: > > chkrootkit updates the > > access times of all the files in /tmp > > it to that time a

Bug#1089588: chkrootkit: updates access times of /tmp/* and lots more, breaking systemd-tmpfiles

2024-12-09 Thread Richard Lewis
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024, 12:42 Julian Gilbey, wrote: > Package: chkrootkit > Version: 0.58b-3 > Severity: normal > > I was wondering why my /tmp is never cleared by systemd-tmpfiles, and > tried playing around with the settings in /etc/tmpfiles.d, but it > didn't help. > > I then discovered the source

Bug#1031086: piupart: fails in many packages for /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/e2scrub_reap.service not owned that is not related to package tested

2024-12-07 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 16:12:57 -0700 Manphiz wrote: > I've been dealing with similar spurious error of piuparts when testing > some packages that it reports that package purging left files on system: > > , > | 0m45.6s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on system: > | /etc/default/locale -

Bug#482020: Fwd: avahi riles fo logcheck (Re: Wish for logcheck whitelists)

2024-12-05 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 20 May 2008 18:19:15 +1000 "Trent W. Buck" wrote: > Currently, avahi-daemon provides no > /etc/logcheck/*.d.ignore/avahi-daemon files I believe this is not in debian, but if https://salsa.debian.org/debian/logcheck/-/merge_requests/23 gets merged logcheck will include avahi rules equival

Bug#1084672: git-buildpackage: removal of Python standard libraries in Python 3.13

2024-12-01 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:31:22 -0800 =?UTF-8?B?T3R0byBLZWvDpGzDpGluZW4=?= < o...@debian.org> wrote: > From https://peps.python.org/pep-0594/#pipes > > > The pipes module provides helpers to pipe the input of one command into the output of another > > command. The module is built on top of os.popen. U

Bug#774779: bash: diff for NMU version 5.2.32-1.1

2024-11-26 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, 11:39 Matthias Klose, wrote: > On 24.11.24 11:15, Baptiste Beauplat wrote: > > Control: tags 774779 + pending > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for bash (versioned as 5.2.32-1.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I > > shoul

Bug#1088179: git-buildpackage: should allow a clean up of export_dir on build failure

2024-11-24 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:04:40 + Richard Lewis wrote: > If the builder fails, or is interrupted the export_dir > is not removed. > https://salsa.debian.org/agx/git-buildpackage/-/blob/master/gbp/scripts/buildpackage.py > lines 689-611 > > if not options.tag_only: > if o

Bug#1088011: base-files: please remove mesg from dot.profile "mesg" binary but it was removed from util-linux in Trixie

2024-11-24 Thread Richard Lewis
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024, 13:33 Santiago Vila wrote: > El 21/11/24 a las 22:01, Chris Hofstaedtler escribió: > > Will installs that have not changed /root/.profile automatically get > > the updated file, or do they need to manually change it? > > Actually, I have to look carefully at that. > > That was

Bug#1088179: git-buildpackage: should allow a clean up of export_dir on build failure

2024-11-24 Thread Richard Lewis
Package: git-buildpackage Version: 0.9.30 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, If the builder fails, or is interrupted the export_dir is not removed. While i can see why you might want that, it has never been useful to me -- the failure is often in a

Bug#1041275: sbuild: Using eatmydata with the unshare backend

2024-11-23 Thread Richard Lewis
On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 at 22:56, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Richard Lewis (2024-11-22 23:14:48) > > It shows time is lost throughout, > > I suppose i will try and make a larger tmpfs to use. I remounted /dev/shm larger, it helped, a bit > could it be th

Bug#1041275: sbuild: Using eatmydata with the unshare backend

2024-11-22 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 23:03, Richard Lewis wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 at 22:30, Richard Lewis > wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Nov 2024, 13:10 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, > > wrote: > >> Maybe run sbuild --verbose under > >> annotate-output? It sh

Bug#1041275: sbuild: Using eatmydata with the unshare backend

2024-11-21 Thread Richard Lewis
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 at 22:30, Richard Lewis wrote: > On Mon, 18 Nov 2024, 13:10 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, > wrote: >> thank you for following up. thank *you* for your help >> Can you compare build logs between your schroot build and the unshare build >> to

Bug#1041275: sbuild: Using eatmydata with the unshare backend

2024-11-18 Thread Richard Lewis
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024, 13:10 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, < jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > thank you for following up. > > Quoting Richard Lewis (2024-11-18 09:55:08) > > > Wow, this is wild. Your directory schroot with overlayfs is about half >

Bug#1041275: sbuild: Using eatmydata with the unshare backend

2024-11-18 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 at 11:29, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Richard Lewis (2024-11-17 11:24:24) > > I second this request. If /dev/shm is not large enough you get weird errors, > > and not everyone will want /tmp to be a tmpfs, or to use /tmp at all > >

Bug#1087692: sbuild: provide a way to apply a timeout to piuparts and autopkgtests

2024-11-18 Thread Richard Lewis
This works great thanks. ill add this to the debian wiki page. On Sun, 17 Nov 2024, 17:20 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, < jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Quoting Richard Lewis (2024-11-17 11:43:11) > > $stalled_pkg_timeout terminates the build after inactivi

Bug#1041275: sbuild: Using eatmydata with the unshare backend

2024-11-18 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024, 21:05 Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues, < jo...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Quoting Richard Lewis (2024-11-17 20:20:40) > > > I'm not familiar with eatmydata but as far as I understand the docs > you run > > > something under

Bug#1087475: logcheck-database: pdns rules

2024-11-17 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 17 Nov 2024, 10:14 Kiss Gabor (Bitman), wrote: > On Sun, 17 Nov 2024, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > > > > Some random examples not covered by the patterns: > > > > > > 2024-10-27T08:00:17.063308+01:00 tivald pdns_server[53800]: Done > launch

Bug#1041275: sbuild: Using eatmydata with the unshare backend

2024-11-17 Thread Richard Lewis
Package: sbuild Version: 0.86.3~bpo12+1 Followup-For: Bug #1041275 X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com I second this request. If /dev/shm is not large enough you get weird errors, and not everyone will want /tmp to be a tmpfs, or to use /tmp at all I like the idea of unshare but it

Bug#1087475: logcheck-database: pdns rules

2024-11-17 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 at 18:43, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: > On Sat, 16 Nov 2024, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > Powerdns server log format is probably changed. Service name is no > > > simple "pdns" any more but "pdns_server". > > > > can you e

Bug#1078165: Thank-you! (was: Re: autopkgtest-virt-lxc/bookworm: can no longer test trixie/sid)

2024-11-16 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 15:21:45 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote: > Actual result: bookworm testbed succeeds. sid and trixie testbeds fail > with an error message similar to: > > > : failure: (down) ['mkdir', '-m', '777', > > '/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc./downtmp'] failed (exit status 1, stderr > > 'mkdir

Bug#1072715: make it easier to change autopkgtest backends

2024-11-16 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 06 Jun 2024 23:23:16 +0100 Richard Lewis wrote: > I was thinking you could support a syntax like: > > $autopkgtest_backend="schroot" # default backend > $autopkgtest_root_args=$autopkgtest_root_args_hash[X]; > $autopkgtest_opts=$autopkgtest_opts_args_h

Bug#944102: RE: create sources.list with signed-by

2024-11-16 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sat, 05 Aug 2023 23:36:41 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > I think this proposal to use "signed-by" is a good idea. Me too! > > But if you ever make such support, please consider to use deb822 style file > instead of one-line old style. Me too! The following debian.sources file might be a

Bug#1087475: logcheck-database: pdns rules

2024-11-16 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 07:03:14 +0100 Gabor Kiss wrote: (I dont know why, but gmail did not send me this bug report, although it made it to the bts. hopefully the reply works ok!) > Powerdns server log format is probably changed. Service name is no > simple "pdns" any more but "pdns_server". can

Bug#1087512: ITS: checksecurity

2024-11-15 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024, 23:01 Andreas Tille, wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Am Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 05:57:47PM + schrieb Richard Lewis: > > This is great news. Ive been using a local fork for a while -- i assumed > > this package was dead > > Well, what about if you take

Bug#1086341: logcheck-database: systemd rules - Consumed CPU time change

2024-11-14 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 11:58:34 +1100 Craig Small wrote: > The logcheck rule for system CPU time misses the new memory peak part. > > Current line in ignore.d.server/systemd: > # possibly > https://sources.debian.org/src/systemd/252.4-1/src/core/unit.c/#L2307 (line > 2474 converts the "consumed"->

Bug#1087512: ITS: checksecurity

2024-11-14 Thread Richard Lewis
This is great news. Ive been using a local fork for a while -- i assumed this package was dead https://salsa.debian.org/rpil2/checksecurity feel free to use any of this in debian. On Thu, 14 Nov 2024, 15:09 Andreas Tille, wrote: > Source: checksecurity > Version: 2.0.16+nmu4 > Severity: import

Bug#1086341: logcheck-database: systemd rules - Consumed CPU time change

2024-11-10 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 01:09, Craig Small wrote: > ^([[:alpha:]]{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11}|[0-9T:.+-]{32}) [._[:alnum:]-]+ > systemd\[[0-9]+\]: [^ ]+: Consumed .+ CPU time(, .+ memory peak)?\.$ Agree. Will fix this - it seems that it only sometimes prints the memory peak

Bug#215640: wontfix, but patches considered

2024-11-10 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:26:44 +0200 martin f krafft wrote: > tags 215640 help wontfix > thanks > > I won't fix this but will gladly consider patches. I think this should just be closed, the manpage has been amended in the last 20 years

Bug#165449: logcheck: Trigger values support for some strings

2024-11-10 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:20:28 +0100 Erich Schubert wrote: > > I don't think that logcheck is the right place for tigger vaules, as I > > would like to keep logcheck as simple as possible. Would it be ok if I > > closed this wishlist bug ? > > No, please keep it open. Maybe tag it wontfix if you thi

Bug#198762: I was running my own syslog-summary

2024-11-09 Thread Richard Lewis
> https://git.alphanet.ch/gitweb/?p=various;a=blob;f=logcheck/syslog-summary;h=dcfe82b9ab2065309dc39f929d0d5c9055c75f55;hb=HEAD > (as above, we wouldn't want to include any syslog-summary in the debian package but we should keep the support for such local scripts: i think it should still work if t

Bug#1086598: apt-listchanges: Unable to retrieve changelog for package linux-image-amd64

2024-11-01 Thread Richard Lewis
Package: apt-listchanges Version: 3.24 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, Reporting in case this is helpful, but feel free to close if it is too hard to investigate, as i dont think it's reproducble, and is from stable: I just upgraded linux-imag

Bug#1077187: procps: please drop/replace the obsolete sysctl.conf(5) man page

2024-10-24 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024, 10:33 Craig Small, wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 at 19:43, Craig Small wrote: > >> There should be a note in sysctl.conf stating this is for procps sysctl, >> I'll add that. >> > > https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/commit/ec590d5145668ea1868e1787c272d329ce5feba1 > Coul

Bug#1083102: trixie: last and lastlog are gone

2024-10-03 Thread Richard Lewis
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.documentation as well. Chris Hofstaedtler writes: > util-linux used to ship three vaguely related programs: last, lastb, and > lastlog. In trixie, they are gone. Is this true on all architec

Bug#1082788: chkrootkit: README.FALSE-POSITIVES documentation for bindshell is incomplete

2024-09-29 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 26 Sept 2024 at 11:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > It is difficult to regard > Checking `bindshell'... not found > Checking `bindshell'... WARNING > WARNING: Potential bindshell installed: infected ports: 60001 > as e

Bug#1082802: apt-listchanges: please drop current NEWS entry before the trixie release

2024-09-29 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 26 Sep 2024, 17:57 Paul Gevers, wrote: > Hi, > > On 26-09-2024 18:34, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > > Having said that, (a) I am wary of the hubris of thinking that this is > > going to be a completely seamless and invisible change that people don't > > need to be notified about, and (b) anybo

Bug#1082087: chkrootkit's autopkg tests fail on amd64, arm64 and riscv64

2024-09-23 Thread Richard Lewis
control: tags -1 pending bug is fixed in the git repos On Sat, 21 Sep 2024, 23:21 Richard Lewis, < richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sept 2024 at 08:57, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > On 18.09.24 20:03, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > Thanks, t

Bug#1082087: chkrootkit's autopkg tests fail on amd64, arm64 and riscv64

2024-09-21 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 19 Sept 2024 at 08:57, Matthias Klose wrote: > > On 18.09.24 20:03, Richard Lewis wrote: > > Thanks, this is a consequence of the 64 bit time_t transition which has > > replaced the wtmp/utmp/lastlog files > > the 64bit time_t transition affected 32bit architecture

Bug#1082087: chkrootkit's autopkg tests fail on amd64, arm64 and riscv64

2024-09-18 Thread Richard Lewis
Thanks, this is a consequence of the 64 bit time_t transition which has replaced the wtmp/utmp/lastlog files i am a little surprised those running the transition did not file bugs against affected packages when the new packages were uploaded, (especially as i suggested chkrootkit would be affected

Bug#1081939: logcheck ignores -t flag for systemd journal

2024-09-17 Thread Richard Lewis
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024, 09:51 Andrea Janna, wrote: > > > When logcheck is invoked with -t flag it should not update the offset of > the log files. This works for regular log files but the flag is ineffective > (the offset is updated anyway) when logcheck reads the log from systemd > journal. > The a

Bug#1079830: Please support tab-completing `sudo somecmd /path/private/[tab]` if `~/.sudo_as_admin_successful`

2024-09-09 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024, 23:21 Josh Triplett, wrote: > Package: bash-completion > Version: 1:2.14.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@joshtriplett.org > > If the user has sudo access (`~/.sudo_as_admin_successful` exists), and > they're tab-completing a command starting with `sudo` (to guar

Bug#1017749: marked as done (certbot: /usr/share/doc/certbot/README.rst.gz is not useful for Debian users)

2024-09-09 Thread Richard Lewis
> the Debian Bug report #1017749, > regarding certbot: /usr/share/doc/certbot/README.rst.gz is not useful for > Debian users > to be marked as done. > Hi, im not the bug submitter but i'd like to ask you to reconsider closing this bug. This bug is about the documention and informaton that debia

Bug#1026379: skel.bashrc: please add foot to the color_prompt=yes check

2024-09-09 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 5 Sep 2024, 16:06 Jonatas, wrote: > It would be a great idea to enable color and configure the title > regardless of the terminal used. > Surely Debian already does this for terminals that properly implement the standard methods of declaring what colors they support. eg if "tput setaf"

Bug#1080476: logcheck: Typo "logfiled.d" in error msg

2024-09-09 Thread Richard Lewis
control: close -1 thanks Hi debBug, you reported a bug but it is a duplicate of https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074262 You do need to check bugs are not already filed before reporting new ones, because it makes work for people doing triage, and also saves you making patches t

Bug#1080332: chkrootkit: chkutmp failure - obsolete as utmp is now disabled

2024-09-09 Thread Richard Lewis
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024, 16:54 Richard Lewis, < richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > As far as i could tell, chklastlog is not yet? affected. > Note to self: further investigation shows that chklastlog is actually in the same boat along with chkutmp and chkwtmp/ch

Bug#1080332: chkrootkit: chkutmp failure - obsolete as utmp is now disabled

2024-09-02 Thread Richard Lewis
On Mon, 2 Sep 2024, 12:21 Vincent Lefevre, wrote: > > With systemd 256.5-2, I now get: > > > Checking `chkutmp'... WARNING > > WARNING: chkutmp output: > failed opening utmp ! >

Bug#1025257: chkrootkit: Add possibility to skip large directory scans in find

2024-08-26 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:10:27 + Richard Lewis wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2022, 15:06 Peter Gervai, wrote: > > Would be nice to skip extremely large >directories which the admin choose > to skip in >the scan. > >Typical examples are /var/lib/backuppc or >similar back

Bug#1075883: chkrootkit: false positive for bindshell: actually mosh-server

2024-07-07 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 at 00:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2024-07-07 00:50:05 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > I got the following warning: > > > > -Checking `bindshell'... not found > > +Checking `bindshell'... WARNING > >

Bug#1070231: chkrootkit -s in man page: bad example and confusing

2024-06-29 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 2 May 2024 13:24:33 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > The "chkrootkit -s" example in the man page is > > chkrootkit -s '(systemd-netword|NetworkManager|wpa_supplicant)' > > but if an unrecognized packet sniffer is added on one of the > interfaces, it will not be detected. can you give an

Bug#1070152: chkrootkit: duplicate line from ifpromisc

2024-06-29 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 2 May 2024 13:50:27 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > The default filter is either doing too little or doing too much. That's a valid opinion, but there is no default that will pleases anyone. the current setting has been there for some years and works for the still-not-uncommon case that y

Bug#1033538: chkrootkit: Chkrootkit reports a false positive?

2024-06-29 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 07:56:48 +0200 Antonio wrote: > Thank Richard, > I will do some tests with the diff mode. > > For now, I changed /etc/chkrootkit/chkrootkit.conf: > > MAILTO="journal" > > - and added this on "/usr/sbin/chkrootkit-daily": > > if [ "$MAILTO" = "journal" ]; then >

Bug#1072801: ITP: lsix -- Show thumbnails in terminal using sixel graphics

2024-06-08 Thread Richard Lewis
Blair Noctis writes: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Blair Noctis > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, n...@sail.ng > > * Package name: lsix > Version : 1.8.2 > Upstream Contact: b9 > * URL : https://github.com/hackerb9/lsix > * License

Bug#1072715: make it easier to change autopkgtest backends

2024-06-06 Thread Richard Lewis
Package: sbuild Version: 0.85.0 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com Dear Maintainer, sbuild is really great. I have a small feature request to make it easier to navigate the autopkgtest options: In sbuild.conf i use $autopkgtest_root_args = ''; $autop

Bug#241787: options to seperate hosts and for log compaction would both be nice

2024-06-02 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sun, 12 May 2024 17:01:36 +0100 Richard Lewis wrote: > > This bug is nearly 20 years old. (It is a shame no-one replied - the links > > no longer work and there is not enough info recorded to action) > > > > Unless anyone is watching and can proivde more info about w

Bug#654557: logcheck-database: pure-ftpd rules need update

2024-06-01 Thread Richard Lewis
On Sat, 1 Jun 2024 at 14:21, Kiss Gabor (Bitman) wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Jun 2024, Richard Lewis wrote: > > > > does not cover log entry > > > > > > Jan 4 07:23:42 gatling pure-ftpd: (?@203.158.197.21) [INFO] Logout. > > > > > > The problem is w

Bug#651319: ignore.d.server/nagios: SERVICE FLAPPING line doesn't allow whitespace

2024-06-01 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:39:55 -0800 andrew bezella wrote: > Package: logcheck-database > Version: 1.3.13 > Severity: minor > > in most cases whitespace is allowed in SERVICE names, but for the > SERVICE FLAPPING ALERT it is not. using the cases where > whitespace is allowed as a template, i made t

Bug#591757: logcheck-database: please update ignore rules for nagios

2024-06-01 Thread Richard Lewis
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:28:16 +0200 Albert Dengg wrote: > please update the ignore rules for nagios: > nagios (at least nagios3) will write two lines for each passive > service check that it resives through nsca: > nagios3: EXTERNAL COMMAND: PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT;... > nagios3: PA

Bug#590677: [logcheck-database] additional rules for nagios/radius

2024-06-01 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:52:44 +0200 Hendrik Jaeger wrote: > Package: logcheck-database > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > > Hi, > > check_radius output filter: > > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ check_radius: rc_avpair_gen: > received VSA attribute with unknown Vendor-Id [[:digit:]]+$ A s

Bug#690607: logcheck-database: consider to add a line to ignore.d.server/cyrus-imapd

2024-06-01 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 03:04:36 +0200 Sebastian Steinhuber wrote: > Package: logcheck-database > Version: 1.3.15 > Severity: minor > Tags: patch > > Dear Maintainer, > to drop messages of the form: > > Oct 15 21:01:22 dds cyrus/cyr_expire[26497]: DIGEST-MD5 common mech free > > I added a line (#13) t

Bug#764062: logcheck-database: does not filter amavis CLEAN messages

2024-06-01 Thread Richard Lewis
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:57:07 +0200 =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgRHJvdWV0?= wrote: > ^\w{3} [ :[:digit:]]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ amavis\[[[:digit:]]+\]: > \([-[:digit:]]+\) Passed (CLEAN|SPAM(MY)?)( {RelayedInbound})?,( LOCAL)?( > \[(IPv6:)?[[:xdigit:].:]{3,39}\](:[[:xdigit:]]{0,5})?){0,2} <[^>]*> -> > <[^>

Bug#689418: logcheck-database: refine sendmail STARTTLS rule

2024-06-01 Thread Richard Lewis
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:28:24 +0200 > With sendmail, self-signed certificates trigger a warning like: > > | Oct 2 13:02:07 hostname sm-mta[24652]: STARTTLS=client, > relay=host.example., version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, > cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256 > > There is a logcheck rule for

Bug#632825: logcheck: New ignore rule for arpwatch

2024-06-01 Thread Richard Lewis
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:22:21 +0200 Wojciech Nizinski wrote: > Please add following ignore rule for arpwatch: > > ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ arpwatch: short \(want 42\)$ It's a shame no-one replied since 2011, Is there still interest in adding this rule to logcheck-database? it looks li

Bug#778905: logcheck: logging changes in spamd

2024-06-01 Thread Richard Lewis
control: tags -1 + moreinfo thanks On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 14:57:15 + Andrew Gallagher wrote: > spamd no longer suffixes "(closed before headers)" with "at /usr/sbin/spamd > line N" > > Updated rule attached. This may also apply to other errors that I haven't > been able to test yet. It's a

  1   2   3   4   >