Another thing I noticed while translating 2.33.90 to Swedish was this
message in readelf.c where "alpha" is misspelled:
Unrecognized alpah specific other value: %u
While translating 2.33.90 to Swedish, I came across this code from readelf.c:
warn (ngettext ("debuginfod: Corrupt note: only %ld byte remains, "
"not enough for a full note\n",
"Corrupt note: only %ld bytes remain, "
"not enough for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2020-01/msg00344.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 19650 by sheriff...@chromium.org: binutils:fuzz_bfd:
Heap-buffer-overflow in add_symbol
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19650#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public.
- Y
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 19624 by sheriff...@chromium.org:
binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in wasm_read_leb128
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19624#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the pub
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 19647 by sheriff...@chromium.org: binutils:fuzz_bfd:
Heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl16
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19647#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public.
- Y
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #3 on issue 19643 by sheriff...@chromium.org:
binutils:fuzz_disassemble: Undefined-shift in print_insn_d30v
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=19643#c3
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the publ
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> > > >0: 66 63 08
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #5 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> > >0: 66 63 08movslq (%rax),%cx
> >
> > Looks correct to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438
--- Comment #10 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> Please submit a single patch to fix this bug.
How is
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-12/msg00346.html
not a single patch? From that series
- patches 1 and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #10)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> > Please submit a single patch to fix this bug.
>
> How is
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-12/msg00346.html
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438
--- Comment #8 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> It is OK to encode "movzwq %ax,%rcx" as "movzwl %ax,%ecx". But assembler
> shouldn't accept "movzwl %ax,%rcx".
But addressing this is part of the second patch refere
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #6)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> > Also
> >
> > [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 pr25438]$ cat y.s
> > movzwl %ax, %rcx
> > [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 pr25438]$ gcc -c y.s
> > [hjl@gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> >0: 66 63 08movslq (%rax),%cx
>
> Looks correct to me.
movslq is AT&T syntax for 32 bits -> 64 bits
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25444
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #3 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
>0: 66 63 08movslq (%rax),%cx
Looks correct to me.
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Also
>
> 63 08 movslq (%rax),%ecx
This
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438
--- Comment #6 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> Also
>
> [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 pr25438]$ cat y.s
> movzwl%ax, %rcx
> [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 pr25438]$ gcc -c y.s
> [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 pr25438]$ objdump -dw y.o
>
> y.o: fil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25444
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=67641dd326e026b84d0e4ce47f32f71132449e27
commit 67641dd326e026b84d0e4ce47f32f
19 matches
Mail list logo
