https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #5) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3) > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0) > > > > 0: 66 63 08 movslq (%rax),%cx > > > > > > Looks correct to me. > > > > movslq is AT&T syntax for 32 bits -> 64 bits. It isn't accepted by > > assembler. movsxd should be here. > > MOVSXD, like MOVSX and MOVZX, is Intel syntax, and hence has nothing to do > in AT&T syntax disassembly. > There is no such an instruction of "movslq (%rax),%cx". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
