Bug#1106545: ITA: rpy2 -- Python3 interface to the GNU R language and environment (version 2)

2025-05-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 ITA: rpy2 -- Python3 interface to GNU R I'm planning to work on this, possibly in debian-science. Do you have any existing work on 3.6, and if so where? (Salsa looks like you don't.)

Bug#1104495: [R-pkg-team] Bug#1104495: r-cran-httr2 intermittent test failures on riscv64

2025-05-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Thank you. On 05/05/2025 01:20, Charles Plessy wrote: So please feel free too go ahead. I intend to leave this until after release, since Normal bugs aren't supposed to be fixed during freeze. I have seen a value of 30 at the following line. https://github.com/r-lib/httr2/blob/main/test

Bug#1104495: #1104495 r-cran-httr2 intermittent test failures on riscv64

2025-05-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch I agree this is probably caused by the timeout being too short for slow hardware (such as the current riscv64 test runners). My (untested) attempt to increase the timeout is below. It's *not* an urgent problem, as retrying failures usually works. > Indeed it seems tha

Bug#1104454: r-cran-bslib: test fail - Undefined variable: "$transition-collapse-width"

2025-05-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 01/05/2025 10:47, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Is this a known bug in some older test runner? If so, is that fixed, so future failures will be correctly treated as failures? Yes, that's the r-cran-testthat issue mentioned earlier (*possibly* https://github.com/r-lib/testthat/issues/1997 ), fix

Bug#1104454: r-cran-bslib: test fail - Undefined variable: "$transition-collapse-width"

2025-05-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 pending On 30/04/2025 19:40, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: In the longer term, we probably also want a mechanism to remind us to do that if libjs-bootstrap4 is updated; I vaguely remember there being a static linking register for that purpose. It's https://salsa.debia

Bug#1104335: britney/debci: sometimes lists a non-regression fail as a regression

2025-05-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I've seen two more instances of this, r-bioc-keggrest/arm64 (https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-bioc-keggrest/testing/arm64/57700381/ listed as reference, underlying problem is #1104334) and r-cran-rmarkdown/arm64 (https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-cran-rmarkdown/testing/arm64/57691211/ liste

Bug#1104334: r-bioc-keggrest: test fail - REFERENCE missing value

2025-04-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch It looks like this is because the service this connects to started adding a blank line between entries, which this can't handle. This is known upstream and easy to fix: https://github.com/Bioconductor/KEGGREST/commit/b9132b53ecc8ba501e5976994fa7429568cd1

Bug#1104454: r-cran-bslib: test fail - Undefined variable: "$transition-collapse-width"

2025-04-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch It passes on Salsa (i.e. after rebuilding the package) but fails on debci. It looks like the reason is that this package uses a patched _variables.scss created at build time, but a link to _transitions.scss, so it's seeing the build-time (libjs-bootstrap4 4.6.1) _variab

Bug#1102589: r-cran-broom.helpers: will stay at 1.14 for trixie

2025-04-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: severity -1 wishlist This package can't migrate during the soft freeze because the new version adds a dependency on r-cran-cards, which is not currently in testing at all. Since there are no other Debian bugs in the testing version, and we can do a +really revert if it does become n

Bug#1104454: r-cran-bslib: test fail - Undefined variable: "$transition-collapse-width"

2025-04-30 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: r-cran-bslib Version: 0.9.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Control: affects -1 r-cran-rmarkdown Since twitter-bootstrap4 4.6.2 added transition-collapse-width, some r-cran-bslib and r-cran-rmarkdown tests are failing with Error in `compile_data(sass_input, options)`: Error: Undefined variab

Bug#1104406: dh-r: insufficiently strict versioning of dependencies on r-base-core when symbols are added

2025-04-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: dh-r Version: 20241218 R 4.5 added at least one symbol (R_getVar) to the C API, but did not increment r-api. Some R packages (that can be built against either R 4.4 or 4.5) link to this symbol when built against R 4.5. Hence, if such a package is built against R 4.5, attempting to

Bug#1103118: r-cran-timechange: should depend on R>=4.5

2025-04-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 r-cran-timechange: should depend on R>=4.5 Control: reassign -1 r-cran-timechange Control: affects -1 r-cran-caret r-cran-dbitest r-cran-epir Control: affects -1 + r-cran-lubridate r-cran-recipes Control: affects -1 + r-cran-themis r-cran-tidyverse This isn'

Bug#1104338: r-cran-plotly: test-Depends on r-cran-dendextend which is not in testing

2025-04-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: r-cran-plotly Version: 4.10.4+dfsg-2 Severity: serious r-cran-plotly test-Depends (and runtime Recommends) r-cran-dendextend, which is not in testing. Because of this, it's migration-reference autopkgtests are failing as uninstallable, which is RC by https://release.debian.org/testi

Bug#1104275: (resend to the correct bug) pique autopkgtest not finding data

2025-04-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
My understanding of this policy is that you *can* download *data*, but can't download and run executable code: https://sources.debian.org/src/autopkgtest/5.49/doc/README.package-tests.rst/#L569 pandas has network-using tests and they're passing. Hence, the Forbidden in this particular test is pr

Bug#1104335: britney/debci: sometimes lists a non-regression fail as a regression

2025-04-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: release.debian.org The testing excuses list sometimes shows an autopkgtest as 'Regression', with the reference link going to an old (often old enough that the log is no longer available) passing migration-reference, when a newer migration-reference exists and failed (i.e. when the fai

Bug#1104334: r-bioc-keggrest: test fail - REFERENCE missing value

2025-04-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: r-bioc-keggrest Version: 1.46.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious The autopkgtest is failing with this error: ERROR in test_keggGet: Error in if (.self$lastField == "REFERENCE") { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed I have not yet investigated why.

Bug#1102590: r-cran-fansi fails to migrate to testing

2025-04-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
It's r-base 4.5 that's blocking r-cran-fansi, not the other way round. It looks like the reason is that r-cran-fansi's tests (possibly unintentionally) assert that it doesn't produce warnings, while loading a package built in R 4.5 into R 4.4 triggers a warning.

Bug#1099927: r-cran-testthat does not actually break other packages

2025-04-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/blob/master/etc/britney.conf Thanks. (The britney-in-general documentation giving the name of the setting was easier to find than the britney-in-Debian configuration, and I'd probably mistaken it for a conf.d directory where all the files are

Bug#1104159: r-cran-* autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture

2025-04-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 autopkgtest fails on a 32-bit architecture As discussed in #1099927, the new r-cran-testthat didn't break these, it just started noticing that they were already broken. As only 32-bit architectures are affected, we intend to remove/ignore them.

Bug#1103369: r-cran-svglite R version mismatch

2025-04-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Thanks, and I agree with the above analysis: the buildd logs confirm that r-cran-svglite was binNMUd recently on armhf only, and debci says r-cran-svglite/armhf is currently broken in testing but working in testing + R 4.5.0, https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-cran-svglite/testing/armhf/ r-bas

Bug#1103994: dh-make-R: 'generic' runner runs testthat tests from wrong directory, failing them

2025-04-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: dh-r Version: 20241218 Tags: patch The 'generic' test runner (but not 'run-unit-test') runs tests/*.R with the current directory at the package root. This fails for tests that refer to other files and expect to be run from the tests directory (e.g. this is standard for tests that use

Bug#1099927: r-cran-testthat does not actually break other packages

2025-04-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
In addition to the 3 packages mentioned here, there are 11-13 other R packages that are broken only on less common architectures; these are *not* blocking r-cran-testthat / r-base, but need to be dealt with (e.g. by partial removal) at some point if we want to keep them on amd64. https://bugs.

Bug#1099927: r-cran-testthat does not actually break other packages

2025-04-22 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
r-cran-testthat 3.2.1.1-1 had a bug (*possibly* https://github.com/r-lib/testthat/issues/1997 ) where some kinds of test failure would print a failure message but return a non-error state, causing autopkgtests to "pass" when they shouldn't. r-cran-testthat 3.2.3-1 fixes this bug. This expose

Bug#1103140: python-momepy test failures

2025-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Those all look like rounding errors (probably due to x87 excess precision, since they only happen on i386). This suggests that the appropriate response is either to ignore these tests on i386, or possibly (the graph object output by gdf_to_nx has (x: float, y: float) node keys, so rounding iss

Bug#1103004: skimage test failures

2025-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This has failed twice on reproducible-builds, and started failing between 2025-02-23 and 2025-04-20: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/arm64/skimage.html No other architectures have been tried since 2025-03-26, so we don't actually know whether it's arm64-specific. T

Bug#1102590: r-cran-fansi fails to migrate to testing

2025-04-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This passes its tests in unstable but still fails them in testing. I don't know whether this is caused by R 4.5.0 vs 4.4.3 or by some other package. As far as I know, nothing is actually wrong with the old (testing) version other than that it's old, so just accepting that the new version won

Bug#1102331: r-cran-sparsevctrs: missing test-depends on r-cran-matrix

2025-04-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: r-cran-sparsevctrs Version: 0.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch The autopkgtest is failing with Error in `coerce_to_sparse_matrix(mtcars)`: The package "Matrix" is required. (I'm not sure why this is only now actually failing, when it's always had that error message: possibly a re

Bug#1102330: lmfit: test_manypeaks_speed failure on riscv64 - too slow

2025-04-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-lmfit Version: 1.3.3-1 test_manypeaks_speed has a time limit which usually, but not always, fails on riscv64: https://ci.debian.net/packages/l/lmfit-py/testing/riscv64/ The obvious fix would be to either raise the time limits (there are 3, at tests/test_manypeaks_speed.py:33-

Bug#1088988: Is this bug solved?

2025-04-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Unfortunately not: those always were "ignore these tests to not block an unrelated transition" workarounds, not actual fixes (which is why I didn't close this bug). As far as I'm aware, the status of this bug hasn't changed since the description earlier in this thread.

Bug#1101621: pagure: FTBFS: AttributeError: '_Code' object has no attribute 'co_qualname'. Did you mean: 'co_filename'?

2025-04-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reassign -1 python3-billiard Control: tags -1 patch upstream Control: retitle -1 '_Code' object has no attribute 'co_qualname' This is also happening in CI since around 20 March. The trigger appears to be python 3.13.2-2 adding this patch from upstream git: https://sources.debian.org/

Bug#1101527: pandas fails its autopkgtests

2025-03-29 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 - pending That didn't work, but in a way that suggests that's the wrong syntax to ignore a warning, not that it's going to take more than that. I intend to try again today.

Bug#1101527: pandas fails its autopkgtests

2025-03-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 pending The part you refer to isn't the autopkgtest failure - pandas' pymysql and psycopg2 tests are known not to work in our test environments, so the main autopkgtest doesn't install these. To monitor this, an extra 'ignoredtests' does install them but ignores the resulting

Bug#1095392: smart-open FTBFS: tests hang/fail - moto too old

2025-03-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch This suggests that updating Debian's python3-moto to 5.1.1 will fix this bug. Doing that the straightforward way does build, but I haven't yet tried building smart-open with it: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/python-moto/-/pipelines/829615 (The Lintian errors

Bug#1095392: smart-open FTBFS: tests hang

2025-03-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: reassign -1 python3-moto Control: found -1 5.0.11-3 Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream Control: retitle -1 smart-open FTBFS: tests hang/fail - moto too old *Possibly* we have a bad combination of boto* and moto versions? Looks like we do - when botocore/boto3/moto are installed via pip,

Bug#1095392: smart-open FTBFS: tests hang

2025-03-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 - patch Control: tags -1 - pending Control: retitle -1 smart-open: tests fail, S3 possibly broken That no longer looks like a real solution, as it's not just tests looking at the underlying binary representation that fail: there are also tests (e.g. test_readline, test_s3_iter_

Bug#1095392: smart-open FTBFS: tests hang

2025-03-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch In addition to the hangs, several tests fail. It looks like the trigger is botocore enabling checksums by default: https://sources.debian.org/src/python-boto3/1.36.0%2Bdfsg-1/CHANGELOG.rst/#L12 Turning them off with AWS_REQUEST_CHECKSUM_CALCULATION=when_required makes th

Bug#1095392: smart-open FTBFS: tests hang

2025-03-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This also hangs in debci, and began doing so between 2025-01-29 and 2025-02-01 (in unstable): https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/smart-open/unstable/amd64/ Looking at what changed version between those, the obvious guess is python3-botocore 1.35 -> 1.36 (which did not trigger an autopkgtest beca

Bug#1086208: intent to NMU #1086208: gulkan FTBFS on 32 bit

2025-03-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
] + * Drop myself from uploaders. + + [ Andrej Shadura ] + * Switch to team maintenance. + + -- Rebecca N. Palmer Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:51:17 + + gulkan (0.15.1-2.2) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru gulkan-0.15.1/debian/control gulkan-0.15.1/debian/control

Bug#1082699: intent to NMU #1082699: tint2 FTBFS - undefined reference

2025-03-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
+ +++ tint2-17.0.1/debian/changelog 2025-03-08 13:54:41.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +tint2 (17.0.1-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Link tint2conf against libm. (Closes: #1082699) + + -- Rebecca N. Palmer Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:54:41 + + tint2 (17.0.1

Bug#1075057: intent to NMU #1075057: gxr FTBFS with gcc 14

2025-03-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
-0.15.1/debian/changelog 2025-03-08 13:13:58.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +gxr (0.15.1-4.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Be compatible with gcc 14. (Closes: #1075057) + + -- Rebecca N. Palmer Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:13:58 + + gxr (0.15.1-4.1) unstable; urgency

Bug#1095394: snakemake: tests randomly failing or hanging

2025-02-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 snakemake: tests randomly failing or hanging The autopkgtest has also failed several times recently, usually on pipe-related tests, with either an unexpected number of outputs (race condition??) or a timeout. I don't yet know what causes this.

Bug#992793: isort manpages

2025-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch The fix992793 branch in Salsa updates this manpage, and also adds one for isort-identify-imports. It has the lintian warning groff-message troff::23: warning [p 1, 2.8i]: cannot adjust line [usr/share/man/man1/isort.1.gz:1] which probably refers to the long line withou

Bug#1094385: matplotlib, pandas: build-depend cycle, unable to bootstrap

2025-01-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 28/01/2025 14:21, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: It failed the arch:all build ("dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/build/html"") Probably because I typed the path wrong. (If you're wondering why I didn't upload the previous Salsa commit, that did build: it had a no-copyr

Bug#1094385: matplotlib, pandas: build-depend cycle, unable to bootstrap

2025-01-28 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Uploaded something, but without time to check if it builds. If it doesn't, you have my permission to try fixing it, or I'll try again tonight.

Bug#1094417: pandas: test_frame_setitem_dask_array_into_new_col fails

2025-01-27 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: python3-pandas,python3-dask Version: 2.2.3+dfsg-6,2024.12.1+dfsg-1 The pandas test test_frame_setitem_dask_array_into_new_col is failing in Salsa; it looks like assigning a dask array to a DataFrame used to make a copy and now does not. I'm not sure yet whether this is an actual prob

Bug#1094385: matplotlib, pandas: build-depend cycle, unable to bootstrap

2025-01-27 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
It's not going to be tonight, because my first few attempts didn't work. If current Salsa builds, I intend to upload it in the morning. (It did get far enough to find that there are two new test failures, one that should now be fixed and one that I'll file a separate bug about.)

Bug#1094385: matplotlib, pandas: build-depend cycle, unable to bootstrap

2025-01-27 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
pandas needs to skip some tests *anyway* if you want it built now (because of #1088988), so it probably makes most sense for me to just do a sourceful upload of pandas that temporarily drops the dependency and skips/ignores whatever tests would otherwise fail. (This isn't a _fix_, but it shoul

Bug#1093826: python3-pil: basic import fails

2025-01-23 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
The build log shows that the .so files are getting installed but the .py files (including Image.py, hence this error) aren't. The Debian build includes 'rm pyproject.toml', so this *might* mean upstream has started putting something essential in there.

Bug#1093649: pagure: dump+reload and plugins possibly broken

2025-01-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: pagure Version: 5.14.1+dfsg-1 test_dumping_reloading_ticket and test_install_plugin*/test_plugin* are currently skipped because they fail.

Bug#1093648: pagure: depends on python3-mock

2025-01-20 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: pagure Version: 5.14.1+dfsg-1 Control: block 1059933 by -1 On 17/01/2025 14:48, Alexandre Detiste wrote: This thing showed up on my radar because it still depends on six & mock.

Bug#1073117: DM permissions request Re: ITA: pagure

2025-01-13 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 02/01/2025 08:11, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: I'm not yet sure whether it will be reasonably possible to get [pagure] into a state that we want to keep, or whether I will end up deciding to remove it. My version in Salsa appears to be working except for plugins and dump+reload, which is

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2025-01-12 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 12/01/2025, Simon McVittie wrote: Normally we keep the patch's upstream authorship when applying patches, So do I when using DEP-3 (Author:) tags, which is my more usual format. (because it looked like you've taken the patch directly from upstream rather than writing any code yourself).

Bug#1088988: pandas: FTBFS with xarray 2024.11.0 (test failures)

2025-01-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 pandas<->xarray data conversion issues Control: affects -1 python3-xarray After fixing the easy parts (see Salsa), there are 3 remaining issues: - Datetime-with-timezone, categorical, python-string, and nullable indices lose this dtype (becoming object dtype, keeping their v

Bug#1088988: pandas: FTBFS with xarray 2024.11.0 (test failures)

2025-01-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
These are testing conversion between DataFrame and xarray, and are probably failing because xarray now handles extension types in some places it previously didn't, but not everywhere - https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/9661 . "Attributes of DataFrame.iloc[:, 5] (column name="f") are differ

Bug#1091383: pagure: security issues

2025-01-02 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I suspect that the generate_archive patch has a bug: zf.writestr(zi, path) sets the file contents of the symlink in the zip (i.e. the filename it points to) to path (the filename of the original symlink, not the filename it points to). Hence, it creates a symlink to itself, not a symlink to wh

Bug#1073117: ITA: pagure

2025-01-02 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: retitle -1 ITA: pagure - git-centred forge As you may have noticed, I have been fixing several bugs in pagure. I'm not yet sure whether it will be reasonably possible to get it into a state that we want to keep, or whether I will end up deciding to remove it. (The linked Fedora notic

Bug#1091383: pagure: security issues

2025-01-01 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 pending As previously stated on #debian-security, there are actually four security issues here, fixed by consecutive upstream commits: - This issue: generate_archive() allows file access via symlinks CVE-2024-47515 - Similar issues in _update_file_in_git() (with symlinks)

Bug#786644: Bug#1019742: should reproducible builds vary nocheck?

2024-12-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I take those to be a yes to wanting this option to *exist*, though if it already exists in rebuilderd then it might make more sense to use that. (It would probably also make sense to use rebuilderd instead of reprotest on Salsa to save resources, i.e. requiring 1 extra build instead of 2.) H

Bug#1084587: pagure: test fail in Python 3.13, etc

2024-12-21 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch Control: tags 1085764 patch Control: tags 1064530 patch Control: tags 1046324 patch These are all fixed in https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pagure/-/merge_requests/2 (Caution: untested, beyond a CI run that doesn't run the upstream tests.) I intend to look at pagure's othe

Bug#1082289: reprotest: test fail in Python 3.13

2024-12-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch (This is now RC because Python 3.13 tests are now run by default.) The trigger for this is that __name__ (and possibly all objects that are defined at startup???) is now in the set of objects that have the same id between interpreter runs: python3.12 -c "print(__name_

Bug#1090261: pristine-lfs test fail in Python 3.13

2024-12-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch Using Path() as a context manager hasn't done anything since Python 3.9, and is removed in 3.13: https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.13.html#id4 Path.glob('**') now includes files as well as directories: https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.13.html#pathlib Fix: https:/

Bug#1086284: libmbim/libqmi: parallel builds FTBFS - gtkdoc run too early

2024-12-18 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch Control: retitle -1 parallel builds FTBFS - gtkdoc run too early It is an ordering issue - disabling parallel builds avoids it. Branches that do that are available here: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/libmbim/-/commits/fix1086284 https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-

Bug#1082699: tint2 FTBFS - undefined reference

2024-12-18 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch That symbol is in libm, which main tint2 is linked against but tint2conf isn't. (Possibly one of its other dependencies used to pull it in and no longer does.) Fix: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tint2/-/merge_requests/3

Bug#1086286: libqmi and libmbim FTBFS

2024-12-17 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
At least libmbim is caused by a meson upgrade - it succeeds with meson 1.5.2, and fails with 1.6.0. *Possibly* an ordering issue - 1.5.2 always does the relevant step as the last step, 1.6.0 doesn't. I intend to investigate further.

Bug#1086284: libqmi and libmbim FTBFS

2024-12-17 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Given the close timing and similar messages, these are probably the same underlying bug. It does not appear to be known to either upstream. Plausible triggers that were updated at the right time (Oct 19-24 in unstable, 25-28 in testing) are meson and elfutils. https://tests.reproducible-buil

Bug#1084287: libei FTBFS - python-attrs 24?

2024-12-17 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch This was probably triggered by python-attrs 24 removing the temporary tuples from __eq__ (for efficiency): https://sources.debian.org/src/python-attrs/24.2.0-1/CHANGELOG.md/#L46 This means that comparing an object to itself is no longer automatically True

Bug#1086208: gulkan FTBFS on 32 bit

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 upstream patch This is because Vulkan handles are always 64-bit, even when pointers aren't: https://sources.debian.org/src/vulkan-loader/1.3.296.0-1/vulkan-headers/include/vulkan/vulkan_core.h/#L29 Hence, the fix is to use VK_NULL_HANDLE not plain NULL: https://salsa.debian.org/

Bug#1075057: gxr FTBFS with gcc 14

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch This error correctly notes that subpass is an integer index, not a pointer, in the underlying API: https://sources.debian.org/src/vulkan-loader/1.3.296.0-1/vulkan-headers/include/vulkan/vulkan_core.h/?hl=3720#L3703 https://registry.khronos.org/vulkan/specs/latest/man/html

Bug#1084360: ruby-devise-two-factor FTBFS

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This is caused by ruby-attr-encrypted being updated to 4.x. (It was known at the time that this would break ruby-devise-two-factor, but it was needed for a new version of ruby-saml that contained a security fix, #1081560.) This is fixed upstream in 4.1.1: https://github.com/devise-two-factor/

Bug#1075466: should this be removed? Re: ruby-mmap2 FTBFS with gcc 14

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 15/12/2024 14:06, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Upstream repo apparently has disappeared: https://gitlab.com/lyda/mmap 404s The gemspec points there; the Debian metadata points to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/mmap2 which does technically still exist, but has had no commits for 7 years.

Bug#1052749: ruby-ruby-magic-static FTBFS

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch This appears to be caused by libmagic 5.45 adding a new builtin test, for SIMH tape files: https://sources.debian.org/src/file/1:5.45-3/src/magic.h.in/?hl=80#L65 and the failing test checking that NO_CHECK_BUILTIN is exactly the combination expected: https://sources.de

Bug#1064751: close this bug? Re: ruby-elasticsearch-model FTBFS - faraday 1 vs 2

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This appears to be fixed - ruby-elasticsearch-model now builds in unstable: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/ruby-elasticsearch-model.html (The log now instead says this package doesn't have a test suite, but that appears to be true.) It looks like the issue w

Bug#1075466: should this be removed? Re: ruby-mmap2 FTBFS with gcc 14

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
(Found while looking for semi-random RC bugs to work on, so I may be missing context; if so, I apologize.) This package appears to be abandoned upstream (no commits for 7 years), does not appear to have any reverse dependencies (though be aware that my checking methods are not perfect), and ha

Bug#1075473: fix or update? Re: prometheus-client-mmap FTBFS with gcc 14

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
(Found while looking for semi-random RC bugs to work on, so I may be missing context; if so, I apologize.) Should we be trying to fix this, or does it make more sense to update to a newer upstream version? Upstream have replaced this C extension by a Rust extension: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-

Bug#1077946: can't find gogo/protobuf/proto

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch That is in golang-github-gogo-protobuf-dev, which was installed for the buildd build (successful) but not for recent reproducible-builds attempts (failed). Probably it used to be installed because some other build-dependency was using it, but that package then switched

Bug#1053838: close this bug? Re: ruby-gitlab-markup uninstallable in testing

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This appears to have been fixed: ruby-sanitize is now in testing, and debci/autopkgtest is able to install this package in testing. This bug should probably be closed. (That autopkgtest fails; see https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gitlab-markup/-/merge_requests/1 to fix that.)

Bug#1086783: kxmlrpcclient: FTBFS with nocheck

2024-12-15 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch The fix for this is to always export the symbols (but not actually run the tests): https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/kde/kxmlrpcclient/-/merge_requests/3 Making the symbols optional wouldn't be a full solution, because the definition of nocheck ( https://wiki.debian

Bug#1019742: should reproducible builds vary nocheck?

2024-12-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Should we merge #786644 and #1019742? Or should we consider #1019742 to be "have the option" and #786644 to be "enable it by default"? I'm willing to try implementing this, if we agree that having it is a good idea. Maybe use _PROFILES rather than _OPTIONS and allow it to be more general tha

Bug#1086765: kdiagram FTBFS with nocheck

2024-12-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch This looks similar to kimap #1086766: nocheck turns off BUILD_TESTING, and this package ships some items that are only built with that on. (nocheck is not allowed to change the contents of a package.) The upstream code even notes (at src/KGantt/CMakeLists.txt:15) that t

Bug#1084393: clazy: FTBFS, probably llvm/clang 19

2024-12-14 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch It needed ccb232e435ae3d83559486fce1fdb5866e07 as well, but now builds and passes autopkgtests: https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/extras/clazy/-/merge_requests/4 Alternatively, depending on llvm/clang 18 instead of unversioned, or upgrading to an upstream git sna

Bug#1086766: kimap: FTBFS with nocheck

2024-12-12 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch Since there's no DEB_*FLAGS_MAINT_APPEND for cmake and this package uses BUILD_TESTING in only one place, it's possibly easier to patch out that use: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/kimap/-/tree/fix1086766?ref_type=heads (This runs Salsa CI reprotest, though not

Bug#1084393: clazy: FTBFS, probably llvm/clang 19

2024-12-12 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 - patch The above suggestion does not work: In file included from /builds/rnpalmer-guest/clazy/debian/output/source_dir/src/checks/manuallevel/container-inside-loop.cpp:8: /builds/rnpalmer-guest/clazy/debian/output/source_dir/src/ClazyContext.h: In member function 'bool ClazyC

Bug#1084393: clazy: FTBFS, probably llvm/clang 19

2024-12-11 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch The merged bug and the timing suggest that this was caused by LLVM/Clang 19. Probably-this issue has also occurred in upstream's CI, though I don't see an actual upstream bug report: https://invent.kde.org/sdk/clazy/-/commit/5a86780f0db6969725bd1336b4914bc4

Bug#993592: probably not vulnerable? Re: #993592 CVE-2021-39359

2024-12-10 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 09/12/2024 21:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: But what happens if built with --without-libsoup, I guess then TLS certificate validation is absent as well what are the consequences? When built --without-libsoup, the web functionality is disabled entirely. (Implemented in providers/Makefile.

Bug#1075540: startup-notification FTBFS

2024-12-10 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xdg/startup-notification/-/issues/7 Control: tags -1 patch Fixed by https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/startup-notification/-/merge_requests/2

Bug#993592: probably not vulnerable? Re: #993592 CVE-2021-39359

2024-12-09 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This *probably* doesn't affect Debian stable (5.2.10-3) and later, as they were built --without-libsoup (to avoid an unrelated crash, #1017528), and the description and upstream fix suggest that the vulnerable functionality requires libsoup. Is this enough evidence to mark it as non-vulnerable

Bug#1040202: gnome-photos: FTBFS with gegl 0.4.46

2024-12-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This began failing between 2023-06-19 and 2023-07-01 in experimental (unstable also has #1040746, experimental doesn't), which if the trigger is gegl, means between gegl 0.4.44 and 0.4.46: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/gnome-photos.html It is still failing (gegl 0.4.50), i

Bug#1081894: railway-gtk FTBFS: build-depends on no-longer-existing version

2024-12-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 08/12/2024 13:11, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: In particular, we may need https://salsa.debian.org/ gnome-team/railway-gtk/-/blob/debian/latest/debian/patches/gtk- rs-0.9.patch?ref_type=heads On closer inspection, we don't need that patch because this version of railway-gtk doesn&

Bug#1078361: maybe fixed Re: glib-networking FTBFS

2024-12-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This package does build on amd64 in the reproducible-builds service. (It sometimes fails on armhf but that's a different problem, where it thinks it's in a cross environment.) https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/glib-networking.html However, it's not entirely clear

Bug#1081894: railway-gtk FTBFS: build-depends on no-longer-existing version

2024-12-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch (but a risky one, see below) This FTBFS is because Rust -dev packages are versioned: it's librust-gdk4-0.9+default-dev now. Updating the versions makes it build: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/railway-gtk/-/tree/debian/trixie?ref_type=heads However, I have *not

Bug#1069401: close this bug? Re: nautilus FTBFS

2024-12-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
nautilus also FTBFS in reproducible-builds (on all architectures tested, not just arm64) at around that time, but now builds successfully there: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/nautilus.html The logs aren't kept, so there's no proof that this was specifically this bug, but i

Bug#1073400: close this bug? Re: gtk-doc FTBFS

2024-12-08 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
gtk-doc also FTBFS in reproducible-builds from approximately 2024-05-30 to 2024-09-24 in unstable (but not in trixie, meaning the bug was in something other than gtk-doc) but now builds successfully: https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/gtk-doc.html The logs aren't kept, so there

Bug#544813: close this bug? gda-config-tool* no longer exists

2024-12-07 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This package no longer contains a gda-config-tool* (with or without this bug). It does contain a gda-list-config, but as far as I can easily find, neither that nor any of its other tools claim to have a --usage option. Hence, I suggest closing this bug.

Bug#976763: gdl: missing Homepage

2024-12-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
That's the upstream source repository, not rendered documentation, but there doesn't seem to be anything better (the http://developer.gnome.org/gdl/ suggested in the documentation does not exist; I have reported this as https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdl/-/issues/11 ) and it is common to use t

Bug#1074981: gdl: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-12-06 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch Now fixes them all and builds successfully, but I have not tested the result. (gdl has no tests in the package.)

Bug#1074981: gdl: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-12-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I maybe have a proper fix for this one, but there are more: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/gdl I intend to look at that later.

Bug#1074863: caribou: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-12-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Control: tags -1 patch This (untested) patch may fix this bug, but given the more general issues around caribou's obsolescence (see other bugs), it might be better to just remove it. --- caribou-0.4.21.orig/modules/gtk3/caribou-gtk-module.c +++ caribou-0.4.21/modules/gtk3/caribou-gtk-module.c

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-12-04 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 03/12/2024 22:19, Jeremy BĂ­cha wrote: The Debian GNOME team uses git formatted patches since they apply more cleanly with our git-buildpackage (gbp pq) workflow, Sorry. Reformatted version here: https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/brasero/-/tree/fix1074854v2?ref_type=heads (Still can't

Bug#1088988: pandas: FTBFS with xarray 2024.11.0 (test failures)

2024-12-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Not *obviously* known upstream. Some type mismatches (like this one), some shape mismatches that suggest different handling of duplicates in indexes. (There's also two other apparently unrelated issues that can make pandas FTBFS: test_spss_metadata, and parso not supporting python 3.13.) I

Bug#1074854: brasero: FTBFS with gcc-14

2024-12-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
This applies the above upstream patch to Debian brasero; it builds, but that's all the testing it's had. https://salsa.debian.org/rnpalmer-guest/brasero (Not a real merge request because the above repository was created with 'git push' and hence isn't officially a fork.)

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >